Search found 6011 matches
- 05 Jun 2008 09:35
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Future Nuclear Testing: Pros and Cons-1
- Replies: 319
- Views: 118794
For now a FBF 150 kt bum is ok. Why rock the boat for another 50 kt (200 kt TN) ? Perhaps not even that. ~100 kt seems to be the choice for the UK, ... ... So basically we are talking about the number of warheads an Indian SSBN can deliver and the total number of warheads in the Indian arsenal (FBF...
- 30 May 2008 04:35
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields -2
- Replies: 159
- Views: 72049
I am sure they had high confidence on S1 too till the moment S1 was tested. But I believe in BARCs mastery of boosted weapon. The question is credible yield that puts fear in the mind of adversary. That is a very loaded statement. Is it megatons or few hundered kilotons? Is it 300 kt and above or @...
- 24 May 2008 22:58
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
- 24 May 2008 22:48
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
- 24 May 2008 10:51
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
so basically be on a hair trigger at the prospect of an ASAT launch. Nice , i like your way of thinking , but it breeds instability. and if the warheads are indeed inaccurate they need larger yields . your scenario once again leaves out the prospect of the enemy's counter-strike as well. Can you qu...
- 24 May 2008 10:40
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
Proposing MAD? If they were so careless about their own citizens, why do not we have them in a nuke war with say US? China is deterred because the US can destroy them many times over. The US is deterred because it is unwilling to lose a single city to the Chinese. Hmm, So by the same analogy, we ca...
- 24 May 2008 09:25
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
For a goal of 8 citiies - 500 warheads - even of 15 kilotons, with a 90% failure rate will ensure that 6 Hiroshima size bombs will hit each targeted city. Where is the need to test any further if this goal is acheivable? This assumes that an enemy will be deterred by the prospect of losing 8 cities...
- 24 May 2008 09:21
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
2. It is known in our neighbourhood, that we have the capability of MIRV *and* accuracy. [Look at the PSLV launch]. ... as I have written before this CEP stuff will be rendered useless given the fact that a first strike on us will certainly try to take out our satellite guidance assets. Then test a...
- 24 May 2008 04:39
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
I honestly dont know about the first part. Its the latter I do know- its difficult to scale. I do believe that we have the know how of going upto 300 Kt. The question I have is why do we need to go beyond 300 kt? Why 1 MT or 2 MT? Here are the reasons: 1. The ratio of accuracy to radiation damage t...
- 24 May 2008 04:23
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
Is boosted fission easily scalable? I recall news reports right after the 1998 tests which quoted some scientist saying that they could have easily increased the yield had they put more Tritium. Fusion boosted fission [FBF] is *not* scalable. The only scalable thing is the Teller-Ullam design which...
- 23 May 2008 22:55
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
testimony of Richard Garwin Very very selective quotes - psyops or what? Read it as follows: That amount of fissile material would suffice for 10 thermonuclear weapons, each of which could be in the megaton class and weigh less than 1000 lbs. However, such H-bomb type weapons would require testing ...
- 22 May 2008 23:43
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Casting doubt on Indian nuclear weapon designs and yields
- Replies: 254
- Views: 108487
Thats the whole question IMVHO; if S1 worked we say boosted fission device works; but if S1 does not work do we know why? What if primary did not give the expected yield? Sanku, fission devices and boosted fission devices are actually very easy. The complexity is in the triggers! I will go into the...
- 15 May 2008 10:54
- Forum: Terrorism Archive
- Topic: Jaipur Blasts
- Replies: 356
- Views: 129798
...So, given this policy, how about GoI creating better infrastructure like hospitals and emergency personnel to go with this policy and prove to Indians that they are still loyal to India and not Pukes? What is the state government doing? What does the State's home minister doing? Does not the sta...
- 09 May 2008 10:22
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Long range Agni missile & test launch :Part-1
- Replies: 283
- Views: 147478
Arun_S, Just out of curiosity...is the ROCKSIM available on B-R website in any way related to the ROCKSIM software commercially sold by Apogee Components in massa-land (they are a hobby/model rockets company)? Raja they are two different software but some how got the same name [from being a rocket ...
- 09 May 2008 10:18
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Long range Agni missile & test launch :Part-1
- Replies: 283
- Views: 147478
- 09 May 2008 01:56
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Long range Agni missile & test launch :Part-1
- Replies: 283
- Views: 147478
Image in the Hindustan Times Article. Arun_S any copyright issues involved here? :eek: They cannot even get the failure reason right! Are they confusing GSLV with Agni? Idiots. And look at the text so many grammatical errors. And even the images are not photochor'ed properly !!! Should not PTI be a...
- 07 May 2008 22:13
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Long range Agni missile & test launch :Part-1
- Replies: 283
- Views: 147478
Zero. I doubted it ever flew. I think the whole thing was photo shop'ed.Nitesh wrote:rediff says range is 3000km indiatimes says 3500km now russian says it is 5000km. So the question remain what is the exact range of this missile?ranganathan wrote:Russian gen says Agni-III can reach 5000 km.
Congrats DRDO!
- 02 May 2008 10:38
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Space Program Discussion
- Replies: 479
- Views: 403195
link The above link is a keeper. From the same link: How did the rocket and its sub-systems perform, considering so many satellites were launched? The measure of the total mission comes in terms of the orbital accuracy that is achieved. Normally, we can allow upto 35 km dispersion in altitude, and ...
- 24 Apr 2008 22:14
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Space Program Discussion
- Replies: 479
- Views: 403195
- 13 Apr 2008 02:52
- Forum: Military Scenarios Archive
- Topic: Possible Indian Military Scenarios - Part X
- Replies: 352
- Views: 192523
- 05 Apr 2008 23:02
- Forum: Military Scenarios Archive
- Topic: Possible Indian Military Scenarios - Part X
- Replies: 352
- Views: 192523
- 01 Mar 2008 08:30
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: ATV and K15 missile - News & Discussion
- Replies: 325
- Views: 185210
The difference between pontoons and land based silos is that for anyone to get physically close to a land based silo they would have to be inside Indian territory. Pontoons out in open waters is like planting a Rs 100 note (attached to a string in your hand) in the middle of the road and waiting fo...
- 01 Mar 2008 03:21
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: ATV and K15 missile - News & Discussion
- Replies: 325
- Views: 185210
The idea of using sunk pontoons as silos for Sagarika has some inherent disadvantages 1) These pontoons need to be stationed at 50 meters depth so that would limit how far in to the sea we can go as the oceans get progressively deeper farther from the shore. 2) Once sunk their locations need to be ...
- 01 Mar 2008 02:06
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: ATV and K15 missile - News & Discussion
- Replies: 325
- Views: 185210
Unmanned and fixed underwater barges holding nuclear tipped missiles are open to attacks, and hence are a big security problem. Land-based silos are protected by ABMs atleast. :?: :?: :?: :?: What is the coast guard for? 50 km off the coast, an ABM battery cannot protect an underwater barge? On the...
- 01 Mar 2008 02:02
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: ATV and K15 missile - News & Discussion
- Replies: 325
- Views: 185210
AOA! So the idea is to drop real K-15 pantoons sprinkled within the dummy pantoon distribution? 1). They will be detected by satellite. 2). MPA's will decipher real ones from dummies. 3). Uncle's rig will come and steal (tow) away a couple of pantoons from 'international waters' for analysis. Yindo...
- 29 Feb 2008 21:09
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: ATV and K15 missile - News & Discussion
- Replies: 325
- Views: 185210
Folks dont you think such stationary launching pilons or silos be detected by satellites? IR detectors the difference between waters around and the silo. What about corrosion etc? Sink several dummy pontoons all over the place. Some of them can have real fat ladies which sing once in a while. Lizar...
- 13 Feb 2008 21:39
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion
- Replies: 3965
- Views: 1232239
Filing a patent would be a stupid thing to do. It just makes it so easy for some one else to build an exactly similar system for themselves. As long as they don't commercially sell it, they wouldn't even be violating the patent. If you really come up with something new, especially in the defence fi...
- 12 Dec 2007 19:54
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tracking Errors in Defence reporting
- Replies: 499
- Views: 135506
To err is human. Editors want to cram in all the news that flows via wire with gramatical and space edits. It is because of the work pressure. Defence journos too get letargic and are bound to errors, every one has good day or bad day. Every one has prespectives. Thats why I go slow on yelling at t...
- 13 Oct 2007 10:09
- Forum: Military Scenarios Archive
- Topic: Possible Indian Military Scenarios - Part IX
- Replies: 322
- Views: 188047
- 03 Oct 2007 09:29
- Forum: Military History Archive
- Topic: Historical Battles in Ancient & Medieval Bharat
- Replies: 360
- Views: 215631
- 30 Sep 2007 08:50
- Forum: Military Scenarios Archive
- Topic: Possible Indian Military Scenarios - Part IX
- Replies: 322
- Views: 188047
- 04 Sep 2007 00:27
- Forum: Military Scenarios Archive
- Topic: Possible Indian Military Scenarios - Part IX
- Replies: 322
- Views: 188047
- 19 Aug 2007 21:35
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News and Discussion 17 August 2007
- Replies: 351
- Views: 133482
...First of all Indian economic progress requires electricity, secondly for ordinary material comfort of having electricity in home and that means home located in Indian village... Arun saar, that is a very very important point you are making which everybody in this debate needs to remember. Regard...
- 19 Aug 2007 21:19
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News and Discussion 17 August 2007
- Replies: 351
- Views: 133482
- 18 Aug 2007 22:56
- Forum: Military History Archive
- Topic: Historical Battles in Ancient & Medieval Bharat
- Replies: 360
- Views: 215631
- 18 Aug 2007 22:43
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News and Discussion 17 August 2007
- Replies: 351
- Views: 133482
without going into too many details an annual report will have to be filed which state how much uranium we have mined and how much of it has gone to civilian pro gramme and obviously rest to military program me.If this is not intrusive what is . US inspectors will have the right not to just inspect...
- 18 Aug 2007 21:00
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News and Discussion 17 August 2007
- Replies: 351
- Views: 133482
Some thing is grossly wrong with the nuke deal -we can never know but just a look back - why do we need need civilian nuke co operation?we have done fine without so far including the fast breeder reactor and the advanced heavy water reactor is quite advanced stage including technology for thorium u...
- 18 Aug 2007 20:28
- Forum: Military History Archive
- Topic: Historical Battles in Ancient & Medieval Bharat
- Replies: 360
- Views: 215631
...I grew up on NCERT and state texts all duly vetted by eminent historians ... Ah! Do not remind me those NCERT books. They glossed over the anglo-maratha wars as foot note and I was always conphoosed what happened in the period between Aurangazeb and Bahadur Shah Zafar and what those Marathas wer...
- 18 Aug 2007 06:42
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News and Discussion 17 August 2007
- Replies: 351
- Views: 133482
... testing happens when India REALLY needs to test. The present 123 does not hinder it in any way ... I am just thinking that this whole hoopla about testing is because now it is evidently clear and brought to the conscious fore that any new testing may result in serious sanctions while that same ...
- 15 Aug 2007 06:13
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 13 Aug 2007
- Replies: 338
- Views: 218055