Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 22 May 2013 12:21

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4656 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 ... 117  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 16:14 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 8167
Location: Illini Nation
Quote:
IAC target of 2015 was always ambitious for a SY that has no experience in building such ships , even MDL with decades of experience in building Frigates and Destroyers had delays with P-17 and it took 7 years from launch to commision.

IAC is a far bigger and complicated ship and IN is always stringent with its needs......a more practical date from launch , sea trials and commissioning with Navy will be 2019-2020 ....any thing earlier would be a bonus for Navy.


Is it the yard or is it the supplier to the yard, that is the problem?

I suspect, as it was stated WRT subs and some MMRCA components, Indian companies are not mature enough to absorb modern technologies. Heard something like that the hay used during transporting some gear boxes caught fire, etc. If that story is true, then the situation is pathetic, BUT correctable -perhaps at some extra cost. But such delays have a cost too that should offset any cost associated with upgrading technology support.

This one, like many others, reek of a lack of project management.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 16:28 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Sep 2011 02:13
Posts: 247
Why buy when we can make!!! India has to learn building complex naval platforms for herself, and the RnD is worthy of the time and cost, all these failures are building up the learning/skills and can be put into proper use for future projects. Singha's idea is a very good one, but instead of building a dry dock in Cochin, maybe they can make use of the dry dock with Pipavav which is the biggest dry dock in India and one of the biggest in the world. Also, the joint venture with MDL can come in handy here because MDL has good skills in integration/fitment, which can also mitigate some of the concern that the Navy might have like "If Pipavav can indeed deliver without any prior complex defence ship building experience". By this even if both the projects are delayed, when the ships see service, that would be double the punch, also the skills would be shared ones.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 16:40 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Sep 2011 02:13
Posts: 247
Btw, I was reading an earlier report and it seems, the delay was projected some time back only. Now, the news has come out for an additional one year delay, the plan for operating 2 CBGs by 2015 was scuttled long back owing to the complexity of the project.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120620/nation.htm

Quote:
Once the hull of the warship is launched at the sea, the outfitting is likely to take another four years, hence the warship is expected to be delivered to the Navy only by 2016, which is two years behind its original schedule. Defence Minister AK Antony had laid its keel in February 2009.


Quote:
Sources said one of the gearboxes had been fitted while another one arrived at the yard a few weeks ago. To get it fitted, the ship will have to be taken back to the dry dock. An Indo-German collaboration that supplied gearboxes for the 5,000-tonne stealth warship, INS Shivalik, was chosen in this case also. The aircraft carrier is almost 10 times bigger. The first lot of gearboxes provided by the company was unacceptable and had to be designed afresh.

The contract was to have around 18,000 tonne of the warship ready at the time of the launch, but it is still short by around 4,000 tonne, sources said. The MoD and the Navy have conveyed their displeasure to the shipyard and asked it to get the warship back to the dry dock and simultaneously continue with other works till the gearbox issue is sorted out.


Quote:
The primary reason for the delay is the highly complex nature of the warship that India is attempting along with its simultaneous efforts to localise production. India is the fifth country attempting to make such a warship, which will have fighter aircraft stationed at its deck. So far, only the USA, Russia, the UK and France have produced such warships. China is re-fitting the one that it purchased from Ukraine after the USSR broke up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 16:51 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25500
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
Spain(principe de asturais, juan carlos) and Italy(guieseppe garibaldi, cavour etc) have also produced carriers and large LHDs.
so has Japan in the Osumi class and Soko in the Dokdo class.

we need to stop hiding behind the fig leaf of "onlee a few gora nations have done this so far". we dont have a right to be a Top10 industrial power and still hide our faces.
sure its complex, but we have only ourselves to blame for not being a leading commercial ship building nation already which would mean the people, process , tools and yards would be in place for the surge. only defence related high tech can never pull up a country, overall the state of knowledge and industry has to advance.

no thanks to the NAC tards for this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 16:57 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 28 Apr 2011 11:27
Posts: 293
Ivanev wrote:
Why buy when we can make!!! India has to learn building complex naval platforms for herself, and the RnD is worthy of the time and cost, all these failures are building up the learning/skills and can be put into proper use for future projects. Singha's idea is a very good one, but instead of building a dry dock in Cochin, maybe they can make use of the dry dock with Pipavav which is the biggest dry dock in India and one of the biggest in the world. Also, the joint venture with MDL can come in handy here because MDL has good skills in integration/fitment, which can also mitigate some of the concern that the Navy might have like "If Pipavav can indeed deliver without any prior complex defence ship building experience". By this even if both the projects are delayed, when the ships see service, that would be double the punch, also the skills would be shared ones.



You got a point there. Having ships built at private shipyards can give you the felxibility of working in 2-3 shifts if there is the need. Someone mentioned in here that govt shipyards work a 9-5 shift. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 18:13 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 7501
Location: India
This is what one said.No accountability for PSUs or their heads like "Tatra" Natrajan,and sabotage local industry from competing with the pSUs.See how MD derailed the opportunity for L&T (who have built much of the ATV),etc.,to build the second line of subs ,while they delay and dawdle over the Scorpene production! If Indian pvt. industry is given the chance to build ships and subs and aircraft fo the nation,these timewasters in the PSUs will be jobless an their "extras" and perks enjoyed,as we've seen in the Tatra scam will come to an end.However,to end this incompetence,one requuires strong,firm,focussed leadership at the very top,both by the PM amd DM.Sadly,both have been found lacking ,expert ditherers that they are.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 18:40 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31
Posts: 767
Hate to be saying i told you so i remember the discussion we had here 7 years ago, i stressed importance of building our ship building capabilities incrementally rather than jumping to build something as big IAC, we should focus on building 3 LhDs (split along 3 SYs) and whoever executes' the order most efficiently should be given the contract for the carrier. Rather than reward efficiency and success we seem to be throwing $$ with no repercussion for failure, so it is no surprise the end result there more delays. As i said before i would be surprised if carrier is operational any time before 2018. Before we draw up our plans for super IAC carrier lets try to focus on getting some Mistral based LHDs and use that as stepping stone for something bigger.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 22:05 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 29 Sep 2010 17:33
Posts: 337
Location: May Allah have Piss on Pakistan
We want to Upgrade Our Third Shipyard with Your Money: Russia

Quote:
It has been learnt that India and Russia have already held preliminary discussions for the three additional frigates that the navy would purchase from Moscow. The talks on this issue will gain momentum when Russian deputy prime minister Dmitry Rogozin arrives in Delhi on Tuesday with a jumbo delegation.

"Discussions are at a preliminary stage and it will get concretised in the coming days," said an official speaking on condition of anonymity, refusing to divulge details of the type of frigate and its features at this stage of negotiations.

However, it is understood that these frigates could belong to Krivak IV class of Russia. A Krivak IV class frigate is equipped with a 100-mm gun, a Shtil medium-range air defence system, Club-N supersonic antiship missiles, two Kashtan point defence systems, two twin 533-mm torpedo launchers, and an anti-submarine warfare helicopter.

Russia, it is understood, made the offer to supply three additional frigates. India, which is constructing seven indigenous frigates at Mumbai and Kolkata, is mulling over the proposal.

The issue was discussed last April when the two sides agreed on a roadmap of doables in several areas of military cooperation. This roadmap would be deliberated in details between Rogozin and his Indian interlocutors, officials hinted. His delegation includes Alexander V. Fomin, director of federal service for military and technical cooperation and several key Russian defence industry bosses. The discussions would also focus on supply of spare parts for Russian supplied aircraft to the Indian Air Force (IAF), development of Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft and much delayed aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov.

This will be Rogozin's, a close aide of President Vladimir Putin, maiden visit to India. Rogozin who is the co-chairman of Russian-Indian Intergovernmental Commission on military-technical, trade, economic, scientific and cultural cooperation will hold talks with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, external affairs minister S.M. Krishna and defence minister A.K. Antony besides commerce and industry minister Anand Sharma. Russia is taking part in 20 tenders in India, with which it has a military-technical cooperation agreement until 2020.

Last month India received - INS Teg - the first of three the Stealth Talwar frigates it ordered from Russia six years ago. The 3,970 tonne P-17 project Talwar's are 124.5 meter (386 feet) long, carry 24 anti-aircraft and eight anti-ship missiles, four torpedo tubes, as well as a 100mm gun, short range antimissile guns, a helicopter, and anti-submarine weapons (depth charges and missiles).

The ship has a complete set of electronics gear. The crew strength is 180. All of the Talwars are being equipped with eight BrahMos anti-ship missile (range of 290 km) each. The Talwar is a modified version of the Russian Krivak III class.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jul 2012 22:59 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 29 Sep 2010 17:33
Posts: 337
Location: May Allah have Piss on Pakistan
Work on P17A and IAC 2 has Started

Quote:
They said the work on the next Project 17A has already started.


Quote:
India has started working on its second indigenous aircraft carrier


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 00:18 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31
Posts: 1514
Work started on design and project difination only! No contract has been signed for actual work yet.

P17A contract should have signed at least 2 years back when the launch of the last P17 freed up space for building next Frigate!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 00:20 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 21 Feb 2012 15:54
Posts: 220
Already commented in the INS Vikrant thread on this news report. It seems more of media management by Navy post the news of the IAC-1 delay. This news says nothing more than what we know already


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 05:02 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31
Posts: 1488
From Russia With Love? China vs. India Carrier Showdown

:
The Indian Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, the soon-to-be-commissioned INS Vikramaditya, recently took to the Barents Sea for its second shakedown cruise. After putting the ship through its paces, the Russian shipyard Sevmash will reportedly deliver it to the Indian Navy at year’s end—culminating a prolonged, painful, sometimes comical overhaul process that converted the Soviet “aircraft-carrying cruiser” Admiral Gorshkov into a more conventional flattop featuring a ski jump for vaulting short-takeoff warplanes into the skies.

Meanwhile, China’s first carrier, the Soviet-built vessel formerly known as Varyag, is underway for its longest sea trials since first casting off lines last summer. It will reportedly cruise the Bohai Sea for 25 days. Whether New Delhi and Beijing intend to build blue-water fleets around carrier task forces is no longer in question. They do, and they are.

Which aspiring sea power has the advantage in carrier aviation, China or India?

Tough to say.
:
:

Comparison between the two carriers


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 05:21 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 16 Jun 2012 09:12
Posts: 187
Location: दो गज ज़मीन के नीचे
VinodTK wrote:
From Russia With Love? China vs. India Carrier Showdown

:
The Indian Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, the soon-to-be-commissioned INS Vikramaditya, recently took to the Barents Sea for its second shakedown cruise. After putting the ship through its paces, the Russian shipyard Sevmash will reportedly deliver it to the Indian Navy at year’s end—culminating a prolonged, painful, sometimes comical overhaul process that converted the Soviet “aircraft-carrying cruiser” Admiral Gorshkov into a more conventional flattop featuring a ski jump for vaulting short-takeoff warplanes into the skies.

Meanwhile, China’s first carrier, the Soviet-built vessel formerly known as Varyag, is underway for its longest sea trials since first casting off lines last summer. It will reportedly cruise the Bohai Sea for 25 days. Whether New Delhi and Beijing intend to build blue-water fleets around carrier task forces is no longer in question. They do, and they are.

Which aspiring sea power has the advantage in carrier aviation, China or India?

Tough to say.
:
:

Comparison between the two carriers

Another schlong comparision huh?? lol, keep thinking I say :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 06:56 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Mar 2003 12:31
Posts: 2175
Location: JPEG-jingostan
From a Blog dedicated to tracking Boeing test flights in the Seattle area.

N521DS (IN321) B737-8FV P-8I Indian Navy First Flight

Quote:

L/N 4014 C/N 40611 B737-8FV P-8I N521DS (IN321) Indian Navy
Dep RNT 15:29 PDT ETA BFI ??:?? PDT via MWH
Call Sign BOE202 Hex Code 80030D
Photo Credit: Drewski (Taxying at BFI after first flight)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/smartjunco ... otostream/



I suppose this blog will be a good source of info to track the progress of the P-8I ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 07:53 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25500
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
IN should insist on taking a risk and make sure the LHD deal remains in pvt shipyards. GOI shipyards may supply "modules" but project mgmt and labour should mostly be pvt . let us see where it takes us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 09:50 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31
Posts: 7517
Russia’s Northern Fleet starts 2nd stage of testing for Indian ship

Quote:
MURMANSK, July 16 (Itar-Tass) —— The Russian Northern Fleet has started the second stage of testing for the Indian Navy’s aircraft carrier Vikramaditya.

The purpose of the testing is to check key systems and units, the main and auxiliary power plants, as well as communication and navigation systems, Northern Fleet’s spokesman, Captain 1st Rank Vadim Serga said on Monday, July 16.

“A Northern Fleet crew is operating the ship during the trials. Many of the crewmembers acquired extensive experience of operating heavy aircraft carriers during their service aboard the heavy aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov. Also aboard the Vikramaditya are the trial team, representatives of the Sevmash production association and Indian Navy officers,” Serga said.

Naval aviation is involved in the sea trials: aircraft and helicopters fly around and over the ship in order to check its radar, air defence, communication and control systems.

During the first stage of the trials in the White Sea, the ship’s physical fields were measured, and the crew practiced fuelling and fresh water replenishing operations.

“This is a mandatory procedure for all warships and is used for their protection from mines and torpedoes that respond to the magnetic field of a ship’s body,” Sevmash spokesperson Anastasia Nikitinskaya said earlier.

“The aircraft carrier has become completely autonomous, all of its onboard systems and mechanisms are working, it has its own power plant, galley and water supply system,” Igor Leonov, who is responsible for the transfer of the ship to India, said.

The ship is scheduled to be commissioned on December 4, 2012.

Under a package inter-governmental agreement signed in New Delhi in January 2004, the body of the Admiral Gorshkov was transferred to India for free subject to its upgrading at Sevmash and armament with Russian aircraft.

Russia will also train the Indian crew of about 1,500 and create an infrastructure for the ship in the Indian Ocean.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 10:03 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25500
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
here are the timelines per wiki of the CAVOUR on which our ADS1 is a 30% upsized variant

Name: Cavour
Builder: Fincantieri
Laid down: 17 July 2001 <- i guess this means keel laying
Launched: 20 July 2004 <- so approx 3 yrs from keel laying to floating the hull and empty island out
Commissioned: 27 March 2008 <- this is where they showed their superiority - just 4 yrs to fit it out and make ready for sea trial
In service: 10 June 2009 <- timely and usual 1 yr sea trial

I always notice we tend to float hulls out in less complete state than other nations and then take MUCH longer to complete the fitting out vs the 2-3 yr that is typical for a DDG/FFG and thd 4-5 yrs that carriers take. we are definitely lacking in many aspects....

it is fairly criminal if our Govt shipyards work in a single shift only, even pvt civil construction builders use 3 shifts these days and work round the clock on apartment buildings with only sunday 2nd half off for eqpt downtime, checks and cleanups. the pix of the mazgaon docs with the P15A ships do not inspire much confidence - rubbish and debris all around, decrepit looking worksheds....none of the spit, polish and bundobust one would expect in a western or japan/soko shipyard. if pvt industry is able to find workers for multiple ships wtf cannot our govt shipyards. new people can always trained.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 10:16 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Nov 2010 08:56
Posts: 101
http://thediplomat.com/flashpoints-blog ... -showdown/

2 Russian flattops with aspiring powers The article is balanced and not slanted however lacks in depth analysis.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 12:39 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 7501
Location: India
The news about an extra 3 Talwars being considered is welcome.The series have been a success and built quite rapidly and economically. The point about fitting out delays in Indian yards is a fact.We do not have the sophisticated fitting out facilities at hand where in most foreign yards,a large portion of fitting out of hulls has already been completed because of the modular approach.Until our yards,govt. or private possess these facilities and build in similar manner,we will experience the usual delays.Space constraints,etc. have been held up as one of the problems affecting some yards,esp. MDL.Apart from yard facilties,the training of workers is another matter.It takes just a fraction of the numbers needed for bulding a vessel in Korea when compared with Indian yards.Yet the IN is definitely the best of the 3 services in equipping itself with indigenous systems,suffering less prblems in acquiring eqpt. than either the IAF or IA.

So the problem we face is ,build at home and learn the hard,long way,which does little in equipping the service required to defend eht ecountry's coastline and seas,Or buy from abroad and be at the mercy of foreign yards/companies for spares,etc.At this juncture in time,we will still have to use both options to keep the health of the IN hapy and by incremental methods,mincrease the % and speed of indigenisation.

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/264 ... -2015.html
Quote:
First Scorpene submarine to roll out by 2015: Raju
Hyderabad, July 16, 2012, (PTI):

India is expected to commission its first Scorpene submarine, being developed by French naval construction group DCNS, by 2015, said Union Minister of State for Defence M M Pallam Raju here today.

State-owned Mazagon Dock Limited (MDL) is producing six SSK Scorpene submarines (P75) under transfer of technology from DCNS. Simultaneously, DCNS India, its Indian subsidiary, is working on the selection of Indian companies as partners for local production of the Scorpene's equipment.

"We are expecting the first submarine to roll out by 2015 ...we should have all the submarines by 2018. The total cost is little over Rs 20,000 crore," Raju said at a press conference here.

As per the schedule, hulks of six submarines, considered as a critical part, should be manufactured by the end of the year, he said.

To a query, he said India has got investments of Rs 20,000 crore so far due to 'Indian Defence Offset Policy', that mandates foreign defence equipment suppliers to farm out a certain proportion of the work (30 per cent of the contract value) to Indian suppliers.

Raju today inaugurated the joint facility of city-based SEC Industries and DCNS that would make 14 critical components for the Scorpene, to be supplied to MDL.
French Ambassador François Richier was also present.

DCNS India signed a contract with SEC Industries for the manufacture of high technological equipment for the P75 Scorpene submarines in September 2011; second contract was signed in May this year for additional items.

Bernard Buisson, Managing Director of DCNS India, said these contracts cover an extensive Transfer of Technology.

The Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) for the first locally- made P75 cofferdam doors and coamings was successfully performed at SEC Industries in June. The cofferdam doors and coamings are key safety components of the submarine.



http://www.thehindu.com/business/compan ... 646499.ece

DCNS seeks Indian partners for Scorpene project


*Here's an intersting anti-mine USV that the US is putting into ops in the Gulf.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/259353/u ... eeper.html

US Navy's Unmanned SeaFox Submarines Play a Dangerous Game of Minesweeper


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 15:38 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 14 Oct 2010 19:08
Posts: 72
2nd Boeing P-8I aircraft for India completes 1st flight

Second P-8I just had its first flight :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 15:41 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25500
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
a smoothly oiled machinery it seems. khan is not cheap, but delivers on time except for high risk bleeding edge projects which the P8I is not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 18:08 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 20 Sep 2000 11:31
Posts: 1070
venku_Raj wrote:
2nd Boeing P-8I aircraft for India completes 1st flight

Second P-8I just had its first flight :D


How dare these Yanqi Khans deliver the goods so fast and spoil the good image of all other suppliers ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 19:23 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 13 Jul 2006 18:16
Posts: 779
Kersi D wrote:
venku_Raj wrote:
2nd Boeing P-8I aircraft for India completes 1st flight

Second P-8I just had its first flight :D


How dare these Yanqi Khans deliver the goods so fast and spoil the good image of all other suppliers ?


The P8I is based on a lot of stuff based on the 737 NG commercial version, so all the basic airframe is a commercial one.. as of the electronics nothing is cutting edge like say the Phalcon


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 19:34 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25500
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
still , it does have a lot of mission systems incl some we sent there and some like MAD stinger for whom a canadian supplier was roped in because the P8A will not have it. speaks well of their system integration and test planning if all mission system testing is also making progress in the air and ground. experience counts and they have tons of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 19:46 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 28 Jun 2012 14:14
Posts: 2
[quote="kit"][quote="Kersi D"][quote="venku_Raj"][url=http://idrw.org/?p=12810#more-12810]2nd Boeing P-8I aircraft for India completes 1st flight[/url]

Second P-8I just had its first flight :D[/quote]

How dare these Yanqi Khans deliver the goods so fast and spoil the good image of all other suppliers ?[/quote]

The P8I is based on a lot of stuff based on the 737 NG commercial version, so all the basic airframe is a commercial one.. as of the electronics nothing is cutting edge like say the Phalcon[/quote]

Phalcon is based on a 1983 platform and P8I a more recent 787-ERX one. P8A is supposed to be the worlds best MR platform and P8I has almost all the goodies in that except a few communication stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 19:56 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25500
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
I believe khan is not sharing his best sonobuoys and ofcourse his extensive noise signature library on PLAN subs.
but even khan trailing edge == bleeding edge of the rest, and usually cheaper.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 19:57 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Posts: 17498
Location: NowHere
yup.. capability and maturity of khaanites are top notch.. they spend billions on it.

where as ours is catching up... long way to go., but needs similar investments... not just plug and play and planning, but taking holistic approach towards various programs and projects.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 20:00 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 16 Jun 2012 09:12
Posts: 187
Location: दो गज ज़मीन के नीचे
Sometimes I wonder if this is an Indian discussion forum or US sorry to say this a$$licking forum??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 20:31 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Jul 2006 10:51
Posts: 397
Location: Riga
Philip wrote:
The news about an extra 3 Talwars being considered is welcome.The series have been a success and built quite rapidly and economically.

They should be getting VLS Shtil with 9M317M missile, it has passed the state acceptance tests and is cleared for installation on RuNavy 11356s. Can't see Barak-8 coming soon enough in meaningful quantity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 20:52 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25500
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
did the chinese pay extra to get vl-shtil on their 054 ships ahead of the RuN itself?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 21:10 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 24 Apr 2001 11:31
Posts: 1108
The comparision between the Indian and Chinese carriers above missed 2 important points--1) the Chinese carrier will make sure to stay at least 300 miles away from any Indian ship carrying a Brahmos and 2) will use the range and punch advantage of its Su-33 clones. Our Mig-29k has comparable range but not the punch. Maybe that's why the IN is still looking at other 2-engined fighters, including the Rafale-M which outclasses the Su clones. IN seems to be keeping its options on the F-35 open too in order to counter the J-20 if FGFA is delayed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 21:47 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 Feb 2001 12:31
Posts: 767
Singha wrote:
did the chinese pay extra to get vl-shtil on their 054 ships ahead of the RuN itself?

I believe China co developed its own variant for Vl-shtil with Russia might have played our factor in our decision not to purchase the system (same reason China turned down Yakhont).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 23:07 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 26 Jul 2006 10:51
Posts: 397
Location: Riga
Singha wrote:
did the chinese pay extra to get vl-shtil on their 054 ships ahead of the RuN itself?

Of course, you are well aware that China claims it has nothing to do with VLS Shtil, except some outward resemblance :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012 23:54 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Jan 2009 19:24
Posts: 118
Location: Bangalore
Critics of America in the MoD and the forces are being genuinely won over by American equipment. The on (sometimes ahead) of time delivery and excellent OEM support is winning over real good opinion. I am not faffing, I have a cousin in a senior position in a transport squadron and he says the mission availability of the C-130Js (they are new aircraft) is almost always 100%, which no other aircraft in the IAF's inventory can match. They are looking at upwards of 24 of that type.

It has been a really well-thought decision to buy the P8-I, C-130J and C-17 from the US. These are aircraft you expect to provide 110% in a conflict as they are the backbone, and somewhat invulnerable to sanctions and the "kill switch". It would be a real icing on the cake if we can sew up a deal for some E-2D Hawkeyes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2012 00:42 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 29 Sep 2010 17:33
Posts: 337
Location: May Allah have Piss on Pakistan
Quote:
Naval sources say that even for testing small weapons, ships have to move far out to sea. This not only means extra expense in terms of fuel but also time. Then there’s the fact that in the event of rough seas and during the monsoon, smaller vessels cannot risk leaving harbour. As a result, training suffers.

Quote:
The environmental reasons are many. For the last three years, the Navy has been fighting a case in the Karnataka High Court over a rocky outcrop near Nethrani island off Karwar. Environment groups have won a stay on the Navy’s live fire tests there on the grounds that it is destroying underwater life. The Navy, however, suspects the environment angle may only be a ruse, that commercial interests see value in Nethrani’s location and may have plans to put up a tourist resort there.

Quote:
In other words, the Navy should look elsewhere.

Navy's live fire tests face environment hurdle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2012 06:52 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25500
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
India as the highest density of foreign funded NGOs , environmentalists and "civil society activists" in the world. I have never found out what the third type means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2012 10:55 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31
Posts: 12090
There are half a million foriegn funded NGOs in India. This is because the Indians are unaware that funding is coming with an agenda and they are being setup.

we have an entire generation of leftists who beleive in foriegn causes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2012 11:31 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Posts: 25500
Location: havildar-major, 1st JSOC munna detachment.
one thing I am waiting to see on a IN ship is a Sylver Axx or Type45 type universal VLS that can take a bunch of SAMs - the key being to attain the benefit or 2/3/4 packing inside a bigger cell the smaller SAMs need to be long and slim rather than short and fat. whether by genius or luck the americans lucked out with the quad-ESSM + SM2 combo, while the Aster15 afaik fits into the same cell as a ASter30 and offers no advantage .... same for Barak1 and Barak8 which have their own VL systems. does VL mica go into Sylver vls?

we should likely fund a Barak1-NG in a form factor to permit 3-packing inside Barak8 cells and move to a UVLS system getting rid of the separate barak1 boxes?
is it worth the bother other than the coolness factor?

likewise the Rus UVLS for klub/brahmos needs an adaptor to house the Nirbhay....this will avoid the inclined boxes amidship concept or even worse yet one more VL type for nirbhay.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2012 14:37 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 29 Sep 2010 17:33
Posts: 337
Location: May Allah have Piss on Pakistan
Vikramaditya which is now on sea trials after a refit at Russian shipyards and is now expected to reach India by July 2013.

http://www.defenseworld.net/go/defensen ... om%20India


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2012 15:19 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 03 Feb 2011 16:56
Posts: 1609
Location: Nuked State of Denialistan
^^^ They have kept saying that it will be handed over to the Indian navy on 4 Dec 2012.

Does it mean they will travel around the place, making ports of call and flexing naval muscles?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4656 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 ... 117  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: darshand, Google [Bot], jamwal, kish and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group