Bharat Rakshak

OK enough veering off topic. Please get back to the thread title, thanks.

From the article linked by Singha:



Some questions for the communication gurus:

1. Are these data and pcitures signals sent over the radio network more difficult to intercept/jam than voice signals?

2. As a related question, would radio 'silence' be maintained even if such text data signals are sent/received?

3. Is it a simple matter for two platoons, say, to communicate between themselves over this network as opposed to sending their data back to the company and then being appraised of each other's situations?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If the answers are yes, this would be a huge force multiplier at the small unit level. SLA Marshall's book 'Men Under Fire - The Problem of Battlefield Command' (written soon after WWII, admittedly) talks of how many reverses were caused by lack of lateral communication between the flanks of a unit.

Yes. With encryption and error protected coding, the data terminal would be practically impossible to intercept and difficult to jam. However, voice also can go in the same channel, in digitized form. If the comparison is with the traditional radio, this mode of communication is several orders of magnitude better.



It depends. For text, the duration of the radio burst would be very short. An SMS like phrase can be transmitted in matter of milliseconds, and can be encoded to look like a noise pulse. But sending a picture will take more time, and radio signal will be present for that duration.



The range of the handheld units would be tens of kilometres, depending upon terrain. Technologically, it makes no difference whether the communication is between two field units or to a central location. So, I would imagine they will actually do that. there is an advantage too. If one unit is in a forward position and out of range of the command, another unit can relay info.

The technologies for this platform are well established and well within the capabilities. All we need from outside are the hardware parts :-( (processor, memory, comm ASIC, LCD panel etc).

Dileep,

Please email me at breadomlette at yahoo dot com.

regards
Sunil

Done.

Dileep,thanks for the clarifications.

For what it's worth, in my opinion, when these Simputers become available in numbers, it will be a big improvement in the IA's operational edge. Effective communication and situational awareness at the section and platoon level translates to success at the company and battalion levels. As training modules adapt to utilize better cross-communication within the same heirarchical level, there will be reduced information flow towards higher heirarchies and correspondingly reduced orders flow from the higher heirarchies, freeing the higher commanders to concentrate on the bigger picture. This will allow the concept of 'Directive Control' to be practised more effectively. Only what is continuously practised in peace-time can hope to be implemented during wartime.

Waiting for the real soldiers on this board to step in and correct any fallacies .

It sounds nice to have such facilities near the battlefield.But I wonder if such airconditioned truck will have a thermal prominence against a backdrop unless it is in the thick of the smoke and fire or equally hot zone. Will this not give its position out to any loitering UAV with thermal sensors.It is meant to used in the rear areas of the thrust however if it is a nerve centre then it is target worth attacking in the first place to break the network.
If these networking gadgets fall in enemy hands how safe are they from exposing other nodes in the battlefield. How does one manage if a node goes out or falls to the enemy and should be disconnected immediately from the rest of the network.

I would imagine the TATRAS to be cooler than a tank, but hotter than a troop movement vehicle. Its visibility in IR does not create a huge difference IMO, because everything else, including troops tents, will be visible as well.

Security is a major concern. The SATIs reportedly have a self destruct mechanism. Any computing system that goes to the field should have one anyway.

The data will be encrypted. Even the freely available encryption like PGP is next to impossible to crack. The only way the enemy can get anything out of a SATI is by making the signalman talk. That too not far geographically from his expected location. Same with the other info vehicles and locations. Even if the enemy gets all the flash chips of the SATI intact, they can do nothing with it.

What does Vajra Shakti mean?

Vajra - Indra's weapon, the thunderbolt

Shakti - Power

personally I would have been happy with "Vajra-danti", to rip mushy a new tighter aperture between the pomegranates

what with its canine like associations, would have been a good psy-ops blow to the old H&D as well...

http://www.deccan.com/home/homedetails. ... ital%20eye

Indian army to get digital eye


New Delhi, May 14: The Indian Army’s infantry will now get a digital eye. The Army has been testing the hand-held Simputer, which is to be given to the soldiers of the Ghatak platoon who lead an attack in an operation, to send back images of the battle-ground to operation headquarters.

Once fully adopted, the Indian Army will become one of the few forces to use such a system. The Army bought some Simputer units, developed indigenously by the Indian Institute of Science, earlier this year. It has been testing it in various locations, including in anti-terrorist operations in Jammu and Kashmir. It was also tried out during the recent Vajra Shakti exercise in the plains of Punjab.
An officer of the Corps of Signals, which has made some innovations to make the Simputer compatible for transmitting images, said the hand-held device will be carried by soldiers of the Ghatak platoon.

The soldiers are given a digital still camera. After taking photographs of the area of operation, the soldiers can transmit it to operation headquarters from the battlefield. The officer said this is in contrast to the earlier practice of verbally transferring information through normal communication devices. Commanders will now get precise information to enable them to plan strikes. The official said the system has been working fine and has proved to be very effective.

Only a particular brand of the digital camera has been made compatible with the Simputer. It can take photographs from a distance of 300 metres. The procedure involves soldiers of the Ghatak platoon being dropped by helicopter in the operation area. Armed with the latest light-weight devices, they can send credible feedback to military planners.

The Simputer is just one of the many digital surveillance systems adopted by the Army to enhance its fighting capabilities. The thrust of the Army has been on force multipliers, which are important for fighting futuristic battles. The use of hand-held computers is just the Army’s way of taking the digital revolution to the infantry soldier level. It has already started using advanced surveillance equipment acquired from Israel and satellite imagery.

These Simputer r also known as SATHI (Situation Awareness and Tactical Handheld Information)
Tech Details: http://www.ncoretech.com/sathi/pdf/sathi.pdf

sathi and simputer are different
simputer is more like a pda while sathi was developed exclusively for army
http://www.simputer.org/

Simputer was first developed as a hand held computer. Then SATHI was derived from that platform by the same company. They are NOT the same, but related. I am sure same operating system is used, and a lot of applications too.

The Simputer as a business is a failure. I think SATHI can save that company if military fully inducts it.

Hi, I'm new to the forum,

I'd like to discuss the new Cold Start doctrine, and the new SouthWestern command.

What impact will it have on Pakistan's strategic policies and tactics?

I feel this is long overdue, since we have allowed Pak to wage low-level warfare against us for long enough. Even after discovering their nuclear deterrent, we should have still adopted this Cold Start policy as our own reciprocal form of "enhanced low-level" warfare, to keep the situation at a level just one notch above their preferred guerrilla war approach.

So why have we suddenly gotten wise, and adopted Cold Start? Why and how did we suddenly smarten up?

Has there been some kind of change in the strategic/geo-political scene that has allowed us to do this? Is it because Pakistan has a lot of forces tied down on the Afghan border? Is that what's made Cold Start feasible?

Will we be able to practice the hot-pursuit forward policy prescribed by Cold Start, or will it be something that only exists on paper?