Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 25 May 2013 05:57

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 131 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 13 May 2008 18:55 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 13 Feb 2007 22:17
Posts: 49
Meenaji,


you have mixed up HPT-32 crash and Hawk crash together! You too want to "FIX" HAL?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 13 May 2008 18:59 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4276
rrao

relax

shes posting a news link


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 14 May 2008 05:47 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
rrao wrote:

you have mixed up HPT-32 crash and Hawk crash together! You too want to "FIX" HAL?


Technically nrao is right. From the days when the IAF accident rate was high there has been a thread called "flight safety" in which news links of accidents should be placed.

This thread was a special for this unique case.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 05 Jun 2008 20:23 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
cross post
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/BA ... es/318757/

Quote:
BAE joins IAF blame game on Hawk spares
Huma Siddiqui
Posted online: Thursday , June 05, 2008 at 2323 hrs IST


New Delhi, Jun 4 Even as Indian Air Force cries foul over spares supply by its UK suppliers, BAE Systems has put a question mark on the optimal utilisation of Hawk advance jet trainers fleet by the services. Sources talking to FE on condition of anonymity said that, "There will be serviceability problems. The Indian Air Forcedid not order the required spares until very late and not all those spares have been received yet because of long lead times for manufacturing."
The supplementary spares package which contains 1400 lines of spares, was submitted in February 2006 and was not contracted until January 2008 despite repeated reminders, sources said. This follows claims by the IAF there are problems with servicability of the aircraft as the UK based BAE Systems is not fulfilling its commitment of supplying of modern spare parts for the aircraft.
Sources also revealed that the Hawk AJTis just being flown by Indian Air Force for merely a few hours a week. “The Bidar air force station in Karnataka which is currently getting ready to train the IAF cadets is hardly flying the aircraft for more than a few hours a week. So, how can there be a question of serviceability, when the machines are not being used,"sources pointed out.
The report of the court of inquiry that was ordered by the Indian Air Force (IAF) into the mishap which led to the British Hawk AJT, valued around Rs 85 crore, being completely destroyed, is expected to come out with its report shortly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk crashes
PostPosted: 18 Jun 2008 21:08 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
yet another cross post
Kakkaji wrote:
Kakarat wrote:



From the above link:

Quote:
Also, according to some reports, BAE Systems has been mounting a highly unsavoury unofficial campaign by painting the IAF as a bunch of incompetent chaps who don't know how to handle new aircraft, or how frequently to use them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk crashes
PostPosted: 18 Jun 2008 21:27 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 25 Sep 2006 04:16
Posts: 1228
^^^ Hmmm that would be real stupid thing to do by BAE. By branding IAF as incompetent, they are not really doing any good to their MRCA bid!.

Wasn't there a report saying a British pilot was also involved in the accident?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk crashes
PostPosted: 18 Jun 2008 22:43 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 07 Feb 2007 16:58
Posts: 1610
Either that or BAE has judged that the Indian market is probably not worth ruining their reputation in the global market for by saying they supplied faulty parts or that there was some other defect that was traced back to them.

As regards the smear campaign: that was the expected strategy all along, wasn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk crashes
PostPosted: 20 Jun 2008 01:21 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 358
sunilUpa wrote:
^^^ Hmmm that would be real stupid thing to do by BAE. By branding IAF as incompetent, they are not really doing any good to their MRCA bid!.

Wasn't there a report saying a British pilot was also involved in the accident?



viewtopic.php?p=487164#p487164


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk crashes
PostPosted: 12 Sep 2008 23:50 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 358
Posting this here as this deals with a hawk crash - but in UK on 20th August

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/engl ... 572833.stm

Airmen injured in RAF jet crash

Quote:
"The aircraft itself came to a standstill in the car park, adjacent to air traffic control.

"There's some damage to the aircraft and there was also some damage to three vehicles that were in the car park.



"some damage"

some? Did they say some?

doesnt look like some to me :shock:

http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l261/ ... hForum.jpg

more pics here

http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/inde ... t&p=223342


Last edited by Rahul M on 12 Sep 2008 23:54, edited 1 time in total.
please don't post large images inline, it screws up the page format. tutorial for resizing images is available at misc pics thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk crashes
PostPosted: 13 Sep 2008 00:21 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 15 Jun 2006 17:09
Posts: 146
One more link...

Pictured: The dramatic scene after a 'Red Arrows' Hawk jet crash-landed and smashed into RAF base


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk crashes
PostPosted: 13 Sep 2008 06:26 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
This therad was started specifically for the discussion about a crashed IAF Hawk.
IOW IB4TL :P


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 131 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group