Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 25 May 2013 03:22

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1621 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 ... 41  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:27 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23
Posts: 4928
Sanju wrote:
^Are they referring to PC??


Maybe. As per Swamy, Karthik PC, Tejinder Singh and some Major Hooda, relative of Haryana CM act as a pack.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:41 
Online
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 8184
The Indian Express' stands by the report.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:42 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Jan 2010 02:42
Posts: 283
Ghatotkacha wrote:
Surya wrote:
nothing like a good fat lie about a potential coup leaked by our babus to keep them as lords of the universe sure a Delhi cop is going to stop a mech unit at a checkpoint :rotfl:
:rotfl: No, Delhi pandu will let them go after receiving Rs 500 "welfare-fund" at the checkpoint.
I just imagined the whole scene, and cannot stop laughing.
I know that was not the implication here but I thought I should put in a word for the poor pandus. A large number of them might be corrupt but they're not anti-national by any stretch. I only say this because it could be construed that way and I think always pitting the Army and the Police in the public space is unhelpful and mostly not true anyway. We're all on the same side. FWIW I'd imagine the cops would have organized traffic at the request of the CO.

The report is stupid in so many ways it boggles the mind. What stopped them from simply using the units from the R-day parade and just issuing out ammunition? I wonder if the leaks are deliberately preparing ground. Are we slated for an attack in the near future?


Last edited by anjan on 04 Apr 2012 23:45, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:42 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 May 2006 01:31
Posts: 1887
Location: India/US
Might be that gentleman (who rather aptly, looks like Peter Pettigrew of Harry Potter) who wants to censor the internet.

That editor should be prosecuted for defamation of the units he besmirched as well as inciting unrest in the Army/Civil against a serving CoAS. It does directly impact national security if the CoAS is being tarnished without reason.

(This seems a VERY bad phase - hope those Gulfstreams and UAVs are busy flying around the borders)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:45 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 31 Oct 2005 06:06
Posts: 3075
I am wondering, with the current state of affairs and status of our polity, IF a military coup did happen, how many here would support it.

No intention to start a rumor and suggest anything, just trying to understand the thought process of various people here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:47 
Online
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 8184
There is no need for such a poll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:49 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Jan 2010 02:42
Posts: 283
ShauryaT wrote:
I am wondering, with the current state of affairs and status of our polity, IF a military coup did happen, how many here would support it.

No intention to start a rumor and suggest anything, just trying to understand the thought process of various people here.
The Indian Army can find great support for a coup as long as it does not actually do a coup. ie. We respect them precisely for they don't do.

Even with all the muck flying around you'd be hard pressed to find any operational commanders who'll actually obey orders for a coup. You'd need an Army commander and none of them would do it. That is the long and short of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:50 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jun 2009 12:47
Posts: 917
Altair wrote:
Indian Media is just taught wrong fundamentals right from their Bachelors program. Their syllabus is all Left centric books to fight for the weak and to target the strong. This time the strong one is the Army. If Advani or NaMo had been in a yatra they would have targeted them. Army is just at the wrong place at wrong time.
I hope the Army PR takes the undytv,shakeitdaddy to task.


If the media were to truly fight for the weak(poor/victims) and target the strong(rich/powerful), then I think they would have had several fans. Infact, this is one aspect of the so-called leftist ideology that I can agree with: help the poor against the rich. But, generally, this aspect is just rhetorical. The truth is that the poor become real victims in leftist governed places(ex: USSR, China, Naxal areas,...etc). Because the leftist ideology provides a justifiable excuse(of fighting for the poor) to usurp power(absolute dictatorship). And once the power is acquired, like everybody else, the power is used to perpetuate a monopoly on the power. For this, the rich and elite are co-opted or eliminated. But the poor, they become eternal victims. They are literally treated as slaves.

As far as media is concerned, they tend to lick up and kick down. In most countries, the media is in cahoots with elite power-brokers and power-centers (internally and externally). Here again, the people are the ultimate victims because they are fed wrong/biased/insufficient information and the people's judgement gets clouded. The media is used as a tool to control the people. In a democracy, this can have seriously implications. Because if the people are not properly informed, then their judgements(votes) will be wrong which means that the elected representatives(and the newly formed Govt) would be corrupt/inefficient/imbeciles.

India media seems to have imbibed a strange derision and hatred towards majority community of India. I don't know the exact reason for this. Maybe the leftist leaning is responsible for such thinking. Maybe the majority community(the sheer numbers) are seen as a threat to the power-centers who sponsor the media. Maybe a combination of both factors. Infact, one can say that the media in India displays a strange behaviour: it has contempt for everything that is Indian(culture, product, attire, values,...whatever) and celebrates everything that is foreign.(Hakimullah Shiv may have a field day with analyzing what is the reason for such feelings of inadequacy). To me, it seems to be a relic of colonialism. This media behaviour has been slowly imbibed by the educated Indians. And from them, it is transmitted to rural Indians. In a way, it is a mental slavery and cultural slavery which is being transmitted from the very top of Indian power structure.

So, the media dislikes Advani or NaMo because(and as long as), they stand with(and for) majority community or Indian indigenous products(culture, materials, attires, ...etc). If and when, Advani or NaMo or whoever goes against majority community or India, they will be celebrated. A Roy is a prime example of this phenomenon.

In this particular case, I think the Army is not the strong party. It is the weaker party. So, the media can go against them without any fear of repercussions. On the contrary, if the media started investigating the source of the corruptions, the money-trail, demanding responsibility and accountability from the Govt(and politicians in general), ...etc; then the media would have truly gone against the strong party(and would have done a huge favor to India/people/poor).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:56 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Feb 2008 06:18
Posts: 557
ShauryaT wrote:
I am wondering, with the current state of affairs and status of our polity, IF a military coup did happen, how many here would support it.



I would NEVER support anybody in a uniform running Delhi. I doubt many people in India would want some desi Mushraff clone swaggering up and down Parliament House.

It would require a LARGE "pair" to claim with a straight face that they can manage 1 billion rancorous Indians when managing the Army of 1 odd million is a handful.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2012 23:58 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 07 Nov 2007 22:53
Posts: 4665
Location: Deep in the badlands of BRFATA
Ghatotkacha wrote:
Surya wrote:
nothing like a good fat lie about a potential coup leaked by our babus to keep them as lords of the universe

sure a Delhi cop is going to stop a mech unit at a checkpoint

:rotfl:


:rotfl: No, Delhi pandu will let them go after receiving Rs 500 "welfare-fund" at the checkpoint.
I just imagined the whole scene, and cannot stop laughing.

Also how is slowing down traffic on highway going to help? Mechanised infantrymen are driving Maruti 800s and cannot get off the road? :-o


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 00:03 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23
Posts: 4928
ShauryaT wrote:
I am wondering, with the current state of affairs and status of our polity, IF a military coup did happen, how many here would support it.


As per Dr. Subramanian Swamy some 60 seats in the last Lok Sabha elections were swung using EVMs.

If that's the case, then the coup has already happened.


Last edited by Pranav on 05 Apr 2012 00:09, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 00:06 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Oct 2011 09:42
Posts: 706
Location: Tibet / Balochistan
Quote:
A very ugly and dangerous attempt by Indian Express to discredit Indian Army and its chief

Was Indian Express influenced by arm's lobby?

Indian Express shud not be let off without a thorough investigation of their motives and agenda. Who's agenda are they pursuing?


Arvind Kejriwal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 00:12 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31
Posts: 4472
Here are some of the Tweets by a person named Akhilesh Mishra
Quote:
1. There is one more theory as to why Shekhar Gupta published the #coup story the way he did - on instructions from American master & PMO.
2. This theory surmises that Europeans do not sell arms to likely #coup facing countries. Thus France could refuse to sell Rafale to India.
3. Why would US & PMO sponsor the #coup story by Shekhar Gupta in IE - because both are cut up that F16/F18 by Americans did not go through.
4. So basically, if France does not sell Rafale to India, we will be left with no choice but to re-tender & in this round US could make it.
5. Now the famous think tankis from Takshashila had been lobbying for months for India to go with US fighters & not European ones.
6. Therefore, amongt the very few who have come to defence of Shekhar Gupta story - surprise, surprise-there is the famous Takshashila tanki
7. So if you believe this theory-that US/PMO sponsored Shekhar Gupta story to nix Rafale deal, then it fits in with why tankis supporting IE
8. One way to know real motive of Shekhar Gupta story is to check if everyone who wanted us to buy US jets is defending IE story?
9. Till now, as far as I have counted, everyone who was FOR India buying US jets overiding all other considerations is supporting IE story.
10. So Shekhar Gupta is the favourite media boy of Gen J.J. Singh. Plus a PMO stooge. Any wonder #coup story front paged in IE?


Quote:
1. Some facts on #coup story - Gen J.J. Singh has given only one televised interview post retirement. It was to Shekhar Gupta in WTK on NDTV
2. Shekhar Gupta in that WTK interview had introduced Gen J.J. Singh as one of the finest ever - a "General's General" were his exact words.
3. Now Gen J.J. Singh is the geneteman who engineered the entire age row fracas of Gen. V.K. Singh to position Gen B.K. Singh as future COAS
4. Gen V.K. Singh has recently blamed Gen JJ Singh directly for engineering the age row controversy so as to position his favourite as COAS.
5. Then Gen J.J. Singh had refused to comment. Has he responded now through his favourite media boy and front page story?


Quote:
1. There are times when we lambast those with whom we disagree. But anyone who believes the #coup story must be exiled to Popo Islands.
2. A #coup works in Pak because EVERY corps commander supports the it. In India, would Gen Bikram Singh have supported it Gen V.K. Singh?
3. Would Gen Bikram Singh Chief of Eastern Command and next COAS, for example, have supported Gen V.K. Singh in his #coup attempt?
4. Theory of #coup is premised on the fact that men in those two divisions that moved were extra loyal to COAS.Else, why would he need them?
5. If the commander of Delhi unit of Army was not with Gen Singh, (thus his need for 2 divisions from outside), would his #coup have worked?
6. At any time there are 12,000 troops in Delhi. During Jan 2012. There were 30,000 duet to Army Day / Republic Day. Why need more troops?
7. If Gen V.K. Singh was planning a #coup would anyone else have supported him? What good is a #coup when no corps commander supports you?



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 00:28 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Feb 2009 23:19
Posts: 1901
ShauryaT wrote:
I am wondering, with the current state of affairs and status of our polity, IF a military coup did happen, how many here would support it.

No intention to start a rumor and suggest anything, just trying to understand the thought process of various people here.

I mean no disrespect but this is not even something worth discussing about. I hope that the forum members won't take this (hopefully unintentional) bait.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 00:43 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30615
ShauryaT, No need for that question. Please folks no more follow-up on that.

ramana


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 00:53 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30615
Roperia wrote:
Here we go Indian Civilian-Military Distrust is Nothing New I find these Indian born "experts" living in the west the most ridiculous.



Interesting info not corroborated in Mathai's tell all book


Quote:
In the 1950s, rumor of a coup – compounded by Gen. Ayub Khan’s takeover in Pakistan – was one factor that prompted the elevation of Krishna Menon, a loyalist of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, to the position of defense minister. :eek: The Nehru government and its successors viewed military-to-military ties, particularly with the U.S., with great suspicion. :mrgreen:

There are plenty of other examples of alarmism from the government about military intentions, most of them demonstrating not much more than civilian neuroses.

Stephen Cohen, a South Asia expert at the Brookings Institution, has noted that senior intelligence officials claimed to have detected at least three coup plots by generals in recent years, including one supposedly by General K. Sundarji in 1987. :mrgreen:

“There is no credible evidence of such plots,” Mr. Cohen writes, “but insecure politicians and bureaucrats, many of whom have a stereotyped image of the military, listen to these warnings.”



Wah wah what psy-ops!
Now a Cohen baccha quotes Cohen! No need for the great master to write as he has his chelas to do the needful.
There is Latin phrase: "Lapsis Calami, Suggesto Falsi!"
Slip of the tongue and false suggestions.

So the TSP coup in 1957 prompted JLN to promote Krishna Menon the most un-Defence Minister of India.

All TSP had to do to make Chacha self-flaggelate would have been to do one more coup and JLN would have disbanded the Army.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 01:36 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30615
NVS writes in NewsInsight:

Media putsch

Quote:
Media putsch
Motivated campaigns against the army chief must end, says N.V.Subramanian.

4 April 2012: It is becoming clearer that elements with vested interests and corrupt intentions are out to destroy the image of General V.K.Singh before his retirement. The aim appears to be to derail the Tatra investigations taken up at his behest and his general exertions to cleanse the army.

Today's frontpage story in The Indian Express is aimed towards that end by whoever leaked some sensational details of military movements. The piece tries to draw the inference that a coup was in the making coinciding with the army chief's petition to the Supreme Court about the age row. The inference would be idiotic weren't it so dangerously speculative.

Thankfully, prime minister Manmohan Singh took no time to deny the story and called it "alarmist". Defense minister A.K.Anthony went further and said the piece was "baseless" and spoke of the army glowingly as a bulwark of India's constitutional democracy. The same newspaper carried a piece about the bugging of Anthony's phone with the insinuation that the army chief was behind it. The report was denied. The trend is clear. In an environment of deteriorated civil-military relations, vested interests, including crooked arms dealers and lobbies, are playing one side against another.

It is in the supreme interest of the country and for the good health of government that civil-military relations are repaired, and the political class as a whole must assure the armed forces that their interests and honour will be protected and totally secured. After this, ignorant calls such as from politicians and sundry commentators for the sacking of the army chief must stop.

Coup fears dogged India especially following Ayub Khan's putsch in neighbouring Pakistan. Those fears found worse expression when Jawaharlal Nehru died in 1964 and the then army chief, General J.N.Chaudhury, ordered an extra brigade to provide bundobast during the funeral. Chaudhury didn't want a repeat of the chaos during Gandhi's last rites when the viceroy and his party threatened to get pushed into the flaming pyre by the multitudes. For all his efforts, Chaudhury was kept under surveillance although his explanation was accepted. :eek:

Writing about it in a 1997 letter to The Independent of London, Neville Maxwell said, "…Indian politicians have never fully shared Western faith that the Indian Army will never assume a political role -- indeed, they have sometimes been quite paranoiac in their fear of the generals". Much earlier, speaking to a British high commissioner in India, General Chaudhury had articulated why a military coup was improbable and impracticable in the Indian context, and it is worth recalling in these troubled times.

Chaudhury spoke of the "deep-rooted respect for constitutional government at all levels in the country", which included the army. Then he said that "the size of India and the degree of decentralisation of its government machinery" was a deterrent against a coup. It would be, General Chaudhury argued, "administratively and operationally impracticable for the Army to seize power from both the Union and the state governments in a single operation". India is bigger in government and even more unwieldy forty-seven years after General Chaudhury spoke.

Chaudhury also noted the heterogeneous composition of the army that would militate against a coup attempt. There would be opposition to it within the army. "It would place a critical strain on the loyalty of the Army, since state loyalties and rivalries are a real factor in the Army," Chaudhury said. A putschist commander would find his hands tied and face a snowballing civil war. It remains so. And lest it be argued that General Chaudhury was revealing himself by even discussing this matter, it should be told he was grilled on the subject previously by defense minister Y.B.Chavan.

Since independence, the armed forces have remained resolutely apolitical. They are meant for territorial defense, with little to no power projection intents, and that is how it stays. Of course several chiefs, given their background, Sandhurst training, etc, have been contemptuous of politicians, but nevertheless respected their preeminence in the civil supremacy paradigm. So it continues to this day, although the stature of the forces has been steadily devalued by the political-bureaucratic establishment.

Yet, the armed forces enjoy the highest respect and credibility with India public opinion. The present denigration of the army chief, therefore, won't be tolerated. There can be two opinions on whether he should have so obsessed with the age issue. But of his integrity and of his generalship, there can be no doubt. Crooked media attempts to run down the chief must end, because they have damaged the media, while causing bigger destruction to the institution of the military.

In the final analysis, the military guarantees the security and independence of India. Nothing should be done that weakens the military.


So what made Shekhar Gupta write that hack piece? And write a confrimatory piece next day?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 02:05 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28
Posts: 9178
Location: Cave of the Saffron Bandits
ShauryaT wrote:
I am wondering, with the current state of affairs and status of our polity, IF a military coup did happen, how many here would support it.
.


absolutely not


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 02:08 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30615
Lalmohan whats the chatter in your area?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 02:12 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Oct 2011 09:42
Posts: 706
Location: Tibet / Balochistan
Maroof Raza said on TIMES NOW's The Newshour debate that less than thousand troops were part of the so called movement and there are around 30,000 personnel stationed in Delhi at any given time and coups are rarely carried out by mechanised infantry. :rotfl:

Shekhar Gupta has discredited himself by putting such a ridiculous story on his front page. He is also the anchor person of NDTV's Walk The Talk program.


Last edited by Roperia on 05 Apr 2012 02:16, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 02:13 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28
Posts: 9178
Location: Cave of the Saffron Bandits
a few years ago, i recall meeting someone quite high up in the american civil-military set up, who remarked to me - almost incredulously - 'man your indian army sure does believe in democracy and staying in the barracks!'

ramana - zero chat i am aware of, like i said, this story is not getting any airtime


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 02:30 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30615
Arun, The real question is why did Shekhar Gupta do this? Who gave him the backing to publish the rot? What made him do this?

Thanks LM.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 02:40 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10
Posts: 1607
ramana wrote:
Arun, The real question is why did Shekhar Gupta do this? Who gave him the backing to publish the rot? What made him do this?

Thanks LM.


He is corrupt and he serves the corrupted. Who they are specifically will sooner or later come out into the open as well. This gov will not survive for long.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 02:45 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Oct 2011 09:42
Posts: 706
Location: Tibet / Balochistan
ramana wrote:
Arun, The real question is why did Shekhar Gupta do this? Who gave him the backing to publish the rot? What made him do this?

Thanks LM.



Ramana sir,

I am checking how the entire English media covered this story.

Both the shows on NDTV approached the whole matter by concentrating on the red herring - Civil military relations.

The best so far has been the discussion on Times Now - the panelists have debunked that story by proving that something like this is operationally not feasible. To support this point the former army commander says - there are six independent army commands in India and the Chief can't bypass the army commanders to order troop movements. (I'm yet to watch Rajdeep Sardesai's show)

Debate: Scoop story flawed?-1
Debate: Scoop story flawed?-2
Debate: Scoop story flawed?-3

Some panelists hint that there is a concerted effort by a group (possibly made of arms lobbies, bureaucrats and politicians) to discredit the Chief. They do not like him since he is cracking down on the corruption which is sadly this group's way of life. The only mistake this time was they went overboard and miscalculated how much nonsense the people of India are willing to buy.


Last edited by Roperia on 05 Apr 2012 02:56, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 02:51 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30615
So some good out of this is there are checks and balances in the system besides the military is not interested which is the best CBM.
Arun, Keep with it. Need ot get to bottom of why SG printed this calumny.

Also wonder why the IB was not set out to find out the real story of this fake coup?
Or they might be embarrassed of its origins?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 03:40 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31
Posts: 12095
ramana wrote:
Arun, The real question is why did Shekhar Gupta do this? Who gave him the backing to publish the rot? What made him do this?



Few things to note about the events outside India at this time.
The pressure on Pakistan and the bounty on Hafiz Saeed has put the PA on alert. To make sure that India is preoccupied and an army which is under scanner for corruption suits the power center since this will give Indian an excuse that it is not watching Pakistan.

China is also slowly moving up its defense readiness in the border areas and may make the first move. Indian political - occupation and controversy over civil mil relations are good to keep other countries relaxed. Induction of the SSN today may have alerted the panda and its preparedness.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 03:42 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Jan 2010 02:42
Posts: 283
Dilbu wrote:
Also how is slowing down traffic on highway going to help? Mechanised infantrymen are driving Maruti 800s and cannot get off the road? :-o
Because apparently they were planning a coup while staying on their tank transporters. Shekhar Gupta probably thinks they are force multipliers.

I have to say props to AKA for rubbishing the story in such strong terms. Either it's blind panic on the part of the corrupt or morale is deliberately being lowered for some other purpose.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 03:51 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 May 2006 01:31
Posts: 1887
Location: India/US
Over the past decade, Shekhar Gupta seems to have no raisin dieter other than to warm RAPE balls by breathing gently on it. Earlier it was his "we will take care of BJP" asinine comment to RAPEs and now this..... as if he is oblivious of India being a democracy with hard fought elections.

What has he got against Indian democracy that he feels to do this? He want to convince his omlette-providers that we are equal onleee?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 03:59 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 06 Jun 2008 10:55
Posts: 1664
I hope this has strong negatives for Shekhar Gupta, more than just being the 'laughing stock'. He was also the primary 'Musharraff Bhakt' at the Agra summit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 04:12 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Posts: 11874
Location: Holding Jannat Ki Chabbi
As suspected here few years ago ,the assault on the national security from within has started. I am afraid , its going to get ulglier unless guilty behind the whole drama are exposed and tried in court of law as well in public. This bizarre episode and the coincident with the shutting up of Anti nuclear power Missionaries in Tamilnadu and the arrival of Akula is indeed strange. As they say follow the money trail, national security now demands exposing this corrupt lobby and its foreign masters and the money involved in it .
If Hazzam Sethi thinks that Poaqs can now squeeze concessions from MMS , he might as well buy the bridge i am selling on Astroid 72p .The whole tamasha might end up plus by strengthing of the instituons.


Last edited by Jhujar on 05 Apr 2012 04:37, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 04:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 7512
Location: India
..


Last edited by Philip on 05 Apr 2012 04:45, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 04:44 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 7512
Location: India
Ramana,a long post unfortunately was lost due to system failure.I'll repost the basics.Ckd out some of it with sources inside the force.

Here is a maverick viewpoint,perhaps not so maverick after all and you have put superbly the finger on the spot.
Who benefits? That is the question....

Gen.VKS,the "Saint",etc. are mere pawns on the chessboard.The pieces think that they are making their own moves,but the moves have already been anticipated and programmed and they are playing true to form.The real target is "the Saint".He is the chief stumbling block for vested interests.His "statuesque" image is because like a statue,he never moves on anything major. Gen.VKS is a "ship that passes in the night".He is a transitory phenomenon.He is of nuisance value.His term in any case has been terminated,but he is also playing his unwitting part.The media too are being manipulated,with exclusive scoops being thrown to them from inside sources ,some of them do not realise how they are all pieces on the board being manipulated.

For quite some time now,a few years in fact,the grouse in Delhi has been the slow decision of the "Saint". $80 billion worth of acquisitions is expected within the next 5 years (KPMG).A real boom time for global defence manufacturers.However,the UPA-2 regime is rapidly running out of steam and the deals must be clinched asap.Removing "the Saint" without good reason is going to be veryt difficult,given his clean character.A raging controversy and scam has to be found.There is already one controversy that will terminate the chief's tenure,his DOB error.It is put into play and "the Saint" has fallen for the babu bait.The "civil vs military" mindset,"politicos must be the bosses" argument is trotted out,and Gen.VKS true to form fights back controversially for a COAS using the media-perfect! The cat is out of the bag,the country now knows that the IA (Gen.VKS) and the MOD (the Saint) are at war.The media regales us with names of other IA suspect senior officers in the "line of succession",reputations are trashed, giving the impression that there is war within the IA too.

But this is only the appetiser.Next comes the "entree".The alleged Tatra bribe offer that rocks the nation.Here the pieces moved on the board are an arms manufacturer-Indian owned,and a PSU.The quiet role of PSU price padding becomes universally known.This is worse than foreign manufacturers where we drive a hard bargain.We are now informed that the PSUs are the main route for kickbacks.One can just imagine what is happening in the other defence PSUs! No longer is the issue a DOB spat,or a succession spat,but a series of potential major scams like Bofors.But this is not the end of the banquet,wait for the main course.

The main course of the plot is the good general's secret letter to the PM,which is tradition for service chiefs,who all moan about the state of their service.The timing is superb,as if it was done by the chief in an act of revenge,on the eve of the BRICS summit when the Chinese "Dr.Hu" will delight in the revelations.Suddenly we are aghast at the state of affairs (as if we didn't know about it all along).Uproar in the house.Cries of "sack the general" from all parties. No ammo to fight with,tanks unreliable,no artillery,the PLA can come down the Himalayan slopes tomorrow and it will be '62 deja vu ! Find the culprit.Who is to blame? Not the good chief,he has been in the saddle only for two years and it takes time to re-equip,at least 3-4 years.Therefore,the villain of the piece is the "Saint".He has done nothing for 6 years while at the helm of defence.He has been an abject failure.He couldn't keep the DOB issue within the "family",he allowed it to become public knowledge,kept quiet about Tatra and now stories about his failure to book the guilty in scandals when CM and Min for civil Supplies (sugar scam) are trotted out staining his dhoti.

What must be done? Typical Congress firefighting.One can't sack the chief,he will become a martyr and enrage the IA.,sacking Adm.Bhagwat was much easier as the IN doesn't have sufficient troops on land for any mischief making unlike the IA.Sack the "Saint"? The Congress dissident hounds start their usual background baying for his scalp.He is a quitter,but will he? Doubtful. Therefore embarass him to the maximum,put a shaft up the "Saint's " backside,and force him to take quick decisions on a fast track basis.He starts obeying and uses the words "streamline" to the IA regarding trials and decision making.The green light goes on,decisions will be forthcoming in double-quick time,no one can now fault the govt. for decisions as the chief's letter revealed all and the GOI/PMO is coming to the rescue!

"Who benefits ?" ,and are now going to laugh all the way to the bank? ....The foreign mainly US and western arms dealers and manufacturers.Here is why.

"Indian Bloom",is one heading in a def.mag."Industry fights for a piece of the growing Indian defence pie".
KPMG study."$80B" to be spent in 5 years time.Only two years left for decision-making.Hurdles though.Some details:

* Boeing expects to do "$32B" business in the next decade."Not just sales ,but partnerships too",Boeing overseas VP.

*IAF to have 60 sqds (1000 aircraft) by 2030.

*Indian Def. budget up ($33.3B")

*New rules,PSUs and private players can form JVs with foreign firms,apart from the formation of "consortia" and pub-pvt partnerships,policy includes provisions for "the exit of state-run defence companies from deals" !!!

Now we understand why the Tatra scam has been exposed.It is a PSU.The owner is an Indian.The principal a former east-bloc manufacturer.No tears shed if Tatra is taken down,it won't affect western manufacturers and open huge opportunities for them! Expose Tatra first then step by step irregularities in other PSUs."Why buy from PSUs wares with padded prices when it costs far less if made abroad ? Bring in pvt. players to replace PSUs,they will be more efficient and less costly".Allow JVs with foreign firms and increase the level of FDI.

* "Not suprisingly",Boeing,Lockheed Martin,and EF have set up Indian operations,including partnerships with pvt. players.30% offsets.

*Robust growth also attracting foreign "second-level" players and leading desi companies like...the Hinduja Group,poised to enter the def, sector to manufacture..."guns,rockets,missile artillery systems"! Ashk Ley. is to establish a JV with Brit. Chemring,munitions and EW major.Also with S.African Paramount Group (anti-mine vehicles).

* 250 Arjuns and 1650 T-90s by 2020,114 LCHs,400 Light helos,150+ ALHs,F-INSAS (future infantry soldier as a system,1st phase alone worth $5B),66,000 advanced assault rifles,plus lcocal manufacturing to equip 800,000 troops,tripod mounted 12.7mm HMGs .IA's mil. mod program of upgrading firepower ( to counter China with more divisions,etc ) $12B.More Agnis,A-5 ICBM etc.

Apart from making massive moolah from the nation's defence plans,another sinister interest is at work.The vested interest want to protect Pak from any Indian adventurism.Therefore,against Pak,we should be incapable of a decisive mil. victory due to eqpt. shortfalls.The thrust should be to counter China.China too does Pak a favour by sabre rattling and India in knee-jerk fashion now plans to spend tens of billions to counter China,while we are being seduced by Pak about "peace",turning our attention away from Af-Pak,where Pak and its backers plan to control Afghanistan.The master-manipulators have been playing this war game for a long time.The pieces on the board are moving very rapidly as time is running out for the UPA-2 "game".We must now wait and see what turns up for for dessert!

PS:The mood in the IA is that Gen.VKS should not suffer Adm.Bhagwat's fate.He is clean,so too is his designated successor (fine soldier) say officers who have served with both.

Just one PSU horror story. LIke Ripley's "Believe it or Not ?" Take your pick.

Deputed IA offr. to major PSU discovers info being regularly sent to Pak. "Mole" in outfit,writes to the boss.Boss calls back ,"mind your own business"! Offr. furious, further investigates and finds PSU R&D product secretly offloaded to pvt. player,while pretending that R&D on product still going on. Pvt.player offers Govt. same (PSU developed) product at huge price.Same bought! When offr. reveals/threatens to reveal all,is sacked!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 05:47 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30615
Philip now I got your attention. How about this? Its 2G related. They sense that internal INC guys are pushing for a re-imaging and hence leaked this 'coup' story to scare them off! After UP loss there is a push for remake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 05:52 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Mar 2006 13:26
Posts: 479
I really wish we never had these weapon tenders and specially this MMRCA.

Either this whole situation is going to distroy delicate thread of our democracy or we will emerge strong as a bull.

How easily a nation can be manipulated by just playing it's so called free media.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 06:51 
Online
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 8184
Troop movement: Govt fails to convince House panel

Everyone has an obligation to not lower the dignity of the Army Chief’s office, says PM

How to buy a battle-ready military


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 07:05 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 22 Apr 2005 23:50
Posts: 571
There is not even a charge that a coup was attempted, only that someone jumped at a cat's shadow, and army must be blamed for it, knowing full well that there is no chance of power flowing through the barrel of the gun. Schizophrenia?

Regarding Gen K Sundarji there were some rumours (after all the messes he cleaned up for the govt of the day) which again turned out to be rumours.

There were similar rumours between Indira ji and SAM Manekshaw, also Cariappa.

The closest India has come to an undemocratic setup is during Emergency.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 07:09 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30615
Josy Joseph wonders

LINK

Quote:
War within: Did Army chief’s rivals spook govt on troop movements?

The writer has posted comments on this article

Josy Joseph

Josy Joseph, TNN |

Apr 5, 2012, 05.29AM IST


War within: Did Army chief’s rivals spook govt on troop movements?
On whose advice did government leaders come to believe that there might be something irregular about what was routine movement of army units to test their efficacy in fog conditions?

NEW DELHI: A media report about the movement of two Army units towards Delhi on the night of January 16-17, triggering fears of a challenge to civilian authority, set off an avalanche of denials on Wednesday, turning the spotlight on one of the worst kept secrets in the capital - the bitter factional feud in the top echelons of the Army.

Amid a chorus of denials to the Indian Express report from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, defence minister A K Antony, the defence secretary, the ministry of defence and the Army, one relevant refutation came through: no notification was required to be given to the defence ministry for the movements of Hisar-based mechanized infantry unit and the Agra-based 50 Para brigade towards Delhi.

And if this was indeed the case, why did the movements create an alarm in the capital? On whose advice did government leaders come to believe that there might be something irregular about what was routine movement of army units to test their efficacy in fog conditions?

That there was alarm seems to be borne out by the fact that the police were directed to raise barricades on the highway as part of what was called a counter-terror exercise. The objective was to slow down the movement of the two units.

The swiftness with which the police drill was set in motion has raised many eyebrows, considering the country can pride itself on its disciplined army with an unshakeable commitment to democracy. Open insubordination has not been considered a realistic risk even by conspiracy theorists.

Many in the capital wondered whether the government was alarmed because the information about the movements - rather, the alert - came from insiders who are generally considered to be reliable. The suspicions were raised because of the bitter factional battle which has raged in the Army for a while.

The sharp differences, which have been the subject of discussion within the Army as well as the defence ministry for over two years, hit a new high over the row over the Army chief General VK Singh's age, leavinan exasperated government scrambling to find ways to put a lid on the conflict, fearing that it might go out of hand.


The fact that police were activated shows PC's hand.

JJ is diverting attention towards IA to show its broken.

One thing in the VKS saga is the continuing finger pointing towards MI doing this, doing that. Previously the National Insecurity Adviser implicated MI elements into saffron terror hangama.

So there is an agenda to drag that branch into some mess or the other.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 07:18 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Nov 2008 06:48
Posts: 647
Location: RAW HQ, Lodhi Road
Shekhar Gupta on NDTV on his story

I must say Shekhar Gupta has NEVER fumbled so much for words. There is something very fishy in this whole affair. Shame on him and IE.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 07:38 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 07 Jun 2008 09:26
Posts: 137
Lt. Gen. H.S. Panag (R) on twitter:
=> Never heard of permission to be taken 4 routine Trg movement of Army units.I was at Hissar as GOC.Never asked anyone.1/2
=> 2/2 Only Banana Republics doubt their AFs.
=> Night of Jan 16th-There was similar insinuation when Sam was Chief!Sam's quip,"Routine movement!Rest is imagination of small minds!"
:mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2012 09:10 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Posts: 3203
Location: Smoking Piskobidis
Fresh PIL against IAC-in-waiting

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_fr ... ng_1671721

Quote:
Former chiefs of naval staff, Admiral L Ramdas and Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat along with a host of former bureaucrats filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court on Wednesday challenging his appointment.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1621 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 ... 41  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group