Bharat Rakshak

Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
It is currently 19 Jun 2013 10:02

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 248 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2010 21:13 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 01 Jan 2010 21:41
Posts: 6208
Location: Dard bhi tum hi dete ho, dawa bhi tum hi, bolo NaMo, yeh Niku ko kya dogey!?!
NP at all, saar. Thanks should go to Raghavendra for doing the heavy lifting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Oct 2010 02:53 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 29 Nov 2008 20:56
Posts: 269
Some more update about CWG network attacks
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/1-000-cyber-attacks-on-Games--most-from-China/698324
1,000 cyber attacks on Games, most from China

Key points:
*Six cyber networks of the Delhi Commonwealth Games faced at least 1,000 “potential” attacks in the 12 days of the event that concluded last night — that is, more than three attacks every hour.

*Some attempts to penetrate CWG circuits were made from Mumbai as well, top sources in the CMG said.

*“In all, our systems detected around 5,000 incidents, about 20 per cent of which could be described as potential attacks. Many were ‘denial-of-service’ attacks, which, if successful, would jam entire networks. But none of these attempts succeeded in penetrating even the first of the three layers of cyber security systems that we had installed,” said a member of the CMG.

*The six networks, including those of Games data, security, venues, Internet services and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd (MTNL), were linked to the Command Centre, which constantly monitored over 3,000 computers, 3,000 CCTVs and 1,800 network switches. A special software detected and mapped all “deviant behaviour” on logs, which were examined by the CMG several times a day.

*“The cyber security systems used in the CWG are now a model which can be replicated in major national networks, and used for cyber security in critical sectors such as railways, aviation and telecommunications.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2010 10:29 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Feb 2009 16:58
Posts: 687
an informative article by former Lt Gen Daulat Singh
Quote:
Chinese are preparing for cyber warfare on a massive scale. The principal targets are USA and India. A very recent assessment by a highly reputed London-based think-tank that cyber warfare between nations is a reality and cannot be brushed aside as fanciful should make us sit up and take notice. The warning is contained in an annual report, The Military Balance, issued by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). This in-depth document analyses each year the competitive arms race that goes on between major nations and predicts its possible fall-out from the point of view of military capabilities and defence economics.
The latest analysis, apart from citing threats in cyberspace, refers to dangers arising from the conflict in Afghanistan, the determined Chinese exercise to diversify its military prowess and the nuclear ambitions of Iran. As a Western analysis, it naturally devotes considerable attention to what is happening in China and North Korea, especially on the cyber front. Releasing the report, the IISS said: "Despite evidence of cyber attacks in recent political conflicts, there is little appreciation internationally of how to assess cyber-conflict. We are now, in relation to the problem of cyber-warfare, at the same stage of intellectual development as we were in the 1950s in relation to possible nuclear war." This may appear to be a strong statement, but it is obviously intended to shake policy makers out of their ignorance and complacence.
It is relevant to recall here events of the past few years in which some small and hapless nations were subjected to a major cyber offensive from their adversaries. First was the attack in 2007 on Estonia, whose economic life was paralysed by Denial of Service (DoS) attacks unleashed from about a million computers, many of which were traced to Russia. It is an open secret that relations between the two nations have been frosty for quite some time. Estonia was under Soviet occupation from 1944 and obtained its freedom only in 1991.
Next was the Russian offensive against Georgia in 2008 as part of a dispute over South Ossetia. Apart from military exchanges, the occasion saw the hijacking of Georgian computers through cyber attacks originating from Russia. Even the Georgian President's official computers were not spared. In July 2009, German espionage agents complained of Internet spying operations by Russia and China with the objective of stealing vital information on critical infrastructure and defence plans. In December, Seoul reported attempts by North Korean computers to hack into the former's databases relating to US-South Korean defence strategies in the event of a war in the Korean peninsula.Also, Google recently launched an investigation into attacks on Internet accounts of human rights activists in China. This has actually ballooned into a major controversy, as a result of which Google has decided not to submit itself to censorship imposed by the Chinese authorities and also revealed the possibility of it pulling out of China altogether.
All this is evidence enough to substantiate the growing feeling that the wars of the future will be fought in cyberspace rather than on traditional battle fields. It is this assessment that has persuaded the Pentagon to prepare itself for a war in cyberspace on par with land, sea and aerial combat. According to one report, it will deploy a large number of cyber experts to look after its 15,000 computer networks spread over 4,000 installations. I presume our South Block has a similar core of trained cyber security team. Or else, in these troubled times, with several hostile neighbours around us, we could be in trouble.
All reports suggest that the al Qaeda is still very active. Its principal foes are the US and the UK. India comes a close third. It is the expert estimate that the al Qaeda may not any longer aim at our defence establishments. It is likely rather to concentrate on our weakest spot, namely, the financial sector. The latter may be strong in terms of business acumen. But what it is generally lax about is in respect of protection of its valuable information networks. The stock market is especially vulnerable. Any interference with its online traffic relating to financial transactions, through tactics such as DoS attacks could be disastrous. Any deliberate corruption of data relating to deals carried out by large-scale credit agencies will be equally ruinous. These are not imaginary but real threats of which financial managers in government and the private sector need to be aware. Any large-scale disruption of the financial market, especially at a time like the present, when economies are passing through a lean phase, could greatly affect political stability. Expert apprehensions of a terrorist use of weak information networks run by financial institutions cannot therefore be ignored.I would like to draw reader attention to an interesting piece, Cyber Warriors by James Fallows in the latest issue of Atlantic, in which he has a lot to say about threats emanating from the Chinese mainland. Its huge population and high computer literacy (with hundreds of millions of Internet users) give an advantage that is difficult to surpass. In crude terms, China could raise a formidable team of young hackers who could cause havoc to other nations with whom China does not enjoy good relations. This is an army that has the might to bring about a total breakdown of the commercial life of any nation of any size. This is an interesting analysis worth pondering over.
James Fallows refers to a forthcoming novel Directive 51 by John Barnes, which depicts a situation where there is such a breakdown. I am sure it is worth waiting for. We can possibly also draw from it some lessons on how to look after our networks!

http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Oct 2010 11:01 
Online
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 8357
William Lynn, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense on Cyber-security

http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/11247


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Oct 2010 14:30 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 19 Mar 2010 20:05
Posts: 161
Govt plans to cut internet services in case of cyber attacks

Code:
Indian law enforcement and national security officials are drawing up plans that will give them technology capabilities to cut off all internet services during emergencies.

After a series of recent meetings on cyber security held at the prime Minister’s Office at South Block, all government departments have been asked to jointly work on developing technologies and also invest in enhancing R&D capabilities to enhance the Centre’s control on internet services within the country, officials aware of the development told ET.

Officially, these steps are aimed at protecting Indian infrastructure from cyber attacks, but analysts fear that this may lead to greater government controls over internet as in China. Globally many countries are working on securing their communication networks from crippling cyber attacks that target the IT infrastructure of banks, airports, railways and government offices, all of which are often connected to the internet.

As the first step, the Centre wants to control national gateways, the points at which all data and internet connects to the outside world. Currently, many of these points are under the control of telecom and internet companies. These firms have capabilities to install filters that can slow down or block certain objectionable content on the directions of the government

The possibility of the Centre taking charge of the internet during emergencies and cyber wars were discussed at a recent meeting at the Prime Minister’s Office, chaired by the national security advisor Shivshankar Menon with representatives from all intelligence agencies and key department such as IT, telecoms, atomic energy, defence and space.

" China has been able to establish controls which enable it to choke the internet at will. The number of vulnerabilities in cyber space could be reduced by ensuring that closed loop information systems are not connected to the internet," said the minutes of this meet, which were seen by ET.

The model similar to that of China is being explored where key government departments work together on cyber space related issues with a long term vision. A move to make many networks closed group and not connected with internet is also being explored. The departments have also been asked to tap competencies and R&D capabilities of private organizations and academia to identify and plug gaps in the country’s cyber security apparatus.

Non possession of full web gateway control has resulted in economic losses for governments in past. In April 2007, when Estonia removed the Russia . war memorials from its territory, it was met with a massive denial of service attack allegedly from Russia. In the days that followed, IT infrastructure in Estonia government, banks, news organizations were crippled and banks suffered losses. In 2008, Russians attacked Georgian news agencies during Ossetia war crashing their servers.

"Shutting the internet would be like closing your shop whenever somebody starts throwing stones on it," says Vikas Desai, technical lead at IT security firm RSA. "Many solutions like a massive firewall, log management should be installed to monitor security, not content," he adds.

The Centre also attempting to map the cyber assets of adversaries (like Pakistan and China) amongst others so that India can retaliate and also launch offensive cyber operations against these nations when subject to an attack.

‘This would involve development of capabilities to observe, understand and react to treats as well as to understand the behavioral dynamics of players in cyber space. It will also be important to develop standards and patents in the next generation technologies in order to control the cyber space," the minutes of the meet chaired by Mr Menon says, while adding this would the only way by which India would attain a bargaining position in the cyber world.

The Centre is also becoming wary of foreign IT security providers like US based ‘Symantec and McAfee’ who are currently entrusted with the tasks of reporting vulnerabilities in Indian cyber space, and have remote access to Indian internet gateways.

"International companies are unlikely to share information beyond India specific domains. These issues need to be addressed through robust regulatory and R&D strategies," the minutes state..

Emails sent to US based Symantec and McAfee on the government's concerns about them did not elicit any response.

A denial of service attack happens when a server is requested for a particular information like a website millions of times in a fraction of second by a computer, that it leads to crashing of the server. In a distributed denial of service attack, many computers attack on the same server, millions of times in a second. This makes it difficult for a firewall to block a particular IP address since millions of other IP addresses are attacking at the same time. However, switching off the internet might bring some relief temporarily to a country, till vulnerabilities are fixed.


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tec ... 791296.cms


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Oct 2010 15:19 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Jul 2001 11:31
Posts: 918
Vril wrote:
Govt plans to cut internet services in case of cyber attacks

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tec ... 791296.cms


So, if anyone launches a serious attachk then Indian gvt. would beat them by launching it's own "denial of service" attack on Indian consumer. :eek:

Sounds more like an ostrich sticking it's head in the sand.

Perhaps they should focus their effort on building a capability to fight back rather than meekly surrender to the threat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 22 Oct 2010 16:49 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Apr 2010 22:50
Posts: 149
Location: Noida, National Capital Region
Cyber Warfare is a subset of Information Warfare.

Maybe GoI may like to hire and train Black Hats to take care of the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 23 Oct 2010 03:00 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 08 Jan 2010 02:42
Posts: 283
JTull wrote:
So, if anyone launches a serious attachk then Indian gvt. would beat them by launching it's own "denial of service" attack on Indian consumer. :eek:

Sounds more like an ostrich sticking it's head in the sand.

Perhaps they should focus their effort on building a capability to fight back rather than meekly surrender to the threat.


If you see the network as primarily enabling economic activity with things like electronic transfers and bill payment then it makes great sense to take India of the internet in the event of a really threatening attack. The US govt was proposing a similar thing recently. Of course given the volume of the internet hosted from there they won't get hit as bad. Still, essential services would mostly survive even in our case. You might lose BRF but you'll still have Railways reservations and the like.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 23 Oct 2010 07:14 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Apr 2010 07:45
Posts: 1149
x-posting from Managing Chinese threat.

Prem wrote:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/china_behind_hijacked_us_internet_data_says_new_report/
China Behind Hijacked U.S. Internet Data, Says New Report

Quote:
Lance Whitney reporting in CNet News: "A Chinese state-run telecom provider was the source of the redirection of U.S. military and corporate data that occurred this past April… The current draft of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission's (USCC's) 2010 annual report, which is close to final but has not yet been officially approved, finds that malicious computer activity tied to China continues to persist following reports early this year of attacks against Google and other companies from within the country."

Quote:
Then on April 8, a large number of routing paths to various Internet Protocol addresses were redirected through networks in China for 17 minutes. The USCC identified China's state-owned telecommunications firm China Telecom as the source of the "hijacking." This diversion of data would have given the operators of the servers on those networks the ability to read, delete, or edit e-mail and other information sent along those paths.


(And GOI has lifted ban on Telecom products from China)


Wow, thats just mind blowing. China has the infrastructure to snoop on a massive scale ! I think it should also be possible to attach viruses to emails, launch phishing attacks etc.

Aside, if they were BRF login pages, then they could read all your passwords. Its not SSL protected, so it is sent as clear text. :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 23 Oct 2010 07:16 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Apr 2010 07:45
Posts: 1149
JTull wrote:
Vril wrote:
Govt plans to cut internet services in case of cyber attacks

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tec ... 791296.cms


So, if anyone launches a serious attachk then Indian gvt. would beat them by launching it's own "denial of service" attack on Indian consumer. :eek:

Sounds more like an ostrich sticking it's head in the sand.

Perhaps they should focus their effort on building a capability to fight back rather than meekly surrender to the threat.


It could be to prevent mass panicking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Oct 2010 12:49 
Online
BRF Oldie

Joined: 19 Nov 2009 03:27
Posts: 8357
ANNALS OF NATIONAL SECURITY
The Online Threat
Should we be worried about a cyber war?
by Seymour M. Hersh

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/11/01/101101fa_fact_hersh?currentPage=all


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2010 07:29 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Apr 2010 07:45
Posts: 1149
Are majority of traffic between India and US routed through China ?

Visual trace route tool

I pinged india.gov.in, it got routed through China.

(If you are logging in from India, try pinging forums.bharat-rakshak.com (hosted in some Chicago site). If it is routed through China, theoretically, they can steal your password. May explain why we see some BRFites id hacked by commies.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Nov 2010 14:00 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 27 May 2009 17:45
Posts: 101
naren wrote:
Are majority of traffic between India and US routed through China ?

No through Singapore.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Nov 2010 14:02 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 27 May 2009 17:45
Posts: 101
http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/10/hackers-exploit-unpatched-firefox-0day-using-nobel-peace-prize-website/

Quote:
In this case it was used via an iFrame on nobelpeaceprize.org which then downloaded malware to the visitors machine using a multi-exploit back-end which amongst others also leveraged this 0day Firefox exploit.


Quote:
Mozilla claims they will address this issue soon and past history dictates that a patch will come out within a few days, so look forwards to Firefox 3.6.12 by the end of the week. It seems to be a fairly advanced and targeted attack.

Of course the conspiracy theorists will say that the attack was carried out by the Chinese Government as their way of complaining that the most recent Nobel Peace Prize was given to a Chinese dissident named Liu Xiaobo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Nov 2010 14:06 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 27 May 2009 17:45
Posts: 101
JTull wrote:
Perhaps they should focus their effort on building a capability to fight back rather than meekly surrender to the threat.

Circa 2005 in an e-governance conference first time I heard about how IRCTC's firewall operates with a red light switched on cutting all Internet traffic I was equally shocked. Trust the bureaucracy to come up with such solutions worse than the actual problems. No wonder the napakis have 8 times the Internet bandwidth on their DSL lines than us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2010 07:44 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23
Posts: 5053
Quote:
How Israel Spoofed Syria’s Air Defense System - http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/10 ... rael-spoo/

Earlier this month, Israeli fighters bombed a suspected nuclear materials site in Syria. Here’s the million dollar question: How did they do it without tipping off Syria’s Russian-bought air defense radar? Radar expert Dave Fulghum over at Aviation Week’s Ares blog may have the answer: Israel hacked the network.

Israel U.S. aerospace industry and retired military officials indicated today that a technology like the U.S.-developed “Suter” airborne network attack system developed by BAE Systems and integrated into U.S. unmanned aircraft by L-3 Communications was used by the Israelis. The system has been used or at least tested operationally in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last year.

The technology allows users to invade communications networks, see what enemy sensors see and even take over as systems administrator so sensors can be manipulated into positions so that approaching aircraft can’t be seen, they say. The process involves locating enemy emitters with great precision and then directing data streams into them that can include false targets and misleading messages algorithms that allow a number of activities including control.



Quote:
Russia sends 3rd AWACS plane to India
http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20101104/161205321.html

Russia has completed its part of a contract on the delivery of A-50 Mainstay AWACS aircraft to India, a Russian aircraft industry official said.

India ordered three A-50EI variants, developed on the basis of the Russian Il-76MD military transport plane and fitted with the Israeli-made Phalcon radar system, in 2004. The first two aircraft are already in service with the Indian air force (IAF).


It would be extremely surprising if the radar spoofing technology has not already been built into the Israeli avionics in the new AWACS planes.

How would it be used? There are lots of possibilities. Recall the faked call from Pranab Mukherjee to Zardari while the Mumbai 26/11 attack was in progress ...

Hopefully the DRDO understands that you cannot have security until and unless you control the manufacturing process right from the semiconductor foundry stage.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Nov 2010 06:25 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23
Posts: 5053
from China thread in strat forum:

Pranav wrote:
darshhan wrote:
Wlin , Recently when Indian govt. banned chinese telecom vendors like Huawei and ZTE from supplying equipment to Indian telecom operators , these companies were literally begging to stay in the competition and to lift the ban.Even the Chinese govt. started requesting Indian govt to lift the ban.


They are probably interested in monitoring Indian internet traffic, and perhaps installing worms on Indian systems.

Our Babus have worked out an arrangement whereby Huawei will reveal its source code.

Unfortunately, the Babus seem to be unaware that the standard practice these days is to put the Trojans in the hardware itself. Unless you control the semiconductor fabrication process, you have no right to expect any security.


chaanakya wrote:
These are advised by those who know what they are doing. Babus may not have much say in tech things. Yes Tech babus may do so. Hardware Trojans are well known and could be found by Blackbox testing.But then these are technical matters and there are people to advise.

I think permitting Chinese company in one case and not allowing in other case would have been wrong. Your suspicion may not be entirely unfounded. But then what is the guarantee that hardwares supplied by other countries do not have the same.

You are absolutely right that we need to have our semiconductor foundry to have proper security.


Pranav wrote:
chaanakya wrote:
Hardware Trojans are well known and could be found by Blackbox testing.


Not true.

See The Hunt for the Kill Switch - http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors ... ill-switch

and

Cyberwar - Old Trick Threatens the Newest Weapons - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/scien ... wanted=all


chaanakya wrote:

Hardware Trojans in Wireless Cryptographic Integrated Circuits
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp. ... er=5342391
Quote:
the problem of hardware Trojans in wireless cryptographic integrated circuits, wherein the objective is to leak secret information (i.e. the encryption key) through the wireless channel. Using a mixed-signal system-on-chip, consisting of a DES encryption core and a UWB transmitter, we demonstrate the following three key findings of this study: i) Simple malicious modifications to the digital part of a wireless cryptographic chip suffice to leak information without changing the more sensitive analog part. We demonstrate two hardware Trojan examples, which leak the encryption key by manipulating the transmission amplitude or frequency. ii) Such hardware Trojans do not change the functionality of the digital part or the performances of the analog part and their impact on the wireless transmission parameters can be hidden within the fabrication process variations. Hence, neither traditional manufacturing testing nor recently proposed hardware Trojan detection methods will expose them. iii) For the attacker to be able to discern the leaked information from the legitimate signal, effective hardware Trojans must impose some structure to the transmission parameters. While this structure is not known to the defender, advanced statistical analysis of these parameters (i.e. transmission power), may reveal its existence and, thereby, expose the hardware Trojan.

This is just one of such pointers. Its a constant fight between both side of the divide. But these testing do take place for hardware trojans very extensively. And it is not only for Kill Switch but many other variants. As they develop new trojans, new procedure to test them is also being developed.There can be no 100% certainty as you are hunting for what is designed to be stealth. China or any other country supplying hardware fall into same category unless we ourselves have these testing techniques.


The particular example you cite is about the detection of a pre-activated Trojan that modifies a wireless signal. Such black-box testing would not be able to detect the presence of a latent Trojan that is designed to be triggered by a specific data sequence, for example.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Nov 2010 08:56 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30
Posts: 4366
Pranav wrote:
The particular example you cite is about the detection of a pre-activated Trojan that modifies a wireless signal. Such black-box testing would not be able to detect the presence of a latent Trojan that is designed to be triggered by a specific data sequence, for example.


Its very thoughtful of you to have moved the post to proper thread.Thanks for that.

I just cited one example. There are many. As new threats are discovered, new methods are developed to find them out.

The idea outlined in above paper works to a large extent in finding anomalies in electrical signals, its amplitude and frequency , other than those specified by design and then try to trace trojans. There are other ideas as well. The point is you test the system for all possible data sequence a circuit is designed to accept and deliver. May take time but that is the price to pay.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Nov 2010 09:06 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23
Posts: 5053
chaanakya wrote:
The point is you test the system for all possible data sequence a circuit is designed to accept and deliver. May take time but that is the price to pay.


The time that would take may well be more than the age of the universe ...

But yes, I agree that it is a continuous game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2010 16:14 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Jan 2010 13:30
Posts: 4366
Pranav wrote:
chaanakya wrote:
The point is you test the system for all possible data sequence a circuit is designed to accept and deliver. May take time but that is the price to pay.


The time that would take may well be more than the age of the universe ...

But yes, I agree that it is a continuous game.

Pranav , I understand that it would take quite a long time and is extremely difficult. My statement was not meant to be a sweeping statement as it appeared. But if one case is detected, that company or country is going to face huge problem of trustworthiness even though it may not be the originator.

I came across one interesting article and thought you might be interested.

http://www.information-management.com/n ... 938-1.html

Quote:
Tamper-resistant chips are also coming to the commercial market. Pleasanton, Calif.-based CPU Tech has offered the private sector since 2008 the Acalis CPU872 MultiCore chip, which the firm says protects from hardware-based Trojans for high-performance processing within vital applications. It scatters separate parts of the encryption key needed to boot the hardware across different pieces of the chip and also embeds memory onto the chip, so vital data can't be accessed externally. Financial firms have expressed interest in purchasing systems with the chip installed, said Robert Beanland, vice president of marketing for CPU Technology.


Quote:
Law enforcement in Europe uncovered a scam late last year whereby criminals had rigged credit card readers installed at Tesco and other retail outlets there with what was essentially a tiny cell phone that was capturing all the PINs from customers who used their cards on the readers in stores and sending the data through Pakistan; though its ultimate destination remains unknown. Criminals often choose nations with porous security or limited digital forensics practices to route their booty.



Bolded part interests me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Nov 2010 08:08 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Feb 2009 16:58
Posts: 687
wonder who did it? -> UK’s Royal Navy website hacked
Quote:
The website of Britain's Royal Navy has been closed after hackers gained unauthorised access to the military site. Military computer specialists are investigating the cyber-security breach. A statement posted on the website on Monday said it is closed for "essential maintenance". The navy said in a statement that the website was compromised over the weekend but no damage was done. The site has been taken down temporarily as a precaution.


http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101109/world.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Nov 2010 08:33 
Offline
BRFite -Trainee

Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34
Posts: 78
Apparently a Romanian hacker... at least thats what they are putting out

Quote:
The Royal Navy's website has been hacked by a suspected Romanian hacker known as TinKode.

The hacker gained access to the website on 5 November using a common attack method known as SQL injection.

TinKode published details of the information he recovered, which included user names and passwords of the site's administrators.


link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11711478


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Nov 2010 10:41 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 23 Apr 2010 07:45
Posts: 1149
^^^

Royal Navy site was busted with SQL injection ? Lamest of Lame attacks :rotfl:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Nov 2010 07:37 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23
Posts: 5053
chaanakya wrote:
I came across one interesting article and thought you might be interested.

http://www.information-management.com/n ... 938-1.html

Quote:
Tamper-resistant chips are also coming to the commercial market. Pleasanton, Calif.-based CPU Tech has offered the private sector since 2008 the Acalis CPU872 MultiCore chip, which the firm says protects from hardware-based Trojans for high-performance processing within vital applications. It scatters separate parts of the encryption key needed to boot the hardware across different pieces of the chip and also embeds memory onto the chip, so vital data can't be accessed externally. Financial firms have expressed interest in purchasing systems with the chip installed, said Robert Beanland, vice president of marketing for CPU Technology.



This could work if the manufacturer CPU Tech itself is trustworthy. It is impossible to overcome the problem of trust unless one fully controls the hardware fabrication.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Nov 2010 09:14 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23
Posts: 5053
Quote:
Cyber Experts Have Proof That China Has Hijacked U.S.-Based Internet Traffic

For 18 minutes in April, China’s state-controlled telecommunications company hijacked 15 percent of the world’s Internet traffic, including data from U.S. military, civilian organizations and those of other U.S. allies.

This massive redirection of data has received scant attention in the mainstream media because the mechanics of how the hijacking was carried out and the implications of the incident are difficult for those outside the cybersecurity community to grasp, said a top security expert at McAfee, the world’s largest dedicated Internet security company


http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ ... spx?ID=249


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Nov 2010 21:36 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 27 May 2009 17:45
Posts: 101
Pranav wrote:
Quote:
Cyber Experts Have Proof That China Has Hijacked U.S.-Based Internet Traffic
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ ... spx?ID=249

Its a fairly useless thing to do, next time their routers won't be trusted on BGP route advertisements. Just like Pakistan claiming youtube's ASN and then getting the whole country knocked off the Internet for a couple of hours.

http://www.circleid.com/posts/82258_pakistan_hijacks_youtube_closer_look


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Nov 2010 21:37 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 27 May 2009 17:45
Posts: 101
I am not sure how much traffic China can suck in, their global connectivity is no more than 4Tbits of dark fiber methinks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2010 08:47 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Feb 2009 16:58
Posts: 687
this news item in the new york times suggests that stuxnet was meant for iran, do read in full
Quote:
Experts dissecting the computer worm suspected of being aimed at Iran’s nuclear program have determined that it was precisely calibrated in a way that could send nuclear centrifuges wildly out of control.

Their conclusion, while not definitive, begins to clear some of the fog around the Stuxnet worm, a malicious program detected earlier this year on computers, primarily in Iran but also India, Indonesia and other countries.

The paternity of the worm is still in dispute, but in recent weeks officials from Israel have broken into wide smiles when asked whether Israel was behind the attack, or knew who was. American officials have suggested it originated abroad.

The new forensic work narrows the range of targets and deciphers the worm’s plan of attack. Computer analysts say Stuxnet does its damage by making quick changes in the rotational speed of motors, shifting them rapidly up and down.

Until last week, analysts had said only that Stuxnet was designed to infect certain kinds of Siemens equipment used in a wide variety of industrial sites around the world. But a study released Friday by Mr. Chien, Nicolas Falliere and Liam O. Murchu at Symantec, concluded that the program’s real target was to take over frequency converters, a type of power supply that changes its output frequency to control the speed of a motor. The worm’s code was found to attack converters made by two companies, Fararo Paya in Iran and Vacon in Finland. A separate study conducted by the Department of Homeland Security confirmed that finding, a senior government official said in an interview on Thursday.

Quote:
Then, on Wednesday, Mr. Albright and a colleague, Andrea Stricker, released a report saying that when the worm ramped up the frequency of the electrical current supplying the centrifuges, they would spin faster and faster. The worm eventually makes the current hit 1,410 Hertz, or cycles per second — just enough, they reported, to send the centrifuges flying apart.

In a spooky flourish, Mr. Albright said in the interview, the worm ends the attack with a command to restore the current to the perfect operating frequency for the centrifuges — which, by that time, would presumably be destroyed.


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/19/world ... ml?_r=1&hp


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2010 22:30 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 3036
Any speculation as to why Stuxnet was in India?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2010 09:59 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31
Posts: 12179
Pranav wrote:


This could work if the manufacturer CPU Tech itself is trustworthy. It is impossible to overcome the problem of trust unless one fully controls the hardware fabrication.

You need to own the entire instruction set. That is the only way it can be isolated and become trustworthy
China has created its own set - it looks like that
But it looks like - this Internet diversion is something they are being taught by NSA. They were also part of the echelon network. It looks like some power wants PRC to be their partner for long term


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Nov 2010 12:06 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 09 Feb 2009 16:58
Posts: 687
wikileaks on chinese cyber warfare
Quote:
global computer hacking effort: China’s Politburo directed the intrusion into Google’s computer systems in that country, a Chinese contact told the American Embassy in Beijing in January, one cable reported. The Google hacking was part of a coordinated campaign of computer sabotage carried out by government operatives, private security experts and Internet outlaws recruited by the Chinese government. They have broken into American government computers and those of Western allies, the Dalai Lama and American businesses since 2002, cables said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/world ... ml?_r=1&hp


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Nov 2010 00:49 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 17:51
Posts: 8532
Location: Ya kundendu tushar haar dhavala ..
JE Menon wrote:
Any speculation as to why Stuxnet was in India?

One story going rounds on the web is that the worm targets SIEMENS S7-400 PLC and SIMATIC WinCC SW and many of our R&D establishments are SIEMENS's clients including ISRO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Nov 2010 03:06 
Offline
Forum Moderator

Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Posts: 3036
True, but as far as is known Siemens was not responsible for the worm, so it must have gotten in there either after the sale, or during manufacture. Someone deliberately targeted India. I was wondering if there is any speculation as to why and who.... Anything really.

Maybe Siemens was responsible? :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Nov 2010 03:38 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 17:51
Posts: 8532
Location: Ya kundendu tushar haar dhavala ..
Did The Stuxnet Worm Kill India’s INSAT-4B Satellite?


Quote:
On July 7, 2010, a power glitch in the solar panels of India’s INSAT-4B satellite resulted in 12 of its 24 transponders shutting down. As a result, an estimated 70% of India’s Direct-To-Home (DTH) companies’ customers were without service. India’s DTH operators include Sun TV and state-run Doordarshan and data services of Tata VSNL.

INSAT-4B was put into orbit in March, 2007 by the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), which conducts research and develops space technology for the government of India. It is also the agency which controls and monitors India’s satellites and space vehicles while they are operational.

Once it became apparent that INSAT-4B was effectively dead, SunDirect ordered its servicemen to redirect customer satellite dishes to point to ASIASAT-5, a Chinese satellite owned and operated by Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co., Ltd (AsiaSat). AsiaSat’s two primary shareholders are General Electric and China International Trust and Investment Co. (CITIC), a state-owned company. China and India are competing with each other to see who will be the first to land another astronaut on the Moon. China has announced a date of 2025 while India is claiming 2020.

What does this have to do with the Stuxnet worm that’s infected thousands of systems, mostly in India and Iran? India’s Space Research Organization is a Siemens customer. According to the resumes of two former engineers who worked at the ISRO’s Liquid Propulsion Systems Centre, the Siemens software in use is Siemens S7-400 PLC and SIMATIC WinCC, both of which will activate the Stuxnet worm.


I think ISRO some time later did rule out Stuxnet being the cause of INSAT4B's failure as they clarified that there was no PLC on board the satellite which was being run by any of the SIEMENS SCADA products.

The consensus on the WWW is that someone very resourceful who has knowledge of the industrial PLCs specially the one's run by Windows based SIEMENS SCADA sw are targeted by this worm.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2010 04:53 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31
Posts: 1497
Pakistani Government websites: 40 Sensitive Government Websites got Hacked

Quote:
This server was reportedly hosting at least 40 government websites of sensitive nature, including Pakistan Navy, NAB, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, National Assembly, Pakistan’s Military Account, Ministry of Science and Technology, AGP, FAB and others.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2010 13:24 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 06 Dec 2009 14:09
Posts: 156
Indian hackers bugging Pakistan. Here's what the Dawn had to say.

http://blog.dawn.com/2010/12/01/cyber-attack-highlights-internet-security-challenges/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2010 00:22 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 21:35
Posts: 2265
Location: PA, USA
Basically!! to me an ideal design would be to have an India Cloud protected by DMZ which is connected to the world Cloud.

So in the Indian cloud we could have many small clouds which are all protected in their realm.

WAN = Wide Area Network.

1. Army, airforce, navy WAN
2. police and judiciary WANs in each state + center.
3. WAN for each of the Central Government Services.
4. WAN for each of the state Government services.
4. Commercial WAN.

Thus even in the case of an attack it is limited to its own area and can be localized and fixed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2010 20:44 
Offline
BRFite

Joined: 13 Jul 2006 18:16
Posts: 781
The entire set of wikileaks can be downloaded here for those interested.Save it for later.Would be interesting and educational as to how International politics work

http://www.wikileaks.ch/cablegate.html

http://88.80.16.63/torrent/cablegate/ca ... 7z.torrent


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2010 06:36 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43
Posts: 6491
x post

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-emba ... nts/214462

48. (S//NF) SCA CTAD comment: According to Defense Intelligence Agency reporting, the Government of India (GoI) continues efforts to advance its computer security programs -- particularly in light of increased concerns over Chinese computer network exploitation efforts -- but progress is hampered by significant disagreements within its departments. The key GoI organizations involved in developing and implementing security policies are identified as the Ministry of Telecommunications and the Research and Analysis Wing. Although the Indian Army is primarily responsible for the security of military networks, Indian officials acknowledge Army representatives have been largely left out of discussions. Additionally, some other key groups, such as the National Technical Reconnaissance Organization and the Indian Defense Intelligence Agency, have reportedly failed to offer significant contributions. Private security companies are also concerned that the lack of input from the private sector may lead to unfair regulations regarding telecommunications monitoring.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Dec 2010 00:21 
Offline
BRF Oldie

Joined: 11 Jan 2009 00:14
Posts: 2248
To curb this defacing of our websites, we can do a website on a chip idea. My idea is something like this, we have a small single board computer that has two types of memories wired up to the boot controller
1. flash
2. ddram
3. boot rom

The SBC will house a more complex SOC(say an ARM 11 or more advanced processor)
The processor's memory map will be configured to have read only memory which is mapped to the flash and read-write memory area wired to the ddr.
The sbc will also run a digital signature check saved in the boot rom on all the content being displayed every 0.5s. This content will include content from flash + ddr.

The flash once programmed will be locked and can be unlocked for updates by the Admin who can program it via another system on the network connnected to this system via a USB, the other computer ofcourse is not connected to the internet.

This way we can have some amount of dynamic content and lots of static content that wont change


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 248 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 5:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atri, Austin, Jaybhatt and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group