Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 18 Dec 2014 23:03

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3922 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 ... 99  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 07:40 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 05 Apr 2008 17:29
Posts: 617
Location: Skardu
Quote:
On our own track, we will fund ourselves. Baba Kalyani is willing to commit Rs 100 crore for this.”

Going by the kamandu heights DPSUs record , I hope this guy succeeds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 07:51 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 33969
Location: Col of the regiment, ORR JTF unit
> what India lacks is the ability to convert designs into manufactured products.

well said. and about parallel efforts remember khan tries N ways of solving a problem by using competiting proposals upto eval stage and sometimes even awards a split to 2 protos. its necessary to widen the skill base and prevent single points of failure.
all power to him. good move to start off with the voest alpine gun. a DRDO doing thing would have to move N^10 files through MOD all the while harassed by the media and foreign agents.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GC-45_howitzer
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... 45rear.jpg (with APU removed it looks like)

details about the austrian gun...amazingly its a 'son' of the legendary GC-45 gerald bull gun that marked the quantum leap into all modern howitzers .... Denel called its version the G5, israeli bought rights to it and Soltam makes it, NORINCO licensed it and so did the austrians to make the GHN-45 ..

so its a proven and good design, the most illustrious bloodline in modern arty for sure. a gun born of the immortal blood of the vampire elders.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 08:17 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 8351
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
^^ Really heartening to read Baba Kalyani's words and the determination shown ( atleast in his words).

Hope that the baboozes don't derail this and force him to abandon it due to some inane red-tape ( like how L&T's sub building complex is now rotting since MDL got a veto for P-75I also)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 08:51 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4667
if by 2015 we have this approved for service i will start visiting a temple


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 14:16 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 14 Apr 2010 11:27
Posts: 131
L&T and Samsung-Techwin Team up for Artillery Gun Programme

Quote:
A proposal to develop the 155mm/52 calibre tracked, self propelled artillery, with L&T as the lead partner, had been submitted last year to the Ministry of Defence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 14:49 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 8351
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
^^ Well, Samsung seems to be in a hurry to join the "elite" list of companies black-listed by MoD.... godspeed to them on that :mrgreen: :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 14:52 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Mar 2009 11:38
Posts: 1872
Location: Perpetrating thrice-cursed acts of treachery
Surya wrote:
if by 2015 we have this approved for service i will distribute mithai worth it's weight

Quoted for posterity :P :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 15:19 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Jan 2012 21:18
Posts: 122
akimalik wrote:
L&T and Samsung-Techwin Team up for Artillery Gun Programme

Quote:
A proposal to develop the 155mm/52 calibre tracked, self propelled artillery, with L&T as the lead partner, had been submitted last year to the Ministry of Defence.



SP's Show News claims the L&T is joining hand with Nexter for towed gun contest. It's raining gun! :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 15:26 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 1095
Location: Land of the free
Its only thundering guns..... from a long time.....
It is yet to rain............


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 16:13 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Sep 2011 02:13
Posts: 264
none of the guns can be fielded before 2015, as a stop gap measure, some guns could have been imported to meet operational reqts. The alarm raised by the army chief is about operational deficiencies in the present and 2015 is a long way off.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 16:32 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Jan 2012 21:18
Posts: 122
Ivanev wrote:
none of the guns can be fielded before 2015, as a stop gap measure, some guns could have been imported to meet operational reqts. The alarm raised by the army chief is about operational deficiencies in the present and 2015 is a long way off.



It will take at least 30 months from issuing rfp to awarding contract if there is no re-trial and cancellation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 16:57 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Dec 2006 16:48
Posts: 545
Location: Bangalore
Singha wrote:
the 10th mountain seems to have:
4 brigades + 1 aviation brigade
each brigade has
2 x infantry
1 x cavalry
1 x field artillery
not sure what the cavalry uses - Stryker or bradley or if they have tanks also.


10th retains 'Mountain' only due to its history. In reality it is more of a light infantry division. Hence, the presence of 'cavalry'. The only US Army unit that specialize in Mountain warfare is the Vermont National Guard's 3rd Battalion 172nd Infantry Regiment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 17:08 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 30 Apr 2009 02:02
Posts: 1636
Location: Standing at the edge of the cliff
Snehashis wrote:

It will take at least 30 months from issuing rfp to awarding contract if there is no re-trial and cancellation.


All that is fine, but who do we Request for Proposal?? Every gun manufacturer of some repute has either been blacklisted or being investigated or dropped of the contract..

The only option seems to be local development and hence all these activity in this sector.. Had we been able to import the same, we would have again scuttled the OFB proposal..

Sorry about the rant...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 18:19 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4667
the more the merrier


I don't care if one sells to the BSF too :twisted:


then there is always exports to think

One can dream !!!

Its amazing what the country can do when afire is lit under its ass. sigh.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 19:49 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 33969
Location: Col of the regiment, ORR JTF unit
> The only US Army unit that specialize in Mountain warfare is the Vermont National Guard's 3rd Battalion 172nd Infantry Regiment.

you mean the US has all of 900 people trained and equipped to operate in areas like higher reaches of ladakh? how did they plan to fight in the mountains of norway, sweden and italy incase of a soviet breakthrough?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 19:57 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 33969
Location: Col of the regiment, ORR JTF unit
the beauty of the Soko K9 Thunder system is a K10 ammo reload vehicle shares the same chassis and goes over the same terrain at same speed. so a good number of ready rounds travel with the unit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K9_Thunder

The K10 is an automatic ammunition resupply vehicle built on the K9 platform, part of the K9 Thunder system. It shares the same chassis as K9, preserving K9's mobility, and can follow the main artillery battery without lagging behind.[6] Maximum transfer rate of shells is 12 rounds per minute, and maximum load of shells is 104 rounds.[7]
The reloading process is fully automated. The reloading is done through a munition bridge on the K10 that extends out to lock itself into a reception hole located at the rear of the K9. This allows the unit to rearm itself under harsh combat conditions without the crew having to expose themselves to the combat environment

---
the M109 being a old system does not have this. Neither does the much feared PZH2000, wherein loading is done by hand using a retractable drawer in the back of chassis.
only the cancelled Crusader system had this automatic reload vehicle concept.
you can see it in 2:09 here as the powered drawer at press of a button feeds in the round into the magazine inside....rather slow and prone to manpower issue vs the auto reload vehicle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2FzNZahxf4

another thing is even the charges seems to be fetched and rammed in automatically from a wine rack type set of armoured bins, apart from autoloading the shells. in the PZH
a loader has to feed the charge manually after the shell is autoloaded. you see this here and also the ARV in operation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVdoBWBmUYQ

I would say if the interior machinery is reliable, a K9K10 unit will make do with less manpower, operate in harsher conditions with less fatigue and pump out more rounds over a period of N days vs a comparable size of M109/Pzh unit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 20:40 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Jan 2012 21:18
Posts: 122
Singha, we have rejected it once a hybrid version like Bhim T6 due to single vendor scenario.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 21:27 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 21 Nov 2008 04:10
Posts: 2254
Location: Bharathavarshey Bharathakhandey Jumbudweepey Kaveryaha Uttare Teerey
akimalik wrote:
L&T and Samsung-Techwin Team up for Artillery Gun Programme

Quote:
A proposal to develop the 155mm/52 calibre tracked, self propelled artillery, with L&T as the lead partner, had been submitted last year to the Ministry of Defence.


hope Army doesnt have to use Kies to upgrade the gun's firmware. :P


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 22:00 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 26794
Location: NowHere
IBN reported pinaka being used with only unguided rockets. I guess, gps based guidance could be even more potent use of pinaka rather just unguided, improving the CEP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 00:53 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 1095
Location: Land of the free
Just saw this.
It appears that like F77b with the tow truck has identical and nearly equal capabilities to systems like Archer.

Tracked Artillery is a different story though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 01:35 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 1095
Location: Land of the free
OFB SPH at Def Expo 2012

Img1
Img2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 01:44 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Jan 2012 21:18
Posts: 122
koti wrote:
OFB SPH at Def Expo 2012

Img1
Img2



koti, any info on the rate of fire and ammunition carried on the vehicle ? Any order forthcoming from the Army ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 01:56 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 1095
Location: Land of the free
^^nope, sorry.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 07:07 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 33969
Location: Col of the regiment, ORR JTF unit
> hope Army doesnt have to use Kies to upgrade the gun's firmware.

thats equivalent to being hit by counter battery fire. ODIN is the lifesaver.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 08:56 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 15 Dec 2010 12:24
Posts: 162
koti wrote:
OFB SPH at Def Expo 2012

Img1
Img2



This is a joke, right???

What is the purpose of SP guns? The same as wheeled arty, except that they support armoured div's where wheeled arty will not be able to keep up. SP arty functioning is same as wheeled arty - i.e they don't fire on the move. Obviously, SP arty calibre needs to be high (current std of 155mm). If we have to use this stupid contraption, why not just bring back the Abbot which is also 105mm, and one of the best SP guns of it's time. Over 3 decades back the army used to curse the Abbot because of it's low calibre (same as the Vijayanta's, which was unacceptable), and now OFB brings the same calibre back.

This is just having a party with taxpayer money.

Few decade back a good Russian 152SP was rejected - at that time we thought maybe GIAT will come in - big joke!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 09:04 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Mar 2008 04:47
Posts: 773
Look at the truck that gun is mounted on. To come out with a product that shabby looking is frankly embarrassing. Looks like is was made in the Korean war.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 09:27 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 33969
Location: Col of the regiment, ORR JTF unit
er just a thought - how about this replacing the IFG 105mm towed? the kind of artillery positions in the plains or reverse slopes of kargil, protected by sandbags and with lots of ammo lying around would be devasted by high angle airburst or MLRS fire. and the chinese unlike the pakis have plenty of guns, tubes and radars and are always getting more.
I read somewhere that latest 105mm rounds can provide upto 25-30km range and high lethality which is quite good.

looks can always be brushed up, if the concept is workable. for example can be mounted on a stallion 6x6 for higher mobility and more tfta looks. a armoured travelling crew cum firing control panel can be added in rear of crew cab.

for cost reasons I doubt we will be able to afford enough Archer types, even if by some miracle the deal goes through. the automatic magazine reload system seen in archer can perhaps be ported down to our 105mm also as a mini-archer to avoid manual loading and crew exposure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 09:46 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 1095
Location: Land of the free
Singha saab, can you address this?
koti wrote:
Just saw this.
It appears that like F77b with the tow truck has identical and nearly equal capabilities to systems like Archer.
Tracked Artillery is a different story though.

I feel the F77B with the tow truck is itself a similar concept to the Archer. All we need to add is around 2 min lead time before it can fire and around 2 min lead time before it can scoot in comparison to Archer AFAIU.
It has adequate ammunition carrying capacity, protected crew cabin and an overall lower demanding(complex) vehicle. Cost wise this should enable us to have more guns on the ground.
OTOH Tracked Arty like K-9:K-10 is a must.
Adding 4 types of 155mm arty (Tow, SPH, Tracked, Ultra light) doesn't seem quite good(and getting none).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 09:52 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 33969
Location: Col of the regiment, ORR JTF unit
the archer looks like a much shorter vehicle compared to the tow truck + FH77 articulated combo. its a swivelling joint right behind the cab. might be easier to drive it on hilly roads. apparently our bofors trucks had a rough time getting around some corners of NH1 north of srinagar enroute to kargil area.

I guess in plains regions it will not matter. but the whole focus of next 10 yrs is mountain area modernization so ...

archer is more future proof in the sense if someone tightens their WLR spotting to MLRS fire loop down to < 1 min, all towed gun units would be in trouble.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 10:30 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Posts: 15350
Location: Deepest & Highest
I was under the impression that Desi 105mm Shells carry extra explosive power because it uses latest, super duper masala ( i cant recall the name as it was discussed here few months ago)developed by DRDO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 10:55 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 8351
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
^^Jhujar-ji, think you meant CL-20?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 12:18 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25
Posts: 7093
And the shells are called HEER


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 12:23 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 30 Apr 2009 02:02
Posts: 1636
Location: Standing at the edge of the cliff
I get the HE part, but what is the extended range there?? Is the charge that is used to propel the shell out of the gun also use CL-20???


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 12:59 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 15 Dec 2010 12:24
Posts: 162
Singha wrote:
er just a thought - how about this replacing the IFG 105mm towed? the kind of artillery positions in the plains or reverse slopes of kargil, protected by sandbags and with lots of ammo lying around would be devasted by high angle airburst or MLRS fire. and the chinese unlike the pakis have plenty of guns, tubes and radars and are always getting more.
I read somewhere that latest 105mm rounds can provide upto 25-30km range and high lethality which is quite good.


Singha,
Why? Please see my previous post. We already had an excellent SP Gun (Abott) which is 105mm - but 105mm just does not cut it for SP anymore. It would be a utter waste (and possibly a scam) to bring this 'khichdi' into service. If 105SP was OK, desperate experiments like the Catapault would not have been done.

Not sure about HEER - would love to know if it be used for extended time, and the effect it has on the barrel. Even the 25pdr had super charge, but that was for limited use only.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 21:36 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 33969
Location: Col of the regiment, ORR JTF unit
I think HEER is just another name for the 'base bleed' shells. as this is just a long burning propellant inside the shell, after it leaves the barrel via conventional charge, probably it does not impact barrel wear and tear? same for RAP shells...the rocket burns after the shell exits.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012 22:04 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Jan 2012 21:18
Posts: 122
155 mm SHELL HEER

Quote:


It is a high explosive extended range (HEER) Shell. The shell comprises of a forged and machined special steel body. The body possesses optimised geometry to improve the ballistic co-efficient (Reduced drag). The rear of the body is externally threaded to receive the Base Bleed unit (BBU). The BBU reduces the drag and gives additional thrust to carry the shell further.




Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2012 00:14 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 16 Nov 2011 22:31
Posts: 3046
Location: Jambudveepe Bharatvarshe, Bharatkhande, Sakabde, Mero Dakshine Parsve
Well at least to me its not not the size that matters, what matters is the ...

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2012 03:48 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 05 Feb 2012 00:45
Posts: 7
L&T JV for Indian Army Self Propelled Artillery requirement - http://www.larsentoubro.com/lntcorporat ... &PR_ID=541.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2012 03:50 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 05 Feb 2012 00:45
Posts: 7
L&T Second JV with Nexter - http://www.larsentoubro.com/lntcorporat ... &PR_ID=542


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Apr 2012 15:45 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Dec 2006 16:48
Posts: 545
Location: Bangalore
Singha wrote:
> The only US Army unit that specialize in Mountain warfare is the Vermont National Guard's 3rd Battalion 172nd Infantry Regiment.

you mean the US has all of 900 people trained and equipped to operate in areas like higher reaches of ladakh? how did they plan to fight in the mountains of norway, sweden and italy incase of a soviet breakthrough?

They depended on fellow NATO countries like Italy, France and UK to take care of Mountains. US Army's role was more to counter the Operational Manoeuvre Groups of Soviets in the plains. Hence, you see the 'heavy' side in tanks and guns even in so called Infantry divisions. They believed in light infantry divisions transitioning to the nature of warfare in the AOR.
Things have changed over the last decade though with their experience in Afghanistan. Especially the 10th. But too early to call them Mountain Warfare experts.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3922 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 ... 99  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group