Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Post Reply
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5305
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by srai »

pankajs wrote:
Saurav Jha @SJha1618 · 11h 11 hours ago

Indian Army Air Defence: SA-6 replacement - Akash MRSAM. SA-13 replacement - Sosna-R. SA-8 replacement - DRDO's QRSAM.
  • SA-6 (launchers): 160 - Two SA-6 Groups - 12 regiments
  • SA-13 (launchers): 250+
  • SA-8b (launchers): 50
* http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Today/22-Army-Orbat.html
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by pankajs »

I was going to quote my own post. Thanks!

SA-13 replacement - Sosna-R.
SA-8 replacement - DRDO's QRSAM{Astra based QRSAM???}
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by pankajs »

If the Spike is ~8000 now(SKD) and can go up to ~20,000 (Local with TOT) is true it is curtains for Javaline and Javaline NG.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8428
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Indranil »

Septimus P. wrote:http://trishul-trident.blogspot.be/

As per Prasun, Javelin will still be acquired since it is better optimised for mountain warfare and the deal will come in next year. Hopefully true.
Not happening. He often continues in this way when his bhavishya vani doesn't materialize.
Ranjani Brow

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Ranjani Brow »

pankajs wrote:I was going to quote my own post. Thanks!

SA-13 replacement - Sosna-R.
SA-8 replacement - DRDO's QRSAM{Astra based QRSAM???}
No. It's a completely new design but will utilize technologies developed for Astra and Trishul.
abhik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3090
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 17:42

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by abhik »

The soviets had way too many types of SAMs, I think there isbscope to rationalise.
Ranjani Brow

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Ranjani Brow »

Septimus P. wrote:http://trishul-trident.blogspot.be/

As per Prasun, Javelin will still be acquired since it is better optimised for mountain warfare and the deal will come in next year. Hopefully true.
Also as per Prasun, Spike-SR (Range: 50m-800m) is ordered for Special Forces not the -MR (2.5Km) or LR (4Km, LOAL) akin to Javelin ATGM.
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36424
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by SaiK »

do we have buk-m2e s? dunno if it is comparable or on the same class as sm6.
vaibhav.n
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 575
Joined: 23 Mar 2010 21:47

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by vaibhav.n »

hecky wrote:
Septimus P. wrote:http://trishul-trident.blogspot.be/

As per Prasun, Javelin will still be acquired since it is better optimised for mountain warfare and the deal will come in next year. Hopefully true.
Also as per Prasun, Spike-SR (Range: 50m-800m) is ordered for Special Forces not the -MR (2.5Km) or LR (4Km, LOAL) akin to Javelin ATGM.
He is firing one from the hips.

Considering how many SF units we have, why will they require those many numbers of ATGM's?

In any case, even their ATGM's are in a jeep mounted role. No use humping an ATGM across in a Long Range Recce Patrol to terrorize a mujahid when more ghastly means are avalaible.
Thakur_B
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2404
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Thakur_B »

Singha wrote:Thakur saheb, I think crystal maze is the basic popeye which has a range of 80km per the wiki.
the popeye turbo is featured in the Dolphin class subs and is apparently not even used by IDFAF.
there is no photo of crystal maze as its the popeye only.

http://www.rafael.co.il/Marketing/332-en/Marketing.aspx
it lists the basic popeye and thats it.
The crystal maze warhead is also reported to be much smaller, at 80 Kgs only, hence my belief that it is not your regular popeye. If I remember correctly, crystal maze was a new variant of popeye and failed to make the cut in the first round of trials where it could not meet it's advertised penetration in reinforced concrete.
Victor
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2628
Joined: 24 Apr 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Victor »

Would be great to get this puppy too--4kg mini Spike wireless guided anti personnel missile with almost 1 mile range.
Ranjani Brow

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Ranjani Brow »

vaibhav.n wrote:He is firing one from the hips.

Considering how many SF units we have, why will they require those many numbers of ATGM's?

In any case, even their ATGM's are in a jeep mounted role. No use humping an ATGM across in a Long Range Recce Patrol to terrorize a mujahid when more ghastly means are avalaible.
Spike-SR has a disposable launcher. So maybe the order is a mix of -SR or -mini and -LR versions.
8356 (x26) missiles for 321 launchers seems a bit too much to me.

From 2007:
Rafael Armament Development Authority Ltd. will supply its Spike LR anti-tank missile to Spain in a $425 million order. The contract to supply 2,600 Spike missiles and 260 launchers is part of collaboration between Rafael and Santa Barbara Sistemas of Spain, a subsidiary of General Dynamics Corp. (NYSE:GD).
rohitvats
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 7830
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 18:24
Location: Jatland

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by rohitvats »

That idiot Chorgupta writes whatever fancy stuff he can conjure up. 321 launchers and 8,000+ missiles for < 15 battalions between IA/IAF/IN...and I'm including Para infantry as well.

Also, the tripe about IA infantry authorized mix of medium and long range ATGM. Someone tell that idiot that IA infantry operates only Milan/Milan-2T. Unlike US or Pakistan Army even, IA has never operated an ATGM of TOW class. Which is a heavy and long range ATGM.

IIRC, US Marine infantry battalion weapons company has ATGM Platoon with 4xJavelin + 4xTOW launchers. IMO, we have 8 x launchers with 1+5 missiles each. And mountain segment has 2 x launchers and 1+5 missiles each.

And Javelin missile already comes with a cooled seeker. And that is the reason it is an expensive missile. New French ATGM called MMP will also have uncooled IIR and twin modes.
John
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3447
Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by John »

SaiK wrote:do we have buk-m2e s? dunno if it is comparable or on the same class as sm6.
We have the naval variant but not land based Buk. And it is not in the same class as SM-6 it is in same class as Patroit PAC-1.
rohitvats
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 7830
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 18:24
Location: Jatland

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by rohitvats »

BTW, SA-6 Group in the army is a single regiment in itself and not an amalgamation of multiple units.

Read this: Killer Kvadrat is 502 AD Group(SP). It was with Strike Corps earlier but is now with Desert Corps - 12 Corps based in Jodhpur. Which is a 'Pivot Corps'. Rings some bells?

http://www.sainiksamachar.nic.in/englis ... 13/h13.htm
vaibhav.n
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 575
Joined: 23 Mar 2010 21:47

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by vaibhav.n »

rohitvats wrote:That idiot Chorgupta writes whatever fancy stuff he can conjure up.

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
vaibhav.n
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 575
Joined: 23 Mar 2010 21:47

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by vaibhav.n »

Rohit,

Do you have an idea if its the Spike MR or LR? LR will bring loads of commonality across the board for IA, besides could push the ruskies out of the BMP upgrade offering.

I have a feeling they will move fast on the Spice contract since BDL has already completed its Milan 2T manufacture.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20782
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Karan M »

Vaibhav, its likely to be a mix of systems not one alone. The launcher is universal, right? That can explain the higher number of rounds. Depending on the tasking, they get differing numbers of different rounds. Somewhat similar to the new rifle with changeable gun barrels thing.
Ranjani Brow

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Ranjani Brow »

Karan M wrote:Vaibhav, its likely to be a mix of systems not one alone. The launcher is universal, right? That can explain the higher number of rounds. Depending on the tasking, they get differing numbers of different rounds. Somewhat similar to the new rifle with changeable gun barrels thing.
Spike -SR has a disposable launcher.
Spike -MR (2.5Km) and -LR (4Km) share the same launcher. The -LR has a bi-directional fiber-optic data link which enables missile to be used at it maximum range.
Spike -ER is vehicle and helicopter mounted but can also be fitted onto a tripod. It is analogous to Nag/HeliNa

Spike-mini is a Anti-Personal weapon which can be operated from an integral command launch unit or with existing Spike family launchers. (http://defense-update.com/photos/mini_spike.html)

I think the order is a mix of Spike-mini for Special Forces and Spike-LR for regular infantry.
If all 8356 missiles are Spike-LR then the price reported (Rs 3200 crore) is wrong.
Victor
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2628
Joined: 24 Apr 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Victor »

To Counter China, Indian BrahMos Missiles, Patrol Boats for Vietnam?
Unnecessarily sensational headline. Why should India sell any missiles to Vietnam when they can make their own? Next year Vietnam, which can't even develop motorcycles locally, may suddenly test a locally-developed, 1,500 km range cruise missile and put it into service immediately after the one test. It will be called "Dung Cam" ("fearless" in Vietnamese).

Article also mentions a probable Indian electronic spy base in Vietnam.
member_28722
BRFite
Posts: 333
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by member_28722 »

Victor wrote:Why should India sell any missiles to Vietnam when they can make their own? Next year Vietnam, which can't even develop motorcycles locally, may suddenly test a locally-developed, 1,500 km range cruise missile and put it into service immediately after the one test. It will be called "Dung Cam" ("fearless" in Vietnamese).
Swapped TSP for Vietnam? :D
Hobbes
BRFite
Posts: 219
Joined: 14 Mar 2011 02:59

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Hobbes »

saurabh.mhapsekar wrote:
Victor wrote:Why should India sell any missiles to Vietnam when they can make their own? Next year Vietnam, which can't even develop motorcycles locally, may suddenly test a locally-developed, 1,500 km range cruise missile and put it into service immediately after the one test. It will be called "Dung Cam" ("fearless" in Vietnamese).
Swapped TSP for Vietnam? :D
I'd say the Dung Cam, or more colloquially the "Bina Bhay" would be intended for defence of Vietnam from an aggressive neighbor, while in TSP's case it is the aggressive neighbour.
rohitvats
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 7830
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 18:24
Location: Jatland

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by rohitvats »

Karan M wrote:Vaibhav, its likely to be a mix of systems not one alone. The launcher is universal, right? That can explain the higher number of rounds. Depending on the tasking, they get differing numbers of different rounds. Somewhat similar to the new rifle with changeable gun barrels thing.
Karan - as you rightly said, purchase of Spike gives IA lot of flexibility in terms of options.

1. The news report(s) which mention about IA RFP for 3rd Gen F&F missile clearly state that IA wanted 'Active & Passive' F&F capability. That 'Passive' option is your Fiber Optic (FO) cable based two-way video-link with 'man-in-the-loop'.

2. Spike-MR (for infantry) comes with option of having this FO based capability. Basically, if IA deems it fit, an infantry battalion can have few launchers and missiles with FO based passive F&F capability. It opens up lot of possibilities like attack from concealed positions through lofted attack profile, reconnaissance via the video link, battle damage assessment etc.

3. Further, Spike-LR comes with 4 km range and in-built FO capability. But the good thing is that it uses the same missile. The Command Launch Unit (CLU) is most likely to be different to be able to pick up targets at 4 km MAX range. But the beauty is that it also weighs the same as CLU of Spike-MR - i.e. 13 Kg. Another possibility can be that an infantry battalion has a mix of Spike-MR and Spike-LR. Spike LR gives opportunity to take out tanks at pretty long range - not to mention that top attack profile with two-way video link gives opportunity for reconnaissance (which is one of the advertised capability of this FO video link).

4. Also, using Spike-LR we can hopefully replace the Konkurs on BMP-2, which are as it is slated for upgrade.

In short - we can standardize across the bulk of IA's ATGM inventory, save for cannon fired missiles like INVAR and CLGM.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21538
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Philip »

Spike comes in many avatars,no need for the Javelin and it does have top attack capability and tandem warheads to defeat ERA armour.

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/spi ... gm-028081/
Spike Served: India’s New ATGM

Oct 26, 2014 20:15 UTC by Defense Industry Daily staff

RAFAEL Spike firing
Spike firing
(click to view full)
India has been looking for a modern anti-tank/ infantry strike missile to take the place of MBDA Milan missiles that have been produced under license by Bharat Dynamics. The finalists in this competition were the American fire-and-forget Javelin, and Israel’s Spike with its combination of wire guided or fire-and-forget modes. As of October 2014, Spike appears to have won, despite offers from the USA to involve India in developing the next version of Javelin.

The Spike Family
Spike family

The Spike infantry system consists of a missile in its canister, a tripod, a Command Launch Unit that contains the optics and firing system, and a battery. It can go from “off” to firing in less than 30 seconds, as the operator lays the cross hairs on the aim point using either the 10x day sight, or the clip-on thermal imaging night sight.

Fire-and-forget targeting uses the imaging infrared (IIR) seeker, but there’s also an optional fully guided mode, using a fiber optic wire that spools out from the rear. They can be combined via “fire and forget plus,” which locks a target before launch but can be used to change targets or abort after launch. The missile flies in a lofted trajectory, hitting the target in a terminal dive and detonating a tandem high-explosive warhead that can defeat explosive reactive armor. The lofted trajectory also allows the missile to hit targets that are behind earthen walls, or otherwise not directly visible in line of sight. Reloading takes less than 15 seconds.

Spike-MR/ Gill is designed as an infantry-only weapon, and weighs 26 kg/ 57.2 pounds when fully assembled (13.3 kg missile in cannister, 5 kg CLU, 4 kg Thermal Sight, 1 kg missile, 2.8 kg tripod). Its effective range is 2.5 km. Spike-LR is a vehicle and infantry weapon that uses common systems, and extends effective range to 4 km. Vehicle variants include launch mountings and a control console, and Spike has been integrated into missile-capable Remote Weapons Systems.

Beyond these infantry weapons, Spike-ER is a larger missile that equips a number of helicopter types, and reaches out to 8 km. A special helicopter and vehicle-mounted variant called Spike-NLOS extends range to 25 km, and relies heavily on “fire and forget plus” via optical guidance. Neither appears to be on India’s acquisition radar just yet, but once Indian firms are license-building Spike family weapons, the government can always sign subsequent agreements to broaden its scope.

Spike infantry components
Spike components
(click to view full)

Oct 24/14: Spike picked. India’s top-level Defence Acquisition Council clears INR 900 billion in acquisitions. New submarines are the biggest, but there’s also clearance for up to INR 32 billion to buy and license-build about 300 Spike family launcher systems and 8,000 missiles.

Other DAC clearances include INR 530 billion for 6 submarines; 2 SDV underwater commando delivery vehicles; INR 20 billion to have the state-owned Ordnance Factory Board build about 360 more BMP-2 tracked IFVs under license; and INR 18.5 billion for 12 more license-built Do-228NG short-range transport and maritime surveillance aircraft from HAL. Sources: NDTV, “6 Made-in-India Submarines for Navy for 53,000 Crores” | IANS, “Defence ministry clears Israeli anti-tank missile, six submarines”.
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5305
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by srai »

^^^
This video shows the different modes being talked about in the above article.
Varoon Shekhar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2178
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 23:26

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Varoon Shekhar »

http://www.frontline.in/the-nation/no-f ... epage=true

Good article by T.S.S on the Nirbhay. Details about guidance system, but wish they would state whether the turbo fan engine in the second stage is imported or Indian made. That's not clear at all from the article.
Thakur_B
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2404
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Thakur_B »

Varoon Shekhar wrote:http://www.frontline.in/the-nation/no-f ... epage=true

Good article by T.S.S on the Nirbhay. Details about guidance system, but wish they would state whether the turbo fan engine in the second stage is imported or Indian made. That's not clear at all from the article.
A small mistake by TSS, Nibhay was launched from a MAN truck and not Tatra. Current engine is supposed to be imported and the one under development reverse engineered.
Last edited by Thakur_B on 29 Oct 2014 18:39, edited 1 time in total.
Sagar G
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2594
Joined: 22 Dec 2009 19:31
Location: Ghar

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Sagar G »

^^^ *MAN
Thakur_B
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2404
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Thakur_B »

Sagar G wrote:^^^ *MAN
Thank you, corrected.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Singha »

it is a commercial grade MAN truck and easily replaceable with any other.

only the pinaka and prithvi seem to be on X-country capable trucks. the rest will need to stick on or near roads...which is fine as all are long range weapons.

among imported maal the smerch is on x-country chassis.
John
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3447
Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by John »

Ranjani Brow wrote:
pankajs wrote:I was going to quote my own post. Thanks!

SA-13 replacement - Sosna-R.
SA-8 replacement - DRDO's QRSAM{Astra based QRSAM???}
No. It's a completely new design but will utilize technologies developed for Astra and Trishul.
I believe IAF/IA want Akash to fill that role not QRSAM.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8428
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Indranil »

Singha wrote:it is a commercial grade MAN truck and easily replaceable with any other.

only the pinaka and prithvi seem to be on X-country capable trucks. the rest will need to stick on or near roads...which is fine as all are long range weapons.

among imported maal the smerch is on x-country chassis.
You are right. Currently it is in a tractor-trailer configuration, and the tractor is easily replaceable. The current trailer can take 4 missiles. Tata declared that their 12X12 will be used for the Pragati, Brahmos and Nirbhay missiles.
sudhan
BRFite
Posts: 1157
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 17:53
Location: Timbuktoo..

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by sudhan »

I just noticed something when comparing pics from 2013 Nirbhay launch and the recent launch. Nirbhay looks much bigger (at least to my eyes).. Here are the pics.. Pliss to look at the personnel standing around for scale. To me it looks like in the recent pic the missile looks longer and has more girth too..

Old 2013 pic..

Image

Recent Pic before launch..

Image

Is it just me or is Nirbhay beefier compared to 2013? (we did hear the scientist say that the missile has an improved design)
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20782
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Karan M »

sudhan, looks the same to me. the improved design probably refers to the redesigned RLG-INS and incorporation of a backup system (probably the same MEMS/INS-GPS they use in Agni/BMD programs).
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20782
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Karan M »

also, drdo has a very simple but effective scoring mechanism to see how missile tests perform at the basic level.** (apart from detailed telemetry etc). they assign a score to each phase. eg booster ignition and into the air - 1 point. transition to flight - 1 point. navigation- 2 points etc. so in previous test, the failure was at one level. all rest worked perfectly, so only iterative improvements there (if any)

**source: prithvi program director at some event
member_28108
BRFite
Posts: 1852
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by member_28108 »

I think it just is a matter of perspective. I tried to place "n" people in perspective and it seems to be the same.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19236
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by NRao »

Booster seems much longer. The rest of the missiles seems about the same.
dinesha
BRFite
Posts: 1211
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 11:42
Location: Delhi

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by dinesha »

India readies for full-fledged test of indigenous ICBM
http://www.business-standard.com/articl ... 903_1.html

India is readying for the full-fledged test-firing from a canister of an indigenous long-range missile that carries a one-tonne nuclear warhead and can target cities as far as Beijing. The previous two launches of the 5,000 km Agni-5 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) with dummy warheads have been from open mobile launchers. The canisterised version has a much longer shelf-life, with the container being made of special steel that absorbs the blast of the takeoff. "The test will happen by the end of November or early December. It will be another feather in the cap of Indian missile scientists," an official of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) that developed the 50-tonne missile told IANS on condition of anonymity.

"We have already successfully fired two dummy missiles, and we are confident that the canister launch will be successful," the official added. The dummy missiles tested were of exact mass and height as the Agni-5, but without the warhead. According to the official, in the launch, a gas generator inside the canister ejects the missile up to a height of about 30 metres. A motor is then ignited to fire the missile.

As the launch process happens inside a canister, it takes away the need of a jet deflector on the launcher that is otherwise needed for redirecting the high energy exhaust. The strength of the surface of the launch pad is not a critical factor either, making it possible to launch the missile from anywhere. In addition to giving the user more flexibility, a canister-based missile offers the option to launch at a very short notice and with less manpower. "Canister launch provides the missile a quick reaction stop-and-launch system," the official said.

"As the missile is sealed in a canister, there is no impact on the outside environment. This protects the missile, and many pre- checks are not needed, making the launch process shorter," the official added.


The Agni-5 is the most advanced version of the Agni, or Fire, series, part of the Integrated Guided Missile Development Programme that started in the 1960s.

Before this, DRDO scientists successfully conducted from an underwater pontoon the K-15 ballistic missile that will be used to arm the Indian Navy's submarines.

(Anjali Ojha can be contacted at anjali.ojha@ians.in)
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25101
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by SSridhar »

India, Russia to export BrahMos - Dinakar Peri, The Hindu
The governments of India and Russia have agreed that BrahMos missile will be exported to a list of mutually agreeable countries for defensive purposes. There is also a negative list to which exports are barred.

The missile has been showcased in several countries to apprise the potential customers of its capabilities. “If any country approaches us we will look into it on a case by case basis. BrahMos Aerospace has the production capacity, game plan and skilled labour to supply. I would like to state that we are ready and waiting. It is for the government of India to decide”, Sudhir Mishra, CEO and MD of BrahMos Corporation said on Wednesday.

It has been learnt that three submarine manufacturers Amur (Russia), HDW (Germany) and Navantia (Spain) have approached BA for installing BrahMos on the new Project- 75I submarines should they bag the contract. The manufacturers have all assured that BrahMos can be installed on their submarines without affecting the quality of the missile or the submarine. Land attack capability is one of the requirements of the Project 75I submarines.

Asked about the deliverables for the next five to seven years, Mr. Mishra said, “We are concentrating all energies on the air launched variant to deliver it on schedule. Second is advanced land variants for the Army. We have recently demonstrated a steep dive capability at 65 degree to identify targets in a clutter. Next we are working on a near vertical and surround capability for use in the mountains.”
Thakur_B
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2404
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Post by Thakur_B »

Igla-S is in rough waters for triservice VSHORADS procurement.
http://www.stratpost.com/russian-no-sho ... rad-trials
Several rounds of trials have been carried out, so far. In May 2012, trials were held at the Mahajan range, in which the Russians managed to score only a single hit out of four. Again during sea trials, the Russian system managed only a single hit out of two. Rosoboronexport was allowed to repeat the Mahajan trials in winter of 2012, in which it managed all four hits. But its sight failed during high altitude trials, following which they were asked to modify their sight’s lens, receiver metrics and software.

Having persisted in the competition, they were invited to try again this summer at the Mahajan range.

Indian evaluators asked them to demonstrate firing of their system in high temperatures at Mahajan by August 15 this year, to demonstrate the functionality of the modified sight. As it turned out, everybody except the Russians showed up.

Instead, Rosoboronexport wrote to the Indian evaluators saying that they did not feel it necessary to conduct another demonstration of their system.
Post Reply