Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by ramana »

ritesh wrote: 10 May 2024 08:22 https://www.opindia.com/2024/05/atmanir ... cial-year/

Quoting from the article.
As a result of a gradual implementation of a negative import list or positive indigenisation lists, foreign producers currently supply only 5–10% of the army’s ammunition requirements.

The aim is to stop all ammunition imports by 2025-26
My view is "bandook kahin se bimhi ho goli hamara!:
While weapon can be from anywhere he shell has to be ours.
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5402
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by srai »

^^^
There would also be a need to at the minimum license manufacturing of core replacement parts for regular wear and tear. For example, gun barrel.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12434
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

^^^

That brings us back to the question of industrial capacity and the minimum annual order quantities. In order build and retain capacity to produce replacement barrels and other spare parts in sufficient quantities. So that fighting can be continued.

Because in times of war, you can't wake up a say that you need build a capacity to produce 5000 barrels per month. When your pre war capacity was, say 50 barrels per month. The industrial and human resources required to accomplish that is an order of magnitude different from one to another.
pravula
BRFite
Posts: 379
Joined: 07 Aug 2009 05:01

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by pravula »

Pratyush wrote: 14 May 2024 09:06 ^^^

That brings us back to the question of industrial capacity and the minimum annual order quantities. In order build and retain capacity to produce replacement barrels and other spare parts in sufficient quantities. So that fighting can be continued.

Because in times of war, you can't wake up a say that you need build a capacity to produce 5000 barrels per month. When your pre war capacity was, say 50 barrels per month. The industrial and human resources required to accomplish that is an order of magnitude different from one to another.
U certainly can. That’s what NATO is doing right now. :mrgreen:
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12434
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

Can it still be done after PRC has solved it's force protection and sustainment issues in Tibet.
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5402
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by srai »

Yes takes a long lead times to set up production ecosystem and scale up from orders being placed. Usually it is anywhere between 12 months to 36 months.

And sometimes even longer when original vendors go out of business.
Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14402
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Aditya_V »

True, we are country which expects Arjun and LCA to be delivered without placing Orders, highest rate of production with 3 years lead time is Orders/8 or 10 if their further promise of orders. But free bus and revdi win elections, we have too many players with the eco systems to disturb everything.

Lets hope Ukraine/ Other conflicts keep happening sucking up suppliers in other parts of the world and we are forced to supply ME/ AFRICA and SE asia which feeding our domestic stocks, that is only way our MIC will ever pick up speed.
ashthor
BRFite
Posts: 279
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 11:35

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by ashthor »

The world will buy from us but we will not buy indian.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5610
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

pravula wrote: 14 May 2024 09:13
Pratyush wrote: 14 May 2024 09:06 ^^^

That brings us back to the question of industrial capacity and the minimum annual order quantities. In order build and retain capacity to produce replacement barrels and other spare parts in sufficient quantities. So that fighting can be continued.

Because in times of war, you can't wake up a say that you need build a capacity to produce 5000 barrels per month. When your pre war capacity was, say 50 barrels per month. The industrial and human resources required to accomplish that is an order of magnitude different from one to another.
U certainly can. That’s what NATO is doing right now. :mrgreen:
How, sir?
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12434
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

^^^

Sarcasm Saar.
mody
BRFite
Posts: 1384
Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31
Location: Mumbai, India

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by mody »

Prem Kumar wrote: 11 May 2024 12:39 Baba Kalyani's son, in an interview recently, said that they can ramp up production to even 250 Guns per annum!!

As mody said above, forget China, overmatch vs Pakistan or 2.5 front war! We are facing a situation where Pakis will outgun us

Given the massive indigenous production capacity, this is criminal negligence by the IA leadership import lobby, bordering on treason

Like it or not, Modi Ji needs to step in and clean house
Kalyani already recently gave a statement that they are going to focus on export opportunities for the ATAGS, as the orders from IA haven't materialized as yet. Truly a sad state of affairs. Even placing a measly order of 307 ATAGS is taking so long. Baba Kalyani had spoken about a potential future upgrade of the ATAGS to a 58 caliber version. With a 25 liter chamber and 58 caliber barrel, the gun would be able to fire precision guided shells to ranges between 75 to 100 Kms. All this can be done, only if the decision makers get off their high horse and start placing orders for domestic systems.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5610
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

Pratyush wrote: 14 May 2024 16:24 ^^^

Sarcasm Saar.
Oh. Apologies.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5610
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

mody wrote: 14 May 2024 16:47 ...
Kalyani already recently gave a statement that they are going to focus on export opportunities for the ATAGS, as the orders from IA haven't materialized as yet. Truly a sad state of affairs.
...
Could even be downright farcical. Imagine if Kalyani systems got orders from the gelf and they in turn loan/pass on some of the pieces to the pakis...
Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14402
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Aditya_V »

The Indian Army learnt that there was a Company called Tonbo Imaging after the Americans praised the Tonbo scopes they were using in a joint exercise. Such is the state of affairs.

https://www.livemint.com/companies/sta ... 060.html

Read it all
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5402
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by srai »

^^^
:((

Maybe RAW agents could pose as foreign defense consultants/contractors and praise indigenous products as “state-of-the-art” (brochure-worthy) in their meetings with IA top brass :twisted:
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4300
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Prem Kumar »

Not enough, unless RAW agent also shows up with baksheesh
Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14402
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Aditya_V »

Prem Kumar wrote: 16 May 2024 09:43 Not enough, unless RAW agent also shows up with baksheesh
It's children and thier future too, one aspect is foreign company taking 15% commission putting foreign sticker on an Indian product
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by ramana »

Canadian Armed Forces Journal article on Russian artillery modernization.

https://www.canada.ca/en/army/services/ ... ation.html

Will post text later.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12434
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

ramana wrote: 26 May 2024 08:35 Canadian Armed Forces Journal article on Russian artillery modernization.

https://www.canada.ca/en/army/services/ ... ation.html

Will post text later.

I read the article. Overall an okay read into the Russian arty developments.

However it's written for those who have not been regularly reading about Russian military developments over the last 10 to 15 years.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59882
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by ramana »

Link: https://youtu.be/r2YQhoJF_o4?si=3BsTLHbCdhn-JCX9





The video describes the efforts required to make the K-9 and its uniqueness in the Western world.

India should get 400-600 K-9s as a lesson from the Ukraine war.
Getting a few 100 K-9s is ridiculous.

With its burst fire mode, a K-9 battery is equal to two Bofors at a minimum.
And much more mobile.
India should develop its own armor plate from the Arjun tank pedigree.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18673
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Rakesh »

https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1800181925350670461 ---> CCS clearance for LCH with ATGMs, 12 Su-30MKIs and MP-ATGM to be granted, meeting likely in August 2024. Might include: 307 ATAGS and 100 K-9s as well.
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5402
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by srai »

^^^
Even when it’s indigenous IDDM, there is no “fast track” process.
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4300
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Prem Kumar »

Rakesh wrote: 10 Jun 2024 22:47 https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1800181925350670461 ---> CCS clearance for LCH with ATGMs, 12 Su-30MKIs and MP-ATGM to be granted, meeting likely in August 2024. Might include: 307 ATAGS and 100 K-9s as well.
Thathasthu! Hope the 100-day plan that Modi chalked up prior to elections, has some serious defence items in it
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2184
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by SRajesh »

Has ATAGS been supplied to Armenia?? (per wiki 80+ ordred by Armenia)
Any indication of how they have fared in Armenia
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12434
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Artillery Corps: News & Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

I have seen confirmed news of the receipt of 6 MARG. No confirmation for the rest of contract.

Armenia has not seen any fighting over the last 12 months for results to come out.

Politically speaking, Armenia has been giving ground without any fighting since 2020. The Russians are letting Armenia bleed. Perhaps because of who is the current leader of that nation. That clown is letting his country be picked apart by Azerbaijan. Because in order to join the western world. Armenia has to have settled borders. Nagorno Karabakh was a dispute. But what he had not understood, that the Azerbaijanis had a similar enclave on the Armenian -Turkish border. Now the Azeris are demanding the handover of that enclave.

It's a flustercuck.
Post Reply