Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 24 May 2013 19:17

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3507 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75 ... 88  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2011 20:39 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13
Posts: 4440
How many Sukhois must crash for us to call it a scandal?

The DDM remains DDM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2011 20:57 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 12 Apr 2010 18:12
Posts: 54
shiv wrote:
FBW failure? Must be Indian software coolies :rotfl: :rotfl:


Hey shiv..the day these coolies stop working ...the billions of dollars they send back to india and the amount which they earn due to outsourcing .. .. will dry up.....further , money will dry up from the pockets of govt of india ..and then of MoD...and then No toys to play with !! So ..even its their fault...today IAF might had lost one of them but its their money which has bought us this toy ....So MORALE of the story ...HAVE RESPECT ....Peace.. !!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2011 21:11 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Jun 2009 12:46
Posts: 176
Location: mahishooru
^^^ OT but can you differentiate between sarcasm and criticism ? .... go easy buddy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2011 21:11 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 07 Mar 2010 15:32
Posts: 604
Location: still settling...
chandanus wrote:
shiv wrote:
FBW failure? Must be Indian software coolies :rotfl: :rotfl:


Hey shiv..the day these coolies stop working ...the billions of dollars they send back to india and the amount which they earn due to outsourcing .. .. will dry up.....further , money will dry up from the pockets of govt of india ..and then of MoD...and then No toys to play with !! So ..even its their fault...today IAF might had lost one of them but its their money which has bought us this toy ....So MORALE of the story ...HAVE RESPECT ....Peace.. !!!!



Chandanus, What exactly are you reading into, what shiv has written?

FOR shiv :- you seem to be getting unpopular among trainees...They pick you more often than not... :rotfl:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2011 21:14 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Posts: 12427
Location: racetrack pattern over BRFATA.
Quote:
FOR shiv :- you seem to be getting unpopular among trainees...They pick you more often than not...
variant of poe's law.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2011 21:40 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 03 Jan 2011 16:01
Posts: 28
Rahul M wrote:
Quote:
FOR shiv :- you seem to be getting unpopular among trainees...They pick you more often than not...
variant of poe's law.


May be in this case its a kind of poe's law but survival rate after suicide is quite high in BR.

Sorry for OT.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2011 21:43 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
chandanus wrote:
shiv wrote:
FBW failure? Must be Indian software coolies :rotfl: :rotfl:


Hey shiv..the day these coolies stop working ...the billions of dollars they send back to india and the amount which they earn due to outsourcing .. .. will dry up.....further , money will dry up from the pockets of govt of india ..and then of MoD...and then No toys to play with !! So ..even its their fault...today IAF might had lost one of them but its their money which has bought us this toy ....So MORALE of the story ...HAVE RESPECT ....Peace.. !!!!


Thanks for the reaction. It is heartening that someone is actually standing up for Indians with spine and pride. You made my day brother. There are at least some Indians with self respect. Most of the time it is a loud caterwaul that some stupid Indian has botched it again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2011 23:40 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 12 Apr 2010 18:12
Posts: 54
^^^^ha ha ..Great shiv...that u took nothing personal in it ...bus..thoda jazbatti ho gaya tha...Afterall we all have some coolie friends in our lives and many others from different walks of life..i.e. paanwala's ...who together constitute this wonderful country...INDIA ...cheers.. :) !!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 00:17 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Sep 2000 11:31
Posts: 1071
Raja Bose wrote:
Rahul M wrote:
not only was it not acknowledged, BAe applied the desi solutions to the worldwide fleet and refused any IP rights.


For nanhas who never read the excellent article on the incident being referred to: A Tale of two Hydraulic Systems

The author (now departed) is our very own Dr.Pisko's cousin. :mrgreen: And in case you think he was some manual wielding geek babu, he won his Vir Chakra for action during the Battle of Longewala.

suryag, Kave Kamplex 72 is for good mujahids onlee. Bad mujahids (who moan about IAF's lack of maintainence of gora-owned FBW software) need to report to Kave Kamplex 420 for le-education.


And the pilot who nursed the second Jaguar back to base got the Vayu Sena medal.

K


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 09:57 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7530
PM visit: India to buy 42 ‘upgraded’ Sukhois

Quote:
New Delhi After negotiating for more than a year, India has firmed up an order with Russia for the purchase of 42 upgraded Sukhoi-30 MKI aircraft to strengthen its aging fleet. An agreement confirming this purchase will be signed during Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to Russia starting Thursday.

While the Cabinet Committee on Security had taken a decision on buying 42 additional Sukhoi MKIs last year, negotiations have taken longer because India was also keen to include some of the features found in fifth generation fighter aircraft. Finally, the Russian side agreed to upgrade the SU-30 MKIs to its latest version known as ‘Super Sukhoi’ with additional characteristics.

The new version is expected to include a new cockpit, an upgraded radar and certain stealth features to avoid radar detection. Significantly, the upgraded Sukhoi-30 MKIs will be able to carry a heavier weapons load, especially the airborne version of the Brahmos cruise missile. India is also looking to upgrade most of its SU-30 MKIs in the long run.

While Russia may have lost out in the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft deal because of not being able to offer certain additional features, officials said, Moscow has assured New Delhi that it will roll out its best in upgraded SU-30 MKIs.

“The defence cooperation is robust and excellent. Our two countries have developed maturity that individual deals will not affect the ties,” said Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai while responding to a question on whether the MMRCA rejection will impact defence ties.

The deal, estimated at over Rs 20,000 crore, will be operational in three years with the first delivery expected in 2014 and the last by 2018. Once the 42 aircraft are inducted, the total strength of SU-30 MKI fleet will go up to 272. It may be noted that by 2017, India plans to phase out 120 MiG 21s and with the MMRCA still not a done deal, the SU-30 MKI fleet will be the mainstay.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 10:19 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 7755
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
^^ Is this separate from the 40 aircraft for the SFC?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 11:45 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 20 Aug 2008 20:30
Posts: 84
These 42 Aircrafts are to be manufactured by HAL? This conforms with the previous news items that the HAL order will only be completed by 2018, also the 20,000 crores cost overruns estimated by CAG.

So it's 40(1996 russia) + 10(1998 russia) + 140(2000 HAL) + 40(2007 russia*) + 42(2011 HAL)= 272?


* - "IAF plans to retain its combat edge by fast-track acquisition of 40 more Sukhoi-30MKIs from Russia as well as faster indigenous production of 140 of these fighters."
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes ... ombat-edge


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 13:15 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Nov 2008 06:48
Posts: 647
Location: RAW HQ, Lodhi Road
Rediff:

Quote:
All Sukhoi flights from Trishul stopped after crash, probe on:
After the crash of IAF Sukhoi-30 MKI fighter aircraft in Pune, all its flights from Trishul airforce station here have been stopped and all aircraft are being checked. "All the flights of Sukhoi has been stopped from here and checking of aircrafts is underway," Chief Administrative Officer of Trishul Airforce Station S K Bhatnagar said. "Crash of Sukhoi is not a common phenomenon. An inquiry is underway to ascertain the reason of the Pune crash," he said.


Also, now these 42 upgraded MKI's are going to cost over 20,000 crores i.e. nearly $90mn a bird. Last year the figure given was over 15,000 crore.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 13:40 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25
Posts: 6199
Nikhil, read the article, these 42 Sukhoi's probably cost $100 million each because of superior features from existing Sukhois like

1) New radar- may be IRBIS
2) strengthened undercarraige for carrying Brahmos.
3) Lower RCS, by redesigned Engine inlets etc. similair to silent eagle proposed by Boeing.

I think this 15000 crore to 20000 crore is probably due to the drop in Rupee value.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 14:32 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 20 Aug 2008 20:30
Posts: 84
Can someone clarify my previous question? Different websites tell different stories.

"In 2007, Rosoboronexport and Irkut, on the one hand, and the Indian Defence Ministry, on the other, made a deal for 40 Su-30MKIs more, which boosted the number of HAL-produced fighters up to 180. Irkut started the delivery of the knockdown kits under the new contract in 2008. HAL’s boss Ashok Nayak has said recently that his corporation had delivered “about 105 Su-30MKI planes” to IAF, with the Indian Defence Ministry expected to order 42 fighters more, driving the total number of HAL-assembled Su-30MKIs up to 222 units."

http://en.take-off.ru/news/102-feb2011/ ... ia-02-2011

Since this is a russian source rather than our mil-illiterate media, this appears more plausible. Or does anyone have the right info?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 17:43 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Aug 2009 20:50
Posts: 1700
Location: Land of Oz!
No need for alarm over crash-Air-marshal bhushan gokhale


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 18:42 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 940
Location: USA
Aditya_V wrote:
Nikhil, read the article, these 42 Sukhoi's probably cost $100 million each because of superior features from existing Sukhois like

1) New radar- may be IRBIS
2) strengthened undercarraige for carrying Brahmos.
3) Lower RCS, by redesigned Engine inlets etc. similair to silent eagle proposed by Boeing.

I think this 15000 crore to 20000 crore is probably due to the drop in Rupee value.


I believe this order is for SFC.
That explains the cost as these will have some redundant hardwired systems.
HAL might not manufacture these if so.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 19:50 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 13 Oct 2004 22:14
Posts: 253
I think the total number is 232 and not 272. HAL 2007 order has not been verified.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2011 20:13 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 May 2006 13:44
Posts: 984
Location: mumbai
alexis wrote:
I think the total number is 232 and not 272. HAL 2007 order has not been verified.
http://www.pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=55262
Quote:
contact for procurement of additional 40 SU-30 MKI was signed with M/s HAL in 2007
Page 45 (Page 36 in the document) http://cdasecbad.ap.nic.in/sankalan/COM ... 0India.pdf
Quote:
In order to arrest the declining force levels of the Indian Air Force (IAF), Ministry concluded a contract with Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) in March 2007 for the supply of 40 aircraft `M' with associated equipment at an aggregate cost of Rs 9,036.84 crore. The aircraft were to be delivered in a phased manner between 2008-11.

How Govt fools people - offset policy applies only when Govt directly purchases. If PSU purchases and re-sells to govt, then offset policy doesnt apply, since anything with PSU label is indigenous.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Dec 2011 19:24 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Jul 2001 11:31
Posts: 918
alexis wrote:
I think the total number is 232 and not 272. HAL 2007 order has not been verified.


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-Russia-sign-deal-for-another-42-Sukhoi-combat-planes/articleshow/11134192.cms

Quote:
"The present protocol envisaged manufacture of an additional 42 aircraft by HAL, taking the total Sukhois for the IAF to 272 planes," Sharma told.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Dec 2011 22:32 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Dec 2006 20:53
Posts: 640
Pune crash: IAF says Su-30MKI aircraft crashed due to unknown fault


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Dec 2011 23:42 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 24 Apr 2010 01:24
Posts: 952
tsarkar wrote:
alexis wrote:
I think the total number is 232 and not 272. HAL 2007 order has not been verified.
http://www.pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=55262
Quote:
contact for procurement of additional 40 SU-30 MKI was signed with M/s HAL in 2007
Page 45 (Page 36 in the document) http://cdasecbad.ap.nic.in/sankalan/COM ... 0India.pdf
Quote:
In order to arrest the declining force levels of the Indian Air Force (IAF), Ministry concluded a contract with Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) in March 2007 for the supply of 40 aircraft `M' with associated equipment at an aggregate cost of Rs 9,036.84 crore. The aircraft were to be delivered in a phased manner between 2008-11.

How Govt fools people - offset policy applies only when Govt directly purchases. If PSU purchases and re-sells to govt, then offset policy doesnt apply, since anything with PSU label is indigenous.


I think this may be because they want to pretend this is a 'follow-on' order equivalent to exercising 'options' in order to avoid the usual parliamentary fracas.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 02:09 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31
Posts: 1308
karan_mc wrote:


Interesting food for thought regarding FBW. It seems the pilots tried for almost 20 minutes to control the aircraft but were unable to do it to a point where they felt comfortable landing the plane.

Very strange though; these systems typically have a lot of redundant components. Depending on the age of the plane, degradation in the electronics can also cause such problems. Wonder if they have a bypass mode where the FBW is completely bypassed and the aircraft operates with stick and pedals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 03:40 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 10 Aug 2006 00:49
Posts: 576
Location: London
^^ on a funny note, I hope Russians have not figured out how to activate kill switch remotely on their planes. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 06:11 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
VikramS wrote:
karan_mc wrote:


Interesting food for thought regarding FBW. It seems the pilots tried for almost 20 minutes to control the aircraft but were unable to do it to a point where they felt comfortable landing the plane.

Very strange though; these systems typically have a lot of redundant components. Depending on the age of the plane, degradation in the electronics can also cause such problems. Wonder if they have a bypass mode where the FBW is completely bypassed and the aircraft operates with stick and pedals.


Vikram - if you read the history of many aircraft you see how odd unknown defects turn up after several thousands of hours have been flown. One of the most well known ones (to mango man) is the story of the Comet and its fatigue fractures. Another one known to BR is the Jaguar landing gear story.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 06:21 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30611
karan_mc wrote:



Modern aviation products develop faults in the electrical or avionics. It could be a connector disengaging due to flight environments, lack of proper mating of connectors etc.
Sometimes the circuit boards flex and short.

And true the same FBW could have a different type of failure this time.

And even after spending hours in diagnosis it could be an unverified failure (UVF).

Most important is to ensure its not systemic (ie in the whole fleet), not operator induced (can be fixed with more training).

Its for such reasons that flight inventory should be diversified.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 08:17 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 27 Mar 2003 12:31
Posts: 129
Location: USA
Aditya_V wrote:
...these 42 Sukhoi's probably cost $100 million each...


Holy smokes we're getting into F-22\F-35 territory now... :eek:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 08:49 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 11 May 2010 19:08
Posts: 309
Location: Waiting for Mushy to meet his 72's
Rambha Fans, Please Do Not Miss This. Its not our MKI, but MKM. Nevertheless, awesome Video. Watch it at 720p .



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 10:12 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 25 Oct 2009 23:05
Posts: 621
Location: The Original West Coast!!
VikramS wrote:
karan_mc wrote:


Interesting food for thought regarding FBW. It seems the pilots tried for almost 20 minutes to control the aircraft but were unable to do it to a point where they felt comfortable landing the plane.

Very strange though; these systems typically have a lot of redundant components. Depending on the age of the plane, degradation in the electronics can also cause such problems. Wonder if they have a bypass mode where the FBW system is completely bypassed and the aircraft operates with stick and pedals.


That is not possible with Su-30 and other such modern fighter planes. These planes have - what is commonly referred to as - relaxed stability. Now that is a euphemism for saying it is an unstable plane by design. This is done to improve in flight maneuverability. Hence the FBW is needed to continuously evaluate the state of the aircraft and apply the corrections as needed to fly the aircraft in the manner desired by the pilot. FBW failure will be catastrophic as evidenced by the first Sukhoi crash. There is no way to control the plane with stick & pedal input.

The question is why the FBW failed if it indeed happened in this case. The first time around the pilot accidentally switched it off in lieu of something else and the IAF had taped/wired the switch to prevent such repeats.


Last edited by Marut on 17 Dec 2011 10:38, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 10:33 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Posts: 1031
krish.pf wrote:
...

So it's 40(1996 russia) + 10(1998 russia) + 140(2000 HAL) + 40(2007 russia*) + 42(2011 HAL)
...


18 x Su-30MK-1 (Irkut) - later replaced by MKI (Irkut)
32 x Su-30MKI (Irkut)
10 x Su-30MKI (Irkut)

140 x Su-30MKI (HAL)
40 x Su-30MKI (HAL)
42 x Su-30MKI+ (HAL)
----------------------------
Total: 272 x Su-30MKI
Attrition: 3


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 16:54 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 05 May 2007 01:20
Posts: 257
Location: ghaziabad
srai wrote:
krish.pf wrote:
...

So it's 40(1996 russia) + 10(1998 russia) + 140(2000 HAL) + 40(2007 russia*) + 42(2011 HAL)
...


18 x Su-30MK-1 (Irkut) - later replaced by MKI (Irkut)
32 x Su-30MKI (Irkut)
10 x Su-30MKI (Irkut)

140 x Su-30MKI (HAL)
40 x Su-30MKI (HAL)
42 x Su-30MKI+ (HAL)
----------------------------
Total: 272 x Su-30MKI
Attrition: 3



18 x Su-30MK-1 (Irkut) - later replaced by MKI (Irkut)
32 x Su-30MKI (Irkut)
10 x Su-30MKI (Irkut)

140 x Su-30MKI (HAL)
40 x Su-30MKI (HAL)
42 x Su-30MKI+ (HAL)
----------------------------
Total: 272 x Su-30MKI
Attrition: 3
---------------------------
Total: 269 x Su-30MKI
= 14 squadrons


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 20:23 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 12:31
Posts: 1469
Question: whether forward HAL production will be of Super-30 standard or vanilla MKI onlee?

Rumours of 2 SFC sqns unfortunately remain unconfirmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 21:16 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17525
Location: NowHere
We have no known fresh agreement about super-30 or whatever upgrade name they call it with HAL. link?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 21:49 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30611
shukla wrote:



Quote:
Former vice-chief of air staff, Air Marshal (retd) Bhushan Gokhale, said there was no need for alarm bells to start ringing following the crash of the Indian Air Force’s (IAF) Sukhoi-30 MkI fighter jet near Pune on Tuesday.

Expressing concern over the crash, Gokhale said, “Prima facie, the cause for the crash points to problems encountered with the control systems of the aircraft.”

The former IAF vice-chief felt the “technical snag” that the ill-fated aircraft is said to have encountered could point to problems in the control system of the aircraft. The control system comprises the auto pilot mechanism, the fly-by-wire system and other mechanical and electrical systems......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Dec 2011 22:37 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17525
Location: NowHere
WoW! It is just like our elders saying, it is just an heart pain.. nothing to worry about. go about doing your job.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Dec 2011 01:24 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Posts: 1031
saptarishi wrote:
srai wrote:
quote="krish.pf"...

So it's 40(1996 russia) + 10(1998 russia) + 140(2000 HAL) + 40(2007 russia*) + 42(2011 HAL)
.../quote

18 x Su-30MK-1 (Irkut) - later replaced by MKI (Irkut)
32 x Su-30MKI (Irkut)
10 x Su-30MKI (Irkut)

140 x Su-30MKI (HAL)
40 x Su-30MKI (HAL)
42 x Su-30MKI+ (HAL)
----------------------------
Total: 272 x Su-30MKI
Attrition: 3


...
----------------------------
Total: 272 x Su-30MKI
Attrition: 3
---------------------------
Total: 269 x Su-30MKI
= 14 squadrons


It remains to be seen what the final number of MKI squadrons IAF will raise. It all depends on what quantity IAF wants for reserves on top of the 16 active MKIs it assigns to a squadron.

Given IAF's desire for 270 MKIs, here is a breakdown of potential number of squadrons and reserves:
  • At 16 MKIs/squadron + 0 a/c sqdn reserve -> 16 squadrons + 14 a/c reserves fleet-wide
  • At 16 MKIs/squadron + 1 a/c sqdn reserve-> 15 squadrons + 15 a/c reserves fleet-wide
  • At 16 MKIs/squadron + 2 a/c sqdn reserves -> 15 squadrons (even)
  • At 16 MKIs/squadron + 3 a/c sqdn reserves -> 14 squadrons + 4 a/c reserves fleet-wide
  • At 16 MKIs/squadron + 4 a/c sqdn reserves -> 13 squadrons + 10 a/c reserves fleet-wide

At 18 MKIs/squadron, including squadron reserves, it comes out to a nice even 15 squadrons. IMO, 15 MKI squadrons is what the IAF wants.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Dec 2011 03:39 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 10 Mar 2009 11:02
Posts: 27
Sukhoi crashes near Pune just before PM's visit and a order for 42 more Shkhois. This might be my stretch of imagination, but the incident deserves through investigation if it was done as part of a planned sabotage. The West is known to penetrate deep into the defense and strategic assets of it "friends" (India), I hope they have not done so already looking at the growing friendship between US and India. And the Shkhoi plane crash is a by-product of that.

I believe if a government doesn't follow what West wants, it'll make its people do what it wants (and its easier to do in a democracy like India). This is how they have used Pakistan.<DELETED>

There were also some news about foreign countries and companies being behind the protests against Kudankulam nuclear power plant. I would like to read other member thoughts on this.


Last edited by Jagan on 18 Dec 2011 04:12, edited 1 time in total.
Poster has been warned


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Dec 2011 03:50 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30611
SaiK and munda, Yes the IAF will dig deep and for long to figure out what went. The immediate need is to ensure no systemic problems. And that appears done. So lets give them their time. The quick reponse was to have immediate maintenance checks.

One question are the actuators hydraulic? Then add them to the mix.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Dec 2011 04:09 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 16 Nov 2004 23:57
Posts: 833
munda wrote:
DELETED



Moderators, this statement is disgusting and highly offensive. To cast suspicion on people who risk everything for their country and their service without a shred of evidence is completely unacceptable. Please take appropriate actions.


Last edited by Jagan on 18 Dec 2011 04:12, edited 1 time in total.
Noted - Poster has been warned on this


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Dec 2011 04:18 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 16 Nov 2004 23:57
Posts: 833
Thank You Jagan. Much appreciated.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3507 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75 ... 88  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher, Kakarat, srin and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group