Bharat Rakshak

Three global networks that have well
established operating bases inside India,
undermine India’s integrity. First is Islamic
radicalism linked with Pakistan. Second is
Marxist radicals supported by China. Third
is Dravidian and Dalit identity separatism
being fostered by the West.
The focus is on the role of U.S. and
European Churches, academics, foundations,
Government and human rights groups in
fostering separation. It tracks money trails
that start out claiming to be for education,
human rights and empowerment training
but end up in programmes designed to
misguide Indian youth to separatist
thinking.
The British to suit their colonial interests
had the policy of divide and rule. Hence
they created a myth that Aryans and
Dravidians are separate races. Christian
evangelists and local Politicians use this
myth for their selfish ends. Christian
organizations in the West spread false
propaganda that Dalits and religious
minorities are persecuted in India.
The Aryan race theory has been rejected by
Europe. But the academics and media in
India still hold on to Aryan invasion
theory. Many such myths are systematically
manufactured and disseminated through
entrenched channels with ulterior motive.
A Tamil translation of this English book is
also available

Reading the UP result

The Samajwadi Party’s victory in Uttar Pradesh has been generally welcomed in the Urdu press. The daily Inquilab, published from Mumbai, Delhi, Lucknow, Kanpur and Bareilly, writes on March 11: “Every Muslim firmly believes that the government to be formed under Akhilesh Yadav will put an end to the injustices meted out to minorities. After the SP assuming power, UP Muslims have begun to feel that they do not have to live in the shadow of fear... that Akhilesh Yadav will not become a part of the global conspiracy that sends young Muslims to jails under false allegations of terrorism.”

In an editorial on March 13, the paper writes: “Along with the correct decision not to take D.P. Yadav, it was the party’s strategy to make Akhilesh Yadav — and not Mulayam Singh — declare the commitment to keeping goonda elements out. The party’s effort to change its image was behind Akhilesh’s emergence as the new face of the campaign, without any (public) claim or assertion to this effect.”

Rashtriya Sahara, in a cautious analysis on March 10, writes: “If the SP victory is a result of their new political consciousness, the Muslims of UP do indeed deserve praise and congratulations. But one has to stop and think. Did the Muslims give such massive support to the SP under some conditions or it was unconditional? ... If the Muslims of UP put their faith in the election manifesto promises, it certainly cannot be seen as the awakening of their political consciousness, as no party looks back at its manifesto after coming to power.”

Delhi-based daily Jadeed Khabar writes (March 12): “If Mulayam Singh wants to play a leading role in national politics, he will have to act with far-sightedness and strategy. He will also have to shoulder the responsibility of properly governing UP because Akhilesh, despite his popular appeal, has no experience of governance.” The paper also expresses concern about the reports of “lawlessness” coming from the state.

Don’t blame NGOs

Commenting on the PM’s controversial remarks on “American” interests, via NGOs, driving the agitations against nuclear power plants and biotechnology in food, Hyderabad’s leading daily, Munsif, writes in a February 29 editorial: “It is not that protests against the hazards in nuclear reactors are being held in India alone. Such protests have also been seen in other countries. Putting the NGOs opposing these plants in the dock, rather than credibly addressing suspicion of nuclear hazards, is no solution”.

On the Jaitapur protests, Rashtriya Sahara writes in its editorial on March 3: “Those opposing the Jaitapur plant were not just illiterate or half-educated fishermen and farmers; many highly educated persons were also with them. All over the world, such campaigns include locals as well as foreigners and NGOs for whom preservation of life and the environment are more important than development. Now, when globalisation is favoured everywhere, it appears odd that when talk of national and foreign factors is brought up to talk of vested interests.”

Israel’s agenda

Most papers have reported the protests against the arrest of freelance journalist Mohammad Ahmad Kazmi for his alleged role in the bombing of an Israeli diplomat’s car last month. But very few have written an editorial yet.

Inquilab’s editor writes, in a signed column on March 10: “The manner in which Kazmi’s arrest has been reported in Israeli newspapers gives the impression that he had been marked by Israeli intelligence agencies for some time now. Israel has long felt that it is necessary to silence the Urdu press so that the Indian government can be fully brought into the Israeli camp. So far, Israel has not been able to compel the Indian government to break its relations with Iran. That is why newer conspiracies are being hatched...”

The paper adds: “The mention of a journalist’s name in the Delhi blast has caused concern, and it is being asked whether this is a conspiracy to muzzle Urdu journalists; if this arrest is part of the global conspiracy to threaten journalists writing against Israel.”

No helmet, no namaz

According to a report (March 1) in the daily Siasat, published from Hyderabad and Bangalore, there is a mosque in the city where entry without wearing a helmet is prohibited. Situated in a military area, the 400-year-old Jama Masjid Qutab Shahi Military Area First Lancer (as it is known) is very well maintained and namaz is offered regularly. It has a stock of 300 helmets for use by those without a helmet on Fridays, when there is a vast congregation. The newspaper report says that the helmet is necessary for two-wheeler riders entering the area, as part of military discipline. But why it is compulsory for those not using a two-wheeler is not made clear by the report.

Some of the most virulent anti-India, anti-Hindu sentiment comes from Sikhs or persons with Sikh names. This has everything to do with the events of 1984-85.

Most of the major evangelical corporations (like World Vision, Campus Crusade, Youth with a Mission, and Samaritan’s Purse) operate in partnership with the US government in its pursuit of foreign policy goals. World Vision, which is effectively an arm of the State Department, is perhaps the most notable example of this. There is also the benefit of a custom-built legislation, with the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 providing necessary sanction to bring errant nations into line.

The list of foreign donors is topped by the Gospel For Asia Inc of the USA (Rs232.71 crore) followed by Fundacion Vicente Ferrer, Barcelona, Spain (Rs228.60 crore) and the World Vision Global Centre of the USA (Rs197.62 crore)
..
The highest amount of foreign contribution was received by the World Vision of India, Chennai, Tamil Nadu (Rs 208.94 crore)

Punjab was made a granary of India by Punjabis and Biharis and other Poorbiyas.


As also by the MS Swaminathan's and assorted other peninsular Indians who worked in the IADP.

Bakwaas article and bakwaas logic. the muslim population percentage in uttar pradesh has more or less stayed the same since independece (of course it will be lesser before 2002 since uttarakhand was part of UP). UP is one of the states in india where fertility gap between hindus and muslims is minimal. so this logic of mr. gautier is dumb

Accepted. Can we go back to why does Bollywood Sterotype Sikhs which is my original question?


Meanwhile X-post from GDF. India already suffers from many misperceptions from Partition that we dont need more oil in the fire.

Please read and the writer can provided detailed numbers to rebut this fearmongering...

Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Haryana

We consider these states together since the high Muslim growth areas of Delhi and Haryana are contiguous with North Western areas of Uttar Pradesh. In Uttar Pradesh there has been an appreciable increase in certain regions as seen below.

India UP North West North East Rest of UP

% Muslims

1951 10.43 14.28 24.24 17.28 10.30

1961 10.69 14.63 24.77 18.46 10.45

1971 11.21 15.48 25.64 20.70 10.98

1981 11.76 15.93 26.40 21.63 11.19

1991 12.59 17.33 29.00 23.22 12.05

% Decadal Increase

1951-61 0.26 0.35 0.53 1.18 0.15

1961-71 0.52 0.85 0.87 2.24 0.53

1971-81 0.55 0.45 0.76 0.93 0.21

1981-91 0.83 1.40 2.60 1.59 0.86

Note : North-West and North-East UP have been defined Table 6.10

1. It will readily be seen that the growth of Muslim population in UP is much higher than the All India growth (except 1971-81 decade) although UP is not a border state

2. Within UP, North West and North East regions have grown much faster. The rest of the state has a growth similar or lower than the All India growth

3. In 1951-61 decade, growth in the state is only slightly higher than the Indian growth. But the North West and particularly North East has grown quite rapidly

4. The 1961-71 decade shows accelerated growth in the state. The North East has again grown quite rapidly.

5. In the 1971-81 decade, the state and all India growth are similar. But yet these two regions have grown far above the state average (refer discussions in Chapter 5).

6. The 1981-91 decade is high for all regions. The growth in North West is now explosive and closer to the growth in North Kerala. Even the ‘Rest’ category of the state has grown appreciably, its decadal growth being similar to the 1951-81 period put together. Table C-T4 and Map 6.1 indicate the districts in which this growth has taken place.

If we look at the map we find that these two regions along with the districts in Bihar enclose Nepal. There are reports that all along this border Muslim dominated regions have been recently formed in Nepal also. No wonder that terrorist organisations like ISI can easily operate and infiltrate in the country from here.

The North Western region is also contiguous with similar regions in Haryana and also Delhi and is close to the North Eastern region of Rajasthan. In fact we see an almost contiguous belt of high Muslim growth region from Pakistan to Bangladesh and beyond. It is for the experts to determine the reasons and significance of such selective growth. This becomes important since in districts like Agra, Sitapur, Lucknow, Fatehpur, Unnao, Sultanpur, Deoria (9.25% growth between 1961-81) and Ghazipur, the growth has been negative in the 1981-91 decade. Many of these districts are in Central and Estern UP. In this movement only due to job opportunities?

In the following districts of Uttar Pradesh not covered by the above regions and included in the ‘Rest’ category in Table C-4, the Muslim growth in the 1981-91 decade has been significantly high :

Mathura (1.73%), Kheri (1.58%), Hardoi (1.75%), Farukkabad (1.53%), Pratapgarh (2.31%), Varanasi (2.40%), Nainital (2.32%), Aligarh (1.46%) and Jaunpur (1.40%. These areas have been marked on the map and it will be seen that many of them are close to the high growth regions and will eventually make both of them contiguous. Dehradun has only a slightly lower growth at 1.30%.

Delhi presents an interesting case. Before Independence Muslims constituted about 30% of the population. In 1951 it had come down to 5.73% and was steadly until 1961. Afterwards it has increased by 3.62% between 1961 and 1991, the growth being as high as 1.70% in the 1981-91 decade. Being a metropolitan area and the national capital, the population in general of Delhi has grown very rapidly. But the Muslims gave grown much faster than the HINDUS in this period. It is generally conceded that Bangladeshi Muslim immigrants have settled down in Delhi in a big way.

Indian Punjab have over 30% Muslims in the pre-Independence period. They migrated to Pakistan during partition except from the district to Gurgaon which had16.91% Muslims in 1951. This district is contiguous with Delhi and now a part of Haryana. Faridabad district was carved out of it in the 1971-81 decade. Along with Delhi its Muslim population has also grown by 3.83% from 1951 to 1991. In the present district of Gurgaon it is 34.41% in 1991, with its rural areas being as hiigh as 42%.

one single "political power" which is declared as Islamic, and uses Islam as a tool to attain and hold power, establishing itself as the most powerful force in ME. all other smaller powers in ME will follow in that power's lead on promises of looted wealth from kafirs. this is consolidation of ME under Islam.

JMTP's.

that is how I imagine it will be. doesn't mean it is the only variety of "Islamic consolidation of ME" that's possible.

Bengal youth have brittle bones, army stops staffing

Bone deformities due to arsenic poisoning are rampant among youth in Bengal, the Indian army has found. Less than 100 youths among the 2,000 who turned up for an army recruitment drive in February, passed the physical test.

The recruitment was not for fighting ranks but for technical positions — aviation, ammunition and nursing.

"We found out most of the candidates came from arsenic affected regions of Bengal, and drink water from hand pumps," he said. Hand pumps — used rampantly in the state — are the most widespread source of arsenic poisoning.
Arsenic contamination in Bengal was detected more than 30 years ago, said Niyogi.
Since the early eighties, arsenic related skin diseases were detected in Malda, Murshidabad, Nadia, North-24-Parganas, South-24-Parganas, Burdwan, Howrah, Hooghly and Kolkata by Kolkata's School of Tropical Medicine and the All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health.
Following a 20-year study, the School of Environmental Studies of Jadavpur University, categorised those districts as severely affected areas

India is a pushover mainly for this reason: when you have an enemy who is motivated by scripture-sourced hatred against you, you have to realize it. you have to actually understand and acknowledge this truth, that the hatred you are getting is not superficial or "economic/financial", but actually unconditional religious hatred. this is how, you will realize the source of the enemy's hatred and be able to combat it. it is not enough, in such cases, to have soldiers stationed at the border. especially when there is a huge contingent of followers of that religion inside the borders.

India lacks this awareness, primarily because the elites in power have deemed it necessary to whitewash the record of the enemy. by doing this, and by effectively banning any public discourse of the truth of past atrocities committed by the enemy, the elites have ensured that the people do not understand the source of enemy's hatred.
<snip>
that is the level of dhimminess of Indians. this is why India will be a pushover. when there is a renewed call of the Ummah, the Indian army at the border will be helpless b/c they were never trained to fight against this enemy.

entire swaths of Indian territory will become "no go" zones, if the call for Jihad is announced and put into action. I hope I am wrong, but my brain tells me I might not be.

it is not enough, in such cases, to have soldiers stationed at the border. especially when there is a huge contingent of followers of that religion inside the borders.

I started with anecdotal stories simply because it is the easiest way to know what's going on "on the ground".

Interesting anecdotes.

It's important not to tar everybody with the same brush. There are also many well adjusted individuals.

The way forward is to delegitimize the ideology in the minds of its adherents; they should feel an intense sense of shame, guilt and loathing for the ideology.

Actually, and ironically, its abroad in more "liberal" "west" that Indian non-muslims may come into direct contact with a freer expression of inner Islamic thought from fellow subcontinental Islamics. It is not that Muslims are not free to express their thoughts about India and non-Muslims back in India. But the Islamic mindset is trained to look at the whole world as being divided into mutually hostile and inevitably genocidic armed camps. In India they are constantly being told that the majority is against them - and only the grace of certain secualr parties protects them. Combined with the tactical line taught - of deception when militarily weaker - this prevents real feelings to come out.

Is the forum being filled with one-sided experiences onlee? Perhaps. It is so fortunate that the WB-BD frontier [and deeper inside] villages of one community have no internet savvy, peacefully co-existing with other communities, realizers of the danger of talking about potential dangers of Islamism.

Correct.

But the same applies to Hindus too. It is easy for a Hindu sitting in America to tell Indians that Muslims are a danger and that the Indian in India is ignorant of this danger.

The Indian in India might know this, but may be restrained by the situation to not say it out loud. This is interpreted by the Hindu in America as "Ignorance that will ensure that India will be a pushover"

Your argument applies to Muslims and non Muslims. People in India are not as stupid as educated Indians think they are.

Most Hindus are well aware from family anecdotes and public material that there is a problem. Muslims too are well aware of that. It is totally absurd to imagine that Indians in India don't know about India things that are obvious to someone sitting in America. The only difference is that the person in America is released from the restrictions of India and say it out loud. The Muslims whom Devesh spoke too were as "free" to speak in America as Devesh is to express his reservations about Indian Muslims. Both are speaking from America with the same access/lack of access to Indian reality.

it is not lack of awareness in India and a special awareness and honesty from America, but an ability to say politically incorrect things openly on teh internet. It was not for nothing that I have repeatedly brought up the topic of how any Indian in America would not dare say a word about harming the US president. It is easy in India to do that. However that does not mean that every Indian in America is in love with the US president. He can't curse openly, that's all. He can make "politically correct" statements.

Communal relations in India are not based on ignorance as has been alleged. They are based on the reality of having to make a country work. People have to work, eat and survive. Communal disharmony just does not cut it. It is, in my view total stupidity to make a general assumption that people in India do not know what they are dealing with as regards communal harmony and tensions. Someone is well behind the curve about life in India and its definitely not the people within India.

So it is incorrect to say that Hindu elite who migrate to USA know already about Islamism from desh. Actually, most of them probably only were shocked for their life to see the open expression of hostility and Islamic aggression from fellow subcontinental muslims in western lands. Many start searching for the real history only after facing such incidents.