WOW !! d_berwal sahab, now brings some good news on Arjund_berwal wrote: New regiment raised and under induction : 55 AR (Arjun)
Search found 279 matches
- 09 Mar 2011 21:14
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3918
- Views: 935488
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- 08 Mar 2011 22:45
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1028116
Re: LCA News and Discussions
OT : In IT, it is applied, where 80% of SAP project are either considered failure or non starters. And professionals called PMPs are employed to produce garbage in form of xls and mpp.aditya.agd wrote:From LCA experience, I think the Project Management discipline needs to be enforced in all DRDO projects.
- 08 Mar 2011 21:43
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1028116
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Still better would have been to realize all this before starting the project, minimize the risks and go for a twin engined Kaveri @ 65 kN. Shaurya Ji, Last heard Kaveri was generating a thrust of 72 - 75 kN. And ADA is already having a project with twin Kaveri and they are calling it AMCA :wink:
- 23 Feb 2011 21:42
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1028116
Re: LCA News and Discussions
So, many different types of system integration need to be done before FOC for Tejas.
Just wondering, if the deadline would be enough for the same ?
Can someone put some light ?
I am not trying to be pessimistic here.
Just wondering, if the deadline would be enough for the same ?
Can someone put some light ?
I am not trying to be pessimistic here.
- 23 Feb 2011 21:20
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: BR Forum Feedback
- Replies: 1360
- Views: 277821
Re: BR Forum Feedback
Rahul Ji, Thank you for the explanation on Jaguar upgrade, I have been following BR for last 10 yrs. My knowledge about aeronautics in nill ;). I am sure you will understand short comings. (I had actually packed up my books on mechanical some 11 yrs back and after that I did my pg on a different sub...
- 23 Feb 2011 20:24
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1199857
Re: Indian Military Aviation
drishyaman there may be some improvement in top speed, but not much at the high end of the envelope as they said, might be better performance at ingress and exit speeds increased thrust will help in climb and turn, but no extrapolation was made - what painstakingly explained to you was that an a2a ...
- 23 Feb 2011 20:20
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1199857
Re: Indian Military Aviation
drishyaman ji, you are coming across as confrontational which I'm sure is not your intention. singha ji's assessment is correct on every count, btw. No Rahul Ji, I am not trying to be confrontational. I am just putting my views :) Let me explain to you what is in the back of my mind (May be I am wr...
- 23 Feb 2011 20:05
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1199857
Re: Indian Military Aviation
Nowhere, I mentioned Mach 2nachiket wrote:You will never have Jaguars zooming around at Mach 2 regardless of the increase in total thrust.
Where did you get that number for Jaguar ?
- 23 Feb 2011 20:03
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1199857
Re: Indian Military Aviation
regardless of thrust the airframe shape and structure puts a limit on top speed and agility. so Mach1.6 at high alt may well remain the top speed. more important will be its medium alt escape speed and low alt ingress speed increase if any. the Jag is not a agile plane....in a IAF demo I have seen ...
- 23 Feb 2011 19:41
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1199857
Re: Indian Military Aviation
If F125IN is selected, the maximum thrust of Jaguar will become 88 kN and 250 kg reduction of weight of the Jaguar (as per wiki) empty weight will become 6750 kg. As of now Jaguar has 65 kN thrust with 7000 kg empty weight and its Maximum Speed is 1.6 Mach. What would be the possible Maximum speed o...
- 23 Feb 2011 17:18
- Forum: Military Expositions Archive
- Topic: AeroIndia 2011
- Replies: 940
- Views: 308382
Re: AeroIndia 2011
Paint peeled off.nits wrote:After seeing the LCA - Moon pic i again remembver my question that i asked some days back and probably didn;t get an asnwer or missed it... posting the Q again to Gurus\Shiv Sir - What is that white stuff all over the LCA...?
- 23 Feb 2011 17:15
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1199857
Re: Indian Military Aviation
I have yet to come across a strong business reason why NAL/HAL would like to build a 70-100 seater , what kind of market they are focusing at and what is the sales projection and revenue generation expected for NCA. So, India should never attempt a civil aircraft after all? There were similar quest...
- 23 Feb 2011 15:00
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
lalmohan... surprisingly i am someone who's used the socialist hardware. I am also pretty close to the field. stop ****** romantising useless hardware. you will have the blood of young pilots on your hands . have you ever operated US and Russian/ European hardware??? you will understand what i am t...
- 23 Feb 2011 00:21
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
Are you trying to put your words in my mouth?malli wrote:so are planning to face china tommorrow without the backup of satellites and missiles???
- 23 Feb 2011 00:16
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
i am very surprised with this argument. firstly TSP never \had more than 52 teens. They could not afford more. Till 2005 all they had was only F-16A/B s with no BVRAAM. Its passe to blame unkil for everything but he could have given AMRAAMs in 1996 to TSP. he didnt. we all can keep arguing but as e...
- 23 Feb 2011 00:10
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
great. i meant that US fighters were much superior to Soviet fighters from 1960 onwards. That is your partisan view. See, I told you above you are partsan ;) Both F-16's disengaged because they didnt have BVR missiles during kargil. So, you mean to say 2, F- 16 ran away seeing a Mig in layman’s lan...
- 22 Feb 2011 23:53
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
Boreas wrote:I wonder what if TSP had 100/150 F16.. perhaps we would have surrendered Kashmir.
and in case PAF managed to have 200 of them.. we would have ceded some of our territory as well.
- 22 Feb 2011 23:51
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
my views are very very simple. these birds had double the range of our soviet birds, they were more serviceable and 52 of them were enough to deter us when they were operational. the jags with the asm had a range of 300 nm while the teens had a range of 520 nm. it makes operational planning very ve...
- 22 Feb 2011 23:18
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
buy the 16. no asshole in quetta would say that he would win the war against india when faced with 72 vs 260 odds Sirji, Are you also partisan here? Quoting your first post here. am surprised with the amount of partisanship on the forum. have you ever played a wargame???? So, you have played, then ...
- 22 Feb 2011 23:00
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
Why ? Could you please, give the argument in favour of your favourite F - 16? That is, why not anyone from the other 5?achilles_malli wrote: buy the 16. no asshole in quetta would say that he would win the war against india when faced with 72 vs 260 odds
- 22 Feb 2011 22:57
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
newbee here again, there's been so much discussions about source codes and tot?? Our great and ever great hyped PSU's have not even changed the the source codes of surface navigation radars. A selesmar radar is available for 74 lakhs in the open market while the armed forces have to buy the same sh...
- 22 Feb 2011 22:35
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
newbee here. am surprised with the amount of partisanship on the forum. have a little experience with military hardware. are you guys all sure that the f-16in is inferior to the gripen?? range, power, loadout, radar etc etc?? same with the twin engines. is anybody in his right mind when he says tha...
- 22 Feb 2011 19:26
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3918
- Views: 935488
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
The first prototype demonstration of Ajun Mark II will take place by June 2011. By 2013-14, the first batch of about 30 tanks will roll out of the HVF, said Sivakumar.
http://flonnet.com/stories/20110311280510000.htm
http://flonnet.com/stories/20110311280510000.htm
- 22 Feb 2011 15:10
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
Dear All, I am currently reading "Disciple", authored by Stephen Coonts. He mentions a unique system called "ALQ-199" that makes US Navy's Hornets invisible to the Iranian radars. I just want to ask some Gurus whether this system really exists or it is a mere imagination of the ...
- 22 Feb 2011 13:08
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Military FAQ Thread
- Replies: 146
- Views: 95984
Re: FAQ Thread
A request to Negi ji and Gurneesh ji, both of you have done a good job in listing the questions on Arjun and Tin Can.
Can you also, provide the answers along with the questions ( I know answers has already been provided ) then people might not ask the same questions again ?
Can you also, provide the answers along with the questions ( I know answers has already been provided ) then people might not ask the same questions again ?
- 22 Feb 2011 13:03
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Military FAQ Thread
- Replies: 146
- Views: 95984
Re: FAQ Thread
when we can think of an LCA Mk3 twin engined with a home grown AESA radar , ECM and stores. 5 years down the line, it would be a win-win. “LCA Mk3 twin engined”. This suggestion comes up every 2 – 3 month. Quoting Rahul M from “Design your own fighter” thread moreover, if you try to design a twin e...
- 22 Feb 2011 13:01
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
MMRCA deal is nothing but a stop gap solution for filling up the depleting force. If any TOT happens along with that, it will be icing on the cake. If, there is going to be any TOT it has to be cutting edge otherwise it will be meaning less and I have a big doubt about the TOT happening. So, I guess...
- 21 Feb 2011 22:22
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
I believe most of us are thinking why IAF is not keen on Tejas project instead of going ahead with MRCA project. Yes If IAF invest the money into development of Tejas it can have a decent fighter for next generation. Supporting a home grown fighter is more important than supporting somebodies econo...
- 21 Feb 2011 21:56
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1028116
Re: LCA News and Discussions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_rule You can start here and then proceed onto: drishyamanji, please consult a big thick book on supersonic aerodynamics for the answer to your questions! P.S. I thought the increase was 1m in overall length, so I guess the additional .5m would be added past the win...
- 21 Feb 2011 21:17
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1028116
Re: LCA News and Discussions
duplicate
- 21 Feb 2011 21:16
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1028116
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Sir ji, Can you please me a more detailed answer with some more explaination, so that a layman like me can understand.Raveen wrote:Better area ruling of the fuselage by lengthening
Also, I had asked 3 questions
- 21 Feb 2011 21:04
- Forum: Military Expositions Archive
- Topic: AeroIndia 2011
- Replies: 940
- Views: 308382
Re: AeroIndia 2011
Bala Vignesh wrote:Drishyamanji,
don't take me bad, but isn't porki itself racist and offensive??? I mean in the general context not in BRF...
Yes,
Now someone will hang me ? If yes, I will still say porki porki porki
By the way, I was expecting a reply from you on Design your fighter thread
- 21 Feb 2011 21:00
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1028116
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Tejas MK – II will be lengthened by 0.5 meter just behind the cockpit. Is that being done to accommodate more of the delta wing within “Mach” cone? Can this be assumed as a drag reduction measure? What else drag reduction measures are taken up (or can be taken up) for reducing the drag in Tejas MK ...
- 21 Feb 2011 20:28
- Forum: Military Expositions Archive
- Topic: AeroIndia 2011
- Replies: 940
- Views: 308382
Re: AeroIndia 2011
Rahul, sorry didn't know it was a offensive word. i meant the guy was our eastern neighbour. Marteen yeah will put up his pic Chirag Ji, The word you used is not just offensive but is Racist. Just like if you call a porki a paki in UK, its considered Racist. Anyways lets see the photo of the so cal...
- 21 Feb 2011 19:27
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1028116
Re: LCA News and Discussions
+1SaiK wrote:LCA is not Mig21++ or 3 legged cheetah. It is Mirage2k++ and soon a 4 legged tiger.
from DRDO thread..
I was actually amazed when the ACM told Tejas was Mig-21++.
What Mr. Ajit Doval spoke is the naked truth.
- 20 Feb 2011 22:59
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1028116
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Angle of Attack is defined as the angle between the axis of the aerofoil and the direction of airflow Yes, that is something what my kid bro who is an CFD analyst told me, earlier I also used to think it as the The angle made by the aircraft axis and the horizon. But, question for you, doesn't ever...
- 20 Feb 2011 22:39
- Forum: Military Expositions Archive
- Topic: AeroIndia 2011
- Replies: 940
- Views: 308382
Re: AeroIndia 2011
^^ Manoba, that is one of the best videos, I have seen so far of the Tejas. Thanks for sharing the same. :) I was wondering if the Tejas can fly like that despite the G restriction of upto "+6" then what will Tejas be capable of when it will be allowed to perform "+9" Gs. And wha...
- 20 Feb 2011 19:45
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 899991
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
With the kind of delay happening in deciding MMRCA for IAF, deciding which one to pick up is becoming a complex decision with time. Now the buzz is that the decision has been deferred to 2012. So, if anyone of them is chosen, they will only be coming in by 2015 (earliest). And also by 2015, our Teja...
- 20 Feb 2011 19:21
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion
- Replies: 6412
- Views: 2125967
Re: Kaveri & aero-engine discussion
Somehow this pic tells me, we already started adopting Snecma technology or getting guidance from Snecma in designing & maturing our Kaveri engine. Kanson ji, Is this assumption of yours wrong then, with the above last post of yours showing that M88 4E will have have a thrust of 75 kN? Sorry !!...
- 20 Feb 2011 17:54
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3918
- Views: 935488
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Issues with Tin Can : 1. Night vision needs upgradation. 2. Heat issues with the computer. 3. Lack of AC. 4. Lack of APU. 5. Gun less accurate than the Arjun’s Gun. Army is deploying Arjun in the desert and Tin Can is too cool to operate in the desert. d_berwal sahab will have problem with Arjun MK...