Click here to go to Home Page
BHARAT RAKSHAK INDIAN LAND FORCES INDIAN NAVY INDIAN AIR FORCE
Bharat-Rakshak.com does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced on these forums, and cannot be held responsible for the content of sites linked from these pages. The opinions expressed under these pages are those of the people who post them and in no way constitutes those of Bharat-Rakshak.com or its Webmasters.
 
It is currently 22 Nov 2009 04:15 am

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic
[CAUTION: You will be starting a new thread!]
Reply to topic
 [ 884 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 09:13 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 10 May 2005 04:56 am
Posts: 470
RKumar wrote:
a_kumar wrote:



Worth waiting for 6 weeks :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :lol: :lol: Well done HAL, ADE, DRDO, IAF!!!



Good to see a topgun Su30MKI pilot flying the LCA.. :D :D
BTW - the photos are not from Jamnagar.. Looks like the photos were taken at HAL Airport, before the LCA's flew to Jamnagar..

After going thorugh the flight test updates, I had predicted this yesterday 8) 8) refer below my post Yesterday..


rakall wrote:
Flight test update summary

Meanwhile in the last 5weeks LCA has notchedup 37 testflights ~ one per day.. Not bad at all..
But it is not so good because only 3 of the 5 airframes (assuming TD1 & TD2 grounded) are flying.. PV2 & LSP1 have not flown at all in the last 5weeks - hopefully something good is going on with them in the hangar.

In the last 5weeks -- PV1 undertook ONLY 4 sorties, PV3 -18 & LSP2 - 15.

Interestingly PV3 has been spending the last week or so in Jamnagar... I think some weapon drops are going on -- hopefully some LGB's are getting wasted..



Some notes from press release:

- 5 week deployment at jamnagar.. the first long deployment away from home.. so lot of maintainaince etc would have been looked at..

- The trials entailed flight envelope expansion in various stores configurations, as well as air-to-ground weapon delivery trials in different modes of weapon delivery.

- "The aircraft has successfully demonstrated its ability to tackle targets which are designated visually by the pilot. After this phase, the Tejas will be able to take on targets whose parameters in terms of location and altitude are fed to the on-board navigation and attack computer. The target does not even have to be visible to the pilot at the point of delivery."


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 11:48 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 26 Jul 2009 06:59 am
Posts: 105
^^^^ Agreed rakall. What you hinted, I took it as a guess. This news is confirmed.

Now I take this as a confirmation ;), which is a very very good news.
rakall wrote:
topgun Su30MKI pilot flying the LCA


Another question
rakall wrote:
- The trials entailed flight envelope expansion in various stores configurations, as well as air-to-ground weapon delivery trials in different modes of weapon delivery.


What about air to air test, are those complete??? As per my understanding, first must to have role is A2A. What is the status?


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 12:00 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 24 Jan 2009 11:53 am
Posts: 72
Location: where the polar bears live
A fair number of Air to ground munition tests can still be done without a functioning radar. Whereas for the majority of A2A tests youll need a functioning radar.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 12:07 pm 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 26 Jul 2009 06:59 am
Posts: 105
Srivastav wrote:
Air to ground munition tests can still be done without a functioning radar. Whereas for the majority of A2A tests youll need a functioning radar.


This makes sense and explains, why IAF can't induct these planes at this moment beside IOC. Thank you.

Sorry another question...
rakall wrote:
- "After this phase, the Tejas will be able to take on targets whose parameters in terms of location and altitude are fed to the on-board navigation and attack computer. The target does not even have to be visible to the pilot at the point of delivery."


Does it mean for next tests,
will use GPS/navigation system + some control system which calculates base on the target location, altitude of the target, altitude of the plane, speed of the plane, angle to the traget. And release the bum at exact position and time without pilot intervention. Sounds COOOL.

And after that A2A tests.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 12:42 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 24 Jan 2009 11:53 am
Posts: 72
Location: where the polar bears live
"After this phase, the Tejas will be able to take on targets whose parameters in terms of location and altitude are fed to the on-board navigation and attack computer. The target does not even have to be visible to the pilot at the point of delivery."

What i understood from the above paragraph is that after the jamnagar tests are done tejas will be able to do the abve stated things.
On a different note i dont think ive yet seen a LCA pic with litening pod. Now that would be an awesome sight for a jingo's eyes.
Also cant wait for the gun tests.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 01:56 pm 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 26 Jul 2009 06:59 am
Posts: 105
Srivastav wrote:

What i understood from the above paragraph is that after the jamnagar tests are done tejas will be able to do the abve stated things.
On a different note i dont think ive yet seen a LCA pic with litening pod. Now that would be an awesome sight for a jingo's eyes.
Also cant wait for the gun tests.



Nope, although wish it is true... but reality is this
Quote:
According to a DRDO statement, "The aircraft has successfully demonstrated its ability to tackle targets which are designated visually by the pilot. After this phase, the Tejas will be able to take on targets whose parameters in terms of location and altitude are fed to the on-board navigation and attack computer. The target does not even have to be visible to the pilot at the point of delivery."


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 02:53 pm 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 12 Jul 2007 07:09 pm
Posts: 657
Location: La La Land
Quote:
Tejas completes test flight in Saurashtra region

The Indian Light Combat Aircraft (LCA), ‘Tejas’ continued its quest for achieving Initial Operational Capability (IOC) by the end of 2010. To achieve this goal, a pair of Tejas single seat fighters supported by a multi-disciplinary trial team, operated from an Indian Air Force airbase in the South Western Air Command area of responsibility for five weeks.

The prototype of the Light Combat Aircraft `Tejas’ at an Air Force base under the Western Air Command.

This was the first time that the Tejas aircraft have operated away from home base of Bangalore for so long.

Two prototypes took part in the trials, the Prototype Vehicle-3 (PV3) and Limited Series Production-2 (LSP-2). The trials entailed flight envelope expansion in various configurations, as well as Air to Ground weapon delivery trials in different modes of weapon delivery.

The aircraft successfully demonstrated its ability to tackle targets which are designated visually by the pilot. After this phase, the Tejas will be able to take on targets whose parameters in terms of location and altitude are fed to the on-board navigation and attack computer. The target does not even have to be visible to the pilot at the point of delivery, according to the Defence Research Development Organisation (DRDO).

The flight trials were conducted by the flight test crew of the National Flight Test Centre (NFTC), who deployed test pilots, flight test engineers and instrumentation specialists for the task.

The support provided by the personnel of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)- the manufacturers of the aircraft, ensured that this indigenous fighter aircraft was able to take to the skies regularly, said DRDO.

The Tejas team included specialist groups from Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE), National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL), Central for Military Air Worthiness and Certification (CEMILAC) and DG-AQA.

The Indian Air Force teams working at ADA and the Air Force base where the trials were conducted have contributed significantly for the success of the trial.

With this milestone achieved, the entire Tejas team is upbeat and the Tejas is one step closer to induction into the Indian Air Force, the DRDO said in a note.

http://news.in.msn.com/national/article ... 353&page=2

Quote:
IAF Conducts Multi-Disciplinary Trial of LCA

Moving closer to achieving Initial Operational Capability configuration for the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) by end of 2010, the Air Force conducted five-week multi-disciplinary trials of a pair of indigenous fighters at its Jamnagar air base.

"The trials entailed flight envelope expansion in various stores configurations, as well as air-to-ground weapon delivery trials in different modes of weapon delivery," a DRDO official said here today.

The LCA successfully demonstrated its ability to tackle targets designated visually by the pilot, officials added.

After this phase, officials said that the LCA will be enabled by its on-board navigation and attack computers to take on targets, which are not visible to the pilot.

The five-week trials were conducted by the flight test crew of the National Flight Test Centre (NFTC) including their test pilots, flight test engineers and instrumentation specialists.

"This was the first time that the Tejas aircraft have operated away from home base for so long," officials said.

LCA is expected to be inducted into the IAF in initial operational capability (IOC) by December 2010. Last year, Defence Minister A K Antony had said that the IAF will induct around seven squadrons of the aircraft in its fleet.

Developing the aircraft since 1982, the DRDO is expected to hand over the first squadron of the LCA in the IOC configuration to the IAF by 2010-end.

A total of seven LCA squadrons will be inducted in the IAF. The first two squadrons will be in the IOC configuration whereas the rest five will be the LCA Mark II, which will be an upgraded version of the aircraft.

The first two squadrons will be equipped with the GE-404 engines and the remaining five will have either the GE-414 or the Eurojet 200 engines. DRDO is also in talks with various aircraft manufacturers to help it in expanding the flight envelope of the aircraft.


http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?667883


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 04:01 pm 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 04 May 2007 07:50 pm
Posts: 106
Location: ghaziabad
CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHAT RADAR the first 40 LCA MARK 1 WILL HAVE? will it be el/m-2032 or mmr with el/m-2052 aesa front end


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 04:15 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 23 Jan 2009 01:01 pm
Posts: 4
Quote:
CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHAT RADAR the first 40 LCA MARK 1 WILL HAVE? will it be el/m-2032 or mmr with el/m-2052 aesa front end


I can't say for sure, but I guess it would be a hybrid radar with air to air modes of mmr while air to ground modes of elta's 2032 radar. So it would be hybrid between our mmr and 2032. If you would be following this thread for some years, you would know that mmr's air to air modes are working well. I hope that helps


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2009 10:27 pm 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 07:01 am
Posts: 582
Srivastav wrote:
On a different note i dont think ive yet seen a LCA pic with litening pod. Now that would be an awesome sight for a jingo's eyes.
Also cant wait for the gun tests.


Its there on the BRF page for the Tejas itself.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 20 Oct 2009 04:32 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 30 Jan 2009 01:19 pm
Posts: 91
Very bad translation, but interesting to read ....

http://translate.google.com/translate?p ... _state0=10,

Quote:
LCA = "Gripen fighter when the CD all the time depends on the performance of the radar if you have AESA (Active Phased Array Radar) LCA can be shot down SU30MKI, but we can say he was stronger than the MKI do? Can not be! The outcome depends on the aircraft, air the entire system performance.

However, LCA's internal equipment is a challenge. However, imports of LCA is very suitable for the radar, receiving systems, intelligence gathering and early warning aircraft systems and coordination. If it is not subject to payload restrictions, he could become multi-purpose fighter.

We all know that LCA's radar reflector surface and the French Rafale, the European Typhoon, Swedish Gripen is small compared to big? Although I know that may belong to a secret, but I really want to know.
CA can be sure that the reflection cross-section is very low, thanks to his appearance, as well as 45% of the amount of composite materials. 而且LCA。 And the LCA air intakes were also low to detect design. I want to reflect size should be smaller than Sweden's Gripen, considering the dimensions of the case.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 05:36 am 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 24 May 2009 05:37 pm
Posts: 30
http://www.ada.gov.in/others/MoreCurrentNews/morecurrentnews.html
LCA-Tejas has completed 1216 Test Flights successfully. (21-Oct-09).
* LCA has completed 1216 Test Flights successfully
(TD1-233,TD2-305,PV1-224,PV2-128,PV3-173,LSP1-54,LSP2-99).
* 123rd & 124th flight of Tejas PV1 occurred on 20th Oct 09.

Do any Panwalas have information about what percentage of the test cases are complete?


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 06:23 am 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 26 Feb 2004 07:01 am
Posts: 95
1216 test flights?

In China, the J10 had to complete more than 3000 test flights before it went into mass production.

So it means still many years left for LCA to go to service?

sameer_shelavale wrote:
http://www.ada.gov.in/others/MoreCurrentNews/morecurrentnews.html
LCA-Tejas has completed 1216 Test Flights successfully. (21-Oct-09).
* LCA has completed 1216 Test Flights successfully
(TD1-233,TD2-305,PV1-224,PV2-128,PV3-173,LSP1-54,LSP2-99).
* 123rd & 124th flight of Tejas PV1 occurred on 20th Oct 09.

Do any Panwalas have information about what percentage of the test cases are complete?


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 06:24 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 06 Dec 2008 09:02 pm
Posts: 287
Read an article on a pakistani daily about LCA. Among a lot of gibberish, they were comparing the increase in unit cost of an LCA with that of an MKI (31 mil vs 33 mil a piece)

Does anyone have the exact price of an LCA as of today? What will be the approximate difference between mk-1 and mk-2 (assuming mk-2 comes out 5 years from now)?

* Link deleted later


Last edited by Kailash on 04 Nov 2009 08:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 06:44 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 30 Jul 2004 09:35 am
Posts: 387
Kailash wrote:
Read an article on a pakistani daily about LCA. Among a lot of gibberish, they were comparing the increase in unit cost of an LCA with that of an MKI (31 mil vs 33 mil a piece)

Does anyone have the exact price of an LCA as of today? What will be the approximate difference between mk-1 and mk-2 (assuming mk-2 comes out 5 years from now)?



Been there, read that and decided it was a waste of bandwidth!


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 07:12 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 12 Aug 2005 09:11 pm
Posts: 355
Location: Bangalore
why the F do ppl give so much importance to what a stupid baki thinks?
Kailash cant you discriminate between a decent newspaper article and a trashy blog?
this is the second time this link has been brought over to BR by people browsing deaf and dumb I think.
Kindly only refer to sources which are not stupid and biased, thanks.

BTW Neela can you edit your post to remove the link to the blog, why should BR give link back to such trashy blogs


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 08:48 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 06 Dec 2008 09:02 pm
Posts: 287
Well, agreed with both Mehta and Neela. The article is crap.

Now can we discuss the price of the LCA as of today?


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 11:02 am 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 13 May 2009 09:03 pm
Posts: 55
Kailash wrote:
Now can we discuss the price of the LCA as of today?

The last I read, it was 31 million a piece (As per Reuters).


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 11:05 am 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 13 May 2009 09:03 pm
Posts: 55
sharma.abhinav wrote:
I can't say for sure, but I guess it would be a hybrid radar with air to air modes of mmr while air to ground modes of elta's 2032 radar

I guess, it's Elta 2052 (and not 2032).


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 01:56 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 24 May 2009 05:37 pm
Posts: 30
Quote:
I guess, it's Elta 2052 (and not 2032).

Elta 2052 is AESA radar.
Tejas Mk-1 will be using Elta 2032, (so without AESA).
We will probably see Elta 2052 or Russian Zuke-AE AESA on Tejas MK-2.


Last edited by sameer_shelavale on 04 Nov 2009 02:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 02:07 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 26 Oct 2009 11:53 am
Posts: 8
Location: Chennapatnam, Bharatha Khandam
Asit P wrote:
Kailash wrote:
Now can we discuss the price of the LCA as of today?

The last I read, it was 31 million a piece (As per Reuters).


Isn't that 31 million for the NLCA?

Even though LCA initially might cost some where between 20-25 million a piece, cost might come down as the production picks up. If only it happens.

Naval LCA will cost more because of the changes that needs to be done and the additional accessories that needs to be fitted.

Now can anyone tell me whats the status of PV5? It is supposed to start flying by now but still no word of it.


Last edited by Venu on 04 Nov 2009 02:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 02:10 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 26 Oct 2009 11:53 am
Posts: 8
Location: Chennapatnam, Bharatha Khandam
Asit P wrote:
sharma.abhinav wrote:
I can't say for sure, but I guess it would be a hybrid radar with air to air modes of mmr while air to ground modes of elta's 2032 radar

I guess, it's Elta 2052 (and not 2032).


Is the ELTA 2052 fully developed and ready for induction :?:. I don't think so :|


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 02:23 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 23 Jan 2009 01:01 pm
Posts: 4
Quote:
I guess, it's Elta 2052 (and not 2032).

Asit sir, as far as I know through my readings on BRF the radar that will be integrated first on LCA MK1 for initial opterational clearence will either be a hybrid of our MMR and Elta's 2032, or would entirely be the 2032. Elta's 2052 would in all probability be considered for the MK2 version of the aircraft.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 03:50 pm 
BRF Oldie
Offline

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 07:01 am
Posts: 2834
Location: NowHere
Quote:
We will probably see Elta 2052 or Russian Zuke-AE AESA on Tejas MK-2.

after spending big sums on Israel for LCA-MMR [elta], why waste again integrating with Russian Zhuk., when LCA-MMR would be ready to FCR russian missiles as well.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 04:36 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 24 May 2009 05:37 pm
Posts: 30
SaiK wrote:
Quote:
We will probably see Elta 2052 or Russian Zuke-AE AESA on Tejas MK-2.

after spending big sums on Israel for LCA-MMR [elta], why waste again integrating with Russian Zhuk., when LCA-MMR would be ready to FCR russian missiles as well.

That makes a point, no doubt.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 05:05 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 29 Oct 2009 12:18 pm
Posts: 9
Location: kpn
SaiK wrote:
Quote:
We will probably see Elta 2052 or Russian Zuke-AE AESA on Tejas MK-2.

after spending big sums on Israel for LCA-MMR [elta], why waste again integrating with Russian Zhuk., when LCA-MMR would be ready to FCR russian missiles as well.

agree


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 11:25 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 13 May 2009 09:03 pm
Posts: 55
sharma.abhinav wrote:
Asit sir, as far as I know through my readings on BRF the radar that will be integrated first on LCA MK1 for initial opterational clearence will either be a hybrid of our MMR and Elta's 2032, or would entirely be the 2032. Elta's 2052 would in all probability be considered for the MK2 version of the aircraft.

sameer_shelavale wrote:
Elta 2052 is AESA radar. Tejas Mk-1 will be using Elta 2032, (so without AESA). We will probably see Elta 2052 or Russian Zuke-AE AESA on Tejas MK-2.


Bhai log, there was a report in 'The Hindu' citing P.S. Subramaniam, Programme Director of ADA. It goes like this:-
Quote:
P.S. Subramaniam, Programme Director, Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), the defence laboratory that is designing the LCA, told The Hindu that “airworthy units” of the Israeli – manufactured MMR would be arriving here early next week for integration into the aircraft. The Elta designed and developed MMR, Elta EL/M-2052 which will be an interim option since India is developing an indigenous one, has already undergone tests on the flight test bed and ground rig in Israel.

That is why I get the impression that LCA MK1 will be a hybrid of Indian MMR and Elta 2052. And we shall try to go for a fully indigenous radar in MK2. Alternatives for MK2 will be sought only if we fail in our endeavour.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2009 11:35 pm 
BRFite -Trainee
Offline

Joined: 13 May 2009 09:03 pm
Posts: 55
Venu wrote:
Isn't that 31 million for the NLCA? Even though LCA initially might cost some where between 20-25 million a piece, cost might come down as the production picks up. If only it happens.


31 Million is the cost of the birds that are currently being flight tested. This is what the article stated:-
Quote:
Five Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) costing about $31 million each have already been manufactured by state-run Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and undergoing trials, while eight more will be ready by mid-2010, defence officials said.


The cost will go further up when we add the cost of the radar and a better engine. Having said that, you are right about the cost coming down owing to economies of scale.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2009 01:03 am 
BRF Oldie
Offline

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 07:01 am
Posts: 2834
Location: NowHere
If that report is any confirmation [actually we have already discussed this here], then it is to be assumed that our new IAF specs mandate AESA for LCA, and while Elta-DRDO works on the LCA-MMR-AESA, the interim is 2052.

If that is a ddmities and that IAF really does not care AESA for LCA, then it could be 2032. The exacts will be known only after MMR loads in, and fires all kinds, and IAF starts user acceptance trials.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2009 02:42 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 06 Dec 2008 09:02 pm
Posts: 287
Currently, royalties/costs for the radar and engine are still flowing out of the country. R&D costs have increased than previously planned and number have drastically come down (to 40). All this has to be amortized while calculating the new cost - certainly going to be > 25mil.

This is while ignoring the mk-2 - which will have its own R&D costs, imports and price tag.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2009 07:42 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 12 Aug 2005 09:11 pm
Posts: 355
Location: Bangalore
Thanks Kailash and Neela,
Didnt mean to be so rude. but generally pissed at such blogs getting clicks from BRF and eyeballs from BRFites.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2009 08:14 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 26 Feb 2008 12:48 am
Posts: 160
Are there any concrete parameters that the LCA has to establish or are they just going to add everything under the sun to the LCA ? I ask because of the confusion between AESA and non-AESA radar that is "going" to be added to the final version.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2009 01:31 pm 
BRF Oldie
Offline

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 07:01 am
Posts: 2834
Location: NowHere
AESA with its extended range helps in BVR engagements. Besides, they could jam in multiple use for it [communications, high freq jamming, LPI, pulse mode with different frequencies using diff t/rs (stealth mode) and wider target types, and very useful for a multi role a/c. Passive ops including RWR, and passive scanning and tracking capabilities improves for more stealth ops. AESA is a high jam resistant., and on passive mode detections, it can go switched off.. The technology really helps LCA for a true "multi - role" capability.

Further an AlGaN or GaN MMICs helps AESA for high amps.. Dileep saab can give more info on this. Also one may wiki arround http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GaN


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2009 03:13 pm 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 02 Feb 2001 07:01 am
Posts: 110
SaiK wrote:
Further an AlGaN or GaN MMICs helps AESA for high amps.. Dileep saab can give more info on this. Also one may wiki arround http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GaN

I did answer these issues - that was waaaaay back in 2006 - some snippets:

Quote:
IIRC some of the basic differentiators between GaAs and GaN based transistors (both having higher operating frequency tapability and similar noise figures) are as follows :
Code:
Features                           GaAs          GaN     
----------                         ------        -----     
Power Density (at X-Band)          1.5W/mm       10W/mm
DC-to-RF Efficiency (at X-Band)    20%           ~36% and 60% (at L-Band)
Energy Gap at Room Temp            1.90eV        3.4eV
Breakdown E-Field (V/Cm)           6.5*10^5      3.5*10^6


Quote:
Betw, in lay-man (like me ) terms, what the above means are as follows:

Power Density: Higher power densities allow smaller chips to handle the same amount of power, resulting in more chips per wafer, and hence, lower costs per chip. Also will result in smaller chips.

DC-to-RF Efficiency: Measure how effieciently RF waves are generated i.e. how less heat is genarated in the process of creating RF waves. Thus higher efficiency implies less thermal mgmt headache and there-in weight penalties.

Energy Gap or Band Gap: Higher the value, allows higher temperature operation (thus requiring less cooling) and higher radiation stability. Also higher the value more closer you're to be classifiead as an insulator.

Break down E-Field: Higher value means higher "tolerance" to higher voltage - thus more resistant to breakdown due to high voltage peaks.

Details can be found in the following Archived thread:
Radar thread - specs & discussions

Hope this helps.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2009 03:17 pm 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 02 Dec 2006 03:23 pm
Posts: 156
It seems like Radar integration is taking lot of time LSP3/4 and PV-5 are no where to be seen and we are coming to end of this year ,it will be very disappointing year for Tejas program if this jets couldn't take their first flight has expected :((


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 05 Nov 2009 04:07 pm 
BRF Oldie
Offline

Joined: 29 Oct 2003 07:01 am
Posts: 2834
Location: NowHere
Quote:
be very disappointing year for Tejas program

you should not, even from a layman's view if you could pay attentions to the factors.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2009 09:21 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 26 Jul 2009 06:59 am
Posts: 105
Just one flight test in 10 days.... something serious is going on :idea: Calm before storm???


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2009 10:29 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 03 Jun 2008 05:50 am
Posts: 648
Location: India
karan_mc wrote:
It seems like Radar integration is taking lot of time LSP3/4 and PV-5 are no where to be seen and we are coming to end of this year ,it will be very disappointing year for Tejas program if this jets couldn't take their first flight has expected :((
RKumar wrote:
Just one flight test in 10 days.... something serious is going on :idea: Calm before storm???
Hopefully so. :oops:

And its supposed to have the IOC next year.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2009 11:10 am 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 26 Jul 2009 06:59 am
Posts: 105
Dmurphy wrote:
And its supposed to have the IOC next year.


I thought this year, if it is next year then IOC should not be a problem. Because for IOC, it requires less then 300 more sorties. Once MMR/radar is integrated, there should be more sorties as more planes will be avilable and system is getting more stable n mature.


Top
  Profile  
               
 Post subject: Re: LCA news and discussion
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2009 03:38 pm 
BRFite
Offline

Joined: 02 Dec 2006 03:23 pm
Posts: 156
LSP-2 (KH2012) first flight was on 16 June 2008 its almost been 18 months now and still no test flight of LSP-3, while LSP-4 was also supposed to be in air by mid 2009 . in this three years (2007-09) period HAL was able to deliver only two LSP and we still need other 6 LSP to meet IOC and FOC by at least 2013, it only shows how slow the actual work is going on in HAL .as per orginal program schedule HAL should deliver all LSP by 2010 ,if LSP-3/4 cannot make its first flight by year end then Tejas program will surely see some more delays


Top
  Profile  
               
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic
[CAUTION: You will be starting a new thread!]
Reply to topic
 [ 884 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gaur, Google [Bot], pgbhat, Prasanth, VijayKumarSinha and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group