ShivaS wrote:No body is clean even Lord Krishna was not clean, but he still upheld the law (Dharma)
Gandhiji was not clean for that matter
so we have to take every one to the cleaners otherwise there will be many proxy rules like SOnia G
One small correction ShivaS garu! There are few people who claim themselves to be Mr/Ms clean and they need to come out admitting their guilt and role in this scam. At least Burkha dutt did not claim to be an honest person, she said she was a good journalist and would go any extent to get what she wanted (paraphrasing).
On the other hand there are people who made their glory on clean image -
1. Mr Clean PM - This gentleman became PM of India on his clean image, or at least he did not correct anyone in media or party when they alleged him to be Mr. Clean.
2. Mata Clean - Rajamata claims herself, her late husband and her even later party are sparkling clean. She has to come out to the public with her own stink first.
3. Beta Clean - This gentleman wants clean politics and clean governance. Perhaps he can come out clean admitting the guilt of his grandpa, grandma, father, mother, and whole khandan...
XXX. I can bring every other name including ABV, NaM etc., but we are talking about 2G spectrum scam.
GOI is entrusted to do this exact job and UPA II failed to that job. I don't see much discussion around it. Burkha dutt is a small fly in this game. A smart mind (that cross-checks the information with other sources) would find BD's loyalties, favoritism, journalistic character by watching just 2-3 programs of hers.
If we were to argue that "the accuser is as dirty as the accused" then we don't need any discussion on any topic. That is a nice tactic by guilty to dodge answering the immediate question.
Whether its a compliment or not depends on side people take.
