Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 26 May 2013 05:21

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2941 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 ... 74  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 10:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 17:51
Posts: 8455
Location: Ya kundendu tushar haar dhavala ..
^ Well the sky over urban areas in India is seldom blue so may be switching to grey makes sense. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 12:14 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 28 Apr 2011 11:27
Posts: 296
rajanb wrote:
Will wrote:
As far as looks go , the LCA cockpit does suck a bit :(


It should not be about looks Will but about Human Factors Engineering. It was used by the Bombay Stock Exchange in 1994 to design the screens for brokers and brokerage houses so that they could take decisions quickly to place their orders for sell/buy fast.

So what is the use if it looks good and is fatiguing, does not present information in the right order and on time. Being shot down is not funny.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_factors_engineering

Cheers


Get your point. But they could make it more pleasing to the eye like the western aircraft. But then again as Rahul pointed out we are yet to see a pic of a complete version of the LCA cockpit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 12:23 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 Feb 2011 16:56
Posts: 1611
Location: Nuked State of Denialistan
Will wrote:
quote="Will"]As far as looks go , the LCA cockpit does suck a bit :(


Quote:
It should not be about looks Will but about Human Factors Engineering. It was used by the Bombay Stock Exchange in 1994 to design the screens for brokers and brokerage houses so that they could take decisions quickly to place their orders for sell/buy fast.

So what is the use if it looks good and is fatiguing, does not present information in the right order and on time. Being shot down is not funny.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_factors_engineering

Cheers


Quote:
Get your point. But they could make it more pleasing to the eye like the western aircraft. But then again as Rahul pointed out we are yet to see a pic of a complete version of the LCA cockpit.


Agreed. But let's get out first customer using it and then the bells and whistles can be plugged into the production a/c.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 18:47 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17550
Location: NowHere
nope.. wrong. we can't spend like that, and change is not easy. The reason why big giants like boeing and lm are into virtual reality.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 19:43 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Jul 2011 16:05
Posts: 234
Location: On the sofa.
Kartik wrote:
Even the Indian Navy's MiG-29K has a pale gray interior.

Image


Sir ji, i think that is the Mig-29 SMT cockpit.

The IN mig-29k cockpit should be this one:

Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 20:07 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 08 Nov 2011 21:35
Posts: 28
Nik Hi, Are these Samtel MFDs, They look lil big as used to see in SU30MKI. The config looks awesome..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 21:58 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7549
Yeah that must be the Mig-29SMT or MMRCA which came to bangalore , I am told the Russian Mig-29SMT has a grey cockpit colour , prolly the odd one out for them


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 22:11 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17550
Location: NowHere
PAK-FA should compare with

Image

or

Image

but .... must beat:

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 22:16 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17550
Location: NowHere
Please note the minor details, but very important in terms of ergo and ease of use.

eg: joy stick is much more hold-able for the user sake - also look angle and position.

Rafale - couple of displays are to right or left.. imho, is a poor design in terms of line of sight hindered by the joy sticks or other obstructions.

but what is advantageous for Ef, is a lack for others..

bottom line, the pilot should not peep or bend or adjust himself for viewing display.. it should be without obstructions.


Last edited by SaiK on 24 Jan 2012 22:22, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jan 2012 22:21 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7549
The way PAK-FA cockpit looks now it would look similar to F-35 cockpit

Image

I think some cockpit might appear eye candy to a lay observer but may not be functionally as useful , while F-35 or PAK-FA cockpit might not appear eye candy to lay observer but could be functionally very useful to pilot. JMT


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jan 2012 01:55 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17550
Location: NowHere
Perhaps AMCA could do a Joint work on this..

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jan 2012 03:05 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31
Posts: 2278
Austin wrote:
Now its possible with the advent of LCD cockpit and compliant NVG the background colour does not matter much .....so may be the IAF has chosen to go with light grey colour and the RuAF continues to use the same teal colour on all its modern aircraft. check the cockpit of the now inducted YAK-130 same teal colour


I don't think so- otherwise why were HF-24 Marut's cockpit coloured light gray inside ? They were our own aircraft and the IAF was already exposed to the MiG-21 and the teal coloured cockpits. If such a theory was considered acceptable by the IAF, they'd have applied it to all their aircraft..after all it was only paint!

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jan 2012 09:07 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31
Posts: 2278
Nick_S wrote:
Kartik wrote:
Even the Indian Navy's MiG-29K has a pale gray interior


Sir ji, i think that is the Mig-29 SMT cockpit.


yup, you're right there..but the point was that the MiG-29K has a light gray interior and not a teal coloured one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jan 2012 09:25 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26
Posts: 1218
Location: Atop Orthanc, cursing, "Damn it where are those backfires??"
Couple of things about this whole color business:

1) I feel any lightish color that is easy on the eyes would work.
2) The teal color seems to bring out the contrast between the instrumentation and the frame more pointedly. Perhaps that makes a difference to russian flyboys.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jan 2012 09:44 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49
Posts: 3831
Colors aside, I am impressed by the design of the Marut cockpit. Feels so roomy and uncluttered unlike the Mig's and Su's of the day. Now the SDRE's didn't have access to any technology that the Russkie's didn't. So the argument that Russian cockpits had a cluttered and confusing look because of inferior technology compared to western aircraft doesn't work in this case.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jan 2012 10:46 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 17:51
Posts: 8455
Location: Ya kundendu tushar haar dhavala ..
The Tu-142 and Il-38 have a teal colour cockpit same is the case with Kamovs in IN service.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 01:16 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31
Posts: 2278
nachiket wrote:
Colors aside, I am impressed by the design of the Marut cockpit. Feels so roomy and uncluttered unlike the Mig's and Su's of the day. Now the SDRE's didn't have access to any technology that the Russkie's didn't. So the argument that Russian cockpits had a cluttered and confusing look because of inferior technology compared to western aircraft doesn't work in this case.


agree with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 03:50 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17550
Location: NowHere
edited: which one is this?
http://aviacaogeral.com/wp-content/uplo ... as-03a.jpg


Last edited by SaiK on 26 Jan 2012 06:54, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 03:59 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17550
Location: NowHere
in disbelieve on the finish quality of cockpit here.. the ergo is cool, except few adjustment on the position of joystick that might hinder visibility to display.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 04:39 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Mar 2008 04:47
Posts: 773
Are you sure that is the nLCA? The HUD/UFCP don't look anything like what was on older models.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 04:59 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 Nov 2011 21:43
Posts: 411
tejas wrote:
Are you sure that is the nLCA? The HUD/UFCP don't look anything like what was on older models.


http://aviacaogeral.com/2011/06/tejas-n ... -em-julho/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 06:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17550
Location: NowHere
dunno,.. but I would be damned if it is bundar!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 06:36 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Mar 2008 04:47
Posts: 773
^^^^ Thanks. That's from a Brazil based site. I think the author is mistaken The MFDs look way too big and the smart stand by displays are gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 06:41 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Mar 2008 04:47
Posts: 773
Looks like a modified version of this. I think it's Chini/Puki Thundaaaar. And I hate to admit looks much more aesthetically pleasing than LCA cocpit with its dinky MFds, bulky UFPC and antiquated HUD :(

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 06:53 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17550
Location: NowHere
huh! it does not deserve a big image then.. I am editing my original post.

--
added later:

now, it is parasun..
http://trishulgroup.blogspot.com/2009/1 ... -down.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 11:45 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25599
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
I support the rafale style of mounting the central MFD higher up just below the HUD - thats the venue for both ground map moving and probably A2A/A2G attack mode as well...makes sense to place it where the pilot can minimize his look downs.

I dunno why the "switch panels" beneath the HUD in Tejas is given so much prominence and importance...its not as if they unlock and fire the DeathStar weapon in the general direction of the enemy.

the Rafale cockpit seems to have 75% LESS switches than Tejas..yet it flies and flies well. look at it there's almost nothing
http://forum.keypublishing.com/attachme ... 1309021329

tejas cockpit.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-p_wkBUXCRHE/T ... 8%2529.jpg

imo in Mk2 Tejas they should
- minimize or get rid of that protuding panel below the HUD
- get a frameless EF style much bigger HUD in
make the side MFDs larger and engulf whatever the triangular panels both sides of the HUD are doing presently
- generally declutter the busy look of the cockpit...it has a lot of knobs and switches for sure...like any 4th gen fighter

EF also hsa a fairly old style cockpit. given the Rafale is 10 yrs behind the JSF in time, the french designers did a superb job imo in predicting where the future was - giant MFDs and touchscreens and backing it as a big bet. perhaps having sextant avionique as a national resource helps them predict better...perhaps they are just Mahdi's followers in keeping things simple and clean :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 12:02 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 14 Feb 2010 21:21
Posts: 426
Location: Troposphere
^^^ That is not LCA but Mig29 cockpit


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 12:13 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Mar 2009 11:38
Posts: 1788
Location: Looking for Qalander Consciousness
tejas wrote:
Looks like a modified version of this. I think it's Chini/Puki Thundaaaar. And I hate to admit looks much more aesthetically pleasing than LCA cocpit with its dinky MFds, bulky UFPC and antiquated HUD :(

http://www.defence.pk/gallery/data/649/ ... 007001.jpg

That's a Pilatus PC-21 cockpit. Bundar's twin seater version is not yet ready AFAIK.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 12:23 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25599
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
and I wonder how pilots are supposed to deal with 20 white buttons around each MFD when he is busy :eek:

I stand corrected by Gurneesh about the Tejas cockpit. if the pic below is the real thing, it looks ok so long as they minimize or get rid of the huge "CRT oscilloscope" thing protuding below the HUD and change the HUD to a wide FOV frameless kit..
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-i8xqIQuUWII/T ... 4%2529.jpg

changing the canopy to a F22 style bubble canopy would be a good move too. I heard it a complex piece of engg to make such canopies in single piece - we can seek such bideshi tech via the MRCA offsets and offsets on american deals like M777.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2012 12:57 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Jul 2011 16:05
Posts: 234
Location: On the sofa.
Parowski wrote:
Nik Hi, Are these Samtel MFDs, They look lil big as used to see in SU30MKI. The config looks awesome..


Sorry, I dont know the make of those but yeah, it looks good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jan 2012 02:41 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Mar 2008 04:47
Posts: 773
Sriman boss, you are right on the money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jan 2012 04:47 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 14 Feb 2010 21:21
Posts: 426
Location: Troposphere
Singha wrote:
and I wonder how pilots are supposed to deal with 20 white buttons around each MFD when he is busy :eek:

I stand corrected by Gurneesh about the Tejas cockpit. if the pic below is the real thing, it looks ok so long as they minimize or get rid of the huge "CRT oscilloscope" thing protuding below the HUD and change the HUD to a wide FOV frameless kit..
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-i8xqIQuUWII/T ... 4%2529.jpg

changing the canopy to a F22 style bubble canopy would be a good move too. I heard it a complex piece of engg to make such canopies in single piece - we can seek such bideshi tech via the MRCA offsets and offsets on american deals like M777.


IMHO that is not a CRT but a monochorme LCD. Something similar to this:

Image

This shows the cockpit lit up which seems to support that.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jan 2012 09:52 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 28 Apr 2011 11:27
Posts: 296
High time ADA/HAL designed an AJT around the Kaveri. With experience from the LCA dont think this should be such a difficult task. Plus it would be great to see the Kaveri put to use in actual operations. Would be a major boost.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jan 2012 11:22 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17550
Location: NowHere
The "will" must come from ADA-HAL. good wishes though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2012 10:19 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7549
Sukhoi T-50 / PAK FA - official patent analysis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2012 08:11 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Aug 2006 15:25
Posts: 545
Russia to Field Air-Launched Missiles for Sukhoi T-50 PAK FA by 2014
..
"The development of Kh-35UE (AS-20 Kayak), Kh-38ME, Kh-58UShKE (AS-11 Kilter), and RVV-MD (AA-11 Archer) class missiles will be completed in 2012-2013," Obnosov said, adding the missiles were currently being tested.

Some of the missiles intended for the fighters -- such as Kh-31PD (AS-17 Mod 2) class missiles -- have already been tested using Sukhoi Su-34 (Fullback) fourth-generation strike aircraft and put into serial production, he added.

The Kh-35UE tactical anti-ship missile has a maximum range of 260 kilometers; the supersonic Kh-31PD anti-radiation missile for use against air defense systems, can fly up to 250 kilometers; the Kh-58UShKE missile, designed to destroy pulse radars, can hit targets within 245 kilometers, and the short-range RVV-MD air-to-air missile has a maximum range of 40 kilometers.
..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2012 08:26 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25599
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
> the supersonic Kh-31PD anti-radiation missile for use against air defense systems, can fly up to 250 kilometers; the Kh-58UShKE missile, designed to destroy pulse radars, can hit targets within 245 kilometers

sounds like good stuff for our MKIs. existing stock of KH31P can be handed own to the Mig29upgs to hit more tactical radar targets like the SP SRSAM/SPAAG units the chinese have on tracked and trucks.
http://ericpalmer.files.wordpress.com/2 ... ag-2s1.jpg
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-Div- ... ocId173500

take a look at the LD-2000 - sounds like something that could produce in volume


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2012 09:21 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49
Posts: 3831
Sweet! It's high time our considerable Russian missile inventory got an update. The Kh-31PD and Kh-58 sound especially useful keeping chipanda S-300s in mind. The RVV-AE replacement is also essential. I guess if we decide to buy these, their integration with the MKI would have to be part of the Super-30 upgrade.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2012 20:01 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Sep 2009 19:30
Posts: 553
Location: Ganga ki dharti.
SriSri wrote:



News say that
Quote:
By the time the T-50 fighter enters service with the Russian Air Force in 2014, its missile systems will be fully operational, Obnosov said.


is it a reporting error...or they are ready to pull the plug.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2012 21:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25599
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
with suitable avionic and mission computer sw update I see no reason why even the existing MKIs cannot fire these new weapons esp the A2G strike missiles.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2941 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 ... 74  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group