Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 24 May 2013 18:50

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2929 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 ... 74  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 01 Oct 2011 04:15 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31
Posts: 1488
Russian helicopters arrive in India
Quote:
The first batch of the Russian Mil Mi-17B5 helicopters has arrived at an air base in the Indian northwestern state of Punjab.

For years, India’s air forces have been using Russian Mil Mi-17 helicopters in the conditions of rough mountain terrain in the states of Ladakh, Arunachal Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh.

The recent batch consists of upgraded versions of the helicopter to be used for the transportation of troops and military vehicles and for rescue and emergency operations.

The contract for the supply of 80 helicopters worth $1,354bln was clinched in 2008.

All assembly work and checks will be performed by Russian experts accompanying the cargo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2011 16:33 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 11 Feb 2010 21:19
Posts: 325
Location: In the Lion's Den
ALH Rudhra performs weapons tests


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2011 20:51 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
Pratik_S wrote:


Interesting. It is spelt Rudhra here. Rudra has a soft "dh" and not a hard "ddh", or its a southie spelling like "Karthik" versus "Kartik"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2011 21:24 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 07 Oct 2005 12:58
Posts: 4034
Location: "There is no greater weapon than a prepared mind."
Yeah..but maybe we are reading too much in this spelling


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2011 22:07 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
krishnan wrote:
Yeah..but maybe we are reading too much in this spelling


Probably. English is a lousy language for Indian names and words. Too much ambiguity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Oct 2011 11:51 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 1454
Location: NullPointerException
shiv wrote:
Pratik_S wrote:


Interesting. It is spelt Rudhra here. Rudra has a soft "dh" and not a hard "ddh", or its a southie spelling like "Karthik" versus "Kartik"


In South they always add an h, like the example you gave, Karthik instead of Kartik, Latha instead of Lata, etc. But as you said, spellings of Indian names in English always looks a little weird.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Oct 2011 09:11 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Feb 2011 18:41
Posts: 325
Image

Image

Quote:
Bangalore. The armed version of India’s Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH) touched 20,000 feet in a test flight early August while two Cheetals performed a daring rescue at 23,000 feet a few weeks later.

The ALH test flight was conducted by Army’s ace test pilot Brig Amardeep Sidhu in Leh while the two Cheetals were taken to this height by ace pilots of the Indian Air Force (IAF) to rescue a stranded foreign mountaineer.

The armed version of the ALH, designated Rudra by the Army Aviation Corps which operates them, is still under various tests before its induction by end-2011. But so far, according to Chairman and Managing Ashok Nayak of HAL, which manufactures the helicopter at its Bangalore facility, all the required tests, undertaken step by step, have been successful.

Rudra has also cleared the airto- air and air-to-ground missile firing tests at the Interim Test Range at Balasore in Orissa and now, combined missile, rocket and gun firing tests, day and night, would be conducted later this year. Pilots also have Helmet mounted cueing systems to ensure precision attacks.

Notably, Rudra is powered by the new Shakti engine developed by HAL and the French Turbomeca, which should be a standard fitting in all versions of the ALH, including the high altitude attack helicopter now called LCH or Light Combat helicopter, Mr Nayak told India Strategic in an interview.


Quote:
But Shakti is the engine of today, Mr Nayak said adding that Turbomeca had done all the required Transfer of Technology (ToT) for its manufacture by HAL. The utility version is however still on the drawing board but should not take long to develop as its various components would be the same as those successfully tested on ALH variants. Its engine is also under the selection process.

Mr Nayak said that Phase I of the Shakti engine’s TOT was over, and the remaining three phases would be completed in about two years and then the infrastructure to manufacture it fully in India would be established. Significantly, he pointed out, the critical engine core technology had already been transferred.


Quote:
It may be noted that Rudra, or ALHWSI (Weapon Systems Integrated) is coming in two versions. The Mark III, which Brig Sidhu took to the new heights, has Electronic Warfare and Targeting Systems while the Mark IV would have a French Nexter 20 mm turret gun, Belgian 70 mm rockets, and MBDA air to air and air to ground missiles. All these systems have been tested individually.


Quote:
Two prototypes of the LCH have done about 100 hours, flown by Group Captain Unni Pillai, a retired IAF test pilot, who is the Chief Test Pilot for HAL now.


Quote:
Mr Nayak said that a 3rd prototype of the LCH is under development, and that it should be inducted by the IAF in about three to four years.


ALH touches 20,000 feet and Cheetal 23,000


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Oct 2011 09:36 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 12 Jun 2010 14:39
Posts: 114
Quote:
Mr Nayak said that Phase I of the Shakti engine’s TOT was over, and the remaining three phases would be completed in about two years and then the infrastructure to manufacture it fully in India would be established. Significantly, he pointed out, the critical engine core technology had already been transferred.

it seems significant TOT.why cant we modify shakthi to suit LOH without turbomeca??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Oct 2011 09:50 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25560
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
likely because modification is not as simple as it sounds (we have never done a greenfield turboshaft before) and having the OEM onboard will reduce risk and ensure timely delivery of a safe product. french will tell us how to make the core and sell us the tools and metals if needed to do so, but they would never tell us what happens if the core temp increase by 100C or shape of the core chamber changed by 10cm or fuel inflow increased by 5% - such design secrets are never transferred.

the other approach is go it alone using shakti as a base - thats the chini approach - maybe it will pay in long run. but as we know the WS10x is struggling to have a lifetime of 100 hrs while its 'blood father' the AL31F goes 1000s of hrs :mrgreen: and this after many years of cloning and playing around! what kind of safety it will have is also a open question as we can see in the bullet train cloning episode.

in the end the IAF unlike the PLAAF will not have a unsafe and immature product shoved down their throat nor they will accept timeline slippage beyond a point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Oct 2011 10:31 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 15 Aug 2010 18:52
Posts: 281
Location: Pune
The cockpit is a visual delight. Thanks for sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Oct 2011 12:26 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 12 Jun 2010 14:39
Posts: 114
Singha wrote:
likely because modification is not as simple as it sounds (we have never done a greenfield turboshaft before) and having the OEM onboard will reduce risk and ensure timely delivery of a safe product. french will tell us how to make the core and sell us the tools and metals if needed to do so, but they would never tell us what happens if the core temp increase by 100C or shape of the core chamber changed by 10cm or fuel inflow increased by 5% - such design secrets are never transferred.

the other approach is go it alone using shakti as a base - thats the chini approach - maybe it will pay in long run. but as we know the WS10x is struggling to have a lifetime of 100 hrs while its 'blood father' the AL31F goes 1000s of hrs :mrgreen: and this after many years of cloning and playing around! what kind of safety it will have is also a open question as we can see in the bullet train cloning episode.

guess doing a WS 10 like thing or modifying it without OEM ,with shakthi will vioalate IPR agreement with the french.but the recent spat sure have made turbomecas chance for the engine bid for LOH a lot lesser.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Oct 2011 09:40 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Feb 2011 18:41
Posts: 325
Combat Helicopters


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Oct 2011 09:13 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 06 Apr 2003 12:31
Posts: 1462
Is the LCH designed to fill an equivalent role to MH-6 Little Bird/AH-6 in the US armed forces? Light gunship for aerial scouting and special operations, that can land in the middle of streets and building terraces for the prosecution of urban warfare, as well as tiny patches of real estate in the jungles of the Red Corridor?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Oct 2011 09:21 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13
Posts: 4440
Rudradev wrote:
Is the LCH designed to fill an equivalent role to MH-6 Little Bird/AH-6 in the US armed forces? Light gunship for aerial scouting and special operations, that can land in the middle of streets and building terraces for the prosecution of urban warfare, as well as tiny patches of real estate in the jungles of the Red Corridor?


The LOH is in the class of AH-6.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Oct 2011 10:40 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Posts: 12427
Location: racetrack pattern over BRFATA.
Rudradev wrote:
Is the LCH designed to fill an equivalent role to MH-6 Little Bird/AH-6 in the US armed forces? Light gunship for aerial scouting and special operations, that can land in the middle of streets and building terraces for the prosecution of urban warfare, as well as tiny patches of real estate in the jungles of the Red Corridor?

no, it is more in the family of the twin engine super cobras of USMC. US army originally used the single engined version of the AH-1 as it attack helicopter, before it shifted to the heavier apache.
role wise there is little difference between LCH and apache but the later being a heavier bird should have better armour against ground fire.

the LOH might be considered the Indian equivalent of the little bird but increasingly, observation roles would be taken over by UAVs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Oct 2011 11:01 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 06 Apr 2003 12:31
Posts: 1462
Even if observation relies mostly on UAVs, a Little Bird type chopper toughened up against small-arms/RPG fire could be useful in certain asymmetric warfare scenarios. e.g. providing aerial observation plus fire support to special forces infiltrating a Pakistani urban zone for a snatch-Dawood type op, or to paramilitary forces in anti-Naxal operations. It may be a while before Rustom or AURA can be deployed in a combat role. I wonder if LOH will fill that gap.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Oct 2011 11:35 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Posts: 12427
Location: racetrack pattern over BRFATA.
it's not possible to toughen up small choppers against ground fire beyond a certain point. RPG's would be lethal to even the most heavily armoured chopper at close range. helos mostly depend on cover and surprise although LCH will feature countermeasures against heat seeking missiles.
both IAF and IA, as well as IN operate a sizable number of UAV units and are increasingly adept at using them. the vayu shakti 2010 videos are a good place to look. the UAV's not only covered the whole demo in night time but also guided MKI's strikes to their target.
LOH and dhruv both are likely to be used in asymmetric warfare.

rustom and esp. AURA are for different jobs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2011 07:07 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31
Posts: 1488
Ageing rotors
Quote:
Nearly 70 per cent of the IAF's 300 helicopters have already completed their prescribed life. There is a deficit of 26 per cent in the number of helicopters required for operational responsibilities. The shortfall in the case of attack helicopters is worse—the fleet is 46 per cent below its required number. Despite availability of funds, the IAF, as pointed out by a Comptroller and Auditor General report in 2010, was unable to induct even a single helicopter between 2002 and 2010.
:
:
Despite the shortage of helicopters at home, the defence ministry has been deploying helicopters abroad for participation in UN missions. Earlier, India had 17 helicopters in Congo and Sudan. In July, India withdrew its four remaining Mi-35 attack helicopters from these missions. It has now deployed six light-utility Chetak and Cheetah helicopters in Congo. “The military leadership is aware of the effect the lack of helicopters could have on the current operations,” said Major. “That is perhaps why we have brought back most of our helicopters from the UN missions.”

The IAF helicopter fleet consists of Cheetah, Chetak, Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH) and the Russian-developed Mi series, which constitute 60 per cent of the IAF inventory and are used for airlift and attack operations. The attack helicopter fleet, currently made up of Mi-25s and Mi-35s, support Army operations. “Helicopters are one of the most important assets of any Air Force,” said Air Commodore (retd) Jasjit Singh, director of Centre for Air Power Studies. He said India needed helicopters in hand to deal with border surveillance and asymmetrical conflicts.

The anti-Maoist operations, for example, have already seen the deployment of two Mi-17 helicopters in Jharkhand to help airlift troops and in evacuation. The Union home ministry, which deployed a fleet of seven choppers for troop deployment, casualty evacuation and sending reinforcements in Maoist-affected areas last year, has hired six Mi-17 helicopters.

In Chhattisgarh, the IAF has deployed four helicopters to assist Central and state police forces. “There is a request for deploying two more helicopters at Ranchi. Thus we will have a total of six helicopters in these operations,” said Air Chief Marshal N.A.K. Browne.

To bridge the shortfall, the IAF is planning to acquire 230 choppers. The list includes 12 AW101 VVIP helicopters, 80 Mi-17 helicopters and 12 heavy-lift choppers. The IAF will also procure 22 attack helicopters. Boeing is leading the race for the order with its AH-64D Apache Longbow choppers.

At IAF headquarters, however, the worry has not been limited to slow procurement. Shortage of spare parts, too, has been an issue. The IAF still sends engines abroad for overhaul, leaving choppers grounded. However, work to decrease India's dependence on the foreign arms companies has already started. The Hindustan Aeronautics Limited is building three helicopters—Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopter, Light Combat Helicopter and Light Utility Helicopter—while at Bharat Electronics Ltd, scientists and engineers are working to provide sophisticated avionics products for the military choppers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2011 08:04 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 06 Feb 2009 07:46
Posts: 1260
Location: GSLV launch pad sweeping team
Do we have a root cause for the Dhruv crash? I'm not suggesting that ageing rotors has anything to do with it but now would be time to order more Dhruvs into the mix.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 15:08 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 940
Location: USA
Is it feasible to deploy grad type rockets from helicopters? Maybe it can double in to be a solution to artillery problems in mountainous terrain.
Did such a prototype ever exist?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 16:02 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13
Posts: 4440
The FSU developed some truly massive air launched rockets. But nothing in the class of the GRAD. The reason being that in order to use the grad. You probably will need the Mi 26 class helo to carry it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 16:28 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 940
Location: USA
Alright,
What about the capability to use transport A/c to launch them then?
Something like an AC130 firing GRAD rockets?

I am looking at the merits of using air-launched artillery over conventional ones.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 16:32 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Posts: 12427
Location: racetrack pattern over BRFATA.
even the 105mm is tough ask for the AC-130. not economical or practical for aircraft that would have to land for every reload. the use of arty is precisely the ability to land round after round on target at minimum cost. nothing can replace it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 16:51 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13
Posts: 4440
^^^

Please take a look at the Zunni and the Russian rockets as well There largest AL rocket was 220 MM IIRC,. After a point you need to have accuracy, as ferrying rockets of that size to be fired over a target zone is a waste of resources. A cluster bomb will do the job much more effectively, and cheaply. If you need range then you have number of stand off missiles to do the job.

In the end the question is what is your need, that required you to throw the Grad using an airborne delivery method.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 17:02 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 940
Location: USA
Rahul M wrote:
even the 105mm is tough ask for the AC-130. not economical or practical for aircraft that would have to land for every reload. the use of arty is precisely the ability to land round after round on target at minimum cost. nothing can replace it.


Rockets should have very less recoil compared to cannons if that was what you intended to say.
I agree with the rest of the post.

Pratyush wrote:
^^^
In the end the question is what is your need, that required you to throw the Grad using an airborne delivery method.

Can't think of anything substantial. Maybe quicker deployment and deployment from otherwise inaccessible areas(Lack of arty there or mountainous terrain).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 17:08 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 07 Oct 2005 12:58
Posts: 4034
Location: "There is no greater weapon than a prepared mind."
SPG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 17:12 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Posts: 12427
Location: racetrack pattern over BRFATA.
koti, where would the exhaust go ? you know what gas ingestion does to aero engines don't you ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 17:23 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
By definition any aircraft with bombs is air launched/airborne artillery. When the air launched munition is designed to go further than can be taken by gravity alone, it becomes an air launched missile. If unguided it is just like a Grad. If guided it becomes just like a Brahmos.

Unguided rockets in underwing pods or in internal racks such as the HF 24 had are exactly the same principle as a Grad. However the Grad has a warhead weight of about 20 kg as per Wiki while the 57 mm rocket pods used by the Mi 25 has a warhead weight of 1.5 kg or so. In fact Libyan rebel forces were shown using such aircraft rocket pods mounted on trucks and that was discussed here.

But that extends only to 20 km - or a bit longer for Pinaka/Smerch type MBRLs. If you need to hit an area target 500 km away you will need Jags with dumb bombs or PGMs carrying subminitions

Mi 25 in rocket attack
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx8DpE9AiTI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2011 17:30 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
Mi 35 rockets vs Gatling A-10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuLnnVDld-M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Nov 2011 11:25 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 11 Jan 2009 00:14
Posts: 2231
Dont know if this link is kosher(based on the source)

LCH R&D on track to deliver high altitude attack capability to IAF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2011 05:31 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31
Posts: 1488
First Mi-17V-5 helicopters delivered to India
Quote:
The first batch of Mi-17V-5 helicopters have been delivered to India under a contract signed by state arms exporter Rosoboronexport in December 2008 for 80 new helicopters.

The helicopters are manufactured by Kazan Helicopters, a subsidiary of the Russian Helicopters holding company as part of the US$1.35 billion contract. Deliveries will be completed by 2014.
:
he Mi-17V-5 is the most up-to-date modification of the Mi-17. The helicopters being delivered are manufactured to the customer’s specification and are unique in their configuration. Each helicopter is equipped with a KNEI-8 avionics suite featuring four large multi-functional displays that are easy to read and help reduce pilot fatigue. This avionics suite also helps cut down pre-flight inspection time, displaying all systems data and alerting crew when necessary.

The Klimov VK2500-powered aircraft have strengthened gearboxes to enable high-altitude operations, addressing a key requirement that emerged following performance inadequacies with India's current Mi-17s.

The Indian military is being renewed and expanded and the service has several major helicopter procurement projects in the pipeline. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) has developed the 12 000 lb (5.5 ton) Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH), 54 of which will go to the Air Force and 105 to the Army under a US$3.56 billion order.

About half of all Dhruvs will be Weapon System Integrated (WSI) with Mistral 2 air-to-air missiles, Helina anti-tank missiles and a 20 mm cannon slaved to the gunner’s helmet-mounted site. Dhruvs will replace the Air Force’s approximately 65 HAL Chetak light utility helicopters. Deliveries are expected to be completed by 2013-2014.

Additionally, the Indian armed forces in 2007 launched a search for 197 light reconnaissance and surveillance helicopters (64 for the Air Force and 133 for the Army). The winner of the US$750 million competition should be announced soon. The Eurocopter AS 550 Fennec and Kamov Ka-226 are being considered after passing trials.

In the attack role the Indian Air Force has 20 Mi-25/35s in service and hopes to replace them with 22 new attack Helicopters. In May 2008 the Indian Ministry of Defence issued a request for proposals for twin-engined attack helicopters but the tender was cancelled in March 2009, only to be re-opened two months later. The AH-64D Apache and Mi-28 Night Hunter were the leading contenders until the Mi-28N was dropped from the competition, leaving the AH-64 as the leading contender.

HAL is also developing the ambitious Light Combat Helicopter (LCH), which first flew in March 2010 after years of delays. It has stealth features, a glass cockpit and armour protection. The LCH carries the same armament as the WSI Dhruv. The IAF has ordered 65 LCHs for about US$1.4 billion, while the Army is buying 114. HAL expects certification next year and production to begin in 2013.

The Air Force’s heavy lift helicopter fleet consists of four Mi-26 ‘Halos’, which may be replaced by 12-15 new heavy lift helicopters. Boeing’s CH-47F Chinook and Mil’s Mi-26T2 are competing for a contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2011 03:26 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31
Posts: 1488
U.S. interested in Indian helicopter tender
Quote:
The United States has expressed strong interest in participating in India's tender for attack helicopter and heavy-lift helicopters despite the snub it received earlier this year in the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) competition, according to a top official.

In remarks to the Defense Trade Advisory Group, Assistant Secretary for Bureau of Political-Military Affairs Andrew Shapiro said, “I have also advocated for our tenders in the Attack Helicopter and Heavy Lift Helicopter competitions. We are hopeful that both will be selected.”

Earlier, the Indian Air Force was reported to have floated tenders for 22 combat and 15 heavy lift helicopters.

Among the U.S. contenders in the race would be Boeing's Apache, for combat, and the Chinook, for heavy-lift.


The reportedly $550 million-tender aims to replace India's ageing helicopter fleet and trials were said to be on in the hot, humid deserts of Rajasthan and the icy Himalayan heights of Ladakh and Leh.

Mr. Shapiro reflected upon his attendance on February last at the Aero India show, an event at which he said he advocated for U.S. defence sales.

“While India unfortunately did not down-select a U.S. aircraft for its MMRCA competition, I believe our relationship with India is much more than one sale,” he said.

Suggesting that Indian acquisition of the U.S. defence equipment was woven into the fabric of a stronger U.S.-India strategic partnership, Mr. Shaprio said that recent evidence of the U.S. efforts in this regard was India's acquisition of 10 C-17 aircraft and a request for six more C-130J aircraft.


I am confused! I thought India has already selected the 22 Apache attach helicopters???


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2011 14:49 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 7512
Location: India
The Apache is supposed to have been selected,but there's "many a slip 'tween the cup and the lip".The F mag ,in the Apache "to win" featire,says that the MI-28 is also a very capable attack helo.It will probably be a bit cheaper than the US bird,normal for Russian wares (especially subs!),which is why soime bargaining is going on to bring down prices.

I came across in my files recently an excellent though ancient piece by some western mil experts about the coming age of the helo,this was written about 25 years ago (!) and how the Russians also felt that a certain number of attack helos was even more powerful than an armoured division,facts and figures given,including costs.Since this has not been digitised,I will post the article later.It is an intriguing one and especially in the current context of things,the way to go.We need n fact at least 200 dedicated attack helos,which hopefully the LCH (around 180+ for the IA and IAF) will provide along with the supposed Apaches,whose order also needs to be doubled.I suggest that the IA/IAF retain the MI-35s until the Apache number is doubled,and can use these for any UN peacekeeping roles for which they've been used before.Everey helo asset needs to be retained for as long as possible in view of the new Himalayan Sino-Pak JV threat .Extra fire support will come from the armed Dhruvs and MI-17V5s

However,it is frankly past time for the IAF not to act like a dog-in-the-manger and hand over the attack helo assets to the IA,who are better placed to hone their usage and tactics in concert with land forces.The IAF can retain most of the medium and all heavy-lift helos and also whatever light and medium helos ALH and LUHs that they need for their own operations.The time has arrived for the creation of the Army Air Corps,which should not only operate attack and transport helos,but also light aircraft for reconn. AO purposes and even turboprops for COIN ops.Many air forces are looking again towards turboprops for not just COIN but also battlefield support,in the same manner as attack helos instead of using expensive GA fighters.We could develop with the Swis ana rmed version of the Pilatus trainer,or even acquire one of the S.American turboprops used by the Argies and Brazilians.The Italians have recntly designed a very light and inexpensive COIN aircraft,AWST had details,will post later.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2011 15:00 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13
Posts: 4440
What is the need for the Apache. If it is to replace the Mi 25/35. Then onlee 22 will not be enough. Besides the LCH will mature in the next 2 to 3 years it self. That being the case having a duplication in capability with dedicated logistics for both makes little sense to benign with.

I am of the opinion that the Ah 64 ought to be cancelled in favor of the LCH.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2011 15:14 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 30 Apr 2009 02:02
Posts: 1622
Location: Standing at the edge of the cliff
Well, I believe that the Apache's are necessary right now to understand the complexities of using a sensor laden heavy attack helicopter guiding packs of packs of light/medium attack helicopters to target and controlling the engagement to ensure swift annihilation of the enemy forces be it Anti Armour or SEAD/DEAD operations.
The lessons learned can be incorporated into our next iteration of attack helicopters at a very early stage.
JMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2011 16:06 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13
Posts: 4440
^^^

the same job can be done using a UAV fitted with a SAR, or a Jstar, or the HORIZON. No reason why the MWR, cannot be fitted to the LCH. If that is the sole purpose of purchasing the AH 64.

Also you cannot decide where you will use a heavy & where a medium helo. As the enemy will never oblige you. By allowing you a neat bifurcation of his assets telling you to please send your heavy helo after this group and light helo after that group. That never happens.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2011 17:07 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Dec 2006 16:48
Posts: 434
Location: Bangalore
Jingoes need not break their head so much. Apaches will be used as Corps assets (maintained by IAF but controlled by IA :mrgreen: ) while IA LCH will be used as Division/ Brigade level assets. Similar to Smerch MLRS (Corps level) and tube artillery (Div/ Bde level).

IMHO the LCH ordered by IAF will primarily be used for CSAR and SEAD/ DEAD activities. While that of IA will be used for CAS.

Regards,
Kiran


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Nov 2011 00:10 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49
Posts: 3826
KiranM wrote:
IMHO the LCH ordered by IAF will primarily be used for CSAR and SEAD/ DEAD activities.

CSAR? Do you mean as an escort for ALH/Chetak doing the actual CSAR duties? A WSI Dhruv would be better for that. Ans SEAD/DEAD would require anti-radiation missiles. Better done by fixed-wing jets with ECM pods which are more survivable against SAMs.
My take is, the LCH will be used for anti-armor and CAS much like the Apache. But it will carry less payload and we'll have a lot more of them than the gold-plated apaches. The Apaches are likely a one-to-one replacement for the Hinds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Nov 2011 03:14 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Jul 2011 16:05
Posts: 234
Location: On the sofa.
nachiket wrote:
KiranM wrote:
IMHO the LCH ordered by IAF will primarily be used for CSAR and SEAD/ DEAD activities.

CSAR? Do you mean as an escort for ALH/Chetak doing the actual CSAR duties? A WSI Dhruv would be better for that. Ans SEAD/DEAD would require anti-radiation missiles. Better done by fixed-wing jets with ECM pods which are more survivable against SAMs.
My take is, the LCH will be used for anti-armor and CAS much like the Apache. But it will carry less payload and we'll have a lot more of them than the gold-plated apaches. The Apaches are likely a one-to-one replacement for the Hinds.


The first shots in Gulf war were carried out by Apaches against radar sites. That opened a path for allied aircraft to go in.
So thats what he meant by SEAD/DEAD by LCH.

LCH can fly in low, hugging the terrain and get in some shots against major radar sites. Apparently its got around 1/2 the RCS of Dhruv; maybe that can reduce further with some RAM coating.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Nov 2011 05:57 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
Nick_S wrote:
The first shots in Gulf war were carried out by Apaches against radar sites.

That is what that Apache video claimed. I have heard other claims though including the claim that the "first shots" were also stealth aircraft doing SEAD. And of course cruise missiles. May be all are true?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2929 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 ... 74  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher, S.Abhisheik, viktor and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group