Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by shiv »

Gus wrote:The LeT is Ahle-e-Hadith, no? why so less? they don't send foot soldiers into K that much?
These are "terrorists" captured in shitland. clearly Ahl e hadith can never be terrorists and will never be caught as terrorists.

The source of the graph is a the thesis of that silly RAPE whose article suggesting that Shias should leave Pakistan was linked earlier. Pakis seem to think this way. First start killing someone. Then say that the group being killed needs to check out, as if that is a solution.
Comer
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3574
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Comer »

SSridhar wrote:
Gerard wrote:Not pure enough for the land of the pure so...
Time for Shias to leave Pakistan
This Al-Baki is lamenting the decrease of terrorism in J&K.
He is saying it is time to revive terrorism by diverting 'assets' to India just as it happened near-abouts the Geneva Accord time in 1989.
And he is the wounded party here and he wants people to sympathise with the plight :roll:
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7843
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Anujan »

Salmon tasseer's nanha is still goatnapped. Its been years. When he emerges is going to have a strong case of stockholms syndrome.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by shiv »

SSridhar wrote: As for the ahl-e-hadiths, they are active only in enemy countries and the way the 26/11 case has proceeded is proof of State collusion in making delivery of justice a mockery. See here for a chronology of court drama in Pakistan
Oh you mean Shri Hafeez Saeed (copyright Shinde, secular Congress ) and his "alleged involvement" (copyright Manish Tiwari, secular Congress) with terror?

Right honourable Poojya shri shri shri Dr. Hafiz Saeedji needs to be treated with respect. He may become Paki PM later and all these secular Congress ministers may have to suck up to him to avoid being eliminated for saying bad things about him.
menon s
BRFite
Posts: 721
Joined: 01 May 2010 09:51
Location: Bangalore

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by menon s »

Seems like we have lost on the kishenganga issue at the arbitration court. Dawn reports.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by shiv »

menon s wrote:Seems like we have lost on the kishenganga issue at the arbitration court. Dawn reports.
Yes. This is really sad
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-new ... 13660.aspx

Worse news here
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/kisha ... 130219.htm
jamwal
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5727
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 21:28
Location: Somewhere Else
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by jamwal »

Dawn :lol: The correct news is on previous page :
India claims victory in Kishenganga project
India on Monday claimed victory in one of its major disputes with Pakistan, as a court of arbitration based in The Hague gave its go-ahead to New Delhi to divert water from Kishenganga or Neelum river to build a hydro-electric project in Baramullah district of Jammu and Kashmir.

The official spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs, Syed Akbaruddin, said that the award of the Court of Arbitration at The Hague reaffirmed the validity of New Delhi’s position on the Kishenganga Hydro-Electric Project (KHEP) as it allowed diversion of water from Kishenganga as envisaged by India.
and

India can go ahead with Kishenganga
In a major decision, the Court of Arbitration at The Hague has allowed India to go ahead with the construction of the Rs. 3600 crore Kishenganga hydro-electric project in North Kashmir, rejecting Pakistan's plea that this was a violation of the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty.

In its award delivered at The Hague on Monday, the Court chaired by Stephen M. Schwebel, said India can go ahead with the diversion of the waters of Kishanganga, a tributary of Jhelum, for hydro-electric power generation.

However, the court restrained India from adopting the drawdown flushing technique for clearing sedimentation in the run-of-the river project designed for generation of 330 MW power. India may have to adopt a different technique for flushing.

In the initial reports received by The Hindu it is learnt that the court also sought statistics on the environmental flows into the river downstream of the project.

Pakistan had objected to the drawdown flushing apprehending that it will affect flows at its downstream Neelam project.

The judgment was received by Indian Ambassador Bhaswati Mukherjee and her Pakistani counterpart Fauzia Mazhar Sana at The Hague.
a_bharat
BRFite
Posts: 726
Joined: 07 Aug 2009 09:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by a_bharat »

Does the Indus Water Treaty have withdrawal clause where a party can withdraw from it if it is not in its interest? If yes, India should use it, if not India should abrogate the treaty -- the treaty is against the interests of Kashmir (and India).
Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14398
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Aditya_V »

a_bharat wrote:Does the Indus Water Treaty have withdrawal clause where a party can withdraw from it if it is not in its interest? If yes, India should use it, if not India should abrogate the treaty -- the treaty is against the interests of Kashmir (and India).
I think Pakistan should us it against this unjust treaty.
a_bharat
BRFite
Posts: 726
Joined: 07 Aug 2009 09:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by a_bharat »

India should start internal discussions on abrogating the treaty and the pakis will learn to behave.
menon s
BRFite
Posts: 721
Joined: 01 May 2010 09:51
Location: Bangalore

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by menon s »

Being a mature nation, we should accept a verdict as a verdict and nothing else. we are going to build that dam anyway, it might be smaller, it might not have the sluice gates we wanted, but then, had the court said that no diversion is allowed we would have lost completely. Any which way, Pakistan cannot build a dam downstream, that much is sure.
Anindya
BRFite
Posts: 1539
Joined: 02 Feb 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Anindya »

India gives up 80% of Indus waters through this treaty. Being a water parched state, we can hardly afford this level of generosity to a terrorist people and society; a society, which is inherently focused on culling Indians. The IWT needs to be undone.
MurthyB
BRFite
Posts: 704
Joined: 18 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: "Visa Officer", Indian Consulate #13,451, Khost Province, Afghanistan

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by MurthyB »

jamwal wrote:Dawn :lol: The correct news is on previous page :


India can go ahead with Kishenganga

However, the court restrained India from adopting the drawdown flushing technique for clearing sedimentation in the run-of-the river project designed for generation of 330 MW power. India may have to adopt a different technique for flushing.

In the initial reports received by The Hindu it is learnt that the court also sought statistics on the environmental flows into the river downstream of the project.

Pakistan had objected to the drawdown flushing apprehending that it will affect flows at its downstream Neelam project.
Not surprisingly, most issues with Pakistan usually revolve around flushing.
Rajdeep
BRFite
Posts: 491
Joined: 23 Aug 2010 20:48

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Rajdeep »

The seven-member Court of Arbitration headed by eminent American jurist Stephen M Schwebel had finished hearing arguments of both Indian and Pakistani representatives on August 31 last and delivered the final award on Monday.
“It (the award of the Court of Arbitration) highlights once again that India is adhering to all the provisions of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT),”
so now hafiz suar can scream his nuts off , how this was YYY conspiracy onlee. :rotfl:
member_22539
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2022
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by member_22539 »

Brad Goodman wrote:Great cinema will emerge from Pakistan: Naseeruddin
I feel great cinema will emerge from Pakistan in the near future. Great cinema will also emerge from Bangladesh and Nepal because these are countries which have been through hell. It will be these tortured countries which will produce great cinema, literature, poetry and paintings. I really feel that. It will emerge in the same manner as it did from Italy and Germany after World War II and even from countries like France, Poland and former Czechoslovakia. They really suffered.
Maybe someone ought to tell him to stay in Pakistan and make TFTA movies rather than come back to India and degrade himself by acting in chi-chi SDRE movies.
a_bharat
BRFite
Posts: 726
Joined: 07 Aug 2009 09:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by a_bharat »

I don't know the historical context and the reasons/compulsions for India entering into this grossly unfair treaty with pak. I can only guess that it is done by "statesmen" (those who acquire international stature at the expense of their country) or by naive cowards hoping to buy peace from pak. I don't think a country should be bound by stupid acts of one administration -- forever.

I won't call giving away one's substantial rights in the hope of buying peace from an entity like pak a wise or mature act. Being dharmic and being a sucker are two different things.
Narad
BRFite
Posts: 885
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 15:15

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Narad »

Former TTP deputy amir Maulvi Fcukeer arrested by afghan intelligence.
“Maulvi Faqir and his four accomplices who had entered Nangarhar from Bajaur Agency were apprehended near Basawal on Torkham Road near the border of Khyber Agency’s Tirah Valley,” an Afghan intelligence official said on condition of anonymity.

“Yes I can confirm their names as they had told us. Maulvi Faqir, Shahid Umar, Maulana Hakeemullah Bajauri, Mualana Turabi and Fateh are the people who have been arrested,” he replied when asked about the identity of the arrested people.

“They were traveling in a vehicle when (we) intercepted near Basawal village of Nangarhar,” he added.

The Afghan intelligence official, who identified himself with the name Abdullah, said: “Arms and ammunition have also been seized from their vehicle. The five are in the custody of Afghan intelligence officials who are interrogating them.”

Maulvi Faqir was the deputy amir (second-in-command) of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the Taliban chief in Bajaur Agency, but was later removed from his position in March 2012 on suspicions of entering into a peace deal with the Pakistani government.

Faqir Muhammad, who hails from Chopatra Village of Bajaur Agency, was first part of the Tehreek-i-Nifaz-i-Shariat-i-Muhammadi, and later the deputy chief of TTP until March 2012 when he announced himself as the TTP chief after the death of Baitullah Mehsud. Faqir had also publicly accepted his ties with al-Qaeda network and had been accused of a number of cross-border attacks in Bajaur Agency and the settled Lower and Upper Dir district.
-Yawn
pankajs
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14746
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:56

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by pankajs »

Pakistan: Man buries pet dog near graveyard, arrested by police to 'defuse' angry crowd
Islamabad: Pakistani police arrested a man in the garrison city of Rawalpindi for trying to bury his dog near a graveyard, according to a media report on Sunday. The man, who was not identified, was arrested under a provision of the Pakistan Penal Code related to trespassing burial places even though he had not entered the cemetery.

Shahzad Town police station chief Fayaz Ranjha told the Dawn newspaper that the man was later sent to Adiala Jail on judicial remand. Students from a madrassa spotted the man digging the earth near a graveyard in Shakrial with a shroud-wrapped body lying nearby.

The students informed local residents and dozens of people gathered at the spot. When the crowd saw that the shroud contained the body of a dog, they went to the police.

Ranjha said the man had been digging a grave next to the graveyard, and not within it, but the police arrested him to "defuse sentiments". During his interrogation, the man explained that the dog was a pet he had found on the road and raised for a long time. When the dog died on Sunday, he decided to give it a proper burial.
In this case I agree with the pakis.Why insult the dog?
kish
BRFite
Posts: 960
Joined: 07 Jun 2010 23:53

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by kish »

The process of eliminating kufr shias is going on without hindrance. Inshallah, even a shia child should'nt be alive in the land of pure.

Targeted attack: Shia doctor, son killed in Lahore
In an apparent sectarian attack, a Shia doctor and his 12-year-old son was shot by unidentified men in Lahore on Monday.
Prof Dr Syed Ali Haider, Head of Ophthalmology Department Lahore General Hospital, died on the spot, while his son, Murtaza, succumbed to his injuries at the hospital, according to the police.
With the killing of this doctor and his son, 3 generations of a family has been proudly eliminated in the land of pure.
Prof Dr Syed Ali Haider was the son-in-law of late Dr Iftikhar Ali Raja, a neurologist of international fame, who was burned alive when a PIA Fokker aircraft caught fire immediately after take-off from Multan Airport in 2006
ha ha ha. The above incident proves Arrah dislikes doctors, particularly shia doctors. So, it is the religious duty of every pure inbred muzlim to kill kufr shia doctors.

pakisatan is a land created for Indian muslims, But it is created for "purest of pure muzlims" like Osama-bin-laden, Zawahiri, Hafiz sayeed, etc. Shias, Ahmadiyas, Barelvies, Sufis are no muslims.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by SSridhar »

The Shi'a binge killing frenzy has come as a blessing to Ahmedis and Brelvis, for all the attention has focussed elsewhere giving them a temporary reprieve. After Hitler, it is Pakistan that has unleashed such a genocide (first against Ahrar, then Balochis, Ahmedis, Brelvis, then Bengalis, Shi'a and all non-Muslim minorities) and this world does not recognize the inhumanity, criminality and banality of this artificial construct going by the name of Pakistan. It still has left a lot of value for the powers that be.
member_23629
BRFite
Posts: 676
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by member_23629 »

Anindya wrote:India gives up 80% of Indus waters through this treaty. Being a water parched state, we can hardly afford this level of generosity to a terrorist people and society; a society, which is inherently focused on culling Indians. The IWT needs to be undone.
This was Nehru's brain wave.
James B
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2249
Joined: 08 Nov 2008 21:23
Location: Samjhautha Express with an IED

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by James B »

Fund crunch may force Pak hockey team to skip Azlan Shah tournament
Pakistan will not be able to send its national team for Azlan Shah tournament in Malaysia next month and the junior team to Singapore unless the government released the promised funds, Pakistan Hockey Federation (PHF) has said.

PHF secretary, Asif Bajwa said that the financial position of the body was weak because the federal government had promised a grant of 100 million rupees which was yet to be released.

"The Punjab government had also promised us 30 million rupees which is yet to reach us," Bajwa said.
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2428
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Brad Goodman »

shiv wrote:Not sure why you people are so upset with Naseeruddin Shah. He is correct BTW. There were some really great Polish and Czechoslovak movies. I can't recall their names and couldn't understand the language but all 9 people who saw them thought they were good. Then there was this other movie from Bechuanaland - a real masterpiece, produced before the nation folded up. At least one person said it was a good movie. I am sure Bakistan will produce a movie like that.
By that logic KSA, Afg, Somalia should already be producing masterpieces. In general sense Africa should be powerhouse of movie production.
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by CRamS »

menon s wrote:Being a mature nation, we should accept a verdict as a verdict and nothing else.
What do you mean? Has India won the verdict or not? If India has won, then what is there to accept? Are you saying India lost and hence has to accept the verdict? Please clarify your position.
kish
BRFite
Posts: 960
Joined: 07 Jun 2010 23:53

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by kish »

A Shia Muslim martyred in a targeted attack by Lashkar-e-Jhangvi terrorists in Karachi
A Shia Muslim was shot martyred in a targeted attack of Saudi-funded terrorists of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi in Karachi on Tuesday.
Every day i keep learning new words from izlamic world. What is this "shot martyred"?

Does the iranian news agency prefer shia muzlims to die "shot martyred"? or Are they reconciled to the fact that muzlims always die violent deaths, and there is nothing called natural death for brave muzlims?

And what is the reaction of umma (OIC)? Isn't there any need for fact finding mission? like the one proposed for India.
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Sushupti »

8) 8)
Image
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25112
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by SSridhar »

Co-existence with India - II - DAWN Blog
Justice and honesty demand that facts be examined before we accept or reject a claim. The facts did not verify the claim that India aspired to annex Pakistan or a part of it. Although a limited right wing of Indian politics threatened to avenge the wrongs of history, yet that mood never dominated India. On the contrary our opinion makers and the ulema on this side of the border kept pushing up on mass level the hype to conquer Kashmir and hoist our flag over the “Red Fort”.

It is difficult in Pakistan to state the fact that India did not annex Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka or another dependent country. It did not annex Bangladesh which achieved its separation from Pakistan purely with Indian Army action. The wars which we claimed as Indian aggression on our eastern border were later exposed as our own initiation. These are facts that embarrass our claims of persecution.
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by RajeshA »

Brad Goodman wrote:Great cinema will emerge from Pakistan: Naseeruddin
I feel great cinema will emerge from Pakistan in the near future. Great cinema will also emerge from Bangladesh and Nepal because these are countries which have been through hell. It will be these tortured countries which will produce great cinema, literature, poetry and paintings. I really feel that. It will emerge in the same manner as it did from Italy and Germany after World War II and even from countries like France, Poland and former Czechoslovakia. They really suffered.
Well there is of course some cinema coming from Pakistan (like almost 2,000 films per year) but I am not convinced with the quality.

I think the problem really is that they haven't gone through hell enough. Naseeruddin is perfectly right. Just as Pakistan is not Islamic enough, and so Allah has no reyham on them, so too it hasn't gone through hell enough to make good films.

If Pakis want to make really good films, they need to go through 400 times more hell. And then the whole world would be awed by the quality of Paki films. Pakis can then be really proud. They need some more genuine pain, you see! Best of Luck Pakistan!

Naseeruddin eej great onlee! Like him I too yam confident that good films would come out of Pakistan.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by shiv »

Brad Goodman wrote:
shiv wrote:Not sure why you people are so upset with Naseeruddin Shah. He is correct BTW. There were some really great Polish and Czechoslovak movies. I can't recall their names and couldn't understand the language but all 9 people who saw them thought they were good. Then there was this other movie from Bechuanaland - a real masterpiece, produced before the nation folded up. At least one person said it was a good movie. I am sure Bakistan will produce a movie like that.
By that logic KSA, Afg, Somalia should already be producing masterpieces. In general sense Africa should be powerhouse of movie production.
Yes Yes of course. There was a Somali masterpiece call "Blacock down" Good thinking. Yugoslavia had some great movies. here is the theme from a movie. "Kolikaju Prijedori " means momeens get uncovered meat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74WtNbNc0tg
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by shiv »

RajeshA wrote:
If Pakis want to make really good films, they need to go through 400 times more hell. And then the whole world would be awed by the quality of Paki films. Pakis can then be really proud. They need some more genuine pain, you see! Best of Luck Pakistan!

Naseeruddin eej great onlee! Like him I too yam confident that good films would come out of Pakistan.
:D Actually Naseeruddin Shah has sad something that means that Pakistan's good films are in the future. None yet.
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2428
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Brad Goodman »

^^^ Naseer should see Malyalam movies just in case he wants to see quality movies. Hindi movies might have become too commercial. But I am sure regional cinema has some amazing gems. I am in touch with Marathi movies and there are few classics I have seen in past 2 years. Lot better than that khuda ke liye trash that they keep promoting.
Mihaylo
BRFite
Posts: 762
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 21:10

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Mihaylo »

Naseer Bhai was actually 'misheard'. He actually meant 'Great enema will emerge from Pakistan'

-M
Comer
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3574
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Comer »

Brad Goodman wrote:Great cinema will emerge from Pakistan: Naseeruddin
Great cinema will also emerge from Bangladesh and Nepal because these are countries which have been through hell. It will be these tortured countries which will produce great cinema, literature, poetry and paintings. .... They really suffered.
Is Indian cinema any different from its’ neighbour?
We are just too fat and contented with our selves. We’ll never make a great film in our country.
I think Shri Shah was doing a ChunkyPandeyan ungli to Bakis. Bakis = hell, SDRE = fat and contended. Bakis must be seething with rage.
lakshmikanth
BRFite
Posts: 723
Joined: 27 Oct 2008 10:07
Location: Bee for Baakistan

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by lakshmikanth »

Zero Dark Thirty is probably an example of good (if not great) cinema to "emerge" from Bakistan.
kenop
BRFite
Posts: 1335
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 07:28

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by kenop »

Ground is being laid for greater enema out out of that part of the bhorld.
I just bhonder bhay Naseer bhai sayz probably? Ij he sh...?
SBajwa
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5788
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 21:35
Location: Attari

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by SBajwa »

If Iranians can make such good movies as

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Stoning_of_Soraya_M.

Why can't the naPakis?
nachiket
Forum Moderator
Posts: 9127
Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by nachiket »

lakshmikanth wrote:Zero Dark Thirty is probably an example of good (if not great) cinema to "emerge" from Bakistan.
The scenes shown to be in Pakistan were actually shot in SDRE bania land. :P
Last edited by nachiket on 20 Feb 2013 00:54, edited 1 time in total.
Mihaylo
BRFite
Posts: 762
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 21:10

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Mihaylo »

kenop wrote:Ground is being laid for greater enema out out of that part of the bhorld.
I just bhonder bhay Naseer bhai sayz probably? Ij he sh...?

A great 'enemahdi' will indeed come out of Pakistan

-M
Anurag
BRFite
Posts: 402
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by Anurag »

Zero dark thirty was shot in Chandigargh...
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59878
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Dec 25, 2012

Post by ramana »

Enough on Naseeruddin's hafim induced ravings.
Post Reply