Death on wheels.
Which isn't, Rahul M?
If you are in uniform. it is death on everything.
That is the price to pay if you want your country to be free!
Search found 3593 matches
- 04 Mar 2010 12:34
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
- 04 Mar 2010 12:29
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Rahul M, No pictures of Abrams damaged? They were not damaged? It is easy to pick up western propaganda and rather difficult to get something from the other side, right? Fortunately, I am not a Russian or a Western backer. I want what is best for India! :roll: why should I bother to post abrams pic...
- 04 Mar 2010 11:53
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Rahul M, No pictures of Abrams damaged? They were not damaged? It is easy to pick up western propaganda and rather difficult to get something from the other side, right? Fortunately, I am not a Russian or a Western backer. I want what is best for India! Your posts were impressive, but a trifle low o...
- 04 Mar 2010 11:51
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
So, for a civilian like you, rank matters, but it is no reflection of the intelligence of a person. err, only in the last post you were arguing that rank is a reflection of intelligence and final arbiter of a person's command of a subject ! :rotfl: and I was arguing against it. :lol: Since there ar...
- 04 Mar 2010 11:44
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
RayC we are digressing from the topic lets keep it plain and simple. Rahul's post above has a link which clearly gives an idea of the kind of protection the T family (without ERA) offers against the older RU APFSDS "3BM42" while Arjun's armor was not defeated even by the new Israeli APFSD...
- 04 Mar 2010 11:25
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
So Ajai Shukla is the last word on this forum? What makes him superior to an ex COAS? are you having problem understanding simple english ? I said I'm not saying these depending on what ajai shukla says. the facts are all out there, irrespective of what he does or does not say. he may be superior o...
- 04 Mar 2010 11:12
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
^ RayC I will need to dig for it and fwiw iirc was posted by JCage (as reliable as one can get as far as Indian MBT scene is concerned) ; moreover we don't need it look for it for if you read Rahul's post and see the protection levels offered by ERA less T-80U series against RPG-29 one can only ima...
- 04 Mar 2010 11:10
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
ray sir, clearly you haven't read my post carefully. my argument was NOT that the arjun or any other MBT is invulnerable ( * ) to modern anti-tank weapons but their crew survive even in cases when the tank is a write-off. not so in the case of T-90 and T-72. please read the very links you have post...
- 04 Mar 2010 11:00
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
The Arjun's improvement has been an "ongoing process" since the 80s with no end in sight. So has been the case with Abrams,Leo and the T-72 family . I'll call it when I see it, till then its "in development claims" will remain on paper only! Well in that case you can contend you...
- 04 Mar 2010 10:54
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
RayC.. I am 45 and my father is 80 . He now hates to talk anything about the services. I dont go to him for money :-)) .. On the contrary I provide 3 Ladhaki children scholarships and try to spend atleast 3 weeks every year teaching in some school in Ladhak or Uttrakhand living in fairly spartan co...
- 04 Mar 2010 10:48
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Rahul M, Here is my reply. First of all, if one wants to decide then all tanks are death traps on tracks (and not on wheels as you quaintly put it), more so if the tank crew is not well trained and if the adversary uses the right type of ammunition and attacks the soft spots. Here are some examples....
- 04 Mar 2010 08:32
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
^^you forgot the third point ,both tanks are supposed to be on different roles, and are incomparable according to an army source,.... For IA there isnt any 'superior' tank present , its using both as two separate solutions for same problem at different theaters of war,,. AFAIK ,few months back, the...
- 03 Mar 2010 22:47
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
I want to reiterate that I don't care if Arjun is good or T 90 is good. I am only concerned that we don't die uselessly because of stupid equipment. Is that too much to expect? And do you think we are not as patriotic as you are? The only thing is that your patriotism is on our lives and not yours!...
- 03 Mar 2010 22:43
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
rayC.. frankly i did not quite understand your reply and my dads opinion is not relavant here since he is not participating. all i am saying that there seems to be an apparent contradiction in your posts on the indicated matter ... so could you please clarify your stand on the matter. btw i think t...
- 03 Mar 2010 22:29
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
I want to reiterate that I don't care if Arjun is good or T 90 is good. I am only concerned that we don't die uselessly because of stupid equipment. Is that too much to expect? And do you think we are not as patriotic as you are? The only thing is that your patriotism is on our lives and not yours!
- 03 Mar 2010 22:21
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
pretty sure, its not the Average BRFite who would want to throw the INSAS for some fancy Import... Hell for that matter, any of the indigenous technologies developed so painstakingly. About OFB's QC issues, why don't you work with them??? I mean its the army for crying out loud. they can arm twist ...
- 03 Mar 2010 22:16
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: C-17s for the IAF?
- Replies: 3924
- Views: 754539
- 03 Mar 2010 22:12
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: C-17s for the IAF?
- Replies: 3924
- Views: 754539
Re: C-17s for the IAF?
I thought one passes out if flying for extended period without pressurization above 10000 feet? I do know that even recreational sky divers have to take oxygen flasks when jumping from 13K feet... but thats a civilian requirement. Maybe military world it does not apply? Perhaps RayC was flying belo...
- 03 Mar 2010 21:28
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
No one here is ever going to say that you should show patriotism by using inferior indigenous tech in battle. That is the issue! INSAS was not accepted till it was proven to be excellent. Likewise many other indigenous stuff! And here we have the BRF warriors who want the INSAS junked and buy forei...
- 03 Mar 2010 21:21
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: C-17s for the IAF?
- Replies: 3924
- Views: 754539
Re: C-17s for the IAF?
Why do you continue think that the AN 32 is unpressurized? because you think that the aircraft is russian or cheap or crude or what?? I like Russians and can speak a smattering. But that does not mean I accept your contention that AN 32 is pressurised. I have done many a sortie with this aircraft a...
- 03 Mar 2010 21:09
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Ask him.manjgu wrote:
- 03 Mar 2010 21:04
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
rayC .. i think you got it wrong. its a given that many of us will not see a battlefield. but our fathers, brothers are in harms way as well. so we are not at all casual when talking about death etc. atleast i still did not get a reply to the G pig argument when you accept that casualties are inher...
- 03 Mar 2010 21:00
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
At least, here we know we are doing our job and you want us to die for lousy equipment just to show patriotism that we are supporting indigenoisation? So getting into a Arjun tank is asking someone to die? With an attitude like that... :roll: Both the t90 and the Arjun are untested in battle. All d...
- 03 Mar 2010 20:41
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
rayC... in the case of LCA ( which is still unproven ) testing, would you classify the pilots as G pigs? No. They are test pilots who know the dangers! Test pilots have died before proving aircraft. Part of the job. Just as much as the defence personnel know that to defend the country they may have...
- 03 Mar 2010 20:39
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
RayC ... i did not get your argument about guinea pig? nobody wants def personnel to be G pigs but since def personnel can only test def eqpt in real life conditions , there is a attendant risk? i mean who will fly aircrafts or dive in subs to test something or fire guns in siachen?? as rightly poi...
- 03 Mar 2010 20:10
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
RayC... INSAS - a good example of indigenous dev - i am sure INSAS has also evolved from its first incarnation/version based on its usage, which is the whole idea about product dev.. prototyping and then iterative improvements. Maruti is by no means indegenous development ... its japanese tech , sc...
- 03 Mar 2010 20:03
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
We always wish IA to do well. Even our laments are toward this end. It is my belief that it is this constant penchant for the British Army traidition/standards is bringing the IA not to realise its own potential, Sir. People are so enamoured about British that they always lookup to their methods an...
- 03 Mar 2010 19:57
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
It is not the IA’s mindset or history that prevents induction of indigenous equipment. That is true. If you read carefully again, you will note what I think is the problem is the Indian Army's INSTITUTIONAL FAILING as the primary cuase. Why are we buying Maruti cars instead of the warhorse Ambassad...
- 03 Mar 2010 18:37
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
One wonders why the standards of the IA is going down.Kanson wrote: And proudly saying as a custodian of British Indian Army traditions, they are not taking the intiatives to come out of that inertia..
It was pretty good when the 'British Army traditions' were in place!!
- 03 Mar 2010 13:20
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Unfortunately there is no incentive to induct indian eqpt while there are many to induct phoren eqpt. INSAS. Foreign made? Give a good product and none can complain! Maruti Jeeps and Mahindra and Mahindra Jeeps, Tata and Leyland truck? Guess what? Govt produced Jongas are out and Marutis are still ...
- 03 Mar 2010 13:17
- Forum: Strategy, Politics & International Relations Forum
- Topic: Strategic leadership for the future of India - II
- Replies: 513
- Views: 78385
Re: Strategic leadership for the future of India - II
The government did not set attack dogs like Manish Tiwari or Jayanti Natarajan to shout down inconvenient questions. Dislike both. More so this Jayanti with her flat nose flared as she speaks. Manish has a voice that sound like one scraping a razor blade - scratchy and offending the ear! They speak...
- 03 Mar 2010 13:08
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 4653
- Views: 1528511
Re: Small Arms Thread
Living a life of luxury!somnath wrote:Thats VK Saraswat - DRDO chief..RayC wrote:And worse are the sycophants behind
- 03 Mar 2010 12:58
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
RayC .. i did not understand how inducting a not so 'proven' eqpt in limited no endangers soldiers life Simple. If one Regt is to 'prove' an equipment, and a war breaks out, then are they to sacrifice themselves to 'prove' the efficacy of the equipment? Or should such a Regt not be employed and so ...
- 03 Mar 2010 12:54
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 4653
- Views: 1528511
Re: Small Arms Thread
Avinash R wrote:
- 03 Mar 2010 12:51
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 4653
- Views: 1528511
Re: Small Arms Thread
However, good for the morale of the men.Thats a very small part of the RMs job, management by "moving around"...
Not having idiots who love their own offices and aircon comforts!
- 03 Mar 2010 12:07
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3520
- Views: 845983
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
At the same time, one should not accept equipment to 'promote' indigenisation at the cost of lives of those who are to man such equipment in war or lose a war because of 'promoting' local military industry. RayC, this is exactly the problem!. The Army simply does not have a history or mindset of in...
- 03 Mar 2010 11:19
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Small Arms Thread
- Replies: 4653
- Views: 1528511
Re: Small Arms Thread
George F continued the long line of RMs who did nothing on policy-making...The only difference with GF was that he thought that personal Siachen tourism substitutes for good policy..The current incumbent thinks comlete non-action on procurement to show "cleanliness" is substitute for good...
- 03 Mar 2010 11:04
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Army: News & Discussion
- Replies: 3966
- Views: 1247522
Re: Indian Army: News & Discussion
He has carefully indicated that it was the dhoti clad Defence Minister who forced the COAS. The current COAS would leave a chequered (unfortunately more on the negative side) legacy - would be viewed by posterity in the same league as ACM SK Sareen and Adm Ramdas...The Gen Panag accusations, Sukhna...
- 03 Mar 2010 10:51
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Army: News & Discussion
- Replies: 3966
- Views: 1247522
Re: Indian Army: News & Discussion
Principally correct, but wrong examples..KP Singh married well, his father in law was a big landlord in UP/Haryana and the original DLF business was started by him with KPS..And Brig Bhawani Singh is the scion of the Jaipur royal family, no wonder he owns lots of properties!!! Allow a media spinmei...
- 03 Mar 2010 10:49
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Army: News & Discussion
- Replies: 3966
- Views: 1247522
Re: Indian Army: News & Discussion
Here is a retired MS virtually acusing the serving COAS of lying..And similarly against another fellow officer... He has not accused the COAS. He has carefully indicated that it was the dhoti clad Defence Minister who forced the COAS. I wish this dhoti clad man would be more diligent in getting the...