Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2011

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
Vikas
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6828
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 02:40
Location: Where DST doesn't bother me
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Vikas »


On the Indian side, we have a prime minister, Manmohan Singh, and a leader of the Congress Party, Sonia
Gandhi, who I think understand one critically important fact: A jihadist Pakistan is the globe’s worst nightmare of the 21st century

And pray why should we worry about it? A jihadist Pakistan is already a nightmare for us. Once it becomes Globe's worst nightmare of the 21st century, Maybe they will stop feeding this virulent serpent.
In fact we should work towards making this local nightmare into truly Global one..
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25087
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by SSridhar »

That Bruce Riedel interview is one more confirmation of what the US understands about Pakistan, about India-Pakistan relationship and about India too. The American hug is far more dangerous to the integrity of this nation than the Russian embrace ever was. The present dispensation in India has succumbed lock, stock and barrel to it.

Somehow, everything is crawling out of the woodwork in the last few weeks.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25087
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by SSridhar »

ramana wrote:Nightwatch, 4/21/2011
The timing and the backdrop of strain in the US relationship suggest the new drone program is a bribe between so-called "allies" to permit the US drone campaign to continue..
abhishek_sharma wrote:From the Bruce Reidel's transcript posted above:
After Swat, they came -- the Pakistani air force came to us and said we need to have the advanced radar systems and guidance systems to be able to do a proper job. Now, that was a hard policy decision for the Obama Administration, a very tough policy decision. Because the same radar systems, the same advanced avionics that allow you to attack a target in the Swat Valley will also be perfect for attacking an Indian armored column in the Punjab someday. But these are the kind of real-world decisions that we have to make about Pakistan.
Whether it is a "bribe" as Nightwatch opines or it is "sanity" as Riedel opines, Pakistan has got everything from Nuclear weapons to drones from the Americans. It is little consolation to India which justification is proffered.
Vikas
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6828
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 02:40
Location: Where DST doesn't bother me
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Vikas »

^ and on top of it, India is asked to understand Paki position and compromise by removing forces from the border (for Pakis to walk in easily),
Give Kashmir to Pakistan, don't hold Pakis responsible for terror attacks in India while we arm them to teeth.
Add to it, They also want us to finance this Paki adventure by buying US nuclear reactors & Planes at inflated prices.

Do they take us for suckers...
saadhak
BRFite
Posts: 188
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 21:37

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by saadhak »

Kamboja wrote:The reason you didn't find any hits was that you were searching for http://markazdawa.org, whereas you need to insert a 'www.' before the website address.
Thank you Kamboja - I should've thought of it :oops:
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7807
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Anujan »

What I found funny was this passage
Now, that was a hard policy decision for the Obama Administration, a very tough policy decision. Because the same radar systems, the same advanced avionics that allow you to attack a target in the Swat Valley will also be perfect for attacking an Indian armored column in the Punjab someday. But these are the kind of real-world decisions that we have to make about Pakistan. I think the Obama Administration did the right thing. It gave them those avionics, which may come back to haunt us someday, but in the real world it was the right decision to make.
Apparently the americans thought long and hard and decided that the fact that one day F16s will be used against India was an "acceptable risk".....to America.
Vikas
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6828
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 02:40
Location: Where DST doesn't bother me
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Vikas »

^ Exactly, So why should India not help Pakistan become Global nightmare rather than a local one for us. Someday Gazi's from pakistan will fly the same F-16's, same Manpads and sneak thru same submarines and bomb places far and off in the western world where US interests lie. It may so happen that Gazi's may explode bombs in some places in India too but in the real world it is the right decision to make.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7807
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Anujan »

http://thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail ... =4/23/2011

Apparently Pakis want their defence budget pegged in US dollars, even they know that Paki rupee can be used only in Pakistan :rotfl:
abhishek_sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9664
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by abhishek_sharma »

Pakistan: A Hard Country; Deadly Embrace: Pakistan, America, and the Future of the Global Jihad
The much shorter book Deadly Embrace is in a sense a primary source about U.S. policy toward Pakistan. Riedel, a veteran CIA official, was brought out of retirement in early 2009 by the Obama administration to chair a special committee reviewing Washington's policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan. His conclusion is that a "jihadist state" is possible in Pakistan and a proactive U.S. policy to forestall that danger is needed. Thus, readers are presented with the conundrum of two intelligent specialists making plausible but opposing arguments, the one giving priority to Western withdrawal and the other to what in the Raj days would have been dubbed a "forward," or activist, policy.
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11242
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Gagan »

WRT the 85 Raven drones that the US is giving the Pakistanis.

This is a highly destabilizing move and will shift the power balance in the subcontinent entirely. Here is a youtube video displaying the intricacies of this khatarnaak UAV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQWZdmXcv-g


:((
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11242
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Gagan »

VikasRaina wrote:^ Exactly, So why should India not help Pakistan become Global nightmare rather than a local one for us. Someday Gazi's from pakistan will fly the same F-16's, same Manpads and sneak thru same submarines and bomb places far and off in the western world where US interests lie. It may so happen that Gazi's may explode bombs in some places in India too but in the real world it is the right decision to make.
The problem is that these far off lands are paying pakistan today to not attack them in the future.

India will be the soft target next door with a pliant leadership, which doesn't pay jaziya to the ghazis. Hence the ghazis will direct their ire and energies to conquest the vast rich land of india. Green flag on Red Fort etc.

Ambitions of making Pakistan a global problem need to be followed up by a nationalist leadership at the very minimum.
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by RajeshA »

Every now and again we Indians we get shocked to hear that the world, that the Americans are willing to screw us for an ugly whore, even though we have been model citizens of this world!

After a while, we say the same thing to ourselves: perhaps the fault lies with us, we are not pure enough, we have to show even more faith in America and its intrinsic virtues! What we are doing is, is the same thing the Pakis do! If something goes wrong in Pakiland, they too tell themselves that they have not been true to the faith, and they need to become more Islamic, while we tell us, we need to become even more pro-American!

So are we all Pakis? After all we share common descent!

As long as India does not play her own game, India would continue to be screwed! America would listen to Indian concerns and back off, if at all, only if they feel an Indian long longdee long up their musharrafs tickling their tonsils!

Sometimes I think, it doesn't even matter what game we play, with whatever goal we play, as long as we play, we are good, because it would prove one thing - we too can play!

Of course there are umpteen proposals about what game we can play! But first we need the heart to play any one game, anything other than the game of appeasement!
sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10195
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by sum »

But these are the kind of real-world decisions that we have to make about Pakistan. I think the Obama Administration did the right thing. It gave them those avionics, which may come back to haunt us someday, but in the real world it was the right decision to make.
Sigh...and we continue to thank Americans for this great "sacrifice" by embracing them as "strategic partners" and buying 10-20B $ worth of arms so that they can make more hard decisions and subsidize more goodies to Pakis next door..

Could someone kindly send this Reidel interview to MMS for him to read and digest it?
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by shiv »

List of bullshit from the Bruce Riedel pdf
http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/ ... mbrace.pdf
And just three or four years ago, the Pakistani people, in a
generally peaceful way, overthrew a dictator and brought in democratic
elections, probably the most democratic in Pakistani history. I didn’t say
they were free and fair. Pakistan’s probably never had a free and fair
election. But it got a lot closer in 2008 than it ever has before. So let’s not
underestimate the Pakistani people’s desire for a better future,
Rubbish. 1971 was the closest Pakistan got to a free and fair election. They actually had working political parties back then.


A failed or jihadist Pakistan means the hope of a bright,
shining India as one of the great countries of the 21st century will never
happen. You cannot become the most successful country in the world if
your neighbor next door is sick with paralyzing political problems, with
terrorism, and is a patron state of terror against you.
Why? We have had a sick Jihadist Pakistan next door since 1947. We would probably not have armed ourselves so heavily but would nevertheless have come up if it wasn't for the US encouraging Pakistan with a wink and a nudge. What's with all the pretence now?
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by anupmisra »

Gagan wrote:WRT the 85 Raven drones that the US is giving the Pakistanis. This is a highly destabilizing move and will shift the power balance in the subcontinent entirely. Here is a youtube video displaying the intricacies of this khatarnaak UAV :((
Great! Paki plans to conquer the world are now complete. Coupled with this "stealthy" Raven and that locally mass-produced "hell-e-kapter", the pakis are now a formidable force to reckon with. Indians must be $hitting bricks in their dhotis. Time to buy this hi-tech ballistic missile system for an effective response:

Image
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11242
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Gagan »

GASP !!!
You have just posted the photo of the Taap Secret TELAR of the Raptor drone.

I'm shivering onlee
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7807
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Anujan »

Here is a bit of Lulz for you guys. Samar Mubarakmand says Pakistan has the technology to shoot down the drones. It has......F16s!!
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by anupmisra »

Anujan wrote:Here is a bit of Lulz for you guys. Samar Mubarakmand says Pakistan has the technology to shoot down the drones. It has......F16s!!
If they do that, it will be time to write to my congressman. Pakis are using our technology to shoot down our systems that are meant to keep tabs on how our money is being spent by the pakis to protect our interests.
Cosmo_R
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3407
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 01:24

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Cosmo_R »

anupmisra wrote:
Anujan wrote:Here is a bit of Lulz for you guys. Samar Mubarakmand says Pakistan has the technology to shoot down the drones. It has......F16s!!
If they do that, it will be time to write to my congressman. Pakis are using our technology to shoot down our systems that are meant to keep tabs on how our money is being spent by the pakis to protect our interests.
But is this not all part of the nefarious/Machiavellian US plan from the git go? This strategy may not make sense to mere mortals but to General Atomics and LM it makes eminent dollars and sense.

The strategy is to give pakis so many arms and so much money that they cry 'unkil' :)
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11242
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Gagan »

Pervez Hoodbhoy speaking at the Karachi Literary Festival

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF5SLy9elJc
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 872
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by jrjrao »

SMITH: Why Pakistan will betray us
The question isn’t if - it’s why

This latest series of rifts may indeed prove more damaging and permanent than previous disruptions, but they fit all too neatly in the general narrative of U.S.-Pakistan relations. One day Islamabad is touted as an indispensable ally; the next it is a back-stabbing fountain of Islamist militancy. For the longest time, these competing tensions were encapsulated in the Washington debate over whether or not Pakistan was playing a “double game.”

But we were debating the wrong question. Of course Pakistan is playing a double game. Of course its intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), supports Islamist militants. The relevant question is not if Pakistan is playing a double game, but why? The simplest answer is that Pakistan believes it needs a pliant, anti-Indian regime in Afghanistan and - as it has for decades - Pakistan is using Islamist militants as an extension of its foreign policy.

...Pakistan is fearful of Indian influence in Afghanistan. Around every corner in Kabul, Pakistanis see Indian agents and behind every Afghan initiative, a nefarious Hindu plot. That India’s presence in Afghanistan has been benign, civilian and economic in nature has not stopped the ISI from backing brazen jihadi attacks on the Indian Embassy in Kabul.

Of course, none of Pakistan’s “interests” in Afghanistan justify its backing fanatical jihadists that slaughter the innocent, the majority of which are Muslim. But Washington must better understand the misguided logic behind Pakistan’s double game if it insists on being a party to it until 2014. Pakistan, on the other hand, has been obsessing for so long over a phantom menace, it is blind to the real threat to its strategic interests: a fundamental split with the United States. Ten years of supporting America’s Islamist enemies has poisoned its reputation in America. Its once-mighty defenders in Washington are isolated and shrinking in number, while a younger generation of policymakers knows nothing of Pakistan but militancy, corruption and deception. When the United States inevitably departs Afghanistan, so too, will Pakistan’s “leverage” over America. Only then will Pakistan’s leadership realize the true cost of their double game.

Jeff M. Smith is a fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council.
Vikas
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6828
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 02:40
Location: Where DST doesn't bother me
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Vikas »

Gagan wrote:
VikasRaina wrote:^ Exactly, So why should India not help Pakistan become Global nightmare rather than a local one for us. Someday Gazi's from pakistan will fly the same F-16's, same Manpads and sneak thru same submarines and bomb places far and off in the western world where US interests lie. It may so happen that Gazi's may explode bombs in some places in India too but in the real world it is the right decision to make.
The problem is that these far off lands are paying pakistan today to not attack them in the future.

India will be the soft target next door with a pliant leadership, which doesn't pay jaziya to the ghazis. Hence the ghazis will direct their ire and energies to conquest the vast rich land of india. Green flag on Red Fort etc.

Ambitions of making Pakistan a global problem need to be followed up by a nationalist leadership at the very minimum.
Gaganji, That's why we have to help TSP's IT to become truly global. How long they can focus on low hanging fruit like Yindia. There are bigger Satan's to be vanquished. Already we have seen split between Jehadists on focusing on India vs the World.
All we have to do is to provide right ambiance. Green flag on Red fort is so passe'. Now is the time to fly Sabz-hilali on Buckingham palace.

News like the Florida pastor burning Quran should be made available to ordinary Abdul's for appropriate response... After all a country has to do what a country has to do.

Let's work towards move this Paki problem from being at the Municipality to UNO level.
Chandragupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3469
Joined: 07 Dec 2008 15:26
Location: Kingdom of My Fair Lady

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Chandragupta »

VikasRaina wrote: Gaganji, That's why we have to help TSP's IT to become truly global. How long they can focus on low hanging fruit like Yindia. There are bigger Satan's to be vanquished. Already we have seen split between Jehadists on focusing on India vs the World.
All we have to do is to provide right ambiance. Green flag on Red fort is so passe'. Now is the time to fly Sabz-hilali on Buckingham palace.

News like the Florida pastor burning Quran should be made available to ordinary Abdul's for appropriate response... After all a country has to do what a country has to do.

Let's work towards move this Paki problem from being at the Municipality to UNO level.
[Chankian Hat on]
Is that what Shri MMS is trying to do? Make SDREs look meek & afraid in front of TFTA Paki rackit mards so that the jehadis no longer paint a big red saffron target at our heads and instead look at the martial Americans & Europeans for their glory.
[Chankian Hat off]
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by shiv »


Great article.

This suggests that Pakistan’s perceived interests in Afghanistan are India-centric. However, the fear of ethnic (specifically Pashtun and Baluch) nationalism may play an even greater role in Pakistan’s strategy, penetrating to the heart of what constitutes Pakistani identity and the integrity of the Pakistani state.
The following video illustrates what is being said in the article
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_8TnRPHDCQ
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7113
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Muppalla »

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 065855.cms
LONDON: Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh opened secret talks with Pakistan Army chief ten months ago to build on the cricket-inspired diplomatic thaw between the two countries, a media report said on Saturday.

Singh "appointed an unofficial envoy to make contact with General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, Pakistan's chief of the army staff who exercises de facto control over foreign policy," The Times reported.

The talks, through a back channel, have encouraged the UK and US believe that the countries competition for influence in Afghanistan could be better managed during efforts to start a peace process, it said.

The visit of Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani to watch the semi-final match between India and Pakistan in the cricket World Cup last month has sparked hope of a diplomatic thaw between the two neighbouring countries.

Kayani visited Kabul this week to meet members of the high peace council, a body set up by Afghan President Hamid Karzai, to build contacts with Taliban groups.

The army chief was accompanied by General Ahmad Shuja Pasha, head of Pakistan's powerful Inter-Services Intelligence agency.
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11242
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Gagan »

Shiv saar,
Perfect title! So peaceful, the liberals are gonna lou it.
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2426
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Brad Goodman »

Pakistan Army Chief: Forces Have 'Broken the Back' of Insurgents
Pakistan's army chief says his forces have "broken the back" of insurgents linked to the Taliban and al-Qaida, following criticism from Washington that Pakistan's security forces are not doing enough to fight militancy.
TTP will do a brokeback mountain on the gazi forces :((
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2426
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Brad Goodman »

such a generous and benovalent gesture from martial race

‘Pakistan players willing to play World Series in India’

now this will end India's isolation in world of sports
Former Pakistan hockey captain Muhammad Saqlain has hinted that certain players are willing to play in the new multimillion dollar World Series in India even after being warned not to. The series replicates the pattern of the popular Indian Premier League but has been declared as a no-go area by the International Hockey Federation (FIH).
:roll:
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2426
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Brad Goodman »

ju kaffirs we need electricity on the double

Electricity shortfall jumps to 6,000 megawatts
Electricity shortfall has jumped up to 6,000 megawatts, plaguing the country with long durations of power outages.

According to sources, Pakistan Electric Power Company (Pepco) has yanked the powers of distribution companies and has taken control of the loadshedding schedules. Many grid stations have been shut down simultaneously from the Islamabad control centre.

Reports indicated that Pepco is running short on oil and Pakistan State Oil (PSO) refuses to provide more oil. More than 16 hours of black outs have been reported in Lahore and Gujranwala. Multan, DG Khan and adjoining area residents have been without without power for 12 to 16 hours a day. In interior Sindh there have been six to eight hours of loadshedding. Some villages in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa are going without electricity from 6am to 7pm.
I am amazed how brazenly pakis have copied Americans in past. Isloo street signs are same as DC. The forest department copied signs of state parks in US now they named their power company Pepco to copy the local company that supplies power to Washington DC and neighbouring Maryland counties. The funny part is Pepco is the worst service provider in US ranked at bottom for its services :rotfl:
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2426
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Brad Goodman »

Facing Sania would be "dream come true", says Pak ace
Pakistan's top-ranked woman tennis player Ushna Suhail has said that she is ready to face Indian tennis sensation Sania Mirza at the Wagah Border, if the Pakistan Tennis Federation (PTF) includes a women's event in the proposed Indo-Pak tennis series. Ushna said that although Sania was an experienc ed player and featured among the top 30 players at international rankings, yet she would like to play a tennis match with the Indian to gain exposure in the sport.
WTF first kirkit then hockey and now tennis now sone pe suhaga wimmens playing rakaid mard sport :cry: :cry: :cry:
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2426
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Brad Goodman »

ju kaffirs ISI is watching your acts

ISI takes notice of Indian aggression
The might of Pakistan’s premier intelligence agency, ISI can be gauged from the fact that it has taken a serious notice of the civilian government’s ‘failure’ in raising objections over alleged ‘Indian aggression’ on Pakistan’s water rights and securing international carbon credits on hydropower projects disputed by Islamabad.

According to sources, the ISI came into action after receiving reports that at least two federal ministries — of water and power and environment — had absolved themselves of negligence.

The ISI then lodged a strong protest with the government in Islamabad besides initiating an inquiry to investigate institutional lapse in raising objections over Indian aggression on the country’s water rights.

The top brass of ISI believes that the water issue is of vital national importance for Pakistan and it would recommend strong action against the officials found involved in negligence.

The main concern is how could India secure the credits disregarding Pakistan’s objections over the projects at the Permanent Indus Water Commission.
some politicians needs to sent to meet Salman Tasser for this act
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2426
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by Brad Goodman »

Overseas Pakistanis oppose dual nationality bill

British Pakistanis have reacted angrily to the private NA bill seeking to introduce a new constitutional provision that would disqualify dual nationality holders from public office, including Parliament.

At a meeting held here to protest the introduction of the controversial bill in the Lower House leading British Pakistanis condemned the bill, and said if approved, it would damage Pakistan economically, socially and culturally. Those who spoke on the occasion also included those British Pakistanis who have either served as assembly members or are seeking elected public office in the future
Hameed Pothi, who was until recently member of the Kashmir Council, said that bill was a conspiracy against overseas Pakistanis and it would only harm Pakistan and would achieve nothing. He proposed that the government should introduce measures to catch the crooks who are busy stealing the wealth of Pakistan, not those who are helping Pakistan through remittances.
Conspiracy is used by pakis in the same way as kleenex is used by americans or rather charmin (to wipe musharraf) every ones uses it once or more than once when ever they get the urge
amdavadi
BRFite
Posts: 1489
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by amdavadi »

creating pakiland was conspiracy by yindu bania..
sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10195
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by sum »

Ten years of supporting America’s Islamist enemies has poisoned its reputation in America. Its once-mighty defenders in Washington are isolated and shrinking in number, while a younger generation of policymakers knows nothing of Pakistan but militancy, corruption and deception.
Sorry but couldn't resist the comparison with Yindoos next door of Pak-land.
Am thinking the same thing is happening here with old WKKs like MMS, Kuldip Nayar, IK Gujral etc slowly fading away and the newer generation having no illusion of the sliminess of the Poak snake, even if it took us 60 years..
arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by arun »

Demonstration of the IED Mubarak variant of the IEDology of Pakistan at Salarzai town in Bajaur:

Five die in Pakistan suicide attack
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by anupmisra »

Brad Goodman wrote:such a generous and benovalent gesture from martial race.‘Pakistan players willing to play World Series in India’ now this will end India's isolation in world of sports
Don't kid yourself. There will be a day when PCB will demand its share of $$ from BCCI earnings through IPL because so many pakis watch the game.
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by CRamS »

Many in the India-US relations thread suggested that ambassador Sen is an uber patriot. But I am waiting for an uber patriot of a different kind. Its now established in the open after years of obfuscation that TSP's murder of Indians is official state policy to secure its interests in Kashmir and Afganisthan. Its now justified by the likes of Riedel and many others that India is on its way to super powerdom bla bla and hence must give whatever Paki murderers want.

So is there an uber patriot out there in New Delhi, whose view are heard in Washington and London, that US should cut all the sophistry, and he/she must start the real debate. Why is US so insistent on supporting and propping up a terrorist abomination to contain India. I mean Ronen Sen instead of talking nonsense about why nuke liability bill is bad faith towards USA, tell him to ask the real patriotic question, is US supporting the terrorist abomination TSP to contain India good faith on part of US?
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Mar. 29, 2

Post by shyamd »

CRamS wrote:Many in the India-US relations thread suggested that ambassador Sen is an uber patriot. But I am waiting for an uber patriot of a different kind. Its now established in the open after years of obfuscation that TSP's murder of Indians is official state policy to secure its interests in Kashmir and Afganisthan. Its now justified by the likes of Riedel and many others that India is on its way to super powerdom bla bla and hence must give whatever Paki murderers want.
GoI knows TSP is behind attacks. But in their PoV why waste resources that we can use to grow our economy - lets spend our money on education, health, roads and get our economy moving. TSP will just die off trying to compete with us - This is our strategic calculation. Problem is TSP (and its backers) are getting frustrated that India isn't getting drawn into a conflict. What we should argue for is an effective covert force to strike terror planners. But even here I think the strategists don't want to give an excuse for Pak. Think long term.
Locked