No Sanku ji,Sanku wrote:Bji, Chiron, Prem and others.
I suppose we are solidly in one corner of the ring in our opinions and reading of the situation.
I do however feel that now is different from ever before, the NI belt has, for the first time in history after nearly 700 years of servitude finally seen independence for 60 years. Something which never happened even during the Maratha and Khalsa ascendancy.
It has fundamentally changed the situation -- we have seen one effect -- in 90s.
It would be too pessimistic to assume that all the forces that were unleashed at that point for reclaiming India for Indians and Indian heritage are wasted or spent too early.
Why does the "Man" need to come from the Elite, he/she will not -- it will be a Mayawati/Lalu like figure, NI politics has been toying with that prototype for a while (Modi, Kalyan Singh, Nitish Kumar, Mayawati) without hitting "the" person.
May be next iteration in 10-20 years? Triggered by the very inimical forces mentioned so far.
The demand will never be for partition and independent country. It is mostly probably for a new state. No one in print-media has balls to demand India's partition as of now. However, since many forces are demanding new states (gorkha-land, vidarbha, telangana, and few others), this is one more demand towards it. A new state which inherently has the religious centres of Islam in India and considerably Muslim population. Reminds me of Vanga-Bhanga (1905)... When east bengal was created out for "Administrative efficiency" ...
The Maratha movement profoundly influenced NI Gangetic plains (especially UP). All the important temples which you see today in NI are rebuilt by Marathas, all of them since they were destroyed by zealot Aurangzeb a generation ago. Yet, when Marathas were about to demolish the mosque at Varanasi which is built on the actual site of Vishveshwara temple, the brahmins of Kashi pleaded Peshwas not to destroy the mosques and hurt the religious sentiments of Muslims. Similar things happened in Prayag and Mathura. Marathas expected Muslim opposition, but that was taken care of in battle-field. This opposition from Kashi brahmins was totally unexpected. hence, all the new temples were built along side the mosques which stand on the original temple sites. This just shows the amount of "Dhimmitude" ingrained upon people of NI Gangetic plains.
Marathas held Punjab (until attock and peshawar) only for 18 months, yet it was enough for sikhs to rally and rise in the vacuum of power in Punjab after Panipat. Marathas occupied and influenced NI-Gangetic politics for more than 40-50 years at a stretch, in spite of that, nothing happened. I wish by now, the sanskaars of Dhimmitude are loosened enough and waiting for final nudge to break-open.
One more thing, why are all the elites hailing from this region? What is the reason that all the elite institutions of Islamic studies are located in this region. The reason is that it is close to Delhi and Agra, the cities which were capitals of India during Islamic times. The "Deen" and "Daulat" (religion and state) cannot be segregated in Islam. Thus, centres of Deen are always located near epicentres of "Daulat".
@AbhiG,
I am working on this article and idea on my blog-article. I will put the link as soon as I draft it.. The mercantile and mercenary character of North-Indian politics.. Just give me some time..
Astute observation. Hence I said, if in case this materializes, I am curious about behaviour of Bengali Muslims. I always feel that the Mukti-Bahini and Bangladesh movement was less motivated by language and more by boorish pakjabi attitude and their denial of power. I may be wrong, but I feel that pride for Bangla language was not the first thing that ignited the spark. It later acted as a compounding factor, but I do not think it was the initiator. Given the status of Urdu as second arabic (in terms of holiness) in India, it will be indeed very important to observe the trend of bengali OR Bangladeshi muslims.Pranav wrote:A new Green Pradesh attracting legions of illegal Bangladeshis is a nightmare scenario. The shameless treachery of our politicians is mind-boggling.
Pseudosecularism works only if there is one dominant power. when there are competing power-suitors who are Pseudo-secularists, then the escalation has to cross all the limits. This is exactly what has happened to SP under Mullah Mulayam and Mullah Amar singh. The path they have chosen, it can only lead to a situation when SP becomes Muslim-league of 1940. It is important that they are finished off before. The mistake done by INC of giving up the hard-earned power of 1937 elections by resigning in 1939 should not be repeated again.