Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 25 May 2013 13:18

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2860 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 72  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 05 Jul 2012 23:56 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 21:35
Posts: 2259
Location: PA, USA
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120705/main3.htm

Job scam: Antony orders transfer of NDA Commandant
Tribune News Service

New Delhi, July 4
Defence Minister AK Antony today ordered the immediate removal of Pune’s National Defence Academy Commandant Lt Gen Jatinder Singh days after the CBI unearthed a jobs-for-cash scam there.

“This (the Commandant’s removal) is with the view to ensure a free and fair investigation in the alleged bribery racket in the recruitment of Group ‘C’ posts in the
NDA,” a Defence Ministry spokesperson said.

The CBI today arrested Colonel AK Singh, a Physical Training Officer, at the NDA. He is the Presiding Officer of the Board appointed by the Academy to select subordinate staff. Colonel Singh was produced before the Special Judge in Pune, the CBI said.

The decision to transfer Lt Gen Singh from the NDA and the arrest of Colonel AK Singh comes 10 days after the CBI busted a recruitment scam at the NDA.

On June 24, the CBI had arrested six persons, including a serving Colonel, for allegedly receiving bribe for allegedly taking bribes of Rs 3-4 lakh per candidate for subordinate staff jobs, including those of cooks and gardeners. The CBI had claimed to have recovered Rs 1.76 crore from different locations in connection with the case. Among those arrested ten days ago was Colonel Kulbir Singh, staff officer to NDA Commandant Lt Gen Jatinder Singh.

The CBI had said, “The Staff Officer, in conspiracy with the other accused, obtained illegal gratification of Rs 3-4 lakh from each candidate to appoint them as cooks, gardeners, lab attendants, library attendants and cadet orderly."

The accused had allegedly taken signature of candidates on blank answersheets and subsequently filled in correct answers by fraudulent means. Thus, the actual deserving candidates were cheated.

Ever since New Army Chief Bikram Singh took over on June 1, he has kept his promise “nothing will be brushed under the carpet”. Besides this case, action has been taken against a Brigadier who was taking loans from his juniors.

The case

June 24: CBI arrests six persons, including a serving Colonel, for allegedly receiving bribe of Rs 3-4 lakh per candidate for subordinate staff jobs, including those of cooks and gardeners
The CBI claimed to have recovered Rs 1.76 crore from different locations in connection with the case
Among those arrested was Colonel Kulbir Singh, staff officer to NDA Commandant Lt Gen Jatinder Singh


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Jul 2012 22:56 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 18 Oct 2005 01:38
Posts: 10770
Indian Soldier killed in Congo

Anybody have details on who was KIA? As usual ToIlet wants to write about everything under the sun in its article except about the Indian soldier who died - Nehruvian education at its best :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Jul 2012 04:12 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 30628
Why blame Nehru for morons?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Jul 2012 04:14 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 16 Jun 2012 09:12
Posts: 187
Location: दो गज ज़मीन के नीचे
ramana wrote:
Why blame Nehru for morons?


He was their leader wasn't he?? Vallabh bhai patel should have been the prime minister of Bharat. Atleast we could have gotten rid of 30-40% of the social and govt ills we have today


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Jul 2012 20:13 
Online
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43
Posts: 6355
Antony dusts VK blueprint

Quote:
SUJAN DUTTA
New Delhi, July 2: Defence minister A.K. Antony today asked the army to restructure its organisation to raise more forces particularly for the China border and procure hardware within a two-year deadline.

Antony was practically dusting off a mothballed “transformation” proposal by the former army chief at the first meeting with the new army chief, General Bikram Singh, on a two-year modernisation programme for the army.

“The defence minister asked the army to prioritise and focus on critical areas and suggested systemic and organisational changes to achieve the desired result in a short time-span,” a defence ministry official said after the meeting.

Gen. Bikram Singh and his team including the vice-chief, Lt Gen. S.K. Singh, gave a presentation to the defence ministry on the modernisation programme. Although this was Gen. Bikram Singh’s first such meeting, it is the third in a series after the leak of former army chief, Gen. V.K. Singh’s letter to the Prime Minister on critical shortages in the arsenal.

In his “transformation proposals”, sent after a two-year study to the ministry, the former army chief had suggested streamlining of the Corps of Electronics and Mechanical Engineers (EME), the Army Service Corps (ASC) and the Army Ordnance Corps (AOC) under a single “logistics branch”.

He had also proposed raising two mountain strike corps (of about 30,000 troops each) specifically for the Northeast and the border with China. The finance ministry had pointed to a cash crunch to shoot down the proposal for two corps. But the army has begun raising two divisions for a corps in the Northeast.

Antony told the new army chief and his team that “force accretion” should continue apace. The “force accretion” would involve deployment of more troop and cargo-carrying aircraft (airlifters), acquisition and deployment of “combat air assets”, chiefly ground-attack helicopters, modern ammunition dumps and acquisition and deployment of pilotless aircraft in the eastern command’s area of responsibility.

Last fortnight, the new army chief, Gen. Bikram Singh had asked the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) to accelerate the building and widening of strategic routes to and from the frontier with China. He was reviewing the work on 20 strategic roads in the Northeast including 10 in Arunachal and 12 in Ladakh.

Defence ministry sources said that Monday’s review meeting flagged six priority areas for the army:

• Enhancement of airlift capability

• Improvement in storage of ammunition stocks

• Acquisition and deployment of ground-attack helicopters. (in addition to the possible acquisition of 22 Boeing-made Apache helicopters the army is set to order more than a 100 Light Combat Helicopters)

• Speeding up artillery acquisition — the slowest procurement of hardware because the army has not got a heavy gun since the Bofors 26 years back. The army is now set to buy the US-made M777 ultra light howitzers that can be underslung from helicopters and deployed in the mountains.

• Improved night vision devices, and

• Acquisition of pilotless aircraft and new surveillance equipment.


Gen. Bikram Singh was accompanied to the meeting by, among others, the director-general of military operations (DGMO) and the master general ordnance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Jul 2012 20:30 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Sep 2011 02:13
Posts: 247
shyamd wrote:
He had also proposed raising two mountain strike corps (of about 30,000 troops each) specifically for the Northeast and the border with China. The finance ministry had pointed to a cash crunch to shoot down the proposal for two corps. But the army has begun raising two divisions for a corps in the Northeast.


How is the raising of a new corps progressing without finances being approved and allocated by the finance ministry? Could someone please explain. Also, I remember reading the number to be 90000 additional troops and not 60000 as the report points out. So has it been reduced to 60000 now, ie 2 mountain strike corps?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Jul 2012 21:07 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 Sep 2005 18:24
Posts: 4839
Location: Jatland
^^^Two mountain divisions have already been raised in the NE and are part of III and IV Corps...so, this ~30K accretion in numbers is in addition to the strength of proposed Mountain Strike Corps. Hope this helps.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jul 2012 02:27 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Jan 2008 11:19
Posts: 738
Adarsh scam: Ex-army chiefs called to depose
Quote:
The panel is slated to question Lt Gen (Retd) G S Sihota, who formerly headed the Southern Command, on July 9. He will be followed the next day by the former vice-chief of Army staff, Lt Gen (Retd) Shantanu Choudhary. Gen (Retd) Vij and Gen (Retd) Kapoor will depose on July 11 and a day after will be the turn of two former general officers commanding of Maharashtra, Gujarat and Goa region, Lt Gen (Retd) Tejinder Singh and Maj Gen (Retd) R K Hooda. All these army bigwigs were allotted flats in Adarsh, though, once a controversy erupted, a few promised to return them.


Have their flats been taken back?
Did Antony not know that Tejinder and others had a flat in Adarsh?
Is this Hooda the same whose son/relative is supposed to be close to Chidambram's son?

What a group!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jul 2012 10:30 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30
Posts: 4348
^^ Is it the same (in) famous Teja of Tat ra fame?
Lt. Gen Hooda was seen defending Govt on various TV Channels in Age Row.
Gen Kamphor was the one who planned the Line of succession.

All beneficiary of Ideal Housing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jul 2012 14:23 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Sep 2011 02:13
Posts: 247
Was going through an article in Indiandefencereview by former Deputy Chief of Army Staff Lt Gen Harwant Singh about the Kargil war. It was a really disheartening read and paints a really sad and grim picture of the Ops. Posting the article here, if someone could shed more light on it. A bit long but worth a read -

http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/kargil-controversy-mismanagement-of-higher-defence/

Hope things have changed now for the better!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jul 2012 00:00 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 09:08
Posts: 1146
peter wrote:
Have their flats been taken back?
Did Antony not know that Tejinder and others had a flat in Adarsh?
Is this Hooda the same whose son/relative is supposed to be close to Chidambram's son?

What a group!

It seems Sainik school Kunjpura was the incubator for a big portion of this incestuous group which managed to lodge itself the Indian Army.
Quote:
>Sh BHUPINDER SINGH HOODA
>GEN DEEPAK KAPOOR(Retd) COAS
>LT GEN ARUN NANDA(Retd)
>MAJ GEN RK HOODA
The Arun Nanda was the who was forced to resign by COAS V.K Singh on Sexual Misconduct charges.
Not sure if he is also related to Admiral Nanda's (infamous) family.
SSK - Alumini


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jul 2012 00:11 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Feb 2012 15:54
Posts: 222
Kargil was a good lesson for us to create the role of CDS to enable decision-making seamlessly across the services

What really surprises me is the procrastination by MoD/GoI in making a decision (irrespecitve of whether it is BJP or Congress). What is it that they are afraid of? How much can (or rather should) turf war between IA and IAF be allowed to derail this. It can't just be seen as an inter-services problem... It is of national interest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jul 2012 01:08 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 18 Oct 2005 01:38
Posts: 10770
ramana wrote:
Why blame Nehru for morons?


I am not blaming Nehru, I am using his name to characterize that type of thinking. In fact the specific incident which came to my mind was when they are trying to decide during their cabinet meeting or somesuch whether to accept Hari Singh's accession for J&K and during the meeting Nehru stands up and talks about everything under the sun including God, UN, NAM, Congo, Lady Mountbatten's bongos, everything except the question at hand....till Sardar Patel gets up and asked exasperatedly "Jawaharlal, do you want Kashmir or not???" Nehru silently nods yes and Sardar Patel immediately tells the IA officer in the room that he has his order and thats when the 1st airlift with Major Somnath Sharma and his men begins.

Nehru may have been a great man (so is Manmohan) but he was not a great leader...not even a good one (and neither is Manmohan). I think India will forever regret 2 things: Sardar Patel not becoming PM and LBS passing away in harness.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jul 2012 03:13 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Mar 2008 04:47
Posts: 773
A Congress committee voted 13-3 to make Sardar Patel PM. It was "mahatma" Gandhi who forced Nehru down India's throat condemning millions to socialist inspired poverty and the festering wound called Cashmere.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jul 2012 12:46 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 29 Sep 2010 17:33
Posts: 338
Location: May Allah have Piss on Pakistan
For Allah's Sake, I killed my Fellow Mohmmedians, Not Indian Army
Quote:
For years, the Army was blamed for the Chhattisinghpora massacre. But now, it now out the bloodbath was orchestrated by Lashkar's operational head, Muzammil Butt.

Quote:
it was Muzammil, then operating in Kashmir, who along with dozen men in Army fatigues went to the village in Kashmir's Anantnag district on March 25, 2000 and killed 35 Sikhs.

Quote:
Sources said Jundal's interrogation had revealed that Muzammil, along with his associates, drew all the men of the village out of their homes and asked them to gather near the village gurdwara. The Lashkar men then shot 35 Sikhs in cold blood.

Quote:
The revelation is significant given that sections of Kashmiri political parties and civil rights activists in the country have always asserted that it was the handiwork of the Indian Army.

Quote:
Muzammil, who home minister P Chidambaram recently said had replaced Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi as LeT's operational head


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jul 2012 15:52 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 1454
Location: NullPointerException
tejas wrote:
A Congress committee voted 13-3 to make Sardar Patel PM. It was "mahatma" Gandhi who forced Nehru down India's throat condemning millions to socialist inspired poverty and the festering wound called Cashmere.


Imagine JLN as HM. You would have 600 independent countries within India's borders. Now what was that saying about lesser of two evils?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jul 2012 20:15 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 13 Aug 2005 02:41
Posts: 568
Location: Bangalore
x-posting
originally posted by ramana in Inder malhotra series thread

ramana wrote:
Origins of the civil-mil tussle in independent India. As suspected the good for nothing IB chief was at the root of it.


Army’s shadow over Shastri’s succession: Inder Malhotra

Quote:
In order to wind up the story of Shastri’s succession to Nehru it is necessary to recount just one more episode of some consequence, especially because it finds no mention in most of the narratives of this critically important interlude. The basic reason for the underlying restraint is that the incident had brought in the army, though very briefly and marginally, into the political process at that crucial and delicate juncture.

The facts that are being cited here have never been disputed by anybody. But on what they really meant differences were sharp, even angry. Suspicions arose that perhaps taking advantage of the interregnum the army leadership was toying with the idea of attempting a coup. By the time the government, at the highest level, concluded that nothing of the sort had happened, a lot of bickering and blamegame had gone on in the higher echelons of the establishment though almost entirely behind a curtain of secrecy.

The government’s verdict, together with the country’s proud belief that the Indian military is apolitical and under civilian control, became the incentive to not merely downplay the incident but to ignore it altogether. However, it is wrong to suppress any facet of history. So here goes the sequence of events.

At the time of Nehru’s death, the army chief, General J.N. Chaudhuri (“Muchu”, to friends) was inspecting the troops down south. He immediately flew back to Delhi. The first thing he did was to call in the area commander to ask him whether he had enough men to be able to control the sea of humanity that would turn up for Nehru’s last rites. The major-general confidently replied that he had. But the chief was sceptical. Not wanting to take any risk, he ordered 6,000 soldiers in nearby districts of Uttar Pradesh to come to Delhi. What he omitted to do was inform Y.B. Chavan, who was defence minister in the cabinet, now headed by G.L. Nanda. Chaudhuri’s subsequent explanation to Chavan and many others was that having been in charge of Mahatma Gandhi’s funeral in January 1948 he had found that the manpower at his disposal had proved to be inadequate. This time round, therefore, he wanted the arrangements to be foolproof. About his failure to inform the government his explanation was that it was a routine troop movement. All he was ensuring was that nothing would go wrong while managing crowds of gargantuan proportions mourning a beloved leader.

The highly influential intelligence chief, B.N. Mullik, who had stayed at the prime minister’s elbow practically all through the Nehru era, had anticipated Chaudhuri’s explanation and rejected it completely. He had smelled a rat and had lost no time to inform his boss, Nanda, who was both prime minister and home minister. Not content with this, the intelligence czar even took some rather laughable measures to thwart a military coup. For, he rushed in quite a few battalions of paramilitary formations into the national capital. Those few who knew of this development were surprised that a man of his wide experience should have been so naïve as to think that formations of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) could take on the army’s might. The Border Security Force (BSF) is much better equipped. But it did not exist at that time; it was formed only after the 1965 war with Pakistan.

In all fairness, one must not be too critical of Mullik. He may have been paranoid but there was a reason why he acted the way he did. Since the army takeover in Pakistan under Ayub Khan in 1958 and the Krishna Menon-Thimayya spat in this country — Menon was a waspish defence minister and Thimayya a highly respected and popular army chief — shortly thereafter, he was a deeply disturbed man. He deemed it his paramount duty to see to it that the disaster of military rule never struck India. His fears were accentuated in 1960 when General Ne Win overthrew the civilian government in Burma, now called Myanmar. He therefore kept a sharp eye on the goings-on within the armed forces, especially on generals he regarded as ambitious. Unfortunately, the situation got aggravated after Chaudhuri became chief of army staff nearly 18 months before the end of the Nehru era. Relations between the two became heavily strained because the general constantly accused the director of the Intelligence Bureau (there was no other intelligence agency then) of not providing the army with the intelligence it needed, and Mullik charged Chaudhuri with pusillanimity for refusing to send the troops back to at least those areas of today’s Arunachal Pradesh which even the Chinese, after their withdrawal, conceded were to the “south of the so-called MacMahon Line”. This inevitably affected the events of May 28-29, 1964.

Unlike Mullik, Nanda did not get agitated or excited. Coolly he asked the Union home secretary, L.P. Singh, to find out what exactly was the legal position about the army’s right to move troops in the kind of situation the country was facing. LP entrusted the task to his trusted aide, B.S. Raghavan, who reported back that under the law governing the army while rendering aid to the civil authority, and the accompanying rules and directives, the army could bring in more troops if it felt that the “situation was likely to spin out of control”. This brought the matter to an end.

In any case, by then Nehru’s funeral was over. As the famous British journalist, James Cameron, wrote in The Guardian, during the iconic prime minister’s last journey, New Delhi had become the “most overpopulated spot on earth, and yet not a single untoward incident had taken place”.

Only one small mystery remained among only those in the know. Why had it taken Chaudhuri a fortnight to go and see Chavan and for the latter to express “full satisfaction” with the way all concerned had handled the situation and to declare the chapter as closed? Months later, it transpired that the general had suffered a mild heart attack and could leave his sickbed only when allowed by his doctors.

The writer is a Delhi-based political commentator.


ramana wrote:
Wonder if them both being from Bengal had something to do with Mullick's ire?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Jul 2012 00:53 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Mar 2008 04:47
Posts: 773
merlin wrote:
Quote:
Imagine JLN as HM. You would have 600 independent countries within India's borders. Now what was that saying about lesser of two evils?


With the Sardar in charge Nehru would have hopefully reduced to the figurehead role he deserved,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Jul 2012 05:41 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 22 Apr 2005 23:50
Posts: 571
Raja Bose wrote:
Nehru may have been a great man (so is Manmohan) but he was not a great leader...not even a good one (and neither is Manmohan). I think India will forever regret 2 things: Sardar Patel not becoming PM and LBS passing away in harness.


I would think, if LBS ji signed the cheque at Tashkent then he should pick up the tab for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Jul 2012 10:25 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Oct 2011 09:42
Posts: 706
Location: Tibet / Balochistan
Why Lt Col Purohit's case may have the Army searching for cover | NDTV Video

Quote:
An Annual Confidential Report (ACR)in NDTV's possession has a senior officer praising Lt Col Purohit. "The officer has infiltrated the SIMI and other underground outfits in the region through his capabilities and go-getter attitude.

Dependable, Lt Col Purohit is a good team player." A year later, a similar report said, "...with the basic knowledge of Arabic language and Islamic culture, he provided valuable int (intelligence) on Tabliq-e-Jamat and MFO (Muslim Fundamentalist Organisations) which was well appreciated by the environment...."


1. His ACR says he infiltrated Muslim Fundamentalist Groups, that without a shadow of doubt means that his superiors knew about his activities. Wouldn't that in turn mean that Home Ministry has sanctioned MI to operate inside a non-disturbed area? Aren't non-disturbed areas purview of IB alone?

2. Other than MFOs, lets hold our comments vis-a-vis his links to Abhinav Bharat till IA clarifies whether the officer was infiltrating the group or did he cross the line.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Jul 2012 11:29 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 31 Dec 2008 19:18
Posts: 110
ramana wrote:
Not wanting to take any risk, he ordered 6,000 soldiers in nearby districts of Uttar Pradesh to come to Delhi. What he omitted to do was inform Y.B. Chavan, who was defence minister in the cabinet, now headed by G.L. Nanda.

Seems redux of Shekhar Gupta's supposed 'breaking news' ...though last time it was only a routine troop movement for routine winter exercise.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Jul 2012 20:02 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 03 Aug 2007 21:30
Posts: 4869
Breaking news on TV :
Lt. Colnel Sanjay Shandilya found with Bangladeshi woman Sheeba who has previously trapped another one before. They were caught in a five star hotel. The Officer's and his senior's laptop missing. This is the second case in a year. Bharat Varma on Zee News criticising IA.
The officer was posted on the Paki border. He met her on Facebook.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 11 Jul 2012 21:06 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Mar 2008 21:10
Posts: 928
Truly, we deserve the DDM as much as they deserve us.

Quote:
Army officer caught chatting online with Bangladeshi woman 'working' for ISI, faces inquiry
NEW DELHI: In yet another security breach in the armed forces, an Army officer has been caught for chatting online with a Bangladeshi woman who had earlier "honeytrapped" another Indian officer in an espionage operation masterminded by Pakistan's ISI in Bangladesh late last year.

The Army is conducting a court of inquiry (CoI) against the officer, a Lieutenant Colonel from the 82 Armoured Regiment deployed in a forward formation at Suratgarh district of Rajasthan, to ascertain whether he allegedly divulged or compromised classified operational information along the western front with Pakistan.

The Army strongly denied reports that the Lieutenant Colonel had also got entangled in a honey trap -- basically a hostile intelligence operation for first seducing and then blackmailing a person into divulging confidential information - or that two laptops with sensitive information had gone missing.

"The officer was just chatting with the woman on the computer...there was no physical contact. No laptops have been lost. We are conducting a court of inquiry into the incident," said a senior officer.


Intelligence Bureau sleuths got wind of the fresh episode since they were tracking the Bangladeshi woman, Sheeba, after she had honeytrapped the other Indian Lieutenant Colonel, this time a Para Regiment commando, who was undergoing a staff college course in the military academy of Bangladesh last year.

"The Para officer had been compromised in the ISI honeytrap at Dhaka. But instead of giving away any information, he informed Indian authorities and was promptly flown out of Bangladesh," said an official.


available online at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 824143.cms


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Jul 2012 08:02 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 03 Aug 2007 21:30
Posts: 4869
How do they come up with fake news like this..
There should be a penalty.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Jul 2012 17:59 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 12 Aug 2011 21:19
Posts: 1421
Location: छिछला पानी में (In shallow waters)
archan wrote:
How do they come up with fake news like this..
There should be a penalty.

May be ISI tipped off DDM so it can get away after blaming IA, for which IA had to report certain clarifications. Our DDM is anyway good at spreading stink of ISI propaganda.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Jul 2012 05:45 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 8189
Book review: A Soldier’s General : An Autobiography: Gen J.J. Singh


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Jul 2012 06:03 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17
Posts: 1116
Thanks Shiv ji, I have deleted it. Will be more careful in future.


Last edited by Manish_Sharma on 14 Jul 2012 10:05, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Jul 2012 06:53 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 20927
Location: Pakistan Painindabutt.
Manish_Sharma wrote:
http://goo.gl/VEeIm

Quote:
Indian Army personnel in Sikkim, helping flood victims... lying on ropes tied over river, they made a bridge on their own bodies on which people crossed the river. Salute to the Indian Army !!! Jai Hind !!!


This may be a Chinese propaganda image. To me the uniforms don't look Indian, and I vaguely recall seeing a similar pic earlier


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Jul 2012 08:47 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Jul 2008 10:59
Posts: 168
abhishek_sharma wrote:


What can be more laughable than the name of this book. Soldier's general? Yeah right! Send soldiers to work at his wife's shop. Treated the 'Sahayaks' as some servant. Not even a patch on VKS.

The good General cried profusely out of unexpected happiness when he was announced as COAS.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Jul 2012 02:19 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 06 Feb 2009 07:46
Posts: 1260
Location: GSLV launch pad sweeping team
Hindustan Times: Focus China: Strike corps plan back on drawing board
Shishir Gupta, Hindustan Times
New Delhi, July 15, 2012


The UPA government has sent back the army's 2011 proposal for raising a new mountain strike corps at Pannagarh in West Bengal to the Chiefs of Staff Committee (COSC) this month in order to bring the navy and air force on board and broad base its military capability against China.

The three armed forces chiefs will deliberate on the plan in their next meeting after adding hardware requirements of the air force and navy too in a bid to synergise future operations.

Top official sources said once the three chiefs decide on their specific individual requirements to strengthen the northern borders and deployment in the Indian Ocean, the new proposal will be sent to the Cabinet Committee on Security after due whetting of the defence ministry.

As first reported by HT last August, the army had moved an ambitious proposal to raise a strike corps with two divisions (total of 60,000 men) against China at Pannagarh, position two armoured regiments at Nathu La in Sikkim and Fukche in Ladakh respectively, and deploy an additional infantry brigade to Barahoti plains in Uttarakhand. After being cleared by the defence ministry last year, the proposal was sent to the finance ministry, followed by the CCS, for approval.

The decision to send back the COSC plan came after the country's security managers felt all three services needed to muscle up against the rising military capability of the northern neighbour, and not just the army. The move also came after the navy and air force raised concerns over preferential treatment to army modernisation by the government.

"We have asked the three chiefs to discuss among themselves their hardware requirements within the designated modernisation budget, and come up with a wholesome proposal," said a senior official.

Apart from the army, the air force and navy will also be sending proposals to the COSC before the final view is taken on what new air and naval assets, including helicopters for advance landing grounds and warships for longer reach into Indian Ocean, will be required.

However, given the speed at which China is building its military capacities, defence minister AK Antony has said if the tri-service proposal is not brought to the table soon, the ministry will intervene to allocate military resources within the budget.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Jul 2012 12:42 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 07 Feb 2007 10:10
Posts: 266
Location: Shivamogga, Karnataka
what about Arjun Mk 2 ? anybody know ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Jul 2012 23:49 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 12 Jun 2001 11:31
Posts: 211
Location: UK
Lion of Naoshera

Birth centenary of Indo-Pak war hero celebrated
Quote:
The Army’s Parachute Regiment on Sunday celebrated the birth centenary of Brig Mohammed Usman, the highest-ranking army officer killed in the Indo-Pak conflict in 1947. Brig Usman had shown unparallelled courage and valour during 1947-48 while defending the Naushera Sector of Jammu and Kashmir and recapturing Jhangar, Vice President Hamid Ansari said at the function.


Pakturds lurkers read and weep
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Usman
Quote:
Brigadier Mohammad Usman (15 July 1912 – 3 July 1948) was the highest ranking officer of Indian Army killed in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1947, who as a Muslim became a "symbol of" India's "inclusive secularism".[1] At the time of partition of India he with many other officers declined to move to the Pakistan Army and continued to serve the Indian Army. He was commissioned in the Baluch Regiment. At the time of partition he was offered to become Chief of the Pakistani Army but he chose to stay in India.
When the Baluch Regiment was allotted to Pakistan, Brig Usman was transferred to the Dogra Regiment. At the time of Indo-Pakistani War of 1947 , Brig Usman, Commander of 77 Para Brigade was given command of 50 Para Brigade, deployed at Jhangar in December 1947. [4]
At the time of Indo-Pakistani War of 1947-48 Brigadier Usman was posted at the Jammu and Kashmir front as the brigade commander of the 50 Para Brigade. He led his soldiers from front and in January–February 1948 repulsed a fierce attack on Nowshera and Jhangar, two highly strategic locations in Jammu and Kashmir. He was thence known as the Lion of Naoshera.[5] However, he was killed in action while fighting the Pakistan Army and the tribal raiders on July 3 of that year.[2]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 22:33 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 14 Jul 2006 00:49
Posts: 163
Location: Kolkata
Naushera Ka Sher. That's what Brig Usman was known as. Few know how he died. It was not the injuries in siege that killed him. He stood in the open during an artillery strike and organised an evacuation of his men to the bunker. He is said to died shielding a jawan from a shell blast.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 23:15 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31
Posts: 1514
Gen JJ Singh was widely considered a good chief by BRF until VKS started to peel off the skin to show the rot. Media latched on to JJ Singh with suspicion of wrong doing and it sold readily because him being a Sikh, PM being a sikh and the person that is replacing VKS being also sikh. All of this could very well be true but remains unproven.

He didn't get a flat in adarsh society, neither he cleared any controversial land deal or found to be involved in a fake encounter, ration scam or sex scandal. There is a chance that he might not be a bad guy except for some minor flaws etc. I think the 2 other generals that followed JJ were purely bad people and there is enough direct evidence available to show their culpability.

Amitabh Bachchan's name was recently cleared of Bofors scandal after 25+ years by the Swiss police chief. Reputation of innocent people can get sullied just because they happen to be in the room when the $hit hit the fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 23:51 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Posts: 12427
Location: racetrack pattern over BRFATA.
you must have not been reading then. JJ Singh was considered iffy from the first and long before VKS came along his doings were open secret.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2012 06:24 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 8189
Lifting AFSPA will hit Kashmir ops: Army Chief


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2012 17:45 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Feb 2011 18:41
Posts: 325
Is Colonel Purohit guilty?

Quote:
The Colonel is a legitimate intelligence operative. Interaction with the police authorities, other intelligence agencies, desirable and undesirable elements was very much a part of his duty, without which no intelligence can be gathered and no counter-intelligence operation can be effected. No intelligence agency issues written orders in pursuance of intelligence operations. The entire system is based on trust and faith. It is yet to be established how much of disconnect is there between the legitimate and illegitimate activities of the officer during the course of his duty.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2012 02:26 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31
Posts: 1514
Rahul M wrote:
you must have not been reading then. JJ Singh was considered iffy from the first and long before VKS came along his doings were open secret.


I have been reading I thought but if i missed something would like to correct it? What did you read in pre VKS era that I missed?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2012 02:57 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 20 Oct 2006 21:00
Posts: 2558
^ IIRC, Brig. RayC made some comments here much before VKS episode.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2012 02:59 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 25 Jun 1999 11:31
Posts: 1160
Per a panwala, JJ's son runs an import-export business in Dilli.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2860 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 72  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group