Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 17 Apr 2014 03:08

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2810 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ... 71  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2011 07:57 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Posts: 14014
Location: Chennai
Krishna-Khar meet strictly followed pre-fixed script
Quote:
'Home Minister P Chidambaram told his Pakistan counterpart Rehman Malik last week in Thimpu that the (26/11) trial has become a mockery as four judges have been changed, that only two genuine arrests were made while six were arraigned and as regarding the rest, they are not the real accused.'

Pakistan side is dithering from sending voice samples of the accused of 26/11 attacks because it is against fundamental rights in that country. Malik had told Chidambaram that he would move an amendment in the Pakistan National Assembly to make changes in the law. :rotfl:


See here for a chronology of court drama in Pakistan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2011 08:18 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Jan 2003 12:31
Posts: 1934
Location: USA
Pakis have fundamental rights? :rotfl: Malik sounds more and more like Iraq's Comic Ali.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2011 07:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 9015
26/11 samples sought by FBI already destroyed by Mumbai Police

Kasab moves Supreme Court, challenging death penalty


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2011 06:55 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Jul 2003 11:31
Posts: 2345
ISI threatens retaliation if 26/11 lawsuit continues

Quote:
Kevin Walsh, a lawyer representing Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency, urged a judge to throw out the lawsuit - filed last year by relatives of New Yorkers murdered in a Hasidic center during the 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai, India. "The consequences of this judicial inquiry have the potential to be disastrous," Walsh argued in a letter filed Friday with a federal judge. "The intrusion of these actions into the politics of Pakistan will fuel violence and extremism, directed against the government the US intends to support," the attorney argues.

The suit was filed by relatives of Gavriel Noah Holtzberg, a rabbi originally from Brooklyn, and his pregnant wife, Rivka, who were gunned down when terrorists stormed the Chabad Lubavitch center in a commando-style attack that also killed the couple’s unborn child. The Holtzberg’s 2 year-old son survived the attack after being rescued by an employee. He now lives with his grandfather in Israel. The lawsuit asked for unspecified damages and cites claims that the ISI has worked closely with the Lashkar-e-Taiba terror group.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2011 11:05 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 30 Sep 2002 11:31
Posts: 1658
Location: New Delhi
26/11 attack mindmap


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2011 19:44 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 36470
AdityaM wrote:



Great find. Note its total absence of David Headley/ Doaud Gilani and Tawahur Rana role.

Wish we had a team of BRF memebrs put together a more complete mind map in the same format.


Thanks for linking the same as an example of what can be done to to ogranize the info on the myriad topics on BRF.

They use BRF as a source for their data in some links.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2011 21:03 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 36470
Is it sufficient time to critique the GOI response to the Mumbai attacks? Right after the attacks it would be callous, but not to do so for ever is even more so.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2011 12:19 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 9015
26/11: Coast Guard, Navy caught napping


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2011 17:06 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Posts: 14014
Location: Chennai
ATC hearing the 26/11 case issues contempt notice to Interior Minister Rehman Malik
Quote:
A Pakistani anti-terrorism court conducting the trial of seven suspects in the Mumbai attacks on Wednesday issued a contempt notice to Interior Minister Rehman Malik for announcing that a judicial commission would visit India soon, though the court had not yet decided the matter. {Rehman Malik should not be blamed. He resorted to the usual Pakistani tactic of perfidy. He conveyed this to P.Chidambaram on July 23 a week before Hina Rabbani Khar's India visit. This was done to preempt Indian accusation of Pakistan doing nothing on 26/11. He did not want the fashionable but novice minister Ms. Khar to come under attack in India. The Court pretends not to understand this perfidy. Rehman Malik would now use this as an excuse when he meets P.Chidambaram later that his hands are tied down by the ATC. The court, the minister, the police, the PA, political parties all work hand in glove.}

Judge Shahid Rafique of the Rawalpindi-based court issued the notice in response to a petition moved by defence lawyers, who contended that Mr. Malik had committed contempt of court by stating in a media interview last month that the Pakistani commission would go to India within 10 days even though the court had not decided on the formation of the commission.

During the proceedings conducted behind closed doors at Adiala Jail for security reasons, the judge directed Mr. Malik to respond to the notice at the next hearing on August 13.

“The Interior Minister told the media on the sidelines of a SAARC meeting in Bhutan last month that the commission would go to India within 10 days even though the matter is pending in the court. The court is yet to decide the issue in the light of arguments by the defence and the prosecution,” defence lawyer Shahbaz Rajput told PTI.

“The Minister’s remarks have created an impression that he is controlling the proceedings in the anti-terrorism court and interfering in them. The integrity of the court has been affected and the minister’s remarks were prejudicial and that is why we have decided to protest,” he said.

The defence lawyers argued in court that Mr. Malik’s comments had created the impression that the anti-terrorism court and the Interior Minister have already decided the issue of sending the commission to India.

The anti-terrorism court is currently hearing two petitions regarding the formation of the commission to be sent to India to interview key persons associated with the 2008 Mumbai attacks, including the police officer who investigated the incident and the magistrate who recorded the confession of lone surviving attacker Ajmal Kasab.

In a related development, the prosecution told the judge that it wanted to present three witnesses in the case.

The judge said these witnesses could depose during the next hearing on August 13.

The seven Pakistani suspects, including LeT commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, have been accused of planning, facilitating and financing the November 2008 attacks in India’s financial hub that killed 166 people.

The trial has been marred by repeated delays and only one out of over 160 prosecution witnesses has testified so far.

Justice Rafique is the fifth judge to hear the case since proceedings began in early 2009.


See here for a chronology of court drama in Pakistan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2011 20:23 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 36470
In retorospect the TSP saw the US as an accessory to the Mumbai 26/11 raza due to the Daoud Gilanis's connections to the US agencies. It could be in-advertant or not. Inadvertant as US did not know what Gilani was doing in TSP while working undercover for them. Or he could have been an agent provacator workign for US, egging on LeT to more daring attacks to reveal their true role.

Either way MMS inaction due to what ever reasons has revealed more than lashing out against TSP would have done.

It would have been better of MKN had trapped the razakar gang and got more of them alive. But then the Mumbai Policeman's bravery led to atleast Kasab being caught.

The rest is history.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Aug 2011 20:09 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 36470
Why are 26/11 investigations still in limbo?


Quote:
Why are the Mumbai 26/11 investigations still in limbo?

August 11, 2011 01:21 PM |
Karan Kharb

The nation cannot depend on the US—and of course, Pakistan, to nab the terrorists. Security issues have to be dealt with directly by India through an efficient mechanism with an effective intelligence gathering system, swift combat response, hot pursuit and follow-up methods to effectively fight and eradicate the menace of terrorism

Pakistan's reluctance in prosecuting the sponsors of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks has angered us continually even though a few suspects including Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, the LeT (Lashkar-e-Toiba) operations commander were arrested and put through trial under pressure of mounting world opinion. However, the Indian government, media and people—all have been fuming at the Pakistan government's unyielding attitude on the issue. Nevertheless, while an atmosphere of peace, friendship and cooperation is always the best option for both the countries, aren't we asking for too much in expecting Pakistan to prosecute the people who, it secretly believes, deserve gallantry awards? How naïve of India to expect that her tormenter would come to her rescue! As if we should have asked then President Musharraf to hand over or prosecute Pakistani Army officers and men guilty of the Kargil 1999 intrusion. Agreed, these are the times of outsourcing businesses; but outsourcing matters of national security to Pakistan or the United States would be simply preposterous with disastrous outcomes. Security issues have to be dealt with directly by us through an efficient mechanism with effective intelligence collection system, swift combat response, hot pursuit and follow up methods to effectively fight and defeat the menace of terrorism.

What is more dangerous for the national security is a corruption aided tendency in our officialdom to pass the buck and cover up the mounting inefficiency in police, local administration and intelligence agencies at all levels. Neither our intelligence agencies nor the Mumbai police had any clue about David Headley—the Lashkar member and lead scout of 26/11, who continued visiting and holidaying in Delhi, Mumbai and rest of India for years before and after the Mumbai attack until he was arrested by the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) sleuths in the United States.

And now we want him to be made over to us for 'further action'. The working of the police and intelligence agencies has been disappointing because blinded by rampant corruption they keep groping in the darkness without seeing much. Local suspects arrested from far-off places like Kolkata, Srinagar and Delhi have not led Mumbai police beyond primary level information like how the terrorists managed Indian SIM cards and little else. They did not examine their own surroundings and failed to penetrate the network in Mumbai that made 26/11 possible, no matter how well the ISI had trained and equipped them.

An operation like 26/11 could not have been possible without a prearranged foolproof support base in Mumbai. Typical, military operations in border areas may be carried out without a 'support base in situ' if the objective is clearly identifiable and covered approaches are available. 'Covered approach' in military parlance means a concealed route chosen by the attacker to obscure his movement from enemy observation. But navigating through the hustle and bustle of Mumbai roads and carrying out a simultaneous raid at 10 different targets including Taj Hotel, Oberoi Trident Hotel, Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, Leopold Café, Nariman House Jewish Centre and Cama Hospital by terrorists coming ashore for the first time ever on an alien land humming with activity will be a foolish idea most unlikely to succeed unless intimately supported from the target end. A terrorist squad, howsoever well trained, leaving Karachi for Mumbai, not by air but by sea, would require pre-positioning of a reliable and well organised 'support base' with tentacles at sea, at the beach and in the city. It is understood that the overall coordination and monitoring controls would continue to function from Pakistan. And lo, we have not yet looked for those who constituted this support base for the terrorists and arranged for their reception, guidance, security/disguise, logistics, transport and, if possible, a get-away plan after the operation is over.

Having planned and participated in operations in the elite counter terrorist force, the National Security Guard (NSG), I have some idea about the functioning of Special Forces like ISI (Pakistan), Mossad (Israel), Delta Force (US), GSG-9 (Germany), SAS (UK), et al. While it might sound highly unethical and illegal, it is not unusual for the state secret services to recruit and utilise terrorists, smugglers and criminals to carry out covert operations deep inside enemy territory. Even assassinations and kidnappings are part of the game. Sometimes, victims also are grouped, armed and trained to fight insurgents on behalf of the state like the 'Salwa Judum' in Chhattisgarh. Therefore, it is no big revelation that Ajmal Kasab and his buddies were trained under the ISI's supervision. The manner in which Mumbai 26/11 was executed made it abundantly clear that the operation was planned and executed under expert supervision of the Pakistan Army and the ISI. The tactics, weaponry, grenades, composite survival provisions, medicines, steroids and communication system used by the terrorists pointed towards them unambiguously. Nevertheless, what has got overshadowed by the 'Headley confessions' is the need and urgency of home scrutiny that could have busted the 'in-city network' before it melted away.

Some vital aspects that should have been explored on priority by the Mumbai police and intelligence agencies involved in investigations are:

1. An operation of the type of 26/11 has to be preceded by detailed reconnaissance and surveillance of the target area to assess its vulnerability vis-à-vis security status, suitable time of attack; communication, route, transport, navigational assistance and disguise required.

2. Contingency plans to strike at other targets in the event of initial plans becoming too difficult to execute.

3. Necessity to maintain total secrecy till the last moment.

4. An unobtrusive but tactically useful location near or at the target itself for reconnaissance/surveillance personnel to acquaint themselves with the profile of the target and routine activities, state of security vigilance, vulnerability level etc. Ideally, such surveillance would be mounted several days ahead of the D-day. These advance elements may either join the assault team or withdraw just prior to the H-hour for other tasks.

5. A suitable 'Safe House' for the advance elements and contingencies.

6. Elements who are assigned such missions also need local contacts to merge with the local milieu without rousing suspicions.

7. They might use more than one type of electronic network like satellite phones, mobile phones, radio, VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) etc.

8. It may sometimes become necessary for such terror teams to kill their supporters whom they consider might get caught and blow up in the operation before it is launched, for example the killing of the Captain of the fishing trawler 'Kuber' and taxi drivers.

9. Requirement of subsidiary support like planted media stories, flare up of communal violence, sympathetic political leaders diverting public attention, human rights activists blaming police and security forces, help line activists provoking help seekers etc., can tilt public mood adversely. We have live examples of this support extended by our own leaders like the Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh who blamed "the RSS inspired Hindu extremists for Hemant Karkare's death" and by AR Antulay, then a Union Minister who said "Hemant Karkare's death might be linked to his investigation of the 2006 Malegaon blasts believed to be handiwork of some Hindu extremists."

It is also important for the investigating agencies to understand the mechanics of planning and execution of such operations. Unlike the earlier blasts and shooting incidents in Mumbai, the attack of 26/11 was qualitatively different. Local assistance and coordination must have been provided by helpful elements at sea, on the beach and in the city, perhaps closer to designated targets. The investigating agencies should have focused on the distinct stages and phases of the operation that would have helped narrow down their search on matters of direct relevance rather than groping all over the globe, looking for a needle in a haystack. An analysis of how the events unfolded suggests that most probably the operation went through the following stages:

1. Preliminary Stage: Selection of volunteers, grouping, training, and other preparations.

2. Phase I: Movement requiring means of transport and navigation at sea from Karachi to Indian waters;

3. Phase II: Reception and marrying up with the advance elements, final briefing from a stand-off distance at sea; and landing on the beach;

4. Phase III: Quick dispersal of teams in pre-arranged vehicles for their designated targets;

5. Phase IV: Execution.

Normally, terrorists tasked for such operations are so deeply indoctrinated that they operate almost under a spell and will normally neither surrender nor get arrested alive. Kasab is a rare and lucky find for the Mumbai police.

But it is not only the Mumbai police; the entire system of our governance has been seriously damaged by corruption. It is because of corruption that failure in performance does not get punished and the inefficient and delinquent officers manoeuvre their way up the ladders without much hassle. Gratuitous returns have sickened our leaders, departments and forces that nothing seems to move us speedily in the direction required. We all are aware about the power base of the underworld in Mumbai, the finance capital of India. With Dawood's clout spread in Karachi, Dubai and Mumbai, it should have been possible to pick up more leads to reach more logical conclusions unless these leads led to someone too hot to touch.

Last week I ran into a Pakistani journalist at a seminar in Delhi and asked him why his government was sheltering the LeT operatives like Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi and other criminals wanted by India even when his country is suffering most from terrorism. He retorted, "You are quick to blame Pakistan for not proceeding strictly and swiftly enough against those who are accused of their role in the Mumbai attack of 26/11. Whereas we have proceeded against the suspects of the Mumbai attack despite India not sharing the evidence collected in this regard, aren't you sheltering Afzal Guru despite a death sentence by your own Supreme Court even after his review petition has been rejected and the sentence again confirmed? I'm happy you have not yet blamed Pakistan for this." (Afzal Guru was sentenced to death in 2004 for the attack on the Indian Parliament, was to be hanged on 20 October 2006 but lives on for no apparent reason. His mercy appeal for presidential clemency has been under consideration since 2006!). I tried to explain to him the legal rights of such convicts but he countered me yet again, "In another case, it was your cabinet minister who escorted Maulana Masood Azhar and his co-prisoners aboard a special flight and delivered them to freedom and safety in Kandahar and now you want Pakistan to arrest and send them to you. Isn't it funny?"

I had no answer. At the functional level of administration, we lack professionalism. At the national level, we do not know how to deal with serious situations at home or abroad. Result: no police or army officer knows about the 'government policy' in the event of a hijack or hostage situation because unlike Israel, India has no defined policy on it. Likewise, diplomatically, we are still in an ambivalent state while dealing with nations involved in the Arab Spring. Is India on the right path to assume her global role in the emerging world? Course correction in our governance was never needed more.

(The writer is a military veteran who commanded an Infantry battalion with many successes in counter-terrorist operations. He was also actively involved in numerous high-risk operations as second in command of the elite 51 Special Action Group of the National Security Guard (NSG.) He conducts leadership training and is the author of two bestsellers on leadership development that have also been translated into foreign languages).



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 23 Aug 2011 08:20 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 9015
26/11: 4th case in New York names ISI, its chief Pasha


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2011 08:20 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Posts: 14014
Location: Chennai
Pak Court allows setting up of panel to visit India
Quote:
A Pakistani anti-terrorism court on Saturday allowed the setting up of a commission to be sent to India to record the statements of key witnesses in the 2008 Mumbai attack case.

“Now the government of Pakistan will constitute the commission in the light of the court's order. The government will also speak to India and finalise modalities in this regard,” prosecutor Chaudhry Zulfiqar, who had filed the application, told PTI.

Mr. Zulifqar said the visit of a Pakistani commission to India was necessary to make a headway in the trial of the seven accused .

See here for a chronology of court drama in Pakistan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Sep 2011 15:52 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Posts: 14014
Location: Chennai
Trial in Pakistan adjourned until Sep. 17
Quote:
The trial of seven Pakistanis charged with involvement in the 2008 Mumbai attacks was adjourned for a week after one of the key accused, Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, filed a petition against the judge of the anti-terrorism court.

During a hearing held behind closed doors in Rawalpindi’s Adiala Jail, due to security reasons, Mr. Lakhvi’s lawyers submitted the petition in which he expressed dissatisfaction with Judge Shahid Rafique.

Mr. Lakhvi alleged the judge was working under the influence of Pakistan’s Interior Ministry, the prosecution and the Indian government.

Mr. Lakhvi asked for the judge to be changed, claiming he could not expect justice from him.

There were no proceedings after the petition was filed and the judge adjourned the case till September 17, sources said.

Three prosecution witnesses were expected to testify today.

The proceedings have already been marred by controversies and technical delays and the judge has been changed four times.

Chief prosecutor Chaudhry Zulfiqar said the defence lawyers became annoyed with Judge Rafique after he allowed the formation of a commission to go to India to interview key officials linked to the investigation of the Mumbai attacks.

The defence lawyers were now resorting to “delaying tactics”, he said.{The prosecution lawyer is also in it. He pretends otherwise. Delaying and scuttling this case is a national project of Pakistan.}

See here for a chronology of court drama in Pakistan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Sep 2011 15:00 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Posts: 14014
Location: Chennai
More delay in Pakistani trial, Judge transferred yet again
Quote:
With reports from Pakistan suggesting that the judge handling 26/11 trial has been transferred yet again, government sources said that the delay in bringing the guilty to book was increasingly becoming a matter of concern. Speaking on condition of anonymity, officials said that there was no progress in the trial had become "as clear as daylight".

Pakistan is conducting the trial of seven men, including Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, who have been charged with planning and facilitating the terror strike. Judge Shahid Rafique, who had earlier allowed formation of a panel that will visit India to record statements of important witnesses, was transferred on Saturday.

"We have said in the past that the trial is moving at a glacial pace. It is now clear as daylight that there is no progress at all and this is of very serious concern. We want to reiterate that the trial be expedited," said a government source on condition of anonymity.

According to reports from Pakistan, Rafique is the fifth judge to have been transferred since the trial began. What is interesting is that barely over a week ago, Lakhvi's lawyers had filed a petition in the Lahore High Court seeking removal of Rafique from the trial, saying he was acting at the behest of the Pakistan interior ministry and the Indian government.

There was no progress in the hearing on Saturday because of Rafique's transfer. The September 10 hearing too did not see any headway because of Lakhvi's petition seeking Rafique's transfer. LeT commander Lakhvi is one of the main accused in the case. He said in the petition that he could not expect justice from the judge. The prosecution believes that this petition was filed in anger after Rafique allowed the formation of panel, which is likely to visit India to examine eyewitnesses in the Mumbai attacks.

While the government refrained from going public with its reaction, sources said that the delay was in no way going to help the ongoing dialogue between the 2 countries. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh only last week said, without naming Pakistan, that cross-border terror camps had been reactivated.


See here for a chronology of court drama in Pakistan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2011 05:56 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00
Posts: 5765
In the meanwhile, back at the ranch, more biriyani for kasab :lol:

We really don't know when to quit. Due process, my @$$.

Why do our curiae have so much of amicus for kasab and afzal guru and that other JNU "professor" gilani??

Quote:
Further, the Bench referred to Mr. Geelani's untruthful pleas about his contacts with Afzal and Shaukat and said the needle of suspicion pointed to him. However, "suspicion alone is not sufficient to convict a person."


Due process: SC asks top lawyer to defend Kasab

Quote:
Wed Sep 21 2011,

Sending a strong signal of the supremacy of due process, the Supreme Court has approached senior advocate Raju Ramchandran to defend Ajmal Kasab in his death row appeal as amicus curiae of the court.



Kasab is the lone terrorist arrested for the Mumbai attacks that killed 164 people. His application for stay of execution of the death sentence is expected to come up in the apex court any time now.



The Bombay High Court had upheld the trial court’s award of death sentence in February.



Ramachandran, when contacted, confirmed the development.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2011 19:36 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Posts: 14014
Location: Chennai
Chetak, it doesn't really matter anymore. There won't be any hanging. Everybody suddenly seems to think in this wretched country that the State cannot extinguish any life even after all legal processes. Kasab, therefore, need not fear. As one Tamil political heavy-weight said in the context of the Rajiv killers, even condemned prisoners must be given an opportunity to turn a new life. Can there be a greater punishment than India releasing him thereby telling the worst doers that this is the way we are and that's how we punish benignly ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Oct 2011 20:44 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Posts: 13842
Location: Hindu Enclave, Narrow-Mind Street
Quick question - What phones (make, model) mumbai attackers used?

For example if they are black-berries or VoIP phones, then they are given by unkil to hide the traces??? what kind of issues there will be once the phone technology moves into cloud-computing? In such a scenario, even having the access to the h/w will not yield much intelligence.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Oct 2011 00:07 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 36470
Two contradictory reports

1 Wired magazine says Blackberries used:

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2008/12/the-gagdets-of/

2. Ind Exp says expert witness says Nokia phones made in PRC were used:
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cell- ... fr/502132/

Note Ind Exp says five mobiles (for abduls)were Nokia. Maybe the rest had BBs?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2011 15:33 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13
Posts: 5328
SC stays Kasab's death sentence, says he deserves to be heard


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2011 20:25 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30
Posts: 5842
x-posting


Don't give me death, I was brainwashed like a robot: Kasab
Quote:
NEW DELHI: Pakistani terrorist Ajmal Kasab facing death penalty for the 2008 Mumbai terror attack claimed in the Supreme Court he was brainwashed like a "robot" into committing the heinous crime in the name of "God" and that he does not deserve capital punishment owing to his young age.


What a disingenuous way of defending himself. I this argument is accepted then every Paki pig can come kill and plead same defense. The sooner he is hanged along with AG the better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2011 20:32 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28
Posts: 11027
Location: Beneath the pleasure dome of the great khan
maybe he will spill more beans?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2011 20:45 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30
Posts: 5842
we can always get other pigs to spill the beans which we already know but don't act, seemingly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2011 23:43 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 36470
I think the SC two bench judges are making a mockery of due process. Is it their contention that Kasab did not get due process? If not then what is their contention? And pontificating while sitting on the bench is ridiculous.

Kasab is not an ordinary criminal. He is part of a terrorist gang sent from Pakistan that killed Indian citizens. At a minimum he is responsible for the massacre at the train station and shooting death of the two policemen. What due process was not followed that the justices in their high perch saw?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Oct 2011 00:09 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 28 Jun 2007 06:36
Posts: 2749
Usually, all the death punishment cases are reviewed by the SC. It can be termed as SOP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Oct 2011 15:54 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30
Posts: 5842
Virupaksha wrote:
Usually, all the death punishment cases are reviewed by the SC. It can be termed as SOP.


No, if there is appeal by the convict/his lawyer then only.

After this there is mercy petition to Governor/President. and the all politicking that goes with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2011 19:10 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Posts: 14014
Location: Chennai
Pakistan judicial commission to visit India soon
Quote:
Pakistan on Friday informed India that its Judicial Commission, to interview certain important persons connected with the 26/11 terror attack case probe, would visit here soon.

Pakistani High Commissioner to India Shahid Malik who met Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram conveyed to him that Islamabad would be soon sending the Judicial Commission to carry forward the process of bringing the conspirators of 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai to justice.

"I came to inform the Minister that the Government of Pakistan will be sending the Judicial Commission to carry the process forward and I have mentioned that to the Minister. We will formally be informing the Indian government shortly,’’ he told journalists outside the North Block office of the Home Ministry after the meeting. He added that dates of the proposed visit of the Judicial Commission were yet to be finalised.

The Judicial Commission from Pakistan is to take the statements of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate R.V. Sawant Waghule and Investigating Officer Ramesh Mahale, who have recorded the confessional statement of Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving terrorist of the 26/11 attacks, to pursue the case there. It also wants to take the statement of the doctor who carried out the post mortem of the terrorists killed during the attack.

"The Government of India has been informed. The Home Minister has been informed by me that we will be sending a Commission. Now it is the Indian government to give us certain details,’’ the Pakistan High Commissioner said without disclosing further details.

During the Home Secretary-level talks in March, India agreed to a Pakistani proposal to host a Judicial Commission of that country.

Asked how soon the Commission will visit India, Mr. Malik said: "I cannot put a date to it. Now the process has started. So, I am sure it will take place soon. At the moment, I have come to inform the Home Minister that we have decided to send a Commission.’’

See here for a chronology of court drama in Pakistan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2011 19:20 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 8112
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
^^ In piskology type sentence:
the rapist is now coming over to conduct a investigation and wants to go to the victim's house to medically examine if the victim was indeed raped and just certify it and return back to his home.

And the victim and family seem to be eagerly looking forward to this visit instead of preparing to give a jhapad to the rapist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2011 18:03 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Posts: 14014
Location: Chennai
ATC summons 4 witnesses
Quote:
A Pakistani anti-terrorism court conducting the trial of seven suspects charged in the Mumbai attacks case summoned four prosecution witnesses on Saturday to record their statements at the next hearing on November 19.

Judge Shahid Rafique, who is conducting the trial in Rawalpindi's Adiala Jail for security reasons, summoned the witnesses to depose as proceedings got underway again following a delay of several weeks.

The case had been held up due to a petition filed in the Lahore High Court by Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the main accused in the case.

Lakhvi had sought the transfer of the case from Rawalpindi to Lahore, saying he had no confidence in Judge Rafique. The Lahore High Court dismissed Lakhvi's petition on October 31, saying the matter came under the jurisdiction of the Islamabad High Court. {Of course, the defence lawyers knew that they had to appeal to the newly created Islamabad High Court and yet they chose to appeal to the Lahore High Court in order to cause delay in the proceedings.}

The court said Lakhvi could approach the Islamabad High Court. Lakhvi's counsel Khwaja Sultan said his client had not yet decided whether to approach the Islamabad high court. {Of course, the Islamabad High Court will be approached}

Prosecution lawyer Chaudhry Zulfiqar said the anti-terrorism court had already dismissed Lakhvi's petition for shifting the case to Lahore.

See here for a chronology of court drama in Pakistan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Nov 2011 05:43 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 36470
For all those lamenting non-hanging of Kasab, recall that US hasn't even started trails of the 9/11 suspects that have been caught.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2011 19:34 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Posts: 14014
Location: Chennai
Pak ATC records FIA officer's statement


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2011 23:05 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 10176
ramana wrote:
For all those lamenting non-hanging of Kasab, recall that US hasn't even started trails of the 9/11 suspects that have been caught.


If US is the benchmark for us then we should also go in and take out known terrorist in Pakistan like US does .

US any ways is dealing with many figures involved in 9/11 , we are just dealing with a single individual caught by chance , hanging him will any way not solve our problem when the masterminds are free and we do precious little to get them overtly or covertly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2011 23:11 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25
Posts: 6690
ramana wrote:
For all those lamenting non-hanging of Kasab, recall that US hasn't even started trails of the 9/11 suspects that have been caught.


But they have killed the mastermind? how many Paki Khaki officers have we killed? None,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011 00:44 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jul 2006 02:38
Posts: 370
Location: MASA Land
ramana wrote:
Two contradictory reports

1 Wired magazine says Blackberries used:

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2008/12/the-gagdets-of/

2. Ind Exp says expert witness says Nokia phones made in PRC were used:
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cell- ... fr/502132/

Note Ind Exp says five mobiles (for abduls)were Nokia. Maybe the rest had BBs?

there was a news item which said that the terrorists used BB's from the people they killed in taj hotel.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2011 14:26 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25
Posts: 6690
Mahesh Bhatt gets adult film actress for Murder 3

Quote:
he Bhatts have decided to bring together ex-Bigg Boss housemate Rahul Bhatt


So people who were either injured or had their relatives killed on 26/11 can now reward this SOB with millions of rupees for helping David Headley in his recce activities. Wonderful how things for you if your are close to the INC hierarchy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Nov 2011 01:12 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24
Posts: 5438
Frenchman who could have stopped 08 Mumbai attacks | Bruguiere traced LeT links to US, France & Oz

Quote:
Could This Man’s Warnings Have Prevented the Mumbai Attacks?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline ... i-attacks/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Nov 2011 10:29 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30
Posts: 5842
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city ... 822552.cms

Quote:
So far, Rs 5.29 crore has been spent on setting up a special cell for Kasab. The expenditure on the deployment of ITBP has been Rs 10.87 crore; Rs 27,520 has been spent on food and Rs 26,953 on medicines. "The cost of food has been steadily rising but we are able to keep it roughly about Rs 25 per day," said the official.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Nov 2011 21:05 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 36470
chaanakya wrote:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Maharashtra-has-spent-Rs-16-crore-on-Kasab-so-far/articleshow/10822552.cms

Quote:
So far, Rs 5.29 crore has been spent on setting up a special cell for Kasab. The expenditure on the deployment of ITBP has been Rs 10.87 crore; Rs 27,520 has been spent on food and Rs 26,953 on medicines. "The cost of food has been steadily rising but we are able to keep it roughly about Rs 25 per day," said the official.


Shouldn't he worry about cost cutting for the large ITBP deployment! Does Kasab need such high level of security? The special cell is useful for future malcontents.

Looks like misplaced concern on the costs structure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Nov 2011 23:58 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 28 Oct 2008 05:42
Posts: 356
Location: Paikhana
The American Behind The 2008 Attack On Mumbai

Nice article worth reading


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 23 Nov 2011 00:04 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 36470
Folks Nov 26th is the third anniversary of the attack. Please do whatever to spread the awareness and have a moment of prayer for the victims and wish the dead terrorists are enjoying the jahliya.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2810 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ... 71  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group