Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 26 May 2013 10:39

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3516 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 84, 85, 86, 87, 88  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 05:46 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43
Posts: 6362
For those who were claiming conspiracy at Gen Bikram Singh's appointment. PMO asked Raw to investigate the in-law. Raw didnt find anything. AKA asked IB to conduct an investigation as well now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 05:50 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 31 Oct 2005 06:06
Posts: 3075
shyamd wrote:
For those who were claiming conspiracy at Gen Bikram Singh's appointment. PMO asked Raw to investigate the in-law. Raw didnt find anything. AKA asked IB to conduct an investigation as well now.
And this information is not public!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 06:12 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 21:35
Posts: 2259
Location: PA, USA
Quote:
But if you mean supervision of biggest re-armament exercise as Martial qualities than Gen K Sundarji should be called Martial-est of them all, shan t he? He planned most of the modernisation of Indian Army.


Modernization of the armed forces and being a martial are totally two separate things. Gen K. Sundarji was a great general who understood that modernizing the armed forces is the basic key to survival. Just like Ranjit singh (who got French Tactics and guns against British) and Babar who used modern artillery to win India and Ghori who used fast moving cavalry against slow moving elephants. They were great generals (some were defenders others were foreigners trying to loot India).

Now Raja Dahir (Brahmin too) was a good king of Sindh but he neither kept his armed forces to be modern nor he actively led the armed forces into battle (always defensive)


Quote:
Well what do we think of FM Kariappa or FM Sam Manecksaw, are they dhoti shivering types. They dont belong to martial Races and have give India 1948 and 1971.


Again!! see the general comment above!!! Generals are only as good as its soldiers, their shrewness and their intellect!!

Quote:
Oh I forgot about Major Somnath Sharma, Is he Martial enough.


Off course He is the Martialist of them all!! He fulfilled his Karma and his Dharma protecting his land!! That is what decide who is Martial and who not!!

Quote:
You see , propagating Martial race theory would land you in trouble.


You are reading too much into British theory of Martial races. In my opinion only people who got benifit from this theory were Pakjabis (good for nothing people who lost all the wars they fought and were declared MARTIAL by British probably to setup Pakistan later!! just like USA is playing India against China and Pakistan at this very moment)

Once again!! Declaring people "MARTIAL" is a mindset!! A prize! A Medal!! A proud epithet!! and nothing else!!

SDRE or TFTA in the modern world anybody who is fit enough (mentally and physically) to fight is a good soldier! and declaring his/her people as "MARTIAL" will only help!! All you need is mental ability to

1. Be a Leader to have a vision for strategic goals (at all levels starting from Havaldar to COAS)
2. Be a soldier to follow the orders for tactical strikes for the above strategic goals. (All Soldiers)
3. Have a physical ability to do the above. (All soldiers)

Bottom line for soldiers is the Indic concept of KARMA and DHARAM!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 06:18 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 21:35
Posts: 2259
Location: PA, USA
For me Martial is my grandfather telling me when I was 15 years old that there are only TWO jobs worth a Man!

1. Be a Soldier.
2. Be a Farmer.

everything else is garbage!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 06:21 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 05 May 2006 21:28
Posts: 264
Location: Gujarat
ShauryaT wrote:
shyamd wrote:
......
And this information is not public!


Well it is. IB report to clear decks for chief-in-waiting

Quote:
Defence Ministry has sought a report from the Intelligence Bureau on Lt General Bikram Singh’s daughter-in-law, who has Pakistani origins, but is now a US citizen.


Quote:
According to them, Prime Minister’s office had also recently sought a report from RAW on Singh’s daughter-in- law’s Pakistani origin issue. The RAW had found nothing objectionable, sources said.

Apart from this issue, other controversies like a fake encounter in Srinagar and allegations against UN Peace Keeping Force in Congo under him have also surfaced against Bikram Singh. Singh’s camp feels this is an exercise by ‘ frustrated’ elements , who want to scuttle his appointment.


-Ankit


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 06:57 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4278
err when RAW itself is politicised - what faith does one have in a politcally motivated check??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 06:58 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 31 Oct 2005 06:06
Posts: 3075
Ankit, Thanks for the link. The RAW one probably cannot be public.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 07:18 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 21:35
Posts: 2259
Location: PA, USA
Quote:
by Surya
err when RAW itself is politicised - what faith does one have in a politcally motivated check??


Why is RAW politicised? please explain!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 07:20 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 06 Jun 2008 10:55
Posts: 1668
SBajwa wrote:
For me Martial is my grandfather telling me when I was 15 years old that there are only TWO jobs worth a Man!

1. Be a Soldier.
2. Be a Farmer.

everything else is garbage!!


What did you choose :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 07:35 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Posts: 11882
Location: Holding Jannat Ki Chabbi
Uttam Kheti, Madh Byopar
Nakhid kare Chakri
Sukhi rahe Sansar.

This was for old times when High tech/Industrialized societies did not exist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 07:42 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4278
Quote:
Why is RAW politicised? please explain!!!



Read the way the chiefs have been appointed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 07:43 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4278
Since Sundarji was onlee a General

what happens when a so called martial race General is a flop??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 14:35 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 07 Sep 2011 22:01
Posts: 86
I have just received the following mail from Lt General VK Tubby Nayar (2 Para), former Western Army Commander and also the Governor of Nagaland and Manipur:

Dear kunal,
I will be grateful if u can release the attached open letter to the Hon Prime Minister to the press and other media. These are my honest feelings and I do not wish to say any thing more to any one. Thanks
for the trouble.
Best Wishes.
Tubby Nayar.

Respected Prime Minister,
Most people, including myself, believe that old soldiers should just fade away. Ever since retiring from the Indian Army as the Western Army Commander and subsequently having served as the Governor of Manipur and Nagaland, I firmly held that we have had our innings and matters were best left to those who followed us. However, after giving it considerable thought, I take the liberty in all due respect of writing this 'open letter' to my Prime Minister for like hundreds and thousands of my brother officers - both retired and serving - I am deeply concerned about what today is talked about as the 'Age Controversy'!
In my book, leadership, be it in matters military or otherwise, is based on three simple principles - righteousness, decisiveness and fairness! All three of these seem to have been vitiated in this particular case. There is no doubt that all records, both in the MS and AGs branch, until 2006 clearly reflected 1951 as the Chiefs date of birth. Based on an erroneous entry in the Army List, after the officer had already been cleared for the rank of Lieutenant General, first the MS branch records and then the AGs records were tampered with. To my mind and understanding, this is the simple crux of the issue and I fail to understand what sort of message has been given to the rank and file of the Indian Army by your Government’s inability to resolve this issue.
To hide behind the legal system – the retraction of the Government’s rejection of the Statutory Complaint frankly left the Chief’s lawyers with no choice but to withdraw their petition – and for the media and your Government to project this as a defeat for General VK Singh is indulging in theatrical politics. Like many of my brother officers, after the media blitz that reported on the Supreme Court’s deliberations, I too felt that the Chief should immediately resign in protest. However, once the Order of the Honourable Court came out five days later – without any TV channel or newspaper reporting it – the shoe seems to be on the other foot. By not resigning and continuing with his job despite what was widely projected as a ‘public humiliation’, VK Singh has shown a degree of personal courage that makes me proud of the man and by extension, the Indian Army. Had he resigned, it would have been a petulant act. We must not forget that there is a lot more to the office of the COAS than just the age issue.
Today, Mr Prime Minister, many would like to burry this issue and may accuse me of flogging a dead horse. However, it is my duty as an elder who has served my country to the best of my ability, to point out to you that once the smoke settles, you will be asked why you let this happen. In a system that is reeling from endless corruption charges, where many have learnt to bend with the wind, one man stood up for what he considered wrong. The ‘system’ may have closed in around him and in the short term, defeated him by denying him justice. But you, Mr Prime Minister, are today being seen as the person who is not only shielding the perpetuators of this original crime, but also protecting the beneficiary of this blatant manipulation.
I have had the honour of interacting with you when you were the Finance Minister of our country. I have always found you to be a man who could quickly grasp the larger picture and resolutely follow your convictions. Since Independence, the civil-military equation in this country has evolved in its own unique way, perhaps creating certain imbalances which need to be looked at for like the ‘age issue’, these too cannot be wished away. In a fractured and fragmented country that came together in 1947 as the Union of India, I can say with great pride that the Indian Army managed to retain its secular and non-communal outlook. This has to be protected at all costs! In your watch, if all the lions were to get up and go, the wind will say, I told you so!
Lt General VK Nayar, PVSM,SM(retd)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 15:21 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 07 Sep 2011 22:01
Posts: 86
First PC Katoch (1 Para) and now Tubby Nair (2 Para)....
Sure proves one thing, the Maroon Berets are certainly a Martial Race.


Last edited by kunalverma on 22 Feb 2012 23:04, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 15:57 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7550
shyamd wrote:
For those who were claiming conspiracy at Gen Bikram Singh's appointment. PMO asked Raw to investigate the in-law. Raw didnt find anything. AKA asked IB to conduct an investigation as well now.


So what do they expect to find ? Even the post Gen BS is holding is a critical position and they did not find any thing serious in the Pakistani connection to hold his current post .....such vetting by IB/RAW are just routine affair for top post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 18:05 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 24 Jul 2011 09:36
Posts: 11
shiv wrote:
SinghSardar wrote:
Why is so difficult for some people to call a spade a spade? The above mentioned "Martial Races" are what they are today largely due to the region of India where they come from.


This is why they easily defeated the Sri Lankan Tamils who could not withstand their martial ferocity during the IPKFs tenure. We really must call a martial race a martial race based on it history and record. This spade-shade business confuses me. Spade is for digging - like digging ones grave. Must be some American expression.


The IPKF was under strict orders to not harm civilians - which most Tamils in Sri Lanka were dressed up as. This limitation put on the IPKF was the reason why it sustained losses. A soldier cannot fight with one hand tied behind his back, so to speak. BTW - as any person with knowledge of English knows, calling a spade a spade means calling a fact a fact. Go Google it. I sincerely hope that this clears your confusion. We all learn something new everyday.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 18:08 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4278
Quote:
The IPKF was under strict orders to not harm civilians - which most Tamils in Sri Lanka were dressed up as. This limitation put on the IPKF was the reason why it sustained losses. A soldier cannot fight with one hand tied behind his back, so to speak. BTW - as any person with knowledge of English knows, calling a spade a spade means calling a fact a fact. Go Google it. I sincerely hope that this clears your confusion. We all learn something new everyday.



But then that applies to martial andnon martial

Shouldn't the martial races be able to fight with one hand tied behind and blindfolded!!!!

years of martial race evolution should allow for that!!!

else what difference for normal rice eating SDREs???


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 18:35 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 05:12
Posts: 1506
SinghSardar wrote:
The IPKF was under strict orders to not harm civilians - which most Tamils in Sri Lanka were dressed up as. This limitation put on the IPKF was the reason why it sustained losses. A soldier cannot fight with one hand tied behind his back, so to speak. BTW - as any person with knowledge of English knows, calling a spade a spade means calling a fact a fact. Go Google it. I sincerely hope that this clears your confusion. We all learn something new everyday.


Tamils?? Did IPKF go there to fight tamils? They went there to protect the people and enforce peace between SL and LTTE ..spade a spade.

If you want a free hand to do whatever you want, you dont need trained soldiers. National Bird of the pure flying at 40Kfeet with sufficient droppings would do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 18:50 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4278
that reminds me

kunal

need to contact you.

let me know

regards

surya


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 18:54 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 24 Jul 2011 09:36
Posts: 11
ks_sachin wrote:
Oh dear...oh dear...


SinghSardar

SO you are saying we should disband the Marathas, Madras, Mahar, 16th Cavalry, Meg & Centre, BEG, Bengal Eng Group etc etc as they have the non-martial races.

Well done well done...

PS - disect your post and try and gain an understanding of how contingents are chosen for RD Parades, field postings etc etc. There are a number of parameters to come up with who ends up where but in the where clause there is no field for region = '.....' (sql speak)...

BTW - was speaking to a former DGMT from the Gurkhas and asked him rather innocently which were the best troops he had served with----the answer was 'Madras' - so there you have it...



Sachin, I am not suggesting disbanding any regiment or group at all - read my post again - carefully.
As for your comment about Madras Regt being the best troops goes, without any disrespect to anyone and keeping political correctness in mind, I would suggest that you take a look at the Battle honours and medals awarded to the various IA regiments - "martial" or otherwise.
BTW, BEG and Bengal Engineer Group is the same thing, located in Kirkee in Maharashtra. I spent a few years of my childhood there as my father was posted in Kirkee.
Just to clariify further, BEG, MEG and all armoured regiments (pre-independence such as 7th Cavalry, Skinnner's Horse, Central India Horse etc and many post independence newly raised ones) are "mixed race". So is the Artillery, ASC, Signals etc.

This "martial race" discussion seems to have really touched off a raw nerve among a large number of BR Fites. Do I sense a form of "resentment" against North Indians here as it seems to me that a large majority of people on this forum are South Indian? Correct me if I am wrong. I hope I am. Such sentiments, if true, do not bode well for India's secularism. India is a collection of many states, each with it's unique history, culture and traditions, which must be recognized and respected by all Indians. We all have our strengths, but not always in the same areas. India is a unique and only such country in the world. Even Belgium, a very small country in Europe, with EU headquarters in Brussels, wants to split along ethnic lines.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 18:59 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 24 Jul 2011 09:36
Posts: 11
pandyan wrote:
SinghSardar wrote:
The IPKF was under strict orders to not harm civilians - which most Tamils in Sri Lanka were dressed up as. This limitation put on the IPKF was the reason why it sustained losses. A soldier cannot fight with one hand tied behind his back, so to speak. BTW - as any person with knowledge of English knows, calling a spade a spade means calling a fact a fact. Go Google it. I sincerely hope that this clears your confusion. We all learn something new everyday.


Tamils?? Did IPKF go there to fight tamils? They went there to protect the people and enforce peace between SL and LTTE ..spade a spade.

If you want a free hand to do whatever you want, you dont need trained soldiers. National Bird of the pure flying at 40Kfeet with sufficient droppings would do.


The IPKF was sent to Sri Lanka to enforce peace between SL and the LTTE, but ended up fighting against the LTTE! It was a politically disastrous adventure for India. Go read your history.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 19:05 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 05:12
Posts: 1506
spade-o-spade - then what the fck was the comment about IPKF was sent to fight the tamils. to fight tamils, all you need is to go to Tamil Nadu (a state in Southern India). You dont know the difference between SL army, ltte and civilians? Spend some time educating yourself before sending out byproducts of beans.

Thanks for your "valuable" posts so far...you have completely messed up this forum and the core issue that was under debate General VK Singhs DOB issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 19:08 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 24 Jul 2011 09:36
Posts: 11
Surya wrote:
Quote:
The IPKF was under strict orders to not harm civilians - which most Tamils in Sri Lanka were dressed up as. This limitation put on the IPKF was the reason why it sustained losses. A soldier cannot fight with one hand tied behind his back, so to speak. BTW - as any person with knowledge of English knows, calling a spade a spade means calling a fact a fact. Go Google it. I sincerely hope that this clears your confusion. We all learn something new everyday.



But then that applies to martial andnon martial

Shouldn't the martial races be able to fight with one hand tied behind and blindfolded!!!!

years of martial race evolution should allow for that!!!

else what difference for normal rice eating SDREs???


WOW! Your emotions are really getting the better of you now!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 19:20 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 24 Jul 2011 09:36
Posts: 11
pandyan wrote:
spade-o-spade - then what the fck was the comment about IPKF was sent to fight the tamils. to fight tamils, all you need is to go to Tamil Nadu (a state in Southern India). You dont know the difference between SL army, ltte and civilians? Spend some time educating yourself before sending out byproducts of beans.

Thanks for your "valuable" posts so far...you have completely messed up this forum and the core issue that was under debate General VK Singhs DOB issue.


Speak with respect and be civil - OK!
I know where Tamil Nadu is and that Tamils live there. I also know that Tamils in Northern SL wanted their own autonomous region and were suppressed by the SL (Sinhalese) govt. This gave birth to the LTTE (all Tamils) which took up an armed struggle to achieve what they had not been able to by peaceful means. If someone disagrees with you, then they mess up this forum? Other forum members can read our posts and decide who, if anyone, "messed up" this forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 19:25 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25
Posts: 6200
SinghSardar wrote:
pandyan wrote:
spade-o-spade - then what the fck was the comment about IPKF was sent to fight the tamils. to fight tamils, all you need is to go to Tamil Nadu (a state in Southern India). You dont know the difference between SL army, ltte and civilians? Spend some time educating yourself before sending out byproducts of beans.

Thanks for your "valuable" posts so far...you have completely messed up this forum and the core issue that was under debate General VK Singhs DOB issue.


Speak with respect and be civil - OK!
I know where Tamil Nadu is and that Tamils live there. I also know that Tamils in Northern SL wanted their own autonomous region and were suppressed by the SL (Sinhalese) govt. This gave birth to the LTTE (all Tamils) which took up an armed struggle to achieve what they had not been able to by peaceful means. If someone disagrees with you, then they mess up this forum? Other forum members can read our posts and decide who, if anyone, "messed up" this forum.


SinghSardar, what Pandyian is alluding too is your assumption all Tamils support LTTE, even within SL tamils, LTTE represented a minority and never the Kandy Tamils or the Colombo Tamils.

The Sinhalese Right wing did a lot of wrong and 1983 riots 3000 tamils were killed in rioting trigerring off the Ealam war.

Indian Tamils like 99% of Indian society are very sad 1650 soldiers died in SL and that Rajiv Ghandi for Political reasons spared the life of Prabhakaran who was with great difficulty captured twice by Indian soldiers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 19:28 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Jul 2006 06:01
Posts: 740
Self - Deleted : This discussion is pointless.


Last edited by ParGha on 23 Feb 2012 01:54, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 19:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 21:35
Posts: 2259
Location: PA, USA
Quote:
What did you choose


Back in 1980s I tried and failed and opted out to be an engineer. Which is just a Chakri i.e. "working for somebody". I am a garbage is what my grandfather will say as I am neither soldier nor farmer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 19:43 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4278
Quote:
WOW! Your emotions are really getting the better of you now!



Its actually sarcasm.

but probably got weeded out in the martial races!!! :mrgreen:


Quote:
Many South Indian posters here do seem to be rallying around such a flag too, but that is equally pathetic as well.


Not me - i am bombayite only and my track record on IPKF is known -


Last edited by Surya on 22 Feb 2012 19:53, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 19:51 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Mar 2008 21:10
Posts: 928
Without delving in to the subject, certain facts only...

BEG & Centre Kirkee = Bombay Engineer Group & Centre Kirkee, Mah
Typically troops are Sikhs and others from Raj, Gujarat, Maharashtra, MP, N Karnataka

is not the same as

BEG & Centre Roorkee = Bengal Engineer Group & Centre Roorkee, Uttarakhand
Typically troops are Sikhs and others from Haryana, NCR, Garhwal, Kumaon, Raj, HP, MP, UP, Bihar, WB, Assam & other NE states.

The hinterlands are not watertight compartments and there are overlaps.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 19:58 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23
Posts: 4941
ParGha wrote:
Let me tell you a brutal fact of life: This is 21st Century and an enemy A-100 battery can wipe out an infantry battalion just as quickly (approx 2 minutes from a 70km range), whether it was made up exclusively of the so-called "martial races" or "unmartial races". A cluster-charge will blow your brains out just as well, whether you are a "SinghSardar" or a "ChooahGhulam". Stop wanking off at the "achievements" of history -- not one of them will ever rise from their graves (or pyres) to save you.


Why the takleef at a perfectly innocuous statement that some groups have military traditions.

Sure technology changes ... but it is some of those "achievements of history" that have saved the civilization in the past. And even today you need folks willing to go into harm's way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 20:24 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 22 Apr 2005 23:50
Posts: 571
Dear SinghSardar ji

You are getting into more hot water here and I am attributing this to inexperience.

In the end if you need to corrected with warnings then you will not last long here, and will come out 'You guys are biased against me' experience, but please keep some of your beans in the bag.

Again I am not saying out political correctness. You have some way to go. So keep thinking, but make a bundle of this martial race theory and thow it across to the neighbour in the west.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 20:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
SinghSardar wrote:
shiv wrote:

This is why they easily defeated the Sri Lankan Tamils who could not withstand their martial ferocity during the IPKFs tenure. We really must call a martial race a martial race based on it history and record. This spade-shade busingess confuses me. Spade is for digging - like digging ones grave. Must be some American expression.


The IPKF was under strict orders to not harm civilians - which most Tamils in Sri Lanka were dressed up as. This limitation put on the IPKF was the reason why it sustained losses. A soldier cannot fight with one hand tied behind his back, so to speak. BTW - as any person with knowledge of English knows, calling a spade a spade means calling a fact a fact. Go Google it. I sincerely hope that this clears your confusion. We all learn something new everyday.


Have you actually asked some soldiers in firefights as to what they faced when their hands were not tied. Ability to fight has nothing to do with race or ethnicity. Looks like you have zero idea of Indian history. Recall that the martial races were the first to be overrun by the Mussalman. The South held out for the longest. Now which martial races do you find in Tamil Nadu and Andhra? You are basically bullshitting SinghSardar and I am calling you out on it.

Shut your racist gob right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 20:40 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
SinghSardar wrote:
This "martial race" discussion seems to have really touched off a raw nerve among a large number of BR Fites. Do I sense a form of "resentment" against North Indians here as it seems to me that a large majority of people on this forum are South Indian? Correct me if I am wrong. I hope I am. Such sentiments, if true, do not bode well for India's secularism. India is a collection of many states, each with it's unique history, culture and traditions, which must be recognized and respected by all Indians. We all have our strengths, but not always in the same areas. India is a unique and only such country in the world. Even Belgium, a very small country in Europe, with EU headquarters in Brussels, wants to split along ethnic lines.


You mean that you can talk bullshit but others should say things that you want to hear? Cut the crap. I doubt if you are a sardar. You may be a Paki for all we know - so who the hell do you think you are lecturing people about martial races, north and south India and secularism?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 21:23 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 06 Jun 2008 10:55
Posts: 1668
SBajwa wrote:
Quote:
What did you choose


Back in 1980s I tried and failed and opted out to be an engineer. Which is just a Chakri i.e. "working for somebody". I am a garbage is what my grandfather will say as I am neither soldier nor farmer.


Was only pulling your leg SBajwa.
I got selected and still chose 'chakri', so in the same boat as probably are most on this forum :).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 23:02 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 07 Sep 2011 22:01
Posts: 86
Surya wrote:
that reminds me

kunal

need to contact you.

let me know

regards

surya


Anytime! Kapil's given you my details I believe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 23:16 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49
Posts: 3831
SinghSardar, can you please take this martial race crap to the Off topic thread? Or better still, anywhere besides BRF?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 23:27 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Jan 2010 02:42
Posts: 283
Pranav wrote:
Why the takleef at a perfectly innocuous statement that some groups have military traditions.

Sure technology changes ... but it is some of those "achievements of history" that have saved the civilization in the past. And even today you need folks willing to go into harm's way.
Not speaking for ParGha. My own takleef is when some imaginary exclusive achievements are used to make a case that they alone serve the nation and others primarily march at parades. If you just wanted to spend time alone with your achievements I suspect no one would mind.

There was a question asked earlier about just who was in the Bengal and Madras armies that defeated said "martial races". I guess it's not sunk in yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 23:44 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 06 Jun 2008 10:55
Posts: 1668
Lt Gen Nayar, Katoch, IAS MG Devasahayam, and many others have pointed out the deliberate mangling of records to get the chosen 'line of succession'. They have all pointed out to the letter from MS branch, available to public, stating that the DoB used for promotion of Gen VK Singh was 1951 until 2006, and this included the promotion to Lt Gen. But to what avail? The deliberate action is taking its course and Bikram Singh will be the next General it seems.
Martial race concepts of an upright soldier are all far away from the sordid episode.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 23:59 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30
Posts: 4348
rajrang wrote:
....

But then Gen Sundarji did not win a war for India. It is easy to show martial qualities with intellectual ideas sitting in an office. Would he have put himself in the shoes of Bana Singh and fought on top of Siachen glacier? We do not know for sure.
...

Well, he was young enough not to be a General at the time, but he did fight 1965 and 1971 war. And then Sumdorong Chu in 1986 ( Wiki) so that statement of yours would be wrong , sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2012 00:05 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30
Posts: 4348
shyamd wrote:
For those who were claiming conspiracy at Gen Bikram Singh's appointment. PMO asked Raw to investigate the in-law. Raw didnt find anything. AKA asked IB to conduct an investigation as well now.

And When did Raa find anything useful that we know? They did not even know that Rabinder was about to jump.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3516 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 84, 85, 86, 87, 88  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group