Zin wrote:
Dont mistake my questions. They were not intended to question your nationality or patriotism.
ok.
Zin wrote:
Not true.
One of the pigs is living like a prince in britian with the UK govt funding his expensive lifestyle.
And the money the UK govt provides to muslim groups is being diverted to fund terror activities.
I know both these of incidents are true and have been reported by the british press, right now i cant seem to find the relevant links.
Probably they do it to reveal the extent of Jihadi network, I doubt he is not bugged by MI-5. You should know this fact because even Muslim MP's are bugged.
Zin wrote:
You agree about the failure to keep track of jehadi muslims. That is what intelligence failure means.
Not a intelligence failure, he was slipped because there was no funding to keep vouch on him. If you reveal the dossier of MI-5 they have clearly mentioned it. Also, MI-5/Police did not had enough powers to detain him for longer and question him.
Zin wrote:
So what happens when two muslim men marry each other.
Correct me if i'm wrong.
british law allows such marriages while sharia says that such men should be thrown from the high building.
So which law is going to be applied here.
british law do not allow term "marriage", it says term "civil partnership". Sharia's are not given enough powers in matter of punishing the people in such manner. Definately impossible.
Zin wrote:
Not true.
Fraud cases are being handled by sharia kangroo courts which now have the legal sanction under british law. Read this.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article4749183.eceThe government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and
financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.
Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.
I suspect these financial disputes are only limited to those concerning "Sharia bank" involving muslims on both sides, I am sure it is not applied to financial cases where Muslims or other community commits frauds viz each other, i.e. muslims vs christians.
On criminal cases, read this.
Quote:
Siddiqi said he expected the courts to handle a greater number of “smaller” criminal cases in coming years as more Muslim clients approach them. “All we are doing is regulating community affairs in these cases,” said Siddiqi, chairman of the governing council of the tribunal.
I am not sure this will happen ever on a bigger scale. It is simply impossible.
Quote:
And this is the most horrifying part of this sharia courts.
In each case, the women subsequently withdrew the complaints they had lodged with the police and the police stopped their investigations.
So here you have the sharia courts reducing british women of muslim religion to second class citizens in their own country and the state instead of coming to their aid allows such kangroo courts to function and has enhanced their legal powers.
So, it is an individual's decision to go to Sharia court, if they dont they cant be forced to. Henceforth, the argument that it handles big issues is not true.
Quote:
Next new development in emirate of britian will be theives having their limbs chopped off to comply with sharia law.
It, will be impossible and challenged under human rights acts.
Zin wrote:
So when are the hindu,sikh,buddhist,jain courts going to come up in emirate of britian?
If they want they can come up with their set of laws, but I guess hindu's, sikhs, buddhist and jains itself follows british laws in India so the question does not arise. But if they wish no one can stop it.
Zin wrote:
Read the parts of koran that give specific directions to muslims on how to behave with non-muslims.
I have done so, sir.