Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 24 Jul 2014 06:59

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 191 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2008 00:56 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Quote:
Pls see the diagrams on pg76 to 80.


Oh my !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2008 01:13 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 14 Jun 2000 11:31
Posts: 2803
Location: KhyberDurra
Oh wow it was published 4 months ago in Feb 2008.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2008 02:04 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Nov 2005 14:57
Posts: 4915
I don't see what all the fuss is about. I looked at it, and it doesn't seem to say anything new or revealing. You can get the same from reading a Tom Clancy novel. Big deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2008 02:19 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 14 Jun 2000 11:31
Posts: 2803
Location: KhyberDurra
Sanjay M wrote:
I don't see what all the fuss is about. I looked at it, and it doesn't seem to say anything new or revealing. You can get the same from reading a Tom Clancy novel. Big deal.

Kyuon Miya aap tou chupay rustam ho:
Quote:
Jisnay Lakh-on Haseen Dekhain Ho
Uski Tabiyat Kharaab Kya Hogi?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2008 03:07 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51
Posts: 2335
Beyond testing a thermonuclear device, the Indian scientists may have pursued another portentous breakthrough. Press accounts hinted that the "low yield" device tested on May 11 was composed of non-weapon-grade plutonium. Subsequent interviews by the author with knowledgeable Indian source confirmed this

Okay I don't follow. Portentous for whom-India's nuclear program, the level of global technology??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2008 07:17 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons: Military effectiveness and collateral effects
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0510071v1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2008 09:23 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 2911
> Press accounts hinted that the "low yield" device tested on May 11 was
> composed of non-weapon-grade plutonium. Subsequent interviews by
> the author with knowledgeable Indian source confirmed this

I'm no nuclear scientist but I rumour was that thorium was used in place of plutonium for one of the tests. Again I have no knowledge of nuclear physics to know whether this is even practical. Supposedly it was mentioned that using thorium would significantly lower the yield..but since India has a lot of it, there will be no problems supply side.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2008 21:31 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Sanjay M wrote:
I don't see what all the fuss is about.


Read the entire thing.
It really drives home the need for an ICF facility, something that Arun_S has mentioned several times. It is quite sobering.

The author complains about the assistance from LLNL to Germany with their super laser ICF but doesn't actually state the obvious - this sort of help to a NNWS by a NWS violates article 1 of the NPT.

The author makes the point that Germany, Japan etc, because of their ICF research and access to reactor grade Pu are already virtual thermonuclear super-powers, able to deploy enormous arsenals of very sophisticated TN weapons at short notice.

Only ICF provides the opportunity to understand the physics of the secondary burn.. essential to developing advanced TN 2nd gen weapons in the absence of prolonged testing. Without it, there is no hope for developing 4th gen weapons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2008 03:02 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
North Korea produced 30 kg of plutonium


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2008 03:35 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 02 Nov 2005 14:57
Posts: 4915
Gerard wrote:
Read the entire thing.
It really drives home the need for an ICF facility, something that Arun_S has mentioned several times. It is quite sobering.

The author complains about the assistance from LLNL to Germany with their super laser ICF but doesn't actually state the obvious - this sort of help to a NNWS by a NWS violates article 1 of the NPT.

The author makes the point that Germany, Japan etc, because of their ICF research and access to reactor grade Pu are already virtual thermonuclear super-powers, able to deploy enormous arsenals of very sophisticated TN weapons at short notice.

Only ICF provides the opportunity to understand the physics of the secondary burn.. essential to developing advanced TN 2nd gen weapons in the absence of prolonged testing. Without it, there is no hope for developing 4th gen weapons.


You mean fusion research tech can be used to develop thermonuclear weapons.
But Germany, Japan, etc are open to inspections, whereas we don't want that.

India can research ICF on its own, I suppose.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2008 06:23 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
US AND UAE SIGN NUCLEAR DEAL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2008 06:24 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
U.S. Wants North Korean Nuclear Warheads List, Chosun Ilbo Says


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 23 Apr 2008 00:42 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
American accused of giving nuclear secrets to Israel

U.S. Army Engineer Charged In Giving Israeli Consulate Nuclear Weapons Documents


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 23 Apr 2008 01:34 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Diplomats: US compromises on nuclear technology exports


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 23 Apr 2008 01:41 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
China's new nuclear naval base revealed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 23 Apr 2008 01:48 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Uranium near floor after this year's collapse
Quote:
with nuclear plants taking longer than expected to build and after heavy stock piling last year by utilities, activity on the spot market has dried up and prices have collapsed.
Uranium hit an all-time high of $136 an ounce in June 2007, up from just $7 in 2000. This week the price fell $3 to $65 per pound, according to a leading publisher of prices UxConsulting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 23 Apr 2008 02:56 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
The Kazakh Rockefeller of Nuclear Fuel
Quote:
Kazatomprom has mastered two phases of Dzhakishev's strategic plan: uranium extraction, which accounts for about 46 percent of the cost of nuclear fuel, according to Ux Consulting, and the production of uranium dioxide fuel pellets, an interim step. Completing his integration strategy would almost double the value of the firm's uranium products.

Dzhakishev needs to add conversion, the chemical transformation of uranium to gas, which contributes about 4 percent of finished nuclear fuel's value. The third stage, enrichment, or conversion of the gas into a radioactive compound suitable for civilian fuel production or nuclear weapons, represents about 30 percent.

To deflect nuclear proliferation concerns, Dzhakishev said Kazakhstan won't perform enrichment and instead will contract the step to Russia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 23 Apr 2008 05:37 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Russia accuses Azerbaijan of "obstructing" shipment for Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 24 Apr 2008 02:40 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
U.S. to announce alleged DPRK-Syria nuclear cooperation "soon"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 24 Apr 2008 05:41 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
German utility prepares to build two nuclear power stations in UK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 24 Apr 2008 07:47 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Bombed Syrian reactor was nearly complete


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 24 Apr 2008 16:25 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
The realities of nuclear fuel supply guarantees


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2008 02:19 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Nuclear waste storage inaugurated in Chernobyl


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Apr 2008 02:47 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
IAEA to investigate veracity of report on Syrian nuclear reactor


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Apr 2008 07:02 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
China for nuke-coop with Bangladesh on lines of 'Pakistan model'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Apr 2008 16:01 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
originally posted by satya in another thread
Non-proliferation as disarmament


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Apr 2008 21:32 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Ukraine Commemorates 1986 Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Apr 2008 01:04 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 2911
From what I understand, as part of the nuclear 'deal', US has asked that its nuclear corporations not be held liable for any nuclear disaster arising from their reactors sold to India (like the Union Carbide - Bhopal catastrophy).

I would not be surprised if the Indian govt agreed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Apr 2008 17:52 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Divided nations to meet on ailing atom control pact
Quote:
More than 180 nations gather on Monday to seek elusive common ground on how to save the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Quote:
There is anxiety whether the NPT regime will survive another failure like the 2005 conference


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Apr 2008 18:51 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
http://www.un.org/NPT2010/

Quote:
The NPT, which entered into force in 1970 and was extended indefinitely in 1995, requires that review conferences be held every five years. The Treaty is regarded as the cornerstone of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime. It was designed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to further the goal of nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament, and to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.


not disarmament.. the "goal" of disarmament...

the NPT has been a magnificent success at furthering the goal of nuclear disarmament... the goal is even further away than ever before...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Apr 2008 21:08 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31
Posts: 7330
Destroy Iran's nukes to save our cities


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 191 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group