Indian Naval Discussion

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Post Reply
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Singha »

the Bears turboprop engines are likely the most powerful ever designed around 15000hp each iirc and it uses a peculiar double propeller layout. I doubt spares for either are available from anywhere but Rus mil-ind complex or some boneyards of their naval aviation regiments.
would be interesting to know how many Bears are in squadron service with Rus naval aviation and their uptimes today.

I have no doubt they would have reserved the best of the rest (boneyard beauties) in a special block for their own use, with the other export customers having to manage with the remainder.
putnanja
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4679
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: searching for the next al-qaida #3

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by putnanja »

Interesting news ....

MoD gets notice over INS Khukri sailor's appeal
The Chandigarh bench of Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) issued a notice to MoD on Monday after hearing a petition filed by one of the survivors of INS Khukri. The frigate sank during the '71 Indo-Pak war, and the sailor has questioned the official record prepared by Directorate of Naval Operations.


...
...

Gill, who was on duty on the night of December 9, 1971 when the Pakistani submarine PNS Hangor hit INS Khukri, says there are glaring errors in the records, which came to his notice in February 2004. According to naval history, INS Khukri sank after it was hit by a single torpedo, even as INS Kirpan manoeuvred to deflect the torpedo attack.

But Gill claims three torpedoes hit Khukri and, instead of counter attacking, INS Kirpan retreated. Brig Singh's counsel, advocate R S Bains, has pleaded for a comprehensive inquiry by a judicial commission, withdrawal of gallantry awards from those who allegedly showed cowardice (including officers and commanding officer of INS Kirpan) and fixing responsibility for the Navy's huge cover up after the loss of Khukri.
...
Kersi D
BRFite
Posts: 1444
Joined: 20 Sep 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Kersi D »

shiv wrote: I contacted my unkal Googal and asked her
:eek: :eek: :eek:
arya
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 82
Joined: 29 Oct 2009 17:48
Location: Kanyakubj Nagre

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by arya »

Kersi D wrote:
shiv wrote: I contacted my unkal Googal and asked her
:eek: :eek: :eek:
actually he contacted Googla ben and asked her
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by shiv »

Kersi D
BRFite
Posts: 1444
Joined: 20 Sep 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Kersi D »

arya wrote:
shiv wrote: I contacted my unkal Googal and asked her
:eek: :eek: :eek:
actually he contacted Googla ben and asked her
It must be Googleebehn :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
Gaur
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2009
Joined: 01 Feb 2009 23:19

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Gaur »

shiv wrote:Indian Navy Sea Harriers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv5PGlU4UKc
Wonderful Upload Shiv Sir. +1 like from me.

BTW, enjoyed reading your IEDs and comments in a certain blog recently. :mrgreen:
SriSri
BRFite
Posts: 545
Joined: 23 Aug 2006 15:25

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by SriSri »

vic
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2412
Joined: 19 May 2010 10:00

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by vic »

arun wrote:X Posted from the Indian Missiles and Munitions thread.

US Congress notified of likely sale of Harpoon Block II to India.

21 AGM-84L HARPOON Block II Missiles and 5 ATM-84L HARPOON Block II for use on the Boeing P8-I’s:

India – AGM-84L HARPOON Block II Missiles
Pakistan bought 130 Harpoons for US$ 370 million, how come we are buying similar stuff (Block 2 missiles) for 400% extra??????? Further is this the second order or first one? There were earlier reports of India buying 24 Harpoon Block II missiles to arm its maritime strike Jaguar fighters in a deal worth $170 million through the Foreign Military Sales. So we seem to have got 24+21=45 missiles for around US$ 370 while Pakistan got around 130-150(?) for the same price, what gives?? As it is wooden round therefore therefore spares cannot cost that much. Integration costs with Jags and P-8I should also be minimal, so what is the story?
krishnan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7342
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 12:58
Location: 13° 04' N , 80° 17' E

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by krishnan »

vic wrote:
arun wrote:X Posted from the Indian Missiles and Munitions thread.

US Congress notified of likely sale of Harpoon Block II to India.

21 AGM-84L HARPOON Block II Missiles and 5 ATM-84L HARPOON Block II for use on the Boeing P8-I’s:

India – AGM-84L HARPOON Block II Missiles
Pakistan bought 130 Harpoons for US$ 370 million, how come we are buying similar stuff (Block 2 missiles) for 400% extra???????
pakis got second hand stuff :P
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12413
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

cause we are subsidising the TSP purchase with our purchase onlee..........
sohamn
BRFite
Posts: 462
Joined: 27 Jul 2006 12:56
Location: the Queen of the Angels of Porziuncola
Contact:

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by sohamn »

vic wrote:
Pakistan bought 130 Harpoons for US$ 370 million, how come we are buying similar stuff (Block 2 missiles) for 400% extra??????? Further is this the second order or first one? There were earlier reports of India buying 24 Harpoon Block II missiles to arm its maritime strike Jaguar fighters in a deal worth $170 million through the Foreign Military Sales. So we seem to have got 24+21=45 missiles for around US$ 370 while Pakistan got around 130-150(?) for the same price, what gives?? As it is wooden round therefore therefore spares cannot cost that much. Integration costs with Jags and P-8I should also be minimal, so what is the story?

I think the angle MOD looks is the life cycle cost including training, warranty, parts etc. Whereas some other counties may just look at the cost pf purchase. Thats why most of the the Indian procurement looks costly.

And yes this purchase is only for P8I, we have already purchased the ones for Jags
suryag
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4049
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 00:14

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by suryag »

Viv S
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5303
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 00:46

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Viv S »

The Kilos and U-209s will be decommissioned before this system is ready for installation. Half of the Scorpene fleet and all of the second line subs will have an AIP system. The IN's Chakra class SSBNs have no use for it.

So why exactly are we going for this development? :-?
saurav.jha
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 40
Joined: 16 Dec 2009 20:53

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by saurav.jha »

^^^ They might be developing this for the indigenous 12 subs which is planned..
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Singha »

future midget subs and uuv too.
Ajit.C
BRFite
Posts: 160
Joined: 10 Sep 2008 13:15
Location: Middle East
Contact:

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Ajit.C »

INS Dunagiri was decommissioned on 20th Oct 2010. There was no mention of the decommisioning in "2010 year end review-Indian Navy".
A Sharma
BRFite
Posts: 1207
Joined: 20 May 2003 11:31

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by A Sharma »

Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Singha »

turned to be the most expensive 'gift' in history. if we had spent the same money on ordering a Cavour class from italy atleast we'd have something in hand now, albeit it would operate only the Tejas-N.
vasu_ray
BRFite
Posts: 550
Joined: 30 Nov 2008 01:06

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by vasu_ray »

Per latest news reports Viraat is here to stay until 2020, if not then they should really convert it into a sea-launch platform enabling equitorial launch, the success of Dhanush should be encouraging. They could start with PSLVs and then move onto GSLVs
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5389
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by srai »

Viv S wrote:
The Kilos and U-209s will be decommissioned before this system is ready for installation. Half of the Scorpene fleet and all of the second line subs will have an AIP system. The IN's Chakra class SSBNs have no use for it.

So why exactly are we going for this development? :-?
FYI, in that same article:
...
(Incidentally, The Hindu has learnt from sources in the Navy that it has asked the DRDO to come up with a fully engineered fuel cell AIP by 2014 for possible use in the last two of the six Scorpene submarines being built in Mumbai's Mazagaon Dock. The Navy has also given sanction for the land-based prototype AIP in August this year.)
manish.rastogi
BRFite
Posts: 365
Joined: 01 Nov 2010 15:30
Location: Pandora.....
Contact:

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by manish.rastogi »

okay...so we have quite good relations with south korea and south korea is one if nt the most advanced shipbuilding nation,what stops us to send people over there for training in modern shipbuilding processes....invite some south korean companies to upgrade and build shipyards.....

Also,currently the undersea capability of navy is quite fcuked up....we needed new submarines yesterday also money is not a problem now....well i am totally for indigenisation but desperate times need desperate measures....cant we just order 8-10 kilo class submarines....build 2-3 over here in india...and rest in russia...well they could build these quite fast relative us also whether we build 2 or 8 subs it wont really increase our screw driver knowledge,....so as our docks are already overburdened we could be able to get 4 if not 5 instead of 2 subs in same time with not much loss.....i cant think of any other way to get our fleet strength to normal or to increase!!
vasu_ray
BRFite
Posts: 550
Joined: 30 Nov 2008 01:06

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by vasu_ray »

Navy and Coast Guard are getting the coastal suveillance system, now isn't it a good opportunity to go for the OTH radar network using the same stations dotting the whole of the country's coasline, we already have some technology in the form of a giant radio telescope station at Pune and real time networking from the BMD program

a) they could then monitor the Arabian sea for piracy, terrorists, TSP fleet, IN can then focus on specific threats as needed instead of stretching its limited resources

b) if in future we setup the offshore wind turbines for power generation based on the technology derived from the 12MW Kaveri Marine Gas Turbine project, those can be monitored as well

c) early warning of tsunamis and cyclones

d) monitoring of both shipping lanes and civil airline traffic over the oceans

e) At some point in future if the IN CBG can host the OTH antennas their situational awareness will be phenomenal even for low flying threats

f) throwing in for a safe measure, the Chinese intend to dominate the Indian ocean in the near future probably under the guise of protecting their commercial shipping so we need the AshBM and it should be long ranged than Dhanush
Juggi G
BRFite
Posts: 1070
Joined: 11 Mar 2007 19:16
Location: Martyr Bhagat Singh Nagar District, Doaba, Punjab, Bharat. De Ghuma ke :)

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Juggi G »

DPR-Navy

Image
Raja Bose
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19478
Joined: 18 Oct 2005 01:38

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Raja Bose »

^^Of all things, why did they have to put an crusty ol' Foxtrot in the pic? :roll:
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2115
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by uddu »

To the left is the glorious wake. To the right is the Vibrant future. :lol: Isharon ko samjo. :rotfl:
Juggi G
BRFite
Posts: 1070
Joined: 11 Mar 2007 19:16
Location: Martyr Bhagat Singh Nagar District, Doaba, Punjab, Bharat. De Ghuma ke :)

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Juggi G »

chackojoseph
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4297
Joined: 01 Mar 2010 22:42
Location: From Frontier India
Contact:

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by chackojoseph »

India to set up R&D center for Warship : National Institute for Research and Development in Defence Shipbuilding

:wink:

The objective of NIRDESH is to promote R&D relating to Warship and Submarine design, and to provide impetus in developing composite and complete indigenous capability to meet future demands of ships and submarines by the Indian maritime security agencies. The Institute also intends to act as the knowledge and data bank repository on special system designs and also offer consultancy to shipyards in various competencies.
Last edited by chackojoseph on 01 Jan 2011 13:38, edited 1 time in total.
Rahul M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 17169
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Location: Skies over BRFATA
Contact:

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Rahul M »

how does this relate to DND ?
chackojoseph
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4297
Joined: 01 Mar 2010 22:42
Location: From Frontier India
Contact:

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by chackojoseph »

edited,

Will let you know.

==================

Added it in last para

Indian Navy has its own warship design wing. It is manned by Naval personnel. NIRDESH will cater primarily to Indian defence forces and will have participation from shipyards, Navy, Coast guard etc.
Shyam_K
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 76
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 21:17

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Shyam_K »

As part of the 2010 UK Strategic Defence and Security Review, the Royal Navy is going to retire one of its Bay class landing ship dock with an Albion class landing platform dock being put on extended readiness. The Bay Bay class LSDs are fairly capable and new (oldest being 4 years old). It may be a good idea for IN to look in to buying the retired Bay class LSD to augment INS Jalashva. A quick and possibly cheap way to quickly build up capability while waiting for the Indian built LPD.

Link to the 2010 UK Strategic Defence and Security Review
sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10196
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by sum »

Image

Sea trials of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle scheduled for January-end
KOCHI: The sea trials of the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) designed and developed by the Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute (CMERI), Durgapur — a constituent establishment of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) — are slated to begin off the Chennai coast during the last week of January.

The ‘AUV-150,' as the prototype is named, is built to operate 150 metres under the sea. It was developed in technical collaboration with the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kharagpur.

The performance parameters of the lab-scale model, developed by the IIT, acted as a precursor to the prototype developed by CSIR-CMERI. The project is sponsored by the Ministry of Earth Sciences.

The cylindrical AUV is capable of independently carrying out a plethora of underwater operations, including ocean floor-mapping, surveillance activities and oceanographic studies, based on data gathered using its onboard sensors.

The AUV underwent a series of sheltered water trials at the Defence Research and Development Organisation's Underwater Acoustic Research Facility (UARF) in Kerala's Idukki Reservoir over the last two years. The final leg of the still-water trials was conducted in the reservoir between September and October 2010.

CMERI Director Gautam Biswas said: “The National Institute of Ocean Technology [NIOT] earlier developed a Remotely Operated Vehicle [ROV] with the capability to dive much deeper. Our vehicle, however, is different in that it is not remotely operated from a control station ashore. It has an onboard computer that can be pre-programmed to carry out specific tasks, which makes it a smart vehicle endowed with the ability to devise its own stratagems to execute a mission. The payload and the configuration are determined by the nature of the mission it is tasked with.”

During the sea trials, the AUV's image processing capability would be assessed.

“Besides, its capacity to model environmental parameters such as temperature gradient, current, depth and salinity gradient would be scrutinised. Once the technology is proven through extensive sea trials, the AUV can be customised for applications like close-to-coast undersea monitoring, mine counter-measures, cable and pipeline surveys, besides a host of oceanographic studies,” Professor Biswas said.

Features

The AUV has hybrid communication channels. It uses radio frequency while on surface, but switches to acoustic communication when submerged. “The AUV has its own power, propulsion, navigation and control systems. For movement underwater, it locates own geographical position using navigational sensors, while its forward-looking sonar facilitates obstacle evasion and safe passage. For effective operation, it is equipped with navigational sensors like the inertial navigation system, depth sonar, altimeter etc., and payload sensors like camera, side scan sonar and the like. It has extra roll stability, a cruising speed of up to four knots, and weighs about 490 kg,” Professor Biswas said.

‘Major project'

The CSIR-CMERI held numerous meetings with experts from IIT-Kharagpur and NIOT during the development of the vehicle.

“We also made a presentation at the Naval Science and Technological Laboratory [NSTL] at Visakhapatnam, which is developing its own AUV. The AUV-150 is one of the major projects executed by the CSIR family, and based on a few such projects, a joint R&D Council of CSIR-DRDO has been formed. The Indian Navy has also shown immense interest in our project,” Professor Biswas said.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Austin »

^^ AUV should come in handy for mine hunting ,mapping of ocean surface and special operation for the IN
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Singha »

inspecting underwater structures of oil rigs or releasing one from a submarine to check out its hull or ships hull at sea could be a useful tool.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12413
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

Dont forget the new series of survey ships on order for ze fleet. If this baby can be deployed by those ships, they can map the ocean bed for SSBN deployment of the IN as well.
Kersi D
BRFite
Posts: 1444
Joined: 20 Sep 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Kersi D »

I hope it can travel say ~ 100 kms under water and celebrate Diwali in / under Karachi harbourwhen we get in the mood. :D
Juggi G
BRFite
Posts: 1070
Joined: 11 Mar 2007 19:16
Location: Martyr Bhagat Singh Nagar District, Doaba, Punjab, Bharat. De Ghuma ke :)

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Juggi G »

sumshyam
BRFite
Posts: 552
Joined: 23 Sep 2009 19:30
Location: Ganga ki dharti.
Contact:

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by sumshyam »

Craig Alpert
BRFite
Posts: 1440
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 17:36
Location: Behind Enemy Lines

Re: Indian Naval Discussion

Post by Craig Alpert »

Post Reply