Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 19 Jun 2013 07:19

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2090 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 53  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 09 Feb 2012 18:02 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25
Posts: 6201
My doubts on this deal

1) First of all, how much are we paying for Beoing C-17's is It $4.1 Billion inclusive of Engines and all contracts , $ 4.1 Billion +$380 Mil for Engines + $1.7 billion mentioned above.

2) US is paying $963 mil for 5 aircraft - 193 mil a piece

3) UK is paying $316 mil.

I know there are offsets and we are purchasing related infra. But why should offsets increase price, things in India can be done cheaper. Infrasture worth $2 Billion. There is just not enough transperency regarding this deal or C-130 why we are paying $200 mil per aircraft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Feb 2012 20:59 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 07 Dec 2008 02:32
Posts: 976
FMS is a no-offsets agreement

link

Quote:
Foreign military and direct commercial sales – "no known offsets" and FMF


Suggest you read the whole thing. Amazing detailing - aspiring that one day India forms a similar export law for its exports, and people queue up to get our products ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Feb 2012 04:16 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 8215
Location: Illini Nation
Quote:
My doubts on this deal


Natural to have doubts. However, each plane varies and the associated costs vary too. Nations can approach the manufacturers directly and make a deal. FMS has advantages and tend to cost more.

I have been on C-130s that have NO GPS!!!! There is a boat load of difference between machines in C-130s. Not as much in the C-17s, but take a look at some of the interiors of a Aussie C-17 and the older USAF ones. You would not take a second look at the older USAF one.

Do not know which route the UK or the Aussies went - FMA or direct. When they were bought also has to figure into the cost per unit.

Quote:
FMS is a no-offsets agreement


Very true.

The offsets associated with the Indian C-130 and C-17 are on the part of the manufacturers. Nothing to do with the GotUS/FMS.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Feb 2012 16:53 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Oct 2011 09:42
Posts: 706
Location: Tibet / Balochistan
Indian Air force expresses interest in acquiring six more C-17 planes: Boeing

Quote:
Five of the 10 aircraft will be delivered by next year and the other five in 2014, he said. The deal for supplying ten C-17 aircraft is USD 4.1 billion.

Boeing was also set to deliver first of the maritime petrol :rotfl: airplane, Poseidon P8-I, early next year to the Indian Navy, he told PTI at the Singapore Airshow being held from February 14 to 19. The P8-1 contract is worth USD 2.1 billion.

Boeing is also negotiating to supply 22 AH64 Apache helicopters and 15 CH 47 Chinook helicopters, the Boeing officials said. The Chinook contract is at industrial proposal discussion stage which includes modification to the helicopters to Indian specification," said Lewis.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Feb 2012 17:01 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 12 May 2011 15:51
Posts: 447
Location: Control Room
Quote:
Boeing was also set to deliver first of the maritime petrol airplane, Poseidon P8-I

Before it they were all Diesel.
:rotfl: :rotfl: muahahahhaha. :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Feb 2012 07:16 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 8215
Location: Illini Nation
Feb, 2012 :: Boeing to build 10 C-17 military cargo jets for India in $1.8 billion foreign military sale

...................... FYI only .....................

Quote:
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, Ohio, 3 Feb. 2012. Aircraft manufacturers at the Boeing Co. (NYSE:BA) Defense, Space & Security segment in Long Beach, Calif., will build 10 C-17 Globemaster III military cargo jets for the Indian Air Force in New Delhi, India, under terms of a $1.8 billion contract modification announced Thursday from the U.S. Air Force Aeronautical Systems Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. The aircraft sale is part of the Foreign Military Sales program.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Feb 2012 07:30 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 8215
Location: Illini Nation
Indian Air Force orders 10 Boeing C-17 Globemaster III military transport aircraft.

Quote:
Aircraft manufacturers at the Boeing Co. (NYSE:BA) Defense, Space & Security segment in Long Beach, Calif., will build 10 C-17 Globemaster III military cargo jets for the Indian Air Force in New Delhi, India, under terms of a $1.8 billion contract modification announced Thursday from the U.S. Air Force Aeronautical Systems Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. The aircraft sale is part of the Foreign Military Sales program.

.............................................

However, unless new orders come in next month or early in the second quarter, Boeing will have to take the risk of buying parts that take a long time to build in order to keep production going beyond mid-2014, in hopes of landing new orders later.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Feb 2012 07:34 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Posts: 1039
Aditya_V wrote:
My doubts on this deal

1) First of all, how much are we paying for Beoing C-17's is It $4.1 Billion inclusive of Engines and all contracts , $ 4.1 Billion +$380 Mil for Engines + $1.7 billion mentioned above.

2) US is paying $963 mil for 5 aircraft - 193 mil a piece

3) UK is paying $316 mil.

I know there are offsets and we are purchasing related infra. But why should offsets increase price, things in India can be done cheaper. Infrasture worth $2 Billion. There is just not enough transperency regarding this deal or C-130 why we are paying $200 mil per aircraft.


FMS overall deal is $4.1 billion for 10 C-17s (or an average of $410 mil per plane). Under this government-to-government deal, the US Gov will charge 5% for managing the project and will contract out individual pieces, such as planes (Boeing $1.7 billion for 10 planes), engines (PW $380 million for x number of engines), etc, to various manufactures that make C-17 parts. Also, the deal includes support and warranty for x number of years. There is also a 30% offset requirement. When everything is added up, the overall deal is $4.1 billion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2012 15:50 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7741
Russian-Indian multipurpose transport aircraft to get PD-14M engines [interfax/keypubs]

Quote:
MOSCOW. March 6 (Interfax) - PD-14M, a new version of the PD-14 engine, could be installed in a Russian-Indian multipurpose transport aircraft, a source in the Russian defense industry told Interfax-AVN.

"PD-14M engines designed by Perm-based Aviadvigatel are offered for installation in the multipurpose transport aircraft," the source said.

The new engine version has improved take-off traction of 15.6 tonnes. The take-off traction of the engine's basic version, which is installed in the MS-21-300 aircraft, is 14 tonnes, he said.

The multipurpose transport aircraft (MRTA) is a tactical-strategic military transport aircraft. It is designed to carry personnel (up to 140 soldiers and 90 paratroopers). The aircraft may be based at mountainous airfields (up to 3,300 meters above the sea-level). The take-off weight is 68 tonnes. It can carry up to 20 tonnes. The flying range is 2,000 - 4,700 kilometers depending on the load. The ferry range is 7,300 kilometers. The aircraft's first flight is expected in 2016.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2012 19:38 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Sep 2000 11:31
Posts: 1085
SagarAg wrote:
Quote:
Boeing was also set to deliver first of the maritime petrol airplane, Poseidon P8-I

Before it they were all Diesel.
:rotfl: :rotfl: muahahahhaha. :lol: :lol: :lol:


NO They were using coal and lignite.

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Mar 2012 06:10 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 12 Jun 2000 11:31
Posts: 726
Austin wrote:
The new engine version has improved take-off traction of 15.6 tonnes. The take-off traction of the engine's basic version, which is installed in the MS-21-300 aircraft, is 14 tonnes, he said.


I think there was a proposal to stick a cfm or rr engine on this. I hope we do that and maintain commonality with civilian fleets. The CFM LEAP engines would be ideal given the time frame if this ever gets launched..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2012 11:11 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Oct 2011 09:42
Posts: 706
Location: Tibet / Balochistan
Video 3rd batch of Ukrainian modernized An-32s light transport planes to fly back to India

Quote:
Back in 2009, the countries clinched the biggest bilateral deal in Ukrainian aviation history to modernize military cargo planes owned by the Indian Air Force.

The upgraded An-32s have updated equipment for operation from airfields up to four thousand meters above the sea level as well as in hot conditions.

The upgrades will help in increasing payload carrying capacity of the aircraft from around 6.7 tonnes to 7.5 tonnes and aim to prolong the airplanes' service life to 40 years.

Meanwhile, the Indian Air Force assures that not a single Ukrainian plane has been meant to participate in any warfare.

Ukrainian and Indian officials assured that those military cargo planes are to be used for transportation and humanitarian missions.
...


Why this unusual clarification that they are not meant to participate in any warfare?

I have been curious about An-32's use for dropping bombs since this video, released by IAF on their 79th Anniversary, clearly shows at 5:39 an An-32 being used for precisely that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2012 14:02 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Jan 2012 21:18
Posts: 116
Arun Roperia wrote:
Video 3rd batch of Ukrainian modernized An-32s light transport planes to fly back to India

The upgraded An-32s have updated equipment for operation from airfields up to four thousand meters above the sea level as well as in hot conditions.

The upgrades will help in increasing payload carrying capacity of the aircraft from around 6.7 tonnes to 7.5 tonnes and aim to prolong the airplanes' service life to 40 years.






Does it means replacing old technology equipments with modern one saved 800 kg since there is no engine upgrade ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2012 23:36 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Posts: 1711
Location: Lone Star State
^^^ Guys, this PressTV.ir news looks highly suspect, even the picture of the aircraft shown is not an IAF AN-32 (or even an AN-32), take it with a pinch of salt. wait for news from more authentic sources to emerge. some things to ponder upon..
1) No other source has talked about this limitation till date.
2) This did not emerge during earlier tranches of aircraft delivery
3) IAF has already showcased AN-32's role as a bomber before the upgrade program during VayuShakti 2010, why will this feature be negated.
4) Avionics and other upgrades were performed, airframe strengthening etc was also performed to result in increase of range, fuel-effeciency and payload as well as a reduced take-off distance.
more on this as info trickles in...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2012 23:52 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Posts: 1711
Location: Lone Star State
^^^ The AN-32 upgrade involves some engine work.
Quote:
The 3 year contract that was signed December of 2009 worth $110 million by OJSC Motor Sich and IAF, the AI-20 engines are also to be upgraded.

Engines for the 40 planes to be upgraded in Ukraine are to be overhauled (not replaced) by OJSC Motor Sich for $110M, this is almost 25% of the total cost so I think there is some significant work being done on those AI-20 engines. I think only a part of the 40 odd birds to be upgraded in Ukraine have been completed (approx 25 I presume), these rest (15 of the 40) would be done in phases. Remaining 64 would upgraded in India @ 1st BRD Kanpur.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2012 22:17 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 8215
Location: Illini Nation
Nothing new, just a data point:

India readies to select mid-air refueler


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2012 22:20 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 7778
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
^^ Did anyone else notice a C-130J buzzing around all over Bangalore skies all evening today?

( Just to confirm that it was indeed a C-130 and not some other aircraft and my plane-spotting was OK)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Mar 2012 11:25 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Jun 2009 12:46
Posts: 176
Location: mahishooru
sum sir i missed the c-130 but i also saw a phoren looking transport aircraft over b-lore skies last evening it was a low-winged airplane with only 2 engines and it was soon followed by a AN-32

edit - what i saw might be a HS-748 :-?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Mar 2012 18:25 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 7778
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
Chiru-saar, now that you mention it, it was indeed a dual engine craft and couldnt have been the C-130.

Wonder what it was then since it seemed to been the air for a long time...Doubt if it was a HS-748 since it seemed spanking new and painted in nice gray colour.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Mar 2012 20:04 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Jan 2012 21:18
Posts: 116
sum wrote:
Chiru-saar, now that you mention it, it was indeed a dual engine craft and couldnt have been the C-130.

Wonder what it was then since it seemed to been the air for a long time...Doubt if it was a HS-748 since it seemed spanking new and painted in nice gray colour.



Was it an upgraded An-32 ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Mar 2012 23:14 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Jan 2011 11:24
Posts: 297
SagarAg wrote:
Quote:
Boeing was also set to deliver first of the maritime petrol airplane, Poseidon P8-I

Before it they were all Diesel.
:rotfl: :rotfl: muahahahhaha. :lol: :lol: :lol:

haha :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Mar 2012 15:21 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Jun 2009 12:46
Posts: 176
Location: mahishooru
@sum sir I'm not sure abt it bieng a hs-748 either, any expert gurus can share their views


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Mar 2012 19:40 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Posts: 1711
Location: Lone Star State
chiru wrote:
@sum sir I'm not sure abt it bieng a hs-748 either, any expert gurus can share their views

anyone managed to "foto Keech" this bird, that'll help. also if you guys can collage the description...
1) 1 set of two propellers could imply HS or AN
2) 2 sets of four propellers could imply C130-J.

or it could be something entirely different like some SAAB or Embraer bird which can come to B'lore for a special visit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2012 22:27 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Jun 2009 12:46
Posts: 176
Location: mahishooru
^^ @srinivasan sir - it was a twin turboprop, low wing aircraft, in fresh looking military green - had rounded wing tips - i have never seen a hs-748 flying so cant comment on that.
im positive it cant be an an-32 due to the low wing... and soon after this mysterious aircraft passed over me, it was followed by an AN-32 which i positively identified.
on another note is there an airplane image bank specific to russian planes ? american ones are well documented though!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2012 22:44 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 11 Dec 2008 16:33
Posts: 495
That leaves out the HS 748 only, I guess
Chiru and Sum, did you both spot the same aircraft? Because sum saab said it was a gray coloured aircraft, while Chiru ji is saying it is a military green colour. I thought all IAF aircraft were painted the standard grey now


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Mar 2012 00:16 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Jun 2009 12:46
Posts: 176
Location: mahishooru
@ atreya - my memory of the color is hazy but the features are spot on


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Mar 2012 20:58 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 12:31
Posts: 1473
IAI MMTT and SSTT brochure:

http://www.iai.co.il/sip_storage/files/5/36885.pdf

http://www.ainonline.com/node/23858

Quote:
Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) is proposing aerial tanker versions of business jets such as the Gulfstream G550. At the Singapore Airshow earlier this month, a company official told AIN that its small and smart tactical tanker (SSTT) is still only a proposal, aimed at reducing the costs of aerial refueling training. But the idea has obvious application to long-range strike operations by combat jets, such as the Israeli Air Force might be tasked to carry out against Iranian nuclear sites. An IAI brochure depicts an SSTT refueling from a bigger tanker before proceeding in formation with four fighters to refuel them further within 100 miles of a target. The IAI official also told AIN that the company’s first Boeing 767 Multi-Mission Tanker Transport would fly within the next few months. The Israeli Air Force is interested in using IAI-converted 767s in a dual role as a tanker and VIP transport, he added.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012 19:21 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 07 Dec 2008 02:32
Posts: 976
Indian Air Force To Take Delivery Of All 10 Boeing C-17 By Aug 2014

Quote:
NEW DELHI, March 29 (Bernama) -- The Indian Air Force will have all the 10 Boeing C-17 Globemaster III airlifters by August 2014, Patrick Druez who is in charge of Business Development Global Mobility Systems Boeing Defense, Space & Security, said.

India will take delivery of the first C-17 in June 2013.

"The C-17 met all Indian Air Force requirements in high altitude and hot environment where other airlifters can't," he said at a media briefing on the sidelines of the Defence Expo here Thursday.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Apr 2012 19:31 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Jul 2011 16:05
Posts: 237
Location: On the sofa.
Not sure if this was posted earlier on BRF; its a good article by Air Marshal BK Pandey.

Transport Fleet of the Indian Air Force
http://www.indiandefencereview.com/mili ... Force.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Apr 2012 14:33 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7741
India plans 90-seater civilian plane

Quote:
NEW DELHI: India is working on developing its very own 90-seater civilian aircraft with the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) saying "the strategy for its production has already been evolved" with the design "planned to have unique features like enhanced fuel efficiency, use of bio fuel with low carbon footprint, short to long range haul, shorter air strip requirement and ultra modern avionics".

A design bureau has been set up to undertake indigenous design and development of the plane, called the National Civil Aircraft (NCA-90). A total of seven prototypes are proposed to be developed by CSIR along with the National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL) "to prove the design and demonstrate compliance with respect to airworthiness requirements and certification".

The Planning Commission says the aircraft will be tailored to suit market requirements and will have attractive operating economics. It estimates that "the design and development of the aircraft would cost Rs 4,355 crore. The estimated series production cost would be another Rs 3,200 crore".

Confirming this to TOI, Dr Sudeep Kumar, head of CSIR's planning and performance division, said, "We have set up two separate committees - one for joint venture development that is looking for a corporate group or groups who will join us in developing the aircraft from scratch and then will commercially produce it. The second committee is a technical one which is overlooking the entire project of developing the aircraft."

Dr Kumar added, "The Council has already had talks with the Tata group and will soon meet with Mahindra Aerospace to look for partnership."

Bangalore-based NAL had earlier developed India's first multi purpose 14-seater civilian aircraft Saras. But on March 6, 2009, two IAF test pilots along with a flight test engineer were killed when the second prototype crashed 30 km from Bangalore.

"Saras was 14-seater while NCA is 90-seater. NCA will also be a state-of-the-art machine. We have been asked by the Planning Commission to move a Cabinet note," Dr Kumar said.

According to the CSIR, most developed countries have their own national aircraft. "It is a niche technology. No country wants to share it with others. India has its desired expertise through NAL to develop its very own national civilian aircraft," Dr Kumar said.

Developing the NCA-90, officials say, will not only put India as part of this elite group but will also develop the ancillary industry. "We will have our own maintenance services and spare parts will be available within the country," Dr Kumar added.

The report of the Planning Commission working group in mega science and global alliances for the 12th five year plan says there is a general consensus that India must launch its own civil aircraft development programme.

"It is proposed that the design and development phase to be substantially funded by the government with participation of technical partners whereas the production phases are to be managed through a joint venture with majority partnership from the private sector. While advantage will be taken of the facilities that already exist by way of test-rigs and test-plants, provision has been made towards suitable augmentation and build-up of new facilities," it added.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Apr 2012 18:51 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31
Posts: 1517
Here is a good (as authentic as gets) data point to compare IL76 short runway performance against C17........


http://airmarshalashokgoel.blogspot.com ... il-76.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Apr 2012 22:52 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 12:31
Posts: 1473
Proposals are being sought for Avro replacement. I wish for the air force to simply go in for more Embraers and C-130s instead.

C-295 is a good replacement though, and is found to have roles in MR and AEW as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Apr 2012 23:18 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 7621
Location: India
"Reinventing the wheel",with the 90-seater.By the time the first aircraft flies,and one prays to all the Gods that it does not follow the disastrous example of Saras,Embraer,Bombardier,Sukhoi and one hears of Far-Eastern birds arriving from China and Japan too,will have flown away with all the orders.The 90-seater will be another "technology demonstrator" of little or no value to the nation and a project which would've cost a fortune to keep babudom and PSUs happy.

When established manufacturers have come out with 21st century designs for similar sized aircraft,what was the harm in not tying up with either Embraer or Sukhoi for the same? If China could build a huge manufacturing plant for A-320s,instead of trying to build their own version,why could we not also have done a JV as we are doing with Russia for the MTA? All that the nation has been able to achieve with designin and manufacturing civilian aircraft is to make Avro HS-748s and DO-228s under licence.We cannot even design and manufacture a reliable basic trainer-ours keeps crashing and we have now selected the excellent Swiss PIlatus,a decision like the Hawk,decades late.The 90-seater is going to be another waste of public money and time.I truly wonder which pvt. airline too is going to buy a desi bird when better more reliable ones are available in the international market.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Apr 2012 23:51 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21
Posts: 2262
Philip wrote:
If China could build a huge manufacturing plant for A-320s,instead of trying to build their own version,why could we not also have done a JV as we are doing with Russia for the MTA?


Not true Phillip sir:

Xian MA60 variants,
Comac C919,
ARJ21 variants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Apr 2012 01:19 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4322
forget reinventing the wheel

I would take baby steps

We have not got the Saras in operation

and then we are going to make the leap to 90 seater???

by ourselves??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Apr 2012 01:51 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21
Posts: 2262
But Sirjee,

there are committees which were set up to study the feasibility ... do we know anything better than them here with which we can pass a better judgement of the capability within the nation?

Why so much of pessimism?

I for one wished that they build the turboprop cargo version too. It would have been the ideal replacement for our An-32 and Avros!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Apr 2012 02:56 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4322
there are committees which were set up to study the feasibility

After watching Yes minister and yes prime minister I have no faith in any committee :(

from an armchair view all Ihave is the history of how another developing country (Brazil) approached it and how much pain and time it took them to get where they are.

Even if the Saras was already in use by commercial airlines I would say there is some reason for optimism


IMHO and all that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Apr 2012 10:24 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 7621
Location: India
Indra,production started way back in 2009.I agree,if we can't even produce Saras,2hich was originally a Myasichev conncept,how will we design and develop a 90-seater?

Quote:
Airbus unveils first Chinese-made A320
Updated 5/18/2009

The first Airbus A320 aircraft assembled outside of Europe lands at Tianjin Binhai International Airport following a four hour test flight. Airbus anticipates strong sales as China expands domestic air service.

The first Airbus A320 aircraft assembled outside of Europe lands at Tianjin Binhai International Airport following a four hour test flight. Airbus anticipates strong sales as China expands domestic air service.

SHANGHAI (AP) — The first Airbus A320 jet assembled outside Europe made its maiden flight Monday after its assembly in the northeastern Chinese city of Tianjin.

The Airbus Final Assembly Line China, or FALC, in Tianjin plans to begin deliveries to customers in June, European Aeronautics Defense and Space Co. said in a statement.

The jet successfully conducted a four-hour flight from the Tianjin International Airport, it said.

The plant is expected to be able to produce four A320s a month by 2011 and a total of about 300 A320 planes by 2016.

"This A320 assembled in China unquestionably demonstrated the same quality and performance as those assembled and delivered in Hamburg or Toulouse," Fernando Alonso, senior vice president for Flight & Integration Tests at Airbus said.
.
http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/ ... hina_N.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Apr 2012 10:31 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21
Posts: 2262
But Brazil got there, so did China! Before them, US, EU, Russia got there! At some point of time they all started from scratch!

Why can't we?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Apr 2012 11:16 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7741
We CAN do it provided we are serious about it right from the start of the program.

NCA program should involve atleast one major indian private player Tata or Mahindra with atleast 25 % stake in the program , the rest being government funded.

The other important aspect is to involve a global player to be a lead consultant for the program providing technical and management inputs on how to manage this program , with Boeing and Airbus not competing in this space and would be happy to consult.

Then one key aspect is to choose the lead airline that would buy the NCA-90 and be its first major operator , that could be any private player or public one like AirIndia , the chosen airline would share the major risk of operating it and would get subsidy to buy it in return for fine tuning the bird once its gets flight certified and testing program ends and refinement begins , experience has shown one can encounter some hurdle here so this is as serious as it gets to make it commercially successful.

Aim for EASA certification for the aircraft and develop a global support base for maintenance and spares support for it , including pilot training and simulators and other fine nitty gritty that goes into supporting such aircraft. There are players in market that can be hired to do it , including its marketing , sales and after sales support.

It is one goal to develop an aircraft , fly it and be happy while another to design a competitive aircraft that can compete globally with lead players in the market like Embrarer , Bombardier , Sukhoi and Antonov ....... We should aim for the latter and try to be globally competitive rather then just be happy we have designed and flown a 90 seater and finally force feed the IAF to swollow it if nothing works out , wont do much for civil aviation program in India. Thats what Brazil/Embraer does and is , we should aim to be like them rather than China that has shown it cant compete globally with its civil program and aims such program for local market some times force them to buy.

NCA will decide the fate of civil program in India for the next two decade or till 2030 , if we get it right from the outset then we will have a growing civil program in India and with exponential growth of civil market in india both govt/private player will be benefited and so will the country.

Initially its all right to engage global major buy equipment for them that meets stringent standards with the goal to remain competitive at all times , no need to rush for indiginisation of every thing , once the program has numbers then you can think of replacing some equipment/spares and systems from locally manufacturer , Many big/small players in india would improve their own competitiveness by being part of this program

NCA is too big and serious program for India and its civil aviation program to be left alone to NAL/CSIR and their committees , if we do all that i have said above and much more , thats what major players globally do then we can have a bright future in this domain.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2090 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 53  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group