Search found 8275 matches
- 03 Feb 2023 04:56
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Military Flight Safety
- Replies: 3363
- Views: 907966
Re: Military Flight Safety
What is this discussion? And why?
- 01 Feb 2023 04:23
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Military Flight Safety
- Replies: 3363
- Views: 907966
Re: Military Flight Safety
May I double down on this.rohitvats wrote:- First, we write sweet sounding posts saying we should not speculate what happened.
- 01 Feb 2023 00:50
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
I have missed out a lot here. Tejas Mk2 is happening. It took time to get the funding in place. I know it is frustrating.
- 24 Sep 2022 03:03
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
1. I don't intend to change his opinion or that of anyone else. I am just going to write down what I know (and don't know). I hope young minds and those on the fence read, think and decide for themselves. 2. There is another thing I hope young minds can relearn. I want to disagree respectfully. I do...
- 15 Sep 2022 00:40
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter (TEDBF): News & Discussion
- Replies: 769
- Views: 368998
Re: Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter (TEDBF): News & Discussion
ORCA may be cheaper to operate than AMCA and could provide longer reach and weapons flexibility.
- 06 Sep 2022 11:52
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
2 prototypes.Rakesh wrote:I am not sure. Perhaps KaranM or IR may know the answer to this.ramana wrote:How many prototypes are planned?
The earlier Rs 2,500 crore (from 2009) was for two prototypes. This new sanction of Rs 6,500 will get more than two airframes.
- 25 Aug 2022 00:08
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - 24 July 2021
- Replies: 928
- Views: 498787
Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - 24 July 2021
Is that a chicken and egg situation Indranil? LCA not coming at the rate wanted as enough orders not placed? Sirjee, I feel we as a system of user-enabler-designer-producer are terribly disjointed. In the case of aviation especially, more often than not they are pulling in different directions! It ...
- 23 Aug 2022 23:19
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - 24 July 2021
- Replies: 928
- Views: 498787
Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - 24 July 2021
Also logistically, if bulk of ur mig29 go out in 30s then wud it make sense to maintain 21 odd 29s well into 40s? Whatever we get now has to be logistically supported into the 40s. Question is what is lowest hanging fruit in terms of time and money because Tejas are not coming at the rate we wanted.
- 23 Aug 2022 23:18
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - 24 July 2021
- Replies: 928
- Views: 498787
Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - 24 July 2021
The opposite is what I remember.YashG wrote: on this forum i had read indians inspected the mig29 frames and found them to be in bad shape. Isnt it so?
- 23 Aug 2022 10:39
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
It's for bearings for the canards.
- 23 Aug 2022 04:30
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - 24 July 2021
- Replies: 928
- Views: 498787
Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - 24 July 2021
Russian defence industry team to visit India soon for talks on upgrading IAF’s Sukhoi fleet https://theprint.in/defence/russian-defence-industry-team-to-visit-india-soon-for-talks-on-upgrading-iafs-sukhoi-fleet/1087006/ 18 Aug 2022 Upgrades would include more better radar & integration of elect...
- 23 Aug 2022 04:28
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
I was happy to see a tender from HAL for the Tejas Mk2.
- 14 Jun 2022 22:12
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
Nilesh and I had wrote about this more than 3 years back.
https://delhidefencereview.com/2019/02/ ... t-fighter/
https://delhidefencereview.com/2019/02/ ... t-fighter/
- 10 Jun 2022 00:48
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349257
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
I had speculated that than UAV based version must be in the makes. Turns out that I was right. It is called ULPGM. Seems like Nag Mk2, MPATGM and ULPGM are related. As someone who is not up to date on the Twitter thread. I have the following questions. 1) Would I be correct in understanding form th...
- 09 Jun 2022 01:59
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349257
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/HellHoundIN/status/1532004279266922497?s=20&t=pVAbUdn69ro7dohcqJ6OmQ Going by the length of those ATGM canisters, the missile is about 1.2 mtrs long. That missile is <20kgs in weight. Very interesting. I had speculated that than UAV based version must be in the makes. Turns ...
- 02 Jun 2022 22:37
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349257
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Sorry Ramana sir, had not seen this. People have already answered. SAAW will be employed from at least Tejas, Su-30 and Jaguar. Integration in the latter two is complete. Flight tests are progressing well.ramana wrote:Indranil, Has the SAAW been integrated on Jaguar?
- 02 Jun 2022 05:39
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349257
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Going by the length of those ATGM canisters, the missile is about 1.2 mtrs long. That missile is <20kgs in weight. Very interesting.Kakarat wrote: https://twitter.com/HellHoundIN/status/ ... dohcqJ6OmQ
- 13 May 2022 22:07
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
When all aircrafts are BVR capable, then the fights will end in WVR. Can't say that unless it is a joke that I'm taking too seriously. Too many variables here especially with large force engagements - relative performance of radars and missiles, BVR tactics and pilot skills, EW capability, relative...
- 12 May 2022 23:56
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Air Force Tejas Mk1A: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 6027470
Re: Air Force Tejas Mk1A: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022
Youtube link And to think someone was complaining about aesthetics of the probe, which really is the LEAST bit of a problem when so many others had to be resolved or confirmed as non-issues. :D Must watch. And what a presentation! I had known some of the work and had hinted at the changes to the se...
- 11 May 2022 22:30
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
When all aircrafts are BVR capable, then the fights will end in WVR.Roop wrote:Does dog-fighting even matter any more, these days? (This is a serious question, I'm not trying to be funny).Indranil wrote:However, the 60% more power does buy the Mig29 some dog-fighting capabilities which the Mk2 will not have.
- 10 May 2022 23:04
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
Indranil, If we were to say the Tejas Mk2 can replace M2ks, Jaguar, and the Mig-29s how accurate would that be? And what size fleet are we looking at? Tejas Mk2 is a much more advanced fighter than M2ks and Jaguars. IAF wants to maintain numbers. So 1 for 1 replacement is easy to see. The Mk2 is mo...
- 09 May 2022 22:54
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
Don't worry. My heart and loyalty lie here.Rakesh wrote: Always good to have a reality dose from IR every now and then. Makes unclear issues very lucid. Too bad you don't contribute more on the forum.
- 06 May 2022 22:32
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
Some of you might find the following thread interesting: ... https://twitter.com/indrani1_roy/status/1476023987637420033 Thanks IR. I was reading your article on DDR and I am curious about some parameters listed in Table 1. Comparing Gripen E and Mk2, Tejas has 7.4 m2 higher wing area,1 ton lesser ...
- 06 May 2022 03:23
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
Is the nose diameter of Mk1A and Mk2 the same? Actually, the nose diameter of the Mk1A and Mk2 are relatively similar. The radome of the Mk2 is smaller. The volume of the nose in Mk2 behind the radome is used for the IRST and other LRUs. Mk1's nose https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FH5keAzVEAETZz2?format...
- 19 Mar 2022 02:43
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Air Force Tejas Mk1: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022
- Replies: 822
- Views: 741937
Re: Air Force Tejas Mk1: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022
You guys are eyeballing what would be less drag?
- 23 Feb 2022 11:01
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Air Force Tejas Mk1: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022
- Replies: 822
- Views: 741937
Re: Air Force Tejas Mk1: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022
300 kg of ballast was used when there was no radar.
With IFR probe, radar etc. that number is around 100 kgs now.
With IFR probe, radar etc. that number is around 100 kgs now.
- 23 Feb 2022 10:58
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349257
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Infra Red guided air-to-air missile Does DRDO have any program to develop IR guided AAMs ? I have not heard of any IMVHO it should not be too difficult to design and make a IR AAM since we have already done a lot of work on radar guided Astra, which i believe in much more complex Kersi Yes, Astra-I...
- 17 Feb 2022 00:23
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Air Force Tejas Mk1: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022
- Replies: 822
- Views: 741937
Re: Air Force Tejas Mk1: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022
Why are we assuming that there was no staging? On the way to Malaysia, it was staged through KKD and Rangoon.mody wrote:Direct flight by Tejas to Singapore without aerial re-fueling, only drop tanks. No more doubts should persist on the ferry range and combat range of the Tejas.
- 12 Feb 2022 00:01
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349257
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
That is my first guess too. We are looking at cannon/gun launched missiles.srin wrote:And, gun launched missile for a future 105mm light tank, akin to Falarick missile.
- 11 Feb 2022 05:50
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349257
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
I think there is an ATGM with 105mm diameter in the making.
We have seen this seeker with a lens diameter of 100mm before.
Now, there is a tender for missile with 4 canted nozzles (like in Nag) and a diameter of 103 mm.
We have seen this seeker with a lens diameter of 100mm before.
Now, there is a tender for missile with 4 canted nozzles (like in Nag) and a diameter of 103 mm.
- 25 Jan 2022 23:42
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: HJT-36 Sitara Intermediate Jet Trainer: News & Discussion - 24 April 2019
- Replies: 177
- Views: 100375
- 12 Jan 2022 16:12
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Indian Space Program: News & Discussion
- Replies: 1042
- Views: 764237
- 12 Jan 2022 09:30
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Indian Space Program: News & Discussion
- Replies: 1042
- Views: 764237
Re: Indian Space Program: News & Discussion
ISRO looking to change truss-rod intertank structure in cryogenic stage to common bulkhead intertank structure. Latter will save weight by around 490 kg and height by 1.75m on GSLV Mk3. Will affect SC120, SC200 and SC500 stages. IMHO, much more important than Gaganyaan mission. https://pbs.twimg.com...
- 12 Jan 2022 04:53
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
They have not delayed. Aug22 was and continues to be the roll-out date. 6-8 months from rollout to first flight is typical.
- 08 Jan 2022 06:07
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: HJT-36 Sitara Intermediate Jet Trainer: News & Discussion - 24 April 2019
- Replies: 177
- Views: 100375
Re: HJT-36 Sitara Intermediate Jet Trainer: News & Discussion - 24 April 2019
Mango man question. Can't we use derated Kaveri dry version for Sitara? Too heavy. Will change CG requiring total redesign. + more expensive then HTFE25 or current roosi injin. They can balance the CG movement. The engine is actually much more closer to the CG than the nose. Putting a derated 20 kN...
- 01 Jan 2022 00:26
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
I had the same thought. But they must have considered it Kartik.
- 31 Dec 2021 08:40
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349257
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
I have a feeling. A smaller NAG is in design at DRDL.
- 31 Dec 2021 08:38
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
I don't understand why Uttam Mk2 + smaller radome + IRST can be added to Mk1/Mk1A at MLU.
- 31 Dec 2021 07:27
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Indian Nuclear Submarines -3
- Replies: 2005
- Views: 594521
Re: Indian Nuclear Submarines -3
Does 20 mtrs longer translate to just 4 more tubes of 2 mtr diameter each?
- 31 Dec 2021 07:26
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
Indranil: is the reason for the smaller radome in MK2 to reduce aerodynamic drag that you mentioned in your Twitter thread? Otherwise, why not have a larger radome (or at least the same size as Mk1) with a more powerful Uttam? Would you happen to know the radome size of MK2 vs Gripen-E by any chanc...