Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Why not let the Lt. Gen get to the route of courts for clarity on 'fixing responsibility' part as some kind of ad-hoc criteria, by establishment which itself apparently is clean on diplomacy and policy matters. Let courts decide if one branch of federal govt. can add such ad-hoc criteria in any policy matter for another branch of federal govt.
Can the defense establishment put a criteria of 'fixing responsibility' for govt. in cases such as late acquisitions, corruption, etc.
Can the defense establishment put a criteria of 'fixing responsibility' for govt. in cases such as late acquisitions, corruption, etc.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
^^^ beginning to sound like an episode of "Homeland"!
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 5128
- Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 901991.cms
Ex-Army chief Gen VK Singh's family alleges bugging attempt at house
PTI | Jan 5, 2013, 06.45 PM IST
NEW DELHI: High drama was witnessed at the residence of former Army chief Gen VK Singh here on Saturday after a major went there purportedly to remove the Army's telephone exchange but his family alleged that it was an attempt to plant snooping bugs.
The major of the Signals Regiment was "detained" by the family members who called the media to the scene in Mandir Marg in Delhi Cantonment at around 2pm.
They linked it to the withdrawal of the Z-plus security to Gen Singh, who has been at loggerheads with establishment for over a year following controversy related to his age issue.
Gen Singh's family members claimed that Major R Vikram from 1st Signals Regiment entered their house without prior permission and may have been trying to bug their telephones.
"We found him (the major) at the house. They (team) could not give any reasonable logic for being here. They had no valid documents. They may have come to bug the phone. We detained, apprehended him. He revealed his identity as Maj R Vikram from 1st Signals Regiment," said Gen Singh's lawyer Vishwajeet Singh.
Claiming that the Army major and his team had "some cards with them", he said, "Recently they have withdrawn security and now this has happened. There could be something big."
Army sources admitted that the exchange was being removed from the former Army chief's residence as part of the withdrawal of Z-plus security category with effect from November last.
The Army dismissed the allegations of snooping attempt, saying its team had gone there to remove the Army telephone exchange installed there and the issue was created due to communication gap.
"Due to a miscommunication somewhere, a Signals Regiment party went to remove the Army exchange and lines at the Mandir Marg house of Gen VK Singh. Mrs VK Singh objected to the removal of the exchange without prior notice," Army said in a statement.
In deference to her objection, the team returned without removing the exchange.
The house has been provided by the defence ministry for one year from his retirement on May 31 last year.
"There was a communication gap. The Army team had gone there to remove telephone exchange but no prior information was given due to which all this happened," Army PRO Col J Dahiya said.
He said the Army will now carry out the exercise after giving prior information to the family.
Interestingly, Gen Singh has himself been in the midst of a controversy following allegations that during his tenure as Army chief he had used sophisticated off-the-air interceptors to snoop on the officials of Defence Ministry at the height of his age controversy.
The specialized unit Technical Support Division is now in the process of being disbanded.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
^ One thing that has become more and more clear is that Gen VKS certainly upset powerful people who interfere in the forces' matters and see it as a gravy train for filling their own pockets.
This has ceased to be a matter of a serving Chief taking the MoD to court over an official record. Sad state of affairs. Congratulations Congress, you managed to ruin the one institution that worked in this country.
This has ceased to be a matter of a serving Chief taking the MoD to court over an official record. Sad state of affairs. Congratulations Congress, you managed to ruin the one institution that worked in this country.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Nobody comes out smelling of roses on this one ...Nikhil T wrote:^ One thing that has become more and more clear is that Gen VKS certainly upset powerful people who interfere in the forces' matters and see it as a gravy train for filling their own pockets.
This has ceased to be a matter of a serving Chief taking the MoD to court over an official record. Sad state of affairs. Congratulations Congress, you managed to ruin the one institution that worked in this country.
Not the Supreme Court ... for telling the General to "blow with the wind", and not even checking who changed the DoB
Definitely not the MoD ... for playing favorites and destroying the integrity of a great institution
Definitely not St. Antony ... for doing nothing and let all of this happen on his watch and not take responsibility for anything
Not the media ... for publishing planted and selective leaks on coups and eavesdropping
And ... I must add highly reluctantly, not the general either ... calling for dissolution of parliament and agreeing to the change in DoB in the first place.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: 26 Mar 2002 12:31
- Location: searching for the next al-qaida #3
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Pakistan says 1 dead in border clash with India
The PTI report is below:
Pakistani troops violate ceasefire again
It is an AP news report, which ToI has reported in full. Note the standard disclaimers in the end which the shameless ToI has reproduced in full.ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and India traded accusations on Sunday of violating the boundary line dividing the two sides' forces in the disputed northern region of Kashmir. Pakistan said an Indian cross-border raid on border post killed one of its soldiers, while India said its troops had fired into Pakistan to retaliate for shelling that destroyed a home.
...
...
The PTI report is below:
Pakistani troops violate ceasefire again
SRINAGAR: Pakistani troops on Sunday violated ceasefire by firing mortar shells towards Indian army posts in Uri sector near the Line of Control.
"They (Pakistan army) started firing mortar shells towards our posts at Churunda village in Uri sector around 3.15am," an army spokesman said.
He said some of the shells landed close to civilian habitation but there was no damage done.
The spokesman said the army retaliated the Pakistani shelling briefly after which there has been quiet from both sides.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Though it is a TSP-ian accusation, wouldnt readily disbelieve it.Pakistan said an Indian cross-border raid on border post killed one of its soldiers,
Cross border raid == SF involvement == High value target or message being sent across?
Wonder what caused such a provocation for even our pair-less higher-ups( not sure if netas sign off such things or its only upto sector commander/IA chief level) to sanction such a raid?
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
It's strange how quickly Pakistan has reported this incident and has tried to make it an issue given that it hardly even acknowledges any cross-border firing by its troops despite numerous casualties on the Indian side and Indian protests. Suddenly within hours of the incident we have Reuters, AFP and BBC reporting about this incident ? The term cross border raid sounds decidedly ominous when you consider that both India and Pakistan are nuclear states with a history.
The Indian Army has faced numerous cross-border firing incidents at its positions while Pakistan barely acknowledges them. Perhaps the Indian Army decided to respond more forcefully to this firing incident by "removing" the offending Pakistani post ? Would that be far fetched ??
The Indian Army has faced numerous cross-border firing incidents at its positions while Pakistan barely acknowledges them. Perhaps the Indian Army decided to respond more forcefully to this firing incident by "removing" the offending Pakistani post ? Would that be far fetched ??
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Importing these trucks will be a money spinner for corrupt elements in and out of the army.
We do not have a siberia taiga for the telars to roam in the mud...any old truck like the cheen df31 telar which we already have will do for the bigger missiles and the x conuntry local offerings for the smaller missiles and mlrs.
This is just another sellout...
We do not have a siberia taiga for the telars to roam in the mud...any old truck like the cheen df31 telar which we already have will do for the bigger missiles and the x conuntry local offerings for the smaller missiles and mlrs.
This is just another sellout...
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
I think that many more pakis were killed in the raid than is being admitted.Brando wrote:It's strange how quickly Pakistan has reported this incident and has tried to make it an issue given that it hardly even acknowledges any cross-border firing by its troops despite numerous casualties on the Indian side and Indian protests. Suddenly within hours of the incident we have Reuters, AFP and BBC reporting about this incident ? The term cross border raid sounds decidedly ominous when you consider that both India and Pakistan are nuclear states with a history.
The Indian Army has faced numerous cross-border firing incidents at its positions while Pakistan barely acknowledges them. Perhaps the Indian Army decided to respond more forcefully to this firing incident by "removing" the offending Pakistani post ? Would that be far fetched ??
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Who has given pukis right to complain, after pigs involved in 26/11 are roaming free, or for that matter Dawood Ibrahim and such murderous gangsters. Or rabid jehadis. All the propagandu is about hiding all this to make this appears quickly as some kind of issue, even while firing mortars from across the border as the article itself says that has already destroyed a home in India. Who will pay for this home destroyed?Brando wrote:It's strange how quickly Pakistan has reported this incident and has tried to make it an issue given that it hardly even acknowledges any cross-border firing by its troops despite numerous casualties on the Indian side and Indian protests. Suddenly within hours of the incident we have Reuters, AFP and BBC reporting about this incident ? The term cross border raid sounds decidedly ominous when you consider that both India and Pakistan are nuclear states with a history.
The Indian Army has faced numerous cross-border firing incidents at its positions while Pakistan barely acknowledges them. Perhaps the Indian Army decided to respond more forcefully to this firing incident by "removing" the offending Pakistani post ? Would that be far fetched ??
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
There is firing nearly everyday on the border and only some of the incidents are reported in the press.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 317
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
^especially in the newspapers circulating in regions other than Punjab Haryana & Himachal. I remember firing incidents being regularly reported in papers like TribuneIndia, which were completely absent in other major dailies about 8 years back.
TribuneIndia gives a feeling that it hasbecome now more of congi mouthpiece
TribuneIndia gives a feeling that it hasbecome now more of congi mouthpiece
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: 26 Mar 2002 12:31
- Location: searching for the next al-qaida #3
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Some interesting tidbit from economic times report...
India vs Pakistan: First ceasefire violations of 2013 in Haji Pir sector
India vs Pakistan: First ceasefire violations of 2013 in Haji Pir sector
So does this mean that the pakis now occupy this post that India had vacated during winter?...
Pakistan, however, has claimed that India army crossed the LoC and left two of its soldiers injured. One of the injured later died, reports from Islamabad quoting army sources said. However, defence sources in Baramulla denied they breached the LoC. The dispute is about an outpost that Indian army had left unmanned for some time. While the soldiers were deployed to this post, this triggered today's crisis.
...
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 5128
- Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
^^woooh!!!
some kind of kargil 2? or a mini kargil??
some kind of kargil 2? or a mini kargil??
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
From Pioneer
Fund freezes Cold Start
Monday, 07 January 2013 00:47
Rahul Datta | New Delhi
Hits: 79
E-mail
Print
PDF
alt
inShare
In a major setback to Army’s operational preparedness, its ambitious ‘Cold Start’ doctrine to speedily overwhelm Pakistan in the first few days of the war has been hampered by the budget cut of more than Rs10,000 crore this year. With little hope of getting more funds in the next fiscal too, the Army is not in a position to put in place its critical plan to raise an operational corps to sustain unhindered logistical supply of ammunition to the advancing forces in Pakistan.
After the mobilisation of troops took more than ten days for Operation Parakaram in the wake of the terrorist attack on Parliament in 2001, the Indian Army came up with ‘Cold Start’ doctrine to achieve the military objectives in the shortest possible time with minimum collateral damage.
Army chief General Bikram Singh is likely to brief Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shortly about the situation arising out of the budget cut and its impact on the ‘Cold Start’ doctrine. The presentation was to take place last week, but had to postpone due to the Prime Minister’s other commitments, sources said.
The Army chief will also brief the Prime Minister about the critical shortages facing the Army in terms of outdated artillery guns, ammunition, night-fighting capabilities, air defence and lack of specialised equipment for the Special Forces.
The Army’s plan to fight a two-front war at the same time on the western and eastern borders with Pakistan and China respectively have also taken a hit due to resource crunch as the Government was unlikely to give funds for raising two mountain strike corps for China front, sources said here on Sunday.
As part of this Rs60,000 crore project, the Army was supposed to raise these two corps over a period of four to five years and the funds were to be allotted in a phased manner over the same time frame.
The Army felt that the implantation ‘Cold Start’ doctrine is urgent because Pakistan has a distinct geographical advantage over India and can mobilise its forces faster. The first format of this doctrine took shape in 2004 with a clear objective that the Army should be able to make an offensive thrust into Pakistan from various sectors within the first 48 hours after the war broke out. The ‘Cold Start’ doctrine emphasised building capabilities for such an endeavour.
The doctrine said the entire purpose of a military option to take out terrorist training camps in POK or deter Pakistan Army from launching a counter-offensive will be defeated if India did not rapidly mobilise it forced to attack its enemy.
Maintaining the momentum of the offensive through uninterrupted supply of ammunition for tanks and artillery, besides bullets for advancing mechanised infantry, was part of the ‘Cold Start’ doctrine.
As part of the doctrine, it was planned to have an operational corps to ensure logistical support to the Strike Corps comprising tanks, artillery, attack helicopters and infantry. These three corps along with battle groups will be there to rapidly advance into Pakistan by overwhelming its forces and holding territory.
The ‘Cold Start’ doctrine got a boost during then Army chief General VK Singh’s tenure, but things came to a standstill when he took on the Government over his date of birth issue last year.
This spat saw the Army’s efforts to reduce its teeth-to-tail ratio by ensuring fast delivery of ammunition to its fighting men. This slowed down in the last one and half years, and don’t see to get better this year. Sources said the budget cut put the Army’s operational plans hovering around ‘Cold Start’ doctrine and training on the back burner.
The operational corps is short of funds for the last two to three years to put in place a foolproof system of delivery of ordnance even when facing enemy artillery fire or air attack, they added.
In this situation, if ordered to fight a war at this point of time, the elite Strike Corps and armoured columns of tanks will not be able to advance more than ten to 15 kilometres in a day in Pakistan, officials admitted.
Fund freezes Cold Start
Monday, 07 January 2013 00:47
Rahul Datta | New Delhi
Hits: 79
alt
inShare
In a major setback to Army’s operational preparedness, its ambitious ‘Cold Start’ doctrine to speedily overwhelm Pakistan in the first few days of the war has been hampered by the budget cut of more than Rs10,000 crore this year. With little hope of getting more funds in the next fiscal too, the Army is not in a position to put in place its critical plan to raise an operational corps to sustain unhindered logistical supply of ammunition to the advancing forces in Pakistan.
After the mobilisation of troops took more than ten days for Operation Parakaram in the wake of the terrorist attack on Parliament in 2001, the Indian Army came up with ‘Cold Start’ doctrine to achieve the military objectives in the shortest possible time with minimum collateral damage.
Army chief General Bikram Singh is likely to brief Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shortly about the situation arising out of the budget cut and its impact on the ‘Cold Start’ doctrine. The presentation was to take place last week, but had to postpone due to the Prime Minister’s other commitments, sources said.
The Army chief will also brief the Prime Minister about the critical shortages facing the Army in terms of outdated artillery guns, ammunition, night-fighting capabilities, air defence and lack of specialised equipment for the Special Forces.
The Army’s plan to fight a two-front war at the same time on the western and eastern borders with Pakistan and China respectively have also taken a hit due to resource crunch as the Government was unlikely to give funds for raising two mountain strike corps for China front, sources said here on Sunday.
As part of this Rs60,000 crore project, the Army was supposed to raise these two corps over a period of four to five years and the funds were to be allotted in a phased manner over the same time frame.
The Army felt that the implantation ‘Cold Start’ doctrine is urgent because Pakistan has a distinct geographical advantage over India and can mobilise its forces faster. The first format of this doctrine took shape in 2004 with a clear objective that the Army should be able to make an offensive thrust into Pakistan from various sectors within the first 48 hours after the war broke out. The ‘Cold Start’ doctrine emphasised building capabilities for such an endeavour.
The doctrine said the entire purpose of a military option to take out terrorist training camps in POK or deter Pakistan Army from launching a counter-offensive will be defeated if India did not rapidly mobilise it forced to attack its enemy.
Maintaining the momentum of the offensive through uninterrupted supply of ammunition for tanks and artillery, besides bullets for advancing mechanised infantry, was part of the ‘Cold Start’ doctrine.
As part of the doctrine, it was planned to have an operational corps to ensure logistical support to the Strike Corps comprising tanks, artillery, attack helicopters and infantry. These three corps along with battle groups will be there to rapidly advance into Pakistan by overwhelming its forces and holding territory.
The ‘Cold Start’ doctrine got a boost during then Army chief General VK Singh’s tenure, but things came to a standstill when he took on the Government over his date of birth issue last year.
This spat saw the Army’s efforts to reduce its teeth-to-tail ratio by ensuring fast delivery of ammunition to its fighting men. This slowed down in the last one and half years, and don’t see to get better this year. Sources said the budget cut put the Army’s operational plans hovering around ‘Cold Start’ doctrine and training on the back burner.
The operational corps is short of funds for the last two to three years to put in place a foolproof system of delivery of ordnance even when facing enemy artillery fire or air attack, they added.
In this situation, if ordered to fight a war at this point of time, the elite Strike Corps and armoured columns of tanks will not be able to advance more than ten to 15 kilometres in a day in Pakistan, officials admitted.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 676
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
^^^ Most of the money is being diverted by Congress thugs into vote gathering corruption ridden schemes like Jawahar Rojgar Yojna. There is no money left for education, defence or healthcare.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
I'm trying to understand something here - is the article saying that because of the DOB controversy, the forces modernization was stopped because it didn't receive adequate funding ?The ‘Cold Start’ doctrine got a boost during then Army chief General VK Singh’s tenure, but things came to a standstill when he took on the Government over his date of birth issue last year.
This spat saw the Army’s efforts to reduce its teeth-to-tail ratio by ensuring fast delivery of ammunition to its fighting men. This slowed down in the last one and half years, and don’t see to get better this year. Sources said the budget cut put the Army’s operational plans hovering around ‘Cold Start’ doctrine and training on the back burner.
The operational corps is short of funds for the last two to three years to put in place a foolproof system of delivery of ordnance even when facing enemy artillery fire or air attack, they added.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: 07 Feb 2007 16:58
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
I thought I will add some more misery to this thread:
Watering down the Army's Night Vision systems to satisfy BEL
Watering down the Army's Night Vision systems to satisfy BEL
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 233
- Joined: 25 Jul 2009 21:28
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2013/20130108/main4.htmLadakh fracas: Disciplinary action okayed against 16 Armymen
Nearly seven months after officers and jawans of an artillery regiment clashed at Nyoma near the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in southeastern Ladakh, a Court of Inquiry (CoI) has blamed as many as 56 personnel, including at least five officers, for the incident.
Sources reveal that the CoI has recommended disciplinary action against 16 personnel, including the regiment’s commanding officer, second-in-command and three other officers for failure of command and control, assault, indiscipline and other lapses. In addition, administrative action has been recommended against 40 other personnel for their role in the incident.
CoI FINDINGSThe CoI, presided by Brig Ajay Talwar, Deputy General Officer Commanding 3 Infantry Division has forwarded its findings and recommendations to Headquarters 14 Corps at Leh. The CoI had examined 220 witnesses, including officers, JCOs and other ranks, besides five civilians.
A Court of Inquiry has blamed as many as 56 personnel, including at least five officers, for the incident
It has recommended disciplinary action against 16 personnel, including the regiment’s commanding officer, second-in-command and three other officers for failure of command and control, assault, indiscipline, etc
In addition, administrative action has been recommended against 40 other personnel for their role in the incident
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
I simply cannot make head or tale of the article about CSD and cut in the Army budget. Which and what Corps is the author talking about? Super confused onlee...
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
And I thought it was always the corrupt Armd Core chaps who were running down the poor poor PSU wala hard working babu?vivek_ahuja wrote:I thought I will add some more misery to this thread:
Watering down the Army's Night Vision systems to satisfy BEL
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: 07 Feb 2007 16:58
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Sanku wrote:And I thought it was always the corrupt Armd Core chaps who were running down the poor poor PSU wala hard working babu?vivek_ahuja wrote:I thought I will add some more misery to this thread:
Watering down the Army's Night Vision systems to satisfy BEL
It take a village to burn all the houses of that said village.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
no ones denies PSU problemsAnd I thought it was always the corrupt Armd Core chaps who were running down the poor poor PSU wala hard working babu?
except the army has never rejected more orders because of PSU quality issues.
not to mention that natasha products made by PSU also had quality problems (barrels, ammo ityadi)
so the question mark still remains on Armoured corp decision making!!
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Shiv Aroor @ShivAroor
Update: Army confirms that one of its jawans was beheaded (his head was taken away by the Pak Army attackers). The other was not beheaded.
Update: Army confirms that one of its jawans was beheaded (his head was taken away by the Pak Army attackers). The other was not beheaded.
-
- BRFite -Trainee
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
I am hearing in news that 2 IA soldiers have been killed by puki army well within our LOC.. What the hell is happening here...
-
- BRFite -Trainee
- Posts: 60
- Joined: 08 Dec 2010 11:11
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/314590/jk- ... atrol.html
I just heard on news that both of Indian soldiers were mutilated. One poor chap has his head missing. Army has not been disclosing the gruesome/gory details. I can only guess what the families of those two soldiers will go through.
Pak army did it in Saurab Kalia (1999 Kargil war) case before and it did it once again.
Its time to send SF to local Pak post where this happened and bring back the Pakistani unit responsible (dead or alive) for trial in India.
Diplomacy, Geneva Convention, International Court of Justice won't have any effect on Pakistan regarding this. They will just keep denying officially. We need to make a strong case so that they lose the habit of mutilating our soldiers and start respecting Geneva convention and fight with some honor.
BTW, for some apparent reasons, I am not hoping for any meaningful response from our great PM Dr. Singh.
I just heard on news that both of Indian soldiers were mutilated. One poor chap has his head missing. Army has not been disclosing the gruesome/gory details. I can only guess what the families of those two soldiers will go through.
Pak army did it in Saurab Kalia (1999 Kargil war) case before and it did it once again.
Its time to send SF to local Pak post where this happened and bring back the Pakistani unit responsible (dead or alive) for trial in India.
Diplomacy, Geneva Convention, International Court of Justice won't have any effect on Pakistan regarding this. They will just keep denying officially. We need to make a strong case so that they lose the habit of mutilating our soldiers and start respecting Geneva convention and fight with some honor.
BTW, for some apparent reasons, I am not hoping for any meaningful response from our great PM Dr. Singh.
Last edited by Ghatotkacha on 08 Jan 2013 20:23, edited 4 times in total.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 627
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
no no.. let us just stop playing cricket with them...
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: 26 Mar 2002 12:31
- Location: searching for the next al-qaida #3
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Pak troops cross LoC, kill 2 Indian jawans brutally
JAMMU: In a gruesome attack, Pakistani troops on Tuesday crossed into Indian territory and ambushed an Army patrol party killing two soldiers whose heads were reportedly chopped off.
The attack took place along the Line of Control in Poonch district when Pakistanis came about 100 metres into Indian territory and assaulted the patrol party. Besides killing two Lance Naiks, Hemraj and Sudhakar Singh, they also injured two other soldiers.
During the brutal assault on the patrol party, the Pakistanis are said to have chopped off their heads, one of which they carried with them, informed sources said.
However, the Army, while confirming the killing of Indian soldiers, did not comment on reports that they had been beheaded.
...
...
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Sad, From GOI side things wont go beyond sending Dossiers.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 627
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
I have a hunch.. GOI will try to act strong this time around to deviate focus from internal problems like rape and corruption... lets carvin wrote:Sad, From GOI side things wont go beyond sending Dossiers.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
You must be kidding. The focus on rape and corruption has already been diverted to Asaram Bapu.Prithwiraj wrote:I have a hunch.. GOI will try to act strong this time around to deviate focus from internal problems like rape and corruption... lets carvin wrote:Sad, From GOI side things wont go beyond sending Dossiers.
Now that Pakistan Army is proving with multiple examples that beheading is their SOP, India will prove with more examples of 'strong remarks' and dossiers what our SOP is.
Justice Markandey Katju will find another excuse to repeat the need for unification with Pakistan (and Bangladesh).
Rahul Gandhi will board another train 'without informing his security team'.
There will more announcements on arrests for the Samjhauta Express bombing.
We'll be reminded of the definition of Track II diplomacy vis-a-vis Siachen.
There will be more news on how India got screwed in the Maldives.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
deleted
Last edited by Surya on 08 Jan 2013 22:43, edited 1 time in total.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 627
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
soon IPL will arrive and it will be all fine ....don't worry
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
Correct. I forgot about IPL and my disdain for Aman ki Tamasha is such that I forgot to mention that as well.Prithwiraj wrote:soon IPL will arrive and it will be all fine ....don't worry
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
******
son of bitches shold be hunted down. damn!! This matter should not close till 4 pukie head are hung on a pole on loc.
son of bitches shold be hunted down. damn!! This matter should not close till 4 pukie head are hung on a pole on loc.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 723
- Joined: 27 Oct 2008 10:07
- Location: Bee for Baakistan
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
^^^^ I just hope the same sentiments is nursed by the Generals/Brigadiers in waiting who are out their patrolling the LOC to protect us from Barbarians at the gates.
I also hope that the WKK morons realize this is what would hit them if the Army was not present or was unable to protect us because of "cuts".
I also hope that the WKK morons realize this is what would hit them if the Army was not present or was unable to protect us because of "cuts".
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
this is outrageous. what is further aching me is the almost assured future course of no counter-action. f*king impotents who have no sense of national pride are ruling us.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
that will definitely happen - maybe not publiclywhat is further aching me is the almost assured future course of no counter-action.
Re: Indian Army: News and Discussions 15 Apr 2012
WKK's are "aasteen ke saanp" no matter what happens they will always remain like that because it is in there nature, so hoping for any realization to dawn on them makes the hopeful look completely foolish. I would advise my fellow BRFites to get rid of any such "hopes" and accept the reality for what it is.lakshmikanth wrote:I also hope that the WKK morons realize this is what would hit them if the Army was not present or was unable to protect us because of "cuts".