Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 19 May 2013 11:44

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3393 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 85  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 06 May 2012 09:31 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Posts: 7745
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar
^^ The 707 seems to be in the same position whenever i see it spread over months!! So not sure how active it is..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 May 2012 09:33 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
most certainly its dead...hence the new 9 plane sigint deal. that IL76 didnt look too active either. maybe thats why IAF is looking for a turnkey co in russia who can guarantee spares and uptime for our IL76 and the intent to get more and more C17 and C130J.

IL76 is a good plane, but Rus needs to bring IL476 with PS90A engines into full rate stable production before we dip our toe into the pond again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 May 2012 09:46 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00
Posts: 4943
Singha wrote:
I thought only the aborted naval variant of Dhruv had wheeled landing gear, but yesterday saw a wheeled one in yellow and green army camo flying near HAL. is it a VIP transport model or some other adaptation?



are the 707 still active....?


Some civil variants of the Dhruv are also offered with wheels.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 May 2012 11:20 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 14 Feb 2010 21:21
Posts: 424
Location: Troposphere
^^^ BSF dhruvs have wheels


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 May 2012 03:55 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Posts: 1031
Pilatus set to bag $700 mn IAF jet trainer deal

That averages out to be around $9.3 million per plane.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 May 2012 08:31 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 May 2006 13:44
Posts: 984
Location: mumbai
^^ That isnt right accounting. Deal includes simulators, maintenance equipment and assembling/manufacturing equipment, and dealsize divided by number of planes isnt the correct accounting method.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 May 2012 08:54 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
it might include some level of vendor support for a few years as well...most big deals do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 May 2012 11:02 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7498
I just hope no matter or reason why we imported the hawk or turbo trainer , the next set of AJT and Turbo Trainer would be an all indian designed and built when ever the need is felt for it.

There were too many fckup with projects like Combat Air Trainer ( CAT ) , HAL LOH and HTT-40 but i dearly hope that was our last mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 May 2012 11:25 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
for that to happen, HAL has to deliver and support the IJT in a very confident way....the june 2012 target for IOC is being missed, their is no sign of any flying IJT after the crash, the project status and new timelines are unknown to us here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 May 2012 11:40 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7498
I hope the problem is not serious which is to say no fundamental design flaw , hope she is in the air soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 May 2012 15:10 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7498
Talk of IJT and we have a situation...

After Basic, Intermediate Trainer Crisis Looms For IAF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 May 2012 22:04 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
afaik the IJT has not flown at all after the crash?

is the AL55 engine production ready and fittable on new protos?

the project cannot be doing well, else we would have heard more of it, and seen test flights.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 May 2012 03:34 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 19 Aug 2008 03:15
Posts: 41
There was an unconfirmed report sometime ago, that there were structural issues that surfaced for the IJT during coupling tests. Won't be surprised if it's back in the design bureau. AL-41 integration was completed and there were no issues there apparently.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 May 2012 04:58 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Posts: 1031
tsarkar wrote:
^^ That isnt right accounting. Deal includes simulators, maintenance equipment and assembling/manufacturing equipment, and dealsize divided by number of planes isnt the correct accounting method.


Yes. We know that. The average figures are more for getting an idea of what the spread is for overall deal (in simple terms that is ;)).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 May 2012 05:18 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49
Posts: 3821
gnair wrote:
AL-41 integration was completed and there were no issues there apparently.

You mean AL-55.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 May 2012 06:34 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 19 Aug 2008 03:15
Posts: 41
pardon me. AL-55


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 May 2012 07:11 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
why its not flying daily then using a half dozen protos? the FCS being presumably analog, with austere avionics the complexity would appear much lesser than Tejas.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 May 2012 08:50 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 20 Sep 2008 12:08
Posts: 93
Location: Timbuktu
Russian engine for the Indian Air Force meets the customer’s requirements

Date: Apri 18, 2012

“The HJT-36 developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) is a reliable aircraft, is India’s national pride. It is the first aircraft made by Indians. The basic parameters of the engine meet the customer’s requirements and it flies well. There have been no engine-related accidents or problems, so we are also proud of it. We have executed two contracts; research and development work has been completed. Four engines have been delivered to India and will soon be installed in aircraft”, Fedorov said.

The engine was developed and built in a record time of only three years. As part of the contract with HAL, research is now under way with a view to increasing the service life of the AL-55I to 300 hours. A new batch of 10 engines is currently in production – these engines were contracted to be delivered in 2011–2012.

“It is no secret that the contract will be continued”, the Saturn head told ITAR-TASS.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 May 2012 08:56 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
>> to increasing the service life of the AL-55I to 300 hours

I guess that a typo and should read 3000 hrs. I think the engine delivery delay and the crash and investigation pushed the program back by 2 yrs. if next 2 yrs if it can fly with Al55 engine and meet the specs, IOC can be perhaps expected in mid 2014.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 May 2012 21:32 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Posts: 1031
^^^

I think it was more like the program was delayed by around 4 years ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 May 2012 06:53 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00
Posts: 4943
Maybe a bit OT but quite interesting...

Online Aviation Mueseum


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 May 2012 14:36 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7498
India’s Rustom 1 reaches 50km flight milestone in test flight

Quote:
India's Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE) Rustom 1 unmanned air system is still undergoing testing and recently completed its 14th successful flight.

In a statement, India's government said the 14th flight achieved two milestones: the heaviest take-off weight of 690kg (1,520lb) since testing began in November 2009; and the farthest flight from base thus far, 50km (27nm).

The flight took place from a location in India's southern Karnataka province on 8 May. It lasted 2h and 10min, with the Rustom 1 reaching a top speed of 75kt (140km/h) and altitude of 11,500ft (3,500m).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 May 2012 21:08 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31
Posts: 5202
Acquisition of 75 Pilatus PC-7 Mk 2 approved by the CCS:

Govt clears Rs.1,800 crore trainer aircraft deal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 May 2012 05:47 
Online
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 8148
Safety on the fly


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 May 2012 12:30 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 1451
Location: NullPointerException
DNA also reports that 100+ PC-& MKIIs will be built by HAL under license. If true it strengthens my belief that HAL would rather license manufacture aircraft since margins are likely to be better (and less hassles) than co-develop or develop on its own.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 May 2012 13:19 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
+100. its like services co (cash rich) but unwilling to do new product development in a uncertain customer market. with license made the deal is already done and margins are 400% assured by the rulebook.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 May 2012 15:34 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 20 Dec 2004 21:45
Posts: 80
HAL-CONNECT-ISSUE-2

Quote:
PT2 of Intermediate Jet Trainer (IJT) commenced
flight testing after modification of 3 primary flight
control system circuits in Feb 2012.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 May 2012 17:14 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
masha allah. they are likely testing it someplace like Bidar and not in blr else someone would have seen it.


Last edited by Singha on 11 May 2012 19:46, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 May 2012 18:37 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 1451
Location: NullPointerException
About time. Need it in service ASAP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 May 2012 22:33 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
article in India today may 2012

mirage squadrons still curtailed from full regime 50 days after the 2 crashes as root cause still not found ... only limited training flights allowed
trainee pilots at greater risk in Kirans for basic takeoff / landing training due to HPT32 all gone
3 x Mig27 squadrons facing some spares shortage

all Mig21 and Mig27 to go out by 2017


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 May 2012 23:08 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Jul 2009 04:29
Posts: 254
Location: Out at the sea
wheeled Dhruv versions are there in IAF too...so are the ones built for NDMA, ONGC etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 May 2012 23:41 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Feb 2012 15:54
Posts: 220
Any news on the ALH WSI? Whats the status of the tests and when is the planned induction into IA/IAF?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012 01:11 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 May 2012 06:43
Posts: 396
Without going into the Pilot's vs. Air India problems, can the IAF use its pilots to sustain the airline's critical operations in the short term? do a significant percent of mil pilots from the cargo stream cross train and are certified with the civilian planes? In the whole episode it seems there is no backup plan for the govt.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012 07:39 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26
Posts: 1218
Location: Atop Orthanc, cursing, "Damn it where are those backfires??"
Singha wrote:
article in India today may 2012

mirage squadrons still curtailed from full regime 50 days after the 2 crashes as root cause still not found ... only limited training flights allowed
trainee pilots at greater risk in Kirans for basic takeoff / landing training due to HPT32 all gone
3 x Mig27 squadrons facing some spares shortage

all Mig21 and Mig27 to go out by 2017


There is a similar sounding article on the IBN website. They expect numbers down to 31 sqds in the next 5 years from current state of 34 sqds. So outgoing = 6 sqds of Bison + 2 sqds of Bis + 3 sqd of floggers. Incoming = 6 sqd of MKI + 1 sqd Tejas mk1 + 1 sqd Rafale. So short by around 3-4 sqds at least compared to current levels, not good - very slim pickings :evil:

May be they can have France to ramp up production and inject another sqd of Rafale? However, it will take some time to famiiliarize with the bird and etch out tactics/Ops etc.. Perhaps an extra sqd of M2ks (ex AdlA or Qatar), 29s or even MKI won't be remiss.

In the meanwhile, the IN will get the Vikad + Vikrant. Assuming 2 sqds worth of Fulcrum Ks to be available there in case s**t hits the fan.

What about PAF during this time? I assume they'll get 2 sqds of F-16 blk50 + at least 3 sqd JF-17 + 1 sqd J10. Of course they'll drop some Mirages in this time. Did they get their F-7's BVR equipped yet? Last I heard they did have a decent Italian kit in the nose. But am not sure if their plans mating with any BVR AAM took off.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012 07:49 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49
Posts: 3821
Cain Marko wrote:

There is a similar sounding article on the IBN website. They expect numbers down to 31 sqds in the next 5 years from current state of 34 sqds. So outgoing = 6 sqds of Bison + 2 sqds of Bis + 3 sqd of floggers. Incoming = 6 sqd of MKI + 1 sqd Tejas mk1 + 1 sqd Rafale. So short by around 3-4 sqds at least compared to current levels, not good - very slim pickings :evil:

I had asked in this thread a couple of pages back whether it was possible to estimate the number of Mig-21s still left in active service. We still have a few M/MF squadrons left if I'm not mistaken in addition to the non-upgraded Bis. So the number going out could be higher if all of them are to be retired. Personally I think the IAF will retire the older ones and some of the Floggers while holding off on retiring the Bisons till the Rafale/LCA are available in numbers. It is better to have old Bisons than nothing at all.

As for the PAF, their F-7s should also be up for retirement I guess.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012 08:31 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
vasu raya wrote:
Without going into the Pilot's vs. Air India problems, can the IAF use its pilots to sustain the airline's critical operations in the short term? do a significant percent of mil pilots from the cargo stream cross train and are certified with the civilian planes? In the whole episode it seems there is no backup plan for the govt.


Air India's problems are because it is a private airline used as their own by many in government. Why pull the IAF into this disease ridden organization? Maybe because of IndiAman ki Ashes - GoI is putting Air India in fierce competition with PIA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012 08:31 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26
Posts: 1218
Location: Atop Orthanc, cursing, "Damn it where are those backfires??"
^ I think the St. Antony has mentioned retiring the Bisons starting 2014. I think the 21MFs are already gone and the Bis is on it's way out. By 2014 they'll all be gone and then the Bisons will start.

PAF F7s are still somewhat fresh - induction started in late 80s, and they bought a few as recently as 2000. What I'd be concerned about is if they managed to get some kind of BVR AAM mated to the Grifo radar. Ditto about those Mirage IIIs they are flogging. Last I read, they were trying to get the A Darter program going with South Africa. Or may be some Chinese AAM?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012 08:56 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25449
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
PAF F7 will be around for a long time. the Mirages are likely to get replaced first with JF17. the A5 fantan and F6 must all be retired by now.

while we obviously pay a lot of attention to IAF obsolescence issues, the pakis and cheen also have their issues though its not publicized.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012 18:08 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Feb 2011 18:41
Posts: 325
Singha wrote:
for that to happen, HAL has to deliver and support the IJT in a very confident way....the june 2012 target for IOC is being missed, their is no sign of any flying IJT after the crash, the project status and new timelines are unknown to us here.


Singha, the target was initially july 2011 which was shifted to dec 2011.

however HAL inhouse magazine says the flight testing has resumed from feb 2012. exact quote -

Quote:
PT2 of Intermediate Jet Trainer (IJT) commenced flight testing after modification of 3 primary flight control system circuits in Feb 2012.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012 22:45 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49
Posts: 3821
Singha wrote:
PAF F7 will be around for a long time. the Mirages are likely to get replaced first with JF17. the A5 fantan and F6 must all be retired by now.

while we obviously pay a lot of attention to IAF obsolescence issues, the pakis and cheen also have their issues though its not publicized.

This is from Kaiser Tufail's blog

Quote:
It also must be noted too that other than F-16s, the PAF did not have a capable enough fighter for patrolling, as the minimum requirement in this scenario was an on-board airborne intercept radar, exceptional agility and sufficient staying power. F-7s had reasonably good manoeuvrability but lacked an intercept radar as well as endurance, while the ground attack Mirage-III/5s and A-5s were sitting ducks for the air combat mission.

So in 1999 at least the pakis did not consider any aircraft in their inventory except the F-16 a worthy adversary to the IAF. Kaiser Tufail's comment about the F-7 not having any air-intercept radar is remarkable, considering they are supposed to be equipped with the Grifo. However a look at the F-7PG pictures shows a very small nose cone (nearly akin to the original Mig-21 F-13 on which the J-7 is based). So I am highly skeptical of the capabilities of that radar even in comparison to the old Soviet radars on the Mig-21M and Bis. Kaiser Tufail seems to dismiss the Mirages out of hand, which is surprising as well. Perhaps his concern was because of the condition of the fleet rather than the capabilities of the aircraft.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3393 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 85  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: pushkar.bhat and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group