Bharat Rakshak

This system would be useful to protect ships, radar installations and maybe even tanks ...




http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... GrJnxdDbO8

Also, if such systems are being used by the enemy, then a Mach 6 missile such as Prahaar would probably have a better chance than a Mach 3 missile like Brahmos.

This system would be useful to protect ships, radar installations and maybe even tanks ...

Also, if such systems are being used by the enemy, then a Mach 6 missile such as Prahaar would probably have a better chance than a Mach 3 missile like Brahmos.

Washington, D.C., March 23, 2012 – A central element of the current debate over how to deal with Iran's nuclear program has focused on the possible difficulty of destroying the Qom underground uranium enrichment facility via air strikes. However, documents posted today by the National Security Archive show that Qom is only the latest in a long series of alleged and real underground facilities that for decades have been a high priority challenge for U.S. and allied intelligence collection and analysis efforts, as well as for military planners.

The documents featured in this posting describe in detail the agencies and programs the U.S. government has brought to the task of identifying and assessing underground structures in foreign countries since World War II. Internal records indicate there are more than 10,000 such facilities worldwide, many of them in hostile territory, and many presumably intended to hide or protect lethal military equipment and activities, including weapons of mass destruction, that could threaten U.S. or allied interests.

The records (and introductory essay by Archive Fellow Jeffrey T. Richelson) also discuss the vast complexities of gathering and analyzing intelligence on these facilities, and detail several of the highly technical methods U.S. agencies have developed for the purpose over time.

Is that not a ducted fan?!

Edited: to display image correctly.

Also, if such systems are being used by the enemy, then a Mach 6 missile such as Prahaar would probably have a better chance than a Mach 3 missile like Brahmos.

"The missile was test fired from a ground mobile launcher from the launch complex-3 at about 1122 hours and the trial was successful,"

India today tested BrahMos Block III version with advanced guidance algorithm was flight tested from ITR Balasore.

bad grammar ?

if we draw a line from australia to madagascar, and a fire from chandipur to the south, the intersection is around 5500km range.
a line from orissa to perth is around 5800km
so this is in line with the A5 stated range with designed payload of 5500km

from orissa to edge of antarctica is around 9000km. the A5 might make it with a much reduced payload which is of no use because A5's will be few and need to deliver full heavy payloads.

perhaps in future the A6 a all-composite 3 stage missile might finally deliver a 0.5t payload out to 12000km which will permit our SSBNs to patrol the vast southern IOR region freely while keeping most targets in range.

very good info. can you do the same for Beijing and Chengdu and where should we launch A-5 from?

Beijing, Chengdu from any place in India.

Harbin, from Hyderabad and above.

http://www.freemaptools.com/measure-distance.htm
ships leaving to intl waters near australia! I thought we would go all the way to intl waters near antartica.. two mangoes in one stone.. antarctia expedition to target - to be acquired by mid april.

go a5!!

It has a censor warhead and could change the direction before 24 km.