Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
Budding Journlist6: The SOP states Ashok should have chased and not Mohan. Clearly the SOP was not followed and so the chase never took place.
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
The correct answer is that since Anita was beyond the 40 km limit set, it should have been Ashok that should have gone after her. SOP. Mohan had no authority. And this has been practiced for 10 years now.
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
Budding Journlist 7 (feminist socialist): Its tyranny of money power. Poor bus going Anita is being harassed, by rich, car trotting Mohan and he broke many laws by going 60 KMPH and he should be booked on multiple counts.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 3167
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
Budding Journlist8: First thing we need to know is who, from among Mohan and Ashok had the gun and who had the condom in his pocket. Only one is a true lover the other one is a .......... And per SOP only the true lover has the authority to cross the 40 km limit set.
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
Budding Journalist 9: Reveal in detail the SOPs Mohan used so that we may democratically determine if the correct SOPs were followed and also reveal in detail the intelligence inputs and illegal sources for the inputs used by Mohan to harass the peaceful and innocent Anita. After all, Anita's neighbors also have their rights which must be fully protected. Why was Ashok sleeping, was he katti with Mohan??
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
What the heck....this thread is going to be closed.
I have my doubts if it was Anita. What proof is that it was Anita? It could have been Vimala or Kamala. Sources tell me the bus belonged to one 'Sangeeta Travels' and was hijacked by the rice smugglers who smuggle rice from Punjab to Andhra. Also these smugglers sometimes buy Wheat from Tamil Nadu and sell it in Haryana. Since the car had V8 cylinders it should have easily caught up with the bus. Mohan was too slow. He should have convinced Ashok to take him on a bulldozer. In addition Kumar must have been tasked to fly on a helicopter.
The poor bus just lost its way when smuggling rice and wheat. Mohan had no right to chase causing the bus to drive faster and burst into flames. Cannot understand why Mohan is so infatuated with Anita that he sees Anita in Kamala & Vimala. A thorough probe needs to be done, and mug shots need to be posted on FB, Twitter, WhasApp, and on the street temple walls.
I have my doubts if it was Anita. What proof is that it was Anita? It could have been Vimala or Kamala. Sources tell me the bus belonged to one 'Sangeeta Travels' and was hijacked by the rice smugglers who smuggle rice from Punjab to Andhra. Also these smugglers sometimes buy Wheat from Tamil Nadu and sell it in Haryana. Since the car had V8 cylinders it should have easily caught up with the bus. Mohan was too slow. He should have convinced Ashok to take him on a bulldozer. In addition Kumar must have been tasked to fly on a helicopter.
The poor bus just lost its way when smuggling rice and wheat. Mohan had no right to chase causing the bus to drive faster and burst into flames. Cannot understand why Mohan is so infatuated with Anita that he sees Anita in Kamala & Vimala. A thorough probe needs to be done, and mug shots need to be posted on FB, Twitter, WhasApp, and on the street temple walls.
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
Budding Journalist: IB4TL
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
At last, finally someone is talking sense, worthy of my time. Only doubting one is expeditious nature under priapic SOP, all we are exasperating. I have never disrespected Mohan. Just what SOP are followed I am asking. Fudgemaking with bravery I am. Refer my previous posts to do doubts.
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
An intruding barbarian (terrorist/terrorist-wannabe) chased by defender (followed SoP) and then the barbarian wipes off proof and burns away to smithereens itself is so basic, not sure if it is considered specifically questionable. There was an (unrelated wrt policing high seas) incident when an American vessel opened fire wherein 2 Indian fishermen were killed. link The Indian govt did request inquiries but that never could invite any long and curious questioning that we see here now. Reminds of trial of 2 Italian marines that has dragged on with blood money prolly paid off. link and there was not much chatter about this then either.shiv wrote:It becomes less far fetched if one sees the issue as it was - an intruder boat being chased by a defender. When we introduce "classificatory terminology" like "coastal waters" and "open sea" and say that coastal waters boat should not have gone into open sea - it is (in my terminology) asshole-giri. Why is that so? That is because a fishing boat should equally not be in non-fishing areas and should visibly be a fishing boat. Susu for the goose should be susu for the gand(er) also.krishnan wrote: A CG boat chasing a fishing boat in open sea for 1 hr seems far fetched
The logic that a fishing boat is allowed to do anything and go anywhere but a coast guard boat must restrict itself to some random parameters is ludicrous.
Re: Breaking news: Coast guard intercepted terrorist boat
On that note, the thread is locked.
ramana
ramana