Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 20 Jun 2013 09:51

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4828 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 ... 121  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 24 Jun 2012 08:36 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 15 Mar 2002 12:31
Posts: 934
deleted by mod


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jun 2012 10:37 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31
Posts: 12180
Vivek K wrote:
National security remains a joke. IAF has no vision for the future only GSQRs backed by sexy CFD analysis of projects to nowhere like the AMCA. The navy works better with domestic products but does not seem to take its undersea presence seriously. Will we say goodbye soon to independence that so many sacrifices were made for?

One south american told me recently that the British are coming back to India again. He said Indians are still too British and english even after 60 years


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jun 2012 11:12 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Sep 2011 02:13
Posts: 248
Acharya wrote:
One south american told me recently that the British are coming back to India again. He said Indians are still too British and english even after 60 years

Ya, sure they are, they have to take asylum somewhere when the Pakis take over their country. And Vivek, please get a hold on yourself, you are posting such things all over the places, doesn't really serve any purpose, does it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jun 2012 12:13 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7745
A Sharma wrote:
“A second repair will add another 5 to 7 or even 10 years to the submarines’ scheduled 20-year service life,” said Andrei Dyachkov, Director General of Sevmash shipyard, who is expected to take over as the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, which controls 70 per cent of Russia’s s shipbuilding assets, next month. “This will help the Indian Navy maintain its submarine strength in view of delays in the induction of French-built Scorpene subs and in floating a tender for six more diesel-electric submarines,” he said.


This sounds interesting , a 3rd repair would add atleast 5 years to maximum 10 years extending Kilo life to 25-30 years which is as good as a nuclear submarine

Sindhurakshak crew http://pics.livejournal.com/kuleshovoleg/pic/000s2e8w

Can any one identify the ranks of Submarine officers in the picture ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jun 2012 19:06 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31
Posts: 4324
Quote:
One south american told me recently that the British are coming back to India again. He said Indians are still too British and english even after 60 years


yeah and you understood that beautifully from folks whom the Spaniards decimated in way more ways than the Brits did. Or added your own bias into it??

Hell the Brits might think they are less English


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 03:09 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Jul 2006 10:51
Posts: 400
Location: Riga
Teg arrived in Mumbai on Friday, 22nd.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 11:35 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 12 Oct 2009 23:23
Posts: 53
Austin wrote:
.........

Sindhurakshak crew http://pics.livejournal.com/kuleshovoleg/pic/000s2e8w

Can any one identify the ranks of Submarine officers in the picture ?



^^^
The officer standing 2nd. from the left is Commander and in the middle the officer standing is the Captain .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 12:21 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Posts: 1039
Austin wrote:
A Sharma wrote:
“A second repair will add another 5 to 7 or even 10 years to the submarines’ scheduled 20-year service life,” said Andrei Dyachkov, Director General of Sevmash shipyard, who is expected to take over as the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, which controls 70 per cent of Russia’s s shipbuilding assets, next month. “This will help the Indian Navy maintain its submarine strength in view of delays in the induction of French-built Scorpene subs and in floating a tender for six more diesel-electric submarines,” he said.


This sounds interesting , a 3rd repair would add atleast 5 years to maximum 10 years extending Kilo life to 25-30 years which is as good as a nuclear submarine

...


At this point, IN will need to go for that "second/third" repair on at least 6 to 8 Kilos given that the 6 P-75I won't arrive before 2020 (it takes 7+ years from order to delivery and as of yet no orders have been placed ... only RFIs issued) and the 6 P-75s are getting inducted between 2015 and 2018. As per recent news reports, most of the Kilos and Type-1500s are coming up for retirement by 2018. Repairing 6 to 8 Kilos for additional 5-7 years (up to 10 years (gentle usage)) would keep IN's SSK fleet strength steady at around 12 units until 2025. By then, P-75I would likely have arrived.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 12:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25909
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
this also means the P75I cannot be a heavily modified or greenfield design made to our specs....much longer timeline.

I would say grab bull by horns and go with the Soryu. get the 1st two made in japan and in meantime have them setup production facility here. japan stuff is very costly because they dont export and hence dont gain economy of scale. we can present that opportunity. their corporate sector would surely not mind trumping the koreans for once! :D their govt needs to get pragmatic though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 15:43 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 29 Sep 2010 17:33
Posts: 339
Location: May Allah have Piss on Pakistan
INS Sahyadri to be Commissioned on on July 21

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/new ... 387307.cms


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 17:12 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 29 Sep 2010 17:33
Posts: 339
Location: May Allah have Piss on Pakistan
Quote:
INS Savitri will participate in the National Day celebrations of Seychelles and thereafter be deployed for about two months to undertake surveillance of the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) of Seychelles and Mauritius.

The Indian Navy continues to maintain one Dornier aircraft in Seychelles to provide aerial surveillance for the Seychelles EEZ. Another Dornier aircraft is actively flying from Maldives to meet Maldivian requirements of EEZ surveillance and anti-piracy patrols.


Good Read

How Indian Navy is Modernizing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 09:44 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 27 Jun 2008 00:24
Posts: 982
Plan to operate two carriers any given time: navy chief - Firstpost

Quote:
The Indigenous Aircraft Carrier (IAC) is under construction at the public sector Cochin Shipyard in Kerala. The keel laying for the first IAC, christened INS Vikrant and to weigh about 45,000 tonnes, was done in February 2009 and it is likely to join the Indian Navy service by 2016, as per the revised construction schedule.

India also plans to build another, larger IAC that will weigh about 65,000 tonnes and is likely to be called INS Vishal.


Quote:
Expressing pride in India’s progress along the road of indigenous shipbuilding, Admiral Verma said the Indian Navy had articulated a perspective plan for development of the force up to 2027, a plan that was “capability-based rather than threat-based”.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 09:49 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25909
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
first confirmation from reliable figure about size of IAC2.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 10:27 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7745
The figure of 65K has been floating around for some time after Janes broke the story.

But looking around most navies prefer to build identical class of ships in few numbers to keep logistical common and simple ...i would expect IAC-2 to be idential in displacement to the first type when it gets approved ...but then who knows.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 10:43 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7745
Indian Navy tests out new trump card

Quote:
The heavy airborne cruiser Admiral Gorshkov, built in Nikolaev as part of Project 1143, was the fourth and last Kiev class ship. The story of this family of aircraft carrier ships began in the 1960s when, after Nikita Khrushchev’s resignation, the USSR resumed creating a large surface fleet.

These heavy aircraft cruisers have a complicated background. Their design was the result of many compromises between the Ministry of the Shipbuilding Industry, the military command, seamen and the Soviet political leadership. The fleet expected to get universal combat ships which were cheaper than the US Navy’s combat aircraft carriers. The air wing was to consist of Ka-25 anti-submarine helicopters, and Yak-36 (Yak-38) vertical take-off and landing aircraft.

Many specialists and naval history enthusiasts are still uncertain about their purpose: some consider them to be fighters; others low-flying attack aircrafts. Yet as fighters they were lagging behind their “classmates”, such as the British Harriers – not to mention the normal MiG-23s, Phantom, etc. Indeed, as low-flying attack aircraft they were at a disadvantage to virtually all then-contemporary winged combat craft of the world’s leading countries.

At the same time, due to the Yak-38’s unsatisfactory combat capabilities it was decided to strengthen the ship’s arsenal by equipping it with anti-ship missiles. The construction of the cruisers for Project 1143 began in July 1970, when the head ship Kyiv was laid down at the Black Sea shipyard in Nikolaev. The fourth ship of the project, Baku (the future Admiral Gorshkov), was laid down eight years later.

The collapse of the USSR ruined plans for modernizing the aircraft carrier, according to which she was to receive the latest Yak-141 vertical takeoff and landing airplanes (VTOL). In 1992, the Gorshkov was docked for repairs, and since then she has never been put into operation again. In February of 1994, two major accidents occurred on board the cruiser in succession: a fire, and a steam pipeline explosion. After that, putting the ship back into service was out of the question.

Talks about the ship’s possible sale to India began back in the late nineties. At that time, plans were discussed of her transformation into a classic aircraft carrier equipped for carrying 20-25 MiG-29 aircrafts. The contract for the sale of the aircraft carrier was inked in 2004. According to its terms, Russia was to supply the ship and a group of carrier-based fighters to India, and to train its crew for the sum of $1.5 billion. The Gorshkov carrier was renamed INS Vikramaditya in the Indian Navy service in honor of one of the country’s historic heroes. The architecture of the modernized Gorshkov is reminiscent of the Admiral Kuznetsov, albeit on a smaller scale.

Interest in the project grew stronger in the summer of 2007, when the default on contract was announced. Initially the ship was to be handed to India in 2008, but works were prolonged till 2010. A wrong assessment of the amount of work needed on a number of the ship’s onboard systems, and the undervalued price of her modernization were named as reasons for the failure.

In the Indian fleet, the Russian-made ship is to replace the Viraat aircraft carrier – the former British Hermes built in 1959, and bought by India in 1985. In 2010, the Viraat’s term of service had already reached 51 years. The Gorshkov was built in 1987. It is interesting, therefore, what fate awaits her in 2038?

It is impossible to answer this question, but it is clear that today the ship is a real trump card for the Indian Navy. The Gorshkov with MiG-29s on board provides the Indian Navy superiority over all its neighbors, including its eternal rival Pakistan. The possible capacities of Chinese ships are uncertain. First of all, there are doubts that the Chinese aviation industry is able to create a full-fledged deck fighter using the Soviet SU-33 bought in Ukraine as a prototype.

As a result, the only navy in the region significantly superior to the Indian Navy is the US Navy. At the same time, the United States desperately needs Indian support in a possible confrontation with China.It can only be guessed, then, upon which side India’s trump card will fall.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 10:56 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7745
INS Teg joins Western Fleet - Tarmak


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 13:40 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Jul 2006 10:51
Posts: 400
Location: Riga
Austin wrote:

Any pics of the ceremony itself?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 19:20 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 12:31
Posts: 1473
The keel laying for the first IAC, christened INS Vikrant and to weigh about 45,000 tonnes

Isn't it inappropriate to name the ship as "Vikrant" when the original will remain 'in service' as a museum ship?

It just seems strange to have 2 vessels with the same name! Viraat may be more suitable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 23:01 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 11 Jan 2009 00:14
Posts: 2248
IAC is INS Vikrant and older vikrant is IMS Vikrant


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 05:51 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 30 Aug 2007 18:28
Posts: 3770
Location: Trapped in the TechnoCore
Aditya G wrote:
The keel laying for the first IAC, christened INS Vikrant and to weigh about 45,000 tonnes


Wasn't the IAC supposed to be 40,000 tonnes displacement? Did the Firstpost article get the number wrong or has the puppy swelled by 5,000 tonnes?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 06:18 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 28 Oct 2011 10:40
Posts: 23
Have anybody carefully seen pictures of INS Teg on Tarmak blog.

http://tarmak007.blogspot.com/2012/06/i ... fleet.html

I feel both are two different ship.

Any comments??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 06:21 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 324
mayankdr wrote:
Have anybody carefully seen pictures of INS Teg on Tarmak blog.

http://tarmak007.blogspot.com/2012/06/i ... fleet.html

I feel both are two different ship.

Any comments??


They are different, the first one is Teg. Not sure about the second ship.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 06:42 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31
Posts: 784
Second ship is the JDS Mursame.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 07:22 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 07 Feb 2007 10:10
Posts: 266
Location: Shivamogga, Karnataka
what is the main difference between Shivalik class frigates vs Talwar class frigates ? (other than indigenous and size)

why we are still depending on US for Engines ? aren't TATA, M&M or L&T capable to build it locally ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 07:47 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 05 Jun 2008 11:03
Posts: 1505
Location: Gora Paki
kmc_chacko wrote:
what is the main difference between Shivalik class frigates vs Talwar class frigates ? (other than indigenous and size)

why we are still depending on US for Engines ? aren't TATA, M&M or L&T capable to build it locally ?



Personally me thinks the Shivaliks trump the Talwar class out and out (this is strictly personal opinion onlee)

Differences between the two of the top of me head are:

- More capable sensor suite with the addition of the ELTA radar (s) on the rear mast and the barak 1 radar for CIWS control
- Better ECM/ESM support?
- Capapcity to support two medium sized helos vs 1
- CIC for Shivaliks looks very TFTA and more customised vs. the Talwars (although they may share some components here)
- Better CIWS with Barak 1 + Ak630 vs Kashtan or only AK 630
- SAM and SSM armament is the same with both utilising Shtil 1 with 24 missiles (?) and single arm launcher and although they use Klub vs brahmos i think the UVL can accomodate both as the Garpunbal should be able to guide both of these,
- Shivaliks design is generally more refined compared to Talwars
- More ergonomic design relative to Talwar (this is a guess)

Cons are primarily increased cost of Shivaliks and time taken to build vs the Talwars...

Hopefully Tsarkar, SNaik, John, Austin etall might have more input on this...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 07:48 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25909
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
worldwide the onlee makers of marine power plants are likely GE, pielstick, mtu, rolls royce , wartsila, zorya and maybe a couple more american and japanese cos.
the GE LM2500 is the most widely deployed gas turbine plant on warships per wiki. I am sure we considered Zorya as well (in delhi class ships) and the opex of LM2500 is probably lower or it has some other advantages.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 09:15 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 1475
Location: NullPointerException
Different main gun - A-190(E) 100 mm versus OTO-Melara 76 mm.
Different propulsion - COGOG versus CODOG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 09:17 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 27 Nov 2001 12:31
Posts: 103
Location: Still dreaming of the Caribbean & Africa ...
arijitkm wrote:
Austin wrote:
.........

Sindhurakshak crew http://pics.livejournal.com/kuleshovoleg/pic/000s2e8w

Can any one identify the ranks of Submarine officers in the picture ?



^^^
The officer standing 2nd. from the left is Commander and in the middle the officer standing is the Captain .



Late to this, but fwiw: We can only see the rank insignia on the sleeves of the two that arijitkm has id'd, but I would guess all are Commanders or Captains, going by the braid that's (just about) visible on their cap peaks. Afaict, all have a single row of braid, which would mean Commander or Captain - officers below Commander don't have any braid on their caps; officers above Captain have two rows.

As the officer on the extreme left is wearing aiguilettes (the cords around his shoulder), and is wearing them on his left, he is either on the Naval Attache's staff at the embassy, or an ADC to someone other than the President or a Governor. (ADCs to the President and Governors wear aiguilettes on the right shoulder).

For uniform and protocol trivia enthusiasts, if no-one else! Rgds


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 15:52 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Dec 2008 19:18
Posts: 110
Sree wrote:

Late to this, but fwiw: We can only see the rank insignia on the sleeves of the two that arijitkm has id'd, but I would guess all are Commanders or Captains, going by the braid that's (just about) visible on their cap peaks. Afaict, all have a single row of braid, which would mean Commander or Captain - officers below Commander don't have any braid on their caps; officers above Captain have two rows.

As the officer on the extreme left is wearing aiguilettes (the cords around his shoulder), and is wearing them on his left, he is either on the Naval Attache's staff at the embassy, or an ADC to someone other than the President or a Governor. (ADCs to the President and Governors wear aiguilettes on the right shoulder).

For uniform and protocol trivia enthusiasts, if no-one else! Rgds

Absolutely on dot, sir!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 18:16 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 29 Sep 2010 17:33
Posts: 339
Location: May Allah have Piss on Pakistan
Singha wrote:
this also means the P75I cannot be a heavily modified or greenfield design made to our specs....much longer timeline.

I would say grab bull by horns and go with the Soryu. get the 1st two made in japan and in meantime have them setup production facility here. japan stuff is very costly because they dont export and hence dont gain economy of scale. we can present that opportunity. their corporate sector would surely not mind trumping the koreans for once! :D their govt needs to get pragmatic though.


L&T and Mitsubishi have Agreement for transfer of technology at Katupalli. I think it's Mitsubishi which makes the Soryu's. The Supply chain is already existing, only the Stupid Government has to take action.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 20:02 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31
Posts: 784
andy B wrote:
Personally me thinks the Shivaliks trump the Talwar class out and out (this is strictly personal opinion onlee)

Apart from what you said would like to add the Talwar's 100 mm gun coupled with 5p10 radar is quite potent compared to just a Oto SR in Shivalik and Shivalik does have advantage of 2 RPK-8 systems vs just 1 in Talwar.
However Talwar's biggest advantage is its cost around 400 million where as Shivalik came out to over 650 million and the much shorter construction time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jun 2012 20:50 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Jul 2006 10:51
Posts: 400
Location: Riga
Vikkie in Severomorsk Naval Base
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jun 2012 00:10 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 12 Oct 2009 23:23
Posts: 53
Sree wrote:


Late to this, but fwiw: We can only see the rank insignia on the sleeves of the two that arijitkm has id'd, but I would guess all are Commanders or Captains, going by the braid that's (just about) visible on their cap peaks. Afaict, all have a single row of braid, which would mean Commander or Captain - officers below Commander don't have any braid on their caps; officers above Captain have two rows.

As the officer on the extreme left is wearing aiguilettes (the cords around his shoulder), and is wearing them on his left, he is either on the Naval Attache's staff at the embassy, or an ADC to someone other than the President or a Governor. (ADCs to the President and Governors wear aiguilettes on the right shoulder).

For uniform and protocol trivia enthusiasts, if no-one else! Rgds



oh ! excellent. I missed that .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jun 2012 04:42 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31
Posts: 2293
Vikramaditya trial pics

link

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jun 2012 07:14 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 30 Aug 2007 18:28
Posts: 3770
Location: Trapped in the TechnoCore
Kartik wrote:
Vikramaditya trial pics

link


Is it just me or does everybody notice a lot of rust, especially topside? :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jun 2012 07:19 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 11 Jan 2009 00:14
Posts: 2248
it is expected as gorshkov was a rust bucket earlier :))


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jun 2012 07:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25909
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
if you mean the deck surface, I dont think they have painted the final coatings there yet...will be done before air ops testing starts, some kind of thermal barrier to ensure no engine heat affects the steel.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jun 2012 07:57 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 05 Jun 2008 11:03
Posts: 1505
Location: Gora Paki
amit wrote:
Kartik wrote:
Vikramaditya trial pics

link


Is it just me or does everybody notice a lot of rust, especially topside? :(


Boss, that pic is also looking through a hue of diesel smoke being released which is adding to the effect. We need to be careful (and this statement is not aimed at you but generally to BRF abduls) on constantly going for the TFTA look and criticising anything that doesnt look true through the TFTA spectrum. Aslo as GD clearly mentioned Vikky is going through a comprehensive testing phase let us wait till it gets delivered. Also I suggest we check how TFTA i.e non rusty Khan carriers look (I checked and they didnt look all too different from Vikky's surface IMVHO)

P.S I can bet 10 paisa that Sooooorya is gonna have a nice little anurism with judging the rusty look again on the deck :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jun 2012 12:12 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Feb 2011 18:41
Posts: 325
Indian Navy to select Wake Homing Torpedo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jun 2012 12:47 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7745
Hypersonic Brahmos Missile to be Ready by 2017

Quote:
“I think we will need about five years to develop the first fully-functional prototype [of the hypersonic missile],” Pillai said at an engineering technology forum near Moscow.

“We have already carried out a series of lab tests [of the missile] at the speed of 6.5 Mach,” he said.

Pillai said that the new missile will be made in three variants – ground-launched, airborne, and sea-launched.

The official said the new missiles will be supplied only to India and Russia, without exports to third countries.



This should be the most revolutionary weapons when it comes by 2017 , Brahmos supersonic generates 9 times KE , Hypersonic Brahmos at almost twice that speed will be 16-18 times KE.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4828 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 ... 121  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Narayana Rao and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group