Bharat Rakshak

They are not freely admitting anything. They have an idea of what Unkil knows and can prove and they are trying to manage the release themselves and omit info that can implicate anyone.

Evidently there is a hadith which describes Gazhwa-a-Hind, which says that the Ummah Caliphate will conquer Hindustan. The Paki loony Syed Zaid Zaman Hamid has filed a petition in Paki SC where he says he has:


The hadith:

Perhaps required daily reading for all pappi jhappi politicians.

[url]http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2012\04\05\story_5-4-2012_pg3_2[/url]

NightWatch

For the night of 2 April 2012

^^^^ Reads like Nostradamus ravings!!!

What the heck is ibn Maryam

Son of Mary? Jesus?

The people who actually found themselves in Pakistan. The best definition I can coin for "Pakistanis" is "Those people who found themselves within the borders drawn by Radcliffe and those who deliberately migrated to the area within those" borders .

It appears that Djinnah wanted Hyderabad, Saurashtra, Kashmir in adition to undivided Punjab and Bengal, but even as he was lording over Pakis on 14th August 1947 he had no clue what Pakistan he was going to get. This may be a lie. Maybe he knew, but the story that is recorded is that he did not know. I am of course going to keep working on finding out if he might have known more.

The map on the cover of Rajiv Malhotra's book "Brealing India" was probably the dream of some

The only ready cite I have for this is a book called "Empires of the Indus" by one Alice Albinia. I need to cross check he literature sources to see where she got that.

Thanks for the pointer. But what this man has said seems to have interesting parallels with what Rajiv Malhotra says was done by Christist "scholars" in the South who "absorbed and incorporated" all that was convenient from Hindu tradition/texts as being of Christian origin while simultaneously being bitterly critical of Hindus for anything they did not want. What we are looking at is not just a rewriting of history that is the most commonly recognized issue on here, but a rewriting of religion, sociology and the history of religion. Multiple assaults aimed fundamentally at killing Hindu identity and self esteem. Judging by the way I find Indians even in the media being blindly critical of anything Indian these manipulations have succeeded to a great extent.

Unfortunately the term “IT” in the headline here does not stand for the Islamic Republic of Pakistan’s national pastime of Islamic Terrorism:

Global IT ranking: Pakistan drops 14 places in a year

^^^ So in the end is the offering of a bounty for Hafiz Saeed could yet be another attempt by the US to protect its Pakistani client and save them the blushes by saying that there is no evidence, especially any evidence that India may have gathered, to indicate that Hafiz Saeed is a Islamic Terrorist?

The Islamic Republic of Pakistan gets Electronic Warfare Systems from the US for their US supplied F-16’s:

Pakistani air force getting EW system

Which "court of law" again? lawhore or k'chi? Hafeez Saeed has a great reason to onlee.

Chidambaram may skip PM lunch for Zardari to avoid Rehman Malik

I do not like Chidu one bit but I commend him for choosing to not meet that buffoon.

surinder, what Shiv has written is quite true. Jinnah was quite upset. It is not only Jinnah, but other Pakistanis too. I quote from Ms. Hamida Kuhro, who is the daughter of Kuhro, the first Chief Minister of the Sind in independent Pakistan whose government was dismissed by Jinnah because Kuhro had a misunderstanding with Liaquat Ali Khan. This is what she wrote in a TFT article, even blaming Jinnah for that lapse.

Shiv sir,

Even if the Pakjabi mullah thinks, using his lahori logic, that the north Indian muslim will not fight for India (which is an absolutely absurd assumption), please explain this to me.

Other than UP and Bengal, which have substantial muslim population, and Kashmir which is a muslim majority state the territory marked Mughalstan, contains the following states on that map.

State............. Population (in crores)
Punjab..........................2.5
Harayana......................2.5
Rajasthan......................6.9
Himachal.......................0.7
Uttarakhand...................1.0
(Indian Punjab was divided into present day Punjab and Haryana.)

All of them have 85% and above Hindu population except Punjab (where 2/3 are sikhs and 1/3 Hindus)

Haryana has a Jat majority, Punjab has that of Sikhs, Rajasthan that of Rajputs, Uttarakhand of Garhwals; I mean all of them are fiercely patriotic and absolutely believe in the idea of India. Why even dream such absurd things and to top it all write a book?

blame-to find fault with,To place responsibility for

Then who was responsible for the carnage?

The Anglo-americans are the real villains,the real barbarians.The pakis are just a tool in their hands.

And even now Hafeez pig is being treated with kid gloves and he is in the radar only because of cold calculations

Yawn news reports

Suicide blast in Karachi kills at least three

Roperia the problem with history is that there is too much of it. Pakistan has been inciting separatism in India for a long time and it has simply not worked the way they expected it to work. There was a time maybe after the 1965 war when Indians could thumb their noses at Pakis and tell them that they were unable to incite rebellion even in Kashmir. fter 1971 I think Indians had several years of ROTFL at Pakistan expense laughing at heir two nation theory.

In my view - if the Pakistan army had no survived these fiascos, Pakistan may have turned into a less dysfunctional state - but that is like saying "If my aunt had a di*k she would have been my uncle". But I digress..

The current day situation of Pakistan was sparked by Bhutto senior and Zia's islamization and the cold war "victory" in Afghanistan. Pakistan got what they wanted to show as a victory, but not over India. Pakistan is a nation of 190-200 million brainwashed people who have been/are being taught that their problems are caused by india. Maybe that is true. Maybe India is the source of their problems. But those problems are not going to get better by trying to hit or punish India because Indians are not simply going to get pushed aside. It is another matter that Indians themselves are at the cutting edge of the frontline that hollers that India is a weak pushover about to be swallowed up by Islam aided by internal traitors. But that viewpoint fits in well with the fact that pride in India has been totally beaten out of a lot of educated Indians. Once an Indian gets an education - he learns the history written by the Brits using Islamic sources, believes that Indians do not record history, and then gets convinced that India is nothing, has nothing, and can do nothing and collapse and failure is right around the corner.

Unfortunately for Pakistan, India is not actually gong to roll over, expose its belly and give up. Collapse of Pakistan may not be around the corner either, but that does not translate into collapse of India. It is easy to sit and write reams pointing out how Pakistan is failing. Or not failing. It is equally easy to write reams about why india is failing. Or not failing. Ultimately India and Pakistan are similar in every way except for what has transpired in the last 60-70 years. The people who cook up the particular metrics by which India and Pakistan need to be compared are sociologists and statisticians using the same methods that have been applied for the last 200 years. By those metrics there is very little difference between India and Pakistan. Only Indians and Pakistanis list out differences that no one else recognizes or considers as significant.

India has had as much of a problem staying together as Pakistan. Pakistanis know this and it was Pakistan that was expected to succeed and it was India that was expected to split up and fail. Goes to show that "expectations" are worth only so much. I expect Angelina Jolie to call me any minute now. Partition was a lesson to Indians that splitting of one's country is possible if some people seriously decide to opt out. India certainly could have split further because there is no fundamental difference between India and Pakistan. But after facing one split, Indian politics realised that people have to be internally happy within India for them to want to stay in the Indian union. Not just Muslims, but others as well. India spent 50 years just accommodating its own people and addressing internal fission. And its still going on - not helped at all by people who compare India unfavourably with every developed nation on earth. If Indians show any unity today as Indians it is because effort has gone into that - inclusive effort that started before 1947 but went on after 1947.

Pakistanis assumed that islam would hold them together and that any unhappiness was because India was the problem. Indeed India is a problem because it ain't gonna give Pakis what they want. But Pakistan is lucky because India will allow Pakistan to exist (no other option for India) so they can start looking at what they need to do to run a country. They still haven't started that process - which is why Pakistan is what it is. War with India will not cut it. And terrorism will take them only so far. Ultimately their only way forward will have to be to hide Islam inside their pockets and start dealing with India. If they don;t do that it will be more of same (as we have now) for some more time.

The good CIA officer, true to American tradition, has mastered the art of telling lies and obfuscating without actually lying. Hafeez Saeed is only echoing the deep-held sentiments and obsession of majority of Pakijabis, including US clients, the Paki military. But by attributing this to Hafeez pig alone, the CIA officer deftly spares the rest of his clients.

Of course we know where you are Mr. Saeed! Now, just stay still for fifteen minutes (and don't look up).

Absolutely agree with you.

Indians are indoctrinated with "education" that gives major credit to gandhi, nehru et al. and with minor credit to stalwarts like Subash Chandra Bose.

Yes Gandhi et al. did play their part, but we should never forget the work of people like Subash Chandra Bose, Vinayak Damodar Sarvarkar, Sri Aurobindo and the like who probably did just as much, if not more than the frequently highlighted ones. Even the great Shivaji is mentioned only briefly in our history books. Infact it was only after I started reading about the true history did I realise our NCERT books are just documents for brainwashing children into the congress camp.

Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it - this seems to have been the case when dealing with our neighbours, especially the pakis.

So the pakis have figured out the old Coin with a string technique, huh?

Well Hafiz is the offspring that has been nourished due to Nikkah Mutah between unkil and pakis. Unkil wants this offspring and other offsprings to stay focused on the mission of "destroy India" and god speed to them. However, Unkil is having some doubts that these offsprings could go wayward from their allotted mission, hence the concern and bounty to stay focused.

Global IT ranking: Pakistan drops 14 places in a year

Check out this awesome comment (First off these pakis dont realise that this is about IT access and not about the IT industry as such

So winning a 350k contract, which is probably what a company like infosys throws at partying every year.. pak should move up the rankings.. Oh what an unfair world.



Why??? Time has come for another trainee to send this guy to his 72


while I know that there are dumb guys in the indian IT scene, but 18/20? hahahaha I think its more like 19.999999 out of 20

^^ From above report


India stands at 69th position in the report

all that chart tells me is that the paquis are less skilled than their peer group and clearly don't know how to price their services...
(double whammy...)

A few days ago, we were told that there are enough people in Pakistan who realize their mistakes and want to change Pakistan's trajectory. An overwhelming majority of Paki elites want reconciliation with India.

I am sure we will hear many voices against Hafez Sayyed from that "overwhelming majority". Let us wait.

Anujan, Try to get the true history of LeT. I think it was created same time as AlQ. LeT was for India and AlQ was for other than India ie FSU. LeT was holding tank for Pakjabis and AlQ was for Arabs, Central Asians and other dregs.
When FSU collapsed the raisins for AlQ also collapsed. Hence it turned on its creators as it wasn't disbanded and de-militarized. After Op Parakaram LeT ops in India also got reduced. Again they turned on their creators. Again after mission failure the terrorists were not demobilized and de-militarized. Maybe hope was to retain them as hedge. But idle hands are devil's workshop.

So now figure out who the creators are?

TSPA is only midwife and wet nurse for these snakes.

You know what? Every Pakistani might call the US the home of terrorism but the one single Paki group that will never do that is the Pakistan army. The Paki army does its talking via proxies like Hafiz Saeed. The US too talks indirectly using Drones and now this ransom on Hafiz Saeed's head.

As an aside did you folks see the news item that there was some trouble in Gilgit and the "army was called in".

Isn't it curious that ten times as much trouble occurs in Karachi and in Peshawar/Quetta. But the army never gets called in? Why?

a basket case of stockholm syndrome, has nothing to do with hinduism.

350k will not even get the Infy sales team open their eyes.

Interesting.

Actually, Shiv, could you expand on that?

You probably may think that it as an obvious common knowledge, but I don't totally get it.

Shiv, SSridhar:

Thanks for the links.


This apology-of-a-nation wanted to take the name "India" too ... shocking really.

It seems to be one big large loot-maar: steal the Indian food and call it "mughal" and non-Indian. Steal a language (Hindi) call it Urdu. Steal our architecture, our artisans, our music, our dress, of course our land, and call it as if their own.

The first step towards deligitimization of P-stan is reclaiming the stolen stuff.

Shiv ji, SShridar ji:

It appears that there are some in India too wanted the name change? atleast the author of Foreign influences on ancient India ( By Krishna Chandra Sagar) feels that it is anachronism.
http://books.google.com/books?id=0UA4rkm9MgkC&pg=PA7&dq=pakistan+should+be+named+india&ei=Ct19T-qREcvgUIOUkf0M&authuser=0&cd=8#v=onepage&q=pakistan%20should%20be%20named%20india&f=false

Never heard about the author. But certainly it seems like he didn't think through the ramifications. His idea of renaming it to Bharat are very similar to the ones Paks dream about. Just because you lose a body part, you don't cease to exist or that you transform to another being? There is nothing wrong with Bharat, I am quite happy with that name. But why should India which is known over thousands of years (yes India wasn't called India few hundred years back but foreigners did recognize this land as thus because of the Indus valley inheritors that is us)suddenly cease to be so because it lost a part? to argue on those lines, say Pak now changes its name to India because of Indus, but tomorrow if Indus dries up, will they cease to exist as India then because Indus is no more?