Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 26 May 2013 08:51

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2775 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 ... 70  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 20 Feb 2012 11:21 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 18 Oct 2005 01:38
Posts: 10778
Surya wrote:
small units are always at risk if something goes wrong

Hezbollah trapped a Israeli naval SF team and shot it to pieces.


That was the 1997 raid in Lebanon near Sidon. The claim was it was Amal not Hezb who ambushed and wiped out the S-13 team. BTW unlike Maj Sharma's team which fought it out alone from a disadvantageous position, in case of the S-13 team they had plenty of support from air and naval guns after the initial ambush. Sometimes we forget just how overwhelming the odds are against our men during these operations - most western forces never even come close to such situations.

rohitvats, I would say mainly lungar gup becoz I don't know of any OR who was told explicitly it was SSG. The conclusions were mainly derived from the tactics and equipment employed - a common opinion was that the training and tactics displayed by the intruders was way higher than most conventional troops whether Paki or otherwise.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Feb 2012 11:37 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 Sep 2005 18:24
Posts: 4840
Location: Jatland
^^^Thanks. That is what I had thought.Based on 'interactions' with these piglets, the troops have over the years managed to understand the pschye of these scums and are understand fairly well what is to be expected. Deviations in tactics and CQB skills, like the group in Mumbai or when Afgans first made to Valley, is an indicator of better training/more hardened cadres or worse still, PA/SSG in mufti. Quite possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Feb 2012 11:40 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 18 Oct 2005 01:38
Posts: 10778
^^^One cheeky comment from an ex-CIJWS chap was that if the US SF could fight like these terrorists, the Khans would have won in Afghanistan :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Feb 2012 20:01 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 12 Dec 2008 11:52
Posts: 1258
Location: Restoring Indian Pride
rohitvats wrote:
^^^Thanks. That is what I had thought.Based on 'interactions' with these piglets, the troops have over the years managed to understand the pschye of these scums and are understand fairly well what is to be expected. Deviations in tactics and CQB skills, like the group in Mumbai or when Afgans first made to Valley, is an indicator of better training/more hardened cadres or worse still, PA/SSG in mufti. Quite possible.


One of the things I have noted is how the Indian Army(both SF and non SF) have adapted so well to Counter Insurgency and Counter Terrorism and it is now the Insurgents/Terrorists who are on the defensive.And that too without alienating native population(to a large extent) and without using heavy firepower.It is nothing short of Amazing.Future curriculums of counter insurgency will be incomplete if they do not include successful turning of the tide by Indian Army against Paki Terrorists.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Feb 2012 20:55 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Nov 2002 12:31
Posts: 395
Location: USA
Image

Image

Quote:
A National Security Guards (NSG) soldier participates in a drill during the inauguration of an NSG Hub in Kolkata, India, Saturday, Feb. 18, 2012. The Indian government has taken initiative to set up regional hubs for Indian National Security Guards, the elite commando force, at Mumbai, Hyderabad, Chennai and Kolkata after the terrorist attack on Mumbai in 2008.

source: daylife.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Feb 2012 20:56 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Nov 2002 12:31
Posts: 395
Location: USA
Image

Image
Quote:
A National Security Guards (NSG) soldier participates in a drill during the inauguration of an NSG Hub in Kolkata, India, Saturday, Feb. 18, 2012. The Indian government has taken initiative to set up regional hubs for Indian National Security Guards, the elite commando force, at Mumbai, Hyderabad, Chennai and Kolkata after the terrorist attack on Mumbai in 2008.

source: daylife.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Feb 2012 22:29 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 12:31
Posts: 1469
Raja Bose wrote:
Sometimes we forget just how overwhelming the odds are against our men during these operations - most western forces never even come close to such situations..


.. and how frequent and 'day to day' it seems. I don't think the general populace realizes that we are fighting a war on daily basis .... even though in last 2 years the casualty figures on both sides has gone down considerably compared to the high in 2001


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 02:47 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4278
Quote:
The claim was it was Amal not Hezb who ambushed and wiped out the S-13 team. BTW unlike Maj Sharma's team which fought it out alone from a disadvantageous position,


Amal only provided the outer cover\backup - their job was to fire a bit and melt away. It was hezbollah all the way



Yes the Israelis threatened massive retaliation elsewhere if the extraction team was going to be fired upon through Syrian sources else there would have been more losses


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 07:42 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 18 Oct 2005 01:38
Posts: 10778
^^Oh the extraction team got fired upon too and the evacuation chopper got hit badly. There was a grisly picture afterwards of the fighters parading remains of S-13 commandos from the incident. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 08:35 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4278
Raja

they could have completely prevented the extraction. The israelis were getting desperate and threatened retaliation via Syrain channels

The guy whose remains were paraded was the sapper who was carrying all the explosive and had the misfortune to have a round detonate against him. Sergeant Ila - i think

The rest of the bodies (or most - i need to double check) were extracted minus some body parts which the hezb made full use of in propaganda - including the rescue medic who caught a mortar blast
(Ila was returned with 5 limbs - and the IDF did not mention it till a subsequent video caused an uproar and the body had tobe exhumed0
check Warriors of God - they have even mentioned the part time Amal characters who were in the outer ring


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 09:24 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 18 Oct 2005 01:38
Posts: 10778
^^IDF used to have a webpage which described the incident in detail - cant find it any more.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 14:45 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 7755
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
From Tarmak:
Quote:
Bangalore: The Special Forces (SF) commandos in Bangalore are left in the lurch. They don't have a place for parachute refresher training – a must-do-dare-devil-exercise – also known as para-jumps. The Indian Army says they have identified an area at Hoskote Kera on the outskirts of Bangalore and written to Karnataka government (read as several times) seeking their permission to notify the 505 acres of land for their special training. The Army feels that the area provides an ideal ground for safe landing, with the soil being smooth and absorbing the impact.
The exercise (either a jump or drop) is performed from a chopper, AN-32 or IL-76. In a free fall jump, a paratrooper comes down at great speeds with severe g-force with the the chute opening at one particular height. In the second option, the chute opens the moment a paratrooper is dropped.
The 2 Para Regiment (Special Forces) was allotted to Bangalore post 26/11, while Chennai and Kolkota got the National Security Guard (NSG) hub. Bangalore also houses the Indian Army's Parachute Regimental Training Centre. In 2010, the 2 Para SF set up their base in Hebbal, with little details known about their operations.
Documents with Express show that the Army first wrote to the Karnataka government in May 2010, requesting permission for utilising the land at Hokote Kera for four weeks in a year (one week in a quarter). The Army also gave an undertaking in writing that no permanent assets would be built on the land. “In the same letter, the Army wanted the area notified to avoid high-rise buildings and towers coming up in the vicinity, which might endanger the lives of paratroopers,” sources said.
Sources say that the bureaucratic wrangles in the state government shook the Army a bit considering the premier force had to wait a for a long time for an exercise meant to equip its men in the wake of a terrorists' strike. The paratroopers finally were given the nod to performs their jumps between October 27-29 in 2010 with the Bangalore Rural District collector granting permission in a letter dated 20.10.2010.
In 2011, the Army again wrote to the state government for a repeat exercise, but this time (so far) no permission came forth. This forced the paratroopers to be airlifted to Agra so that they didn't miss their schedules. Now, an irked Army is planning to take up the matter with the state government one more time, wanting a permanent solution to their demand.

Let the Army not lose heart: Karnataka Govt
The Karnataka government is in no mood to drag their feet into yet another controversy with a battalion of woes already chasing them. When Express sought the state's version to Army's plea for a safe drop zone (DZ) for its paratroopers in Hoskote Kere, a senior government official wanted the Army not to lose heart. He also felt that had the Army put a well-oiled follow-up mechanism in place, a different story could have unfolded.
“We have never backed out of our responsibilities in supporting our Armed Forces. We keep getting request from the IAF, CRPF, Navy and many more from time to time. We recently allotted land to CRPF in Belgaum. We are ready to help and take decisions above the board when in comes to our defence forces,” the official said.
When brought to the notice that the Army officials were made to run from pillar to post, the official said: “Let them not lose heart and be patient. The said land in Hoskote is a dried tank bed and there are court rulings in notifying them. I am sure that the local people in the area would benefit if an Army unit comes up there. The economy of the region would also improve.”
With none from local Army units wanting to comment, sources in the Army HQ directly dealing with the 2 Para (SF) told Express that the matter has already reached them. “To a paratrooper every jump matters and it is evaluated by instructors. The availability of air support and safe ground areas are two key things. With the unit moving to Bangalore, it was essential that such facility was available to the paratroopers near the base. When the permission was getting delayed in Bangalore, we directed the local units (Bangalore) to do a recce of an area in Thoranagallu (Bellary). But, they found the land not suitable for jump with rough pebbles all over. We don't want our soldiers to bleed during training, but sweat hard,” the official said.
He said para jumps at Hoskote Kere would be a tremendous motivating factor for the local youth and would also project the role of Indian Army in Karnataka. “It would act as deterrence to any evil designs, in addition to reducing the burden on the exchequer in moving the personnel from Bangalore to Agra and back,” the official told Express.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 17:30 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 17 Aug 2009 20:50
Posts: 1700
Location: Land of Oz!
X-post

PC’s ‘own little air force’ to take wing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 18:44 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Jan 2009 20:44
Posts: 600
Location: Ionosphere
Raja Bose wrote:
^^IDF used to have a webpage which described the incident in detail - cant find it any more.


I found a of news article. Don't know how accurate it is.
The Independent


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 19:05 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25599
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
I like the idea of interior ministry having its own air wing -- so long as its not comandeered by MPs/Gandhis/Gandhibandhus for electioneering and racketeering trips. there has to be a LAW enacted that such assets cannot be diverted or even leased out for these uses even if they sit idle.

BSF clearly is incapable of running its own airwing. better to have a centralized org that HAL and IAF can work properly with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 19:14 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 1454
Location: NullPointerException
Singha wrote:
I like the idea of interior ministry having its own air wing -- so long as its not comandeered by MPs/Gandhis/Gandhibandhus for electioneering and racketeering trips. there has to be a LAW enacted that such assets cannot be diverted or even leased out for these uses even if they sit idle.

BSF clearly is incapable of running its own airwing. better to have a centralized org that HAL and IAF can work properly with.


And you think a law will stop them?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2012 19:18 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25599
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
but enlarging the VVIP sqdn run by BSF with say 12 EMB145 for such national missions might feed the beast enough to keep it away from the real meat :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 06:28 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 23 Mar 2010 21:47
Posts: 74
Aditya G wrote:
Dear Rohit, Surya

What is an Assault Team in our Para SF setup? eg: Maj Mohit Sharma was part of the "B Assault Team" that day.

An assault team is usually but not always the smallest in a given AOR. They consist of a certain number of squads headed by NCO's (Hav). In this case being Bravo Assault Team. They operate for a given sector and are tasked as such. Lets not discuss strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 07:12 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 18 Oct 2005 01:38
Posts: 10778
Shameek wrote:
Raja Bose wrote:
^^IDF used to have a webpage which described the incident in detail - cant find it any more.


I found a of news article. Don't know how accurate it is.
The Independent


No this is not the one. The one I was referring to had a lot of details including names of unit members, eye witness accounts of the raid and the aftermath.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Feb 2012 07:50 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4278
This is from the other side

http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Rev ... nst-Israel

He mentions the place, the Amal characters who provide the outer ring


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 12:29 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Mar 2010 22:42
Posts: 3591
Location: Frontier India : Nemo me impune lacessit
US counter terror special forces stationed in India


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 14:09 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 14 May 2009 12:33
Posts: 177
Location: LOC
^^ i didnt understand.... stationed means.. they do have the authority to engage any hostile situation..... and where will be they stationed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 14:43 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 942
Location: USA
I believe they might have authority to engage on the request of Indian Govt.
In any major terrorist attact, we may use their service to supplement the NSG. Though this is not a likely political possibility I see no other use.
We don't need stationed troops just for training though.

Or they can part of a small team located in the Embassies or their state.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 14:51 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25599
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
conventionally platoons of USMC are based in each consulate for inner security (outer perimeter is the local police). maybe the SF units of USMC or some such have embedded some of their own with the regular USMC detail.

under diplomatic bag rules they are allowed to import without question any form of arms necessary to defend their consulate...that means all small arms for sure, perhaps the line is drawn on things like mortars and 105mm howitzers though :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 15:08 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 942
Location: USA
I don't think so. UBGL and LAW may also be allowed to take care of vehicle based attacks. What I am thinking on is about the presence of MANPADS in Embassies. Post 9/11 that is a definite possibility. And I think in some cases even this should/could be tolerated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 15:27 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28
Posts: 9192
Location: Cave of the Saffron Bandits
koti wrote:
I believe they might have authority to engage on the request of Indian Govt.
In any major terrorist attact, we may use their service to supplement the NSG. Though this is not a likely political possibility I see no other use.
We don't need stationed troops just for training though.

Or they can part of a small team located in the Embassies or their state.


i seriously doubt we would ask US forces to participate in an anti-terror operation, and nor would they participate without their infrastructure in place. In the case of India it is likely to be liaison officers, perhaps staff officer level trainers/advisors and on rotation SF units for joint training.

As Singha says, it is always possible that small units are present within the embassy/consulate for additional counter terror security, or maybe even a SIGINT capability


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 15:53 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 942
Location: USA
Deleted.


Last edited by koti on 02 Mar 2012 15:55, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 15:54 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jul 2009 22:06
Posts: 942
Location: USA
Lalmohan wrote:
In the case of India it is likely to be liaison officers, perhaps staff officer level trainers/advisors and on rotation SF units for joint training.


That wouldn't qualify the comment "US Special Forces stationed in India".
It literally means, A Unit(Platoon IMO),equipped and ready for action with clear objectives.

Lalmohan wrote:
As Singha says, it is always possible that small units are present within the embassy/consulate for additional counter terror security, or maybe even a SIGINT capability

I said that first... :((


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 16:33 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28
Posts: 9192
Location: Cave of the Saffron Bandits
dont forget that its DDM reporting

(and apols for misquoting)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 18:35 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 12:31
Posts: 1469
I haven't heard about foreign SFs operating from India except for the Harkat-ul-Ansar kidnapping from the early 1990s. That was an exceptional case, but from the US briefing it appears that nowadays it is a routine basing. GoI must clarify


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 23:30 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 12:31
Posts: 1469
Image

"Special Response Force" in training - analogue to America's NEST. We also need to raise one such unit under SFC with IAF Garud force a good candidate to do the role.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2012 23:32 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49
Posts: 3831
^^They are using paintball guns. :-?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Mar 2012 02:03 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 28 Oct 2011 10:40
Posts: 23
^^Well I think This pictures are from Pak Army. Look at the third Pic. Clearly one can see Pak Flag on their shoulder.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Mar 2012 02:25 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 22 Nov 2011 18:59
Posts: 299
I am sure a few platoons of Delta, USMC Force Recon, Rangers, Green Berets and Seal Team Six are stationed in India. We are and constantly have been interacting with SF units from the US in order to get ready snatch and grab Puki nukes if and when things go south in puki land.

I am sure Joint Spec Op units and commands have already been drawn up with elite members from both sides.

I am also absolutely convinced that the OBL raid was launched from India. A'bad is just 60 km off LOC. A US nuke sub was stationed off goa a week or two before the raid, all US nuke subs carry Seal teams, C-17s had landed in India at the same time as well enough to transport the stealthy helos. The entire op took 45 mins, which accounts for 30 flight time in total and 15min action on the ground. Jammers on and flying low, they would have gone all the way from India to A'bad in minutes.

Furthermore, RAW informing CIA about the presence of a very big fish outside of Islamabad in 2007 only allowed CIA to focus back on the house. It's obvious our intel and ground support was there. Raw happens to be the final expert in Pak intel. No other agency possess the kind of intel RAW does about PAk.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Mar 2012 02:29 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 May 2006 01:31
Posts: 1887
Location: India/US
^^^ am glad that is all cleared up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Mar 2012 03:12 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49
Posts: 3831
mayankdr wrote:
^^Well I think This pictures are from Pak Army. Look at the third Pic. Clearly one can see Pak Flag on their shoulder.

I know. The pics are from the ISPR website.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Mar 2012 09:41 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 7755
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
Quote:
"Special Response Force" in training - analogue to America's NEST. We also need to raise one such unit under SFC with IAF Garud force a good candidate to do the role.

And how could you say that such a unit might already not be there ( msaybe under the SFF or the SG)?

Regarding the US SF comment and thought that it might be DDM:
"No U.S. special forces in India"

Quote:
That left the question open whether a component of Pentagon's special forces, who conduct operations of hazardous nature such as snatches, sabotage behind enemy lines or liquidation, were secretly stationed in the embassy or one of the consulates – as they do in neighbouring Pakistan and Afghanistan – to track, kill or assist in killing militants. Officials when asked were not willing to hazard a guess on that.

Testimonies before the U.S. Congressional panels, as is the case with depositions before Standing Committees of Parliament here, are sacrosanct and an official may lie at the peril of his job and liberty. Admiral Willard heads the Pacom whose area of “responsibility'' begins from the eastern edge of Asia and end on India's western borders.

Therefore the Admiral would be in the know of all interactions with the Indian military and is unlikely to mix up short term presence of his troops for joint exercises with deployments. He said the special forces were deployed here to help in the maritime domain — that is, to counter threats such as sneak attacks from the sea. He went on to add that other U.S. government agencies were also operating in India.

Definitely it is more than a case of misquoting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Mar 2012 11:00 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25599
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
btw there is something called the DSS (diplomatic security service) also whose personnel are based in US consulates. apart from being a 'internal affairs' kind of job to keep tabs on the american staff they also vet the background of any local employees in the consulates and other places like USEFI probably. word on the street was this vetting job was very detailed and people could get fired for minor things like a visit to binori madrassa or just the usual fiery friday sermon somewhere.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Mar 2012 13:32 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 12:31
Posts: 1469
Reg Paintball guns - they are using those for practice.

sum wrote:
Quote:
"Special Response Force" in training - analogue to America's NEST. We also need to raise one such unit under SFC with IAF Garud force a good candidate to do the role.

And how could you say that such a unit might already not be there ( msaybe under the SFF or the SG)?


There is no published information on any such unit. I hope there is one. GoI should publish the minimum details so that the populace at large is aware of it and can be rest assured.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Mar 2012 21:21 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 7755
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
^^ True but even the mention of SG or SFF gets many in BRF itself into a tizzy. So expecting any info from GoI is just wet dream onlee.. :(( :((


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2775 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 ... 70  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Samudragupta, Shrinivasan and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group