brihaspati wrote:
Are you sure that BJP is hollowing out "defenses" by having corruption on their agenda? What exactly is the meaning of your phrase - are you saying "corruption is on their agenda" means they support/use corruption as an agenda? Or that by targeting or criticizing "corruption" they are "hollowing out defenses"?
I am very uncomfortable with answering your question, because I believe that the entire system is corrupt and an imposed slave system on us, by our victors and serves their interest. So, my belief is that such a system cannot evolve people or parties or individuals who will truly advance the survival and advancement of Hindus and their culture. It is like a fish out of the water. Say land is the eco system which is created for Islamists and the West and water is the eco-system which is necessary for the survival of Hindus. If Hindus are forced to live under the rules of the land, then even in the water, a fish will never be allowed to emerge as the leaders, it will always be the land mammals who will lead, or worse, those fish which can mimic some land mammal characteristics or those fish that are totally subservient to the land mammals. So, again, why I am uncomfortable with your questions is that most of your questions are asking me to make distinctions and discuss the relative merits and demerits between different groups of fish that are both subservient to the land mammal but does not or cannot act as a real fish. To me it is all as Mayawati once said, "some are "Naagraj" and some are "Saapraj". They are all poisonous. To get into the subtleties of the relative differences between their poisons, is really the ultimate in defeatist attitude. It is bad enough that we are forced to live in this destructive system, and now we should be forced to or brainwashed into discussing the merits and de-merits of our torturers. Imagine jews in a Nazi camp critiquing the relative "dress sense" and "style" of the camp guards who take turns torturing them.
However, out of respect for you, I will attempt to answer your questions directly, just this one time. Out of respect for me, please dont ask me again to get into the details of critiquing the relative merits and de-merits of various political factions in India, as ALL of them are evil. That is not to say that they are all equal equal. Just that in my mind, their differences are not significant enough to where it will make any difference on the ground whatsoever. What we need is a new system of governance, in my above example, which is more natural and conducive for Water, not land, and where fish can be fish and fish can lead the fish.
I meant in my post which raised this question in your mind, the BJP unlike Congress does not have it in their agenda to proactively weaken India's defenses. To be fair, even the Congress as a whole doesnt have a conscious agenda to proactively weaken India's defenses. (After all, deep inside all are fish). But in case of Congress, if maintaining our defenses come in the way of even their very small priorities, leave aside massive corruption, they will not mind sacrificing the defense of the country. It is as if, after indulging in massive corruption, dividing the general populace on caste, religion, region, everything that they can to garner votes, serving some of their foreign masters, demeaning the Hindus (all these things are on their active agenda), they can still manage to maintain some defense capabilities, they will take those defense capabilities. But if in forwarding any of those active agenda items, I listed above, if defense and our territorial integrity has to be sacrificed, of course, it will be sacrificed, no questions asked. They wont even give it literally a moment's thought. This does not mean that every Congress person is equally destructive. PV Narsimha Rao was relatively good, but even he was quite corrupt and this corruption put a ceiling on his ability to do good, particularly within the hugely corrupt Congress eco-system he was operating within. Mrs. Gandhi was on the other hand, very corrupt, but made some exception for defense, as she did accord some minimal priority to our defenses. So individuals are all a little different form each other. Someone likes a green salwar, someone a red, but they all are salwar wearers, not Sari wearers.
Now about the BJP. BJP is a little less destructive. But they are also very corrupt and power hungry. They are a little more like Mrs. Gandhi when it comes to prioritizing our defenses, accept they are even less effective. BJP leaders, with the possible exception of Modi, too, if they have to sacrifice our defense capabilities, so that their higher priority agenda items are advanced they will do so. This is evidenced by the fact that they NEVER, whether in opposition of in power, ever, raise the issue of long term and systematic "hollowing out" of our defenses by our system of governance, particularly since the 1980s. Have you ever heard Advani, or Vajpayee or any other leader ever talk to the nation about our defense preparedness and leveled with the nation ? Have you ever seen these BJP leaders trying to mobilize public opinion to drastically reverse our decline in the defense capabilities through a radical restructuring of our processes and resource allocation ? It was bad enough that when they were in power, they not only not talk about this, they took no steps (other than the nuclear tests) to further our core defense capabilities and allocate radically increased amount of money to our armed forces or even reform some of the destructive procurement procedures, but while in opposition, where they get more of a license to criticize their opponents in the government, they never take the opportunity to do so. Vajpayee maintained goodie goddie relationship with everyone in the Congress and other parties, and Advani in his pathetic and comic attempts to be Prime Minister even at this age, tries to emulate Vajpayee and bends over backward for Sonia (have you ever seen his body language whenever he is with Sonia - all subservient and so goodie goodie), but his attempts come off as even more buffoonish than Vajpayee, where sometimes he praises Jinnah, sometimes he criticizes Modi for criticizing MM Sardarji.
Hindus have several problems at the same time. Like you keep on mentioning, one problem is the Macaulyte Hindu. He has ceased to be a Hindu and turned a mercenary. There are a large number of these, and these large numbers of turncoats is UNIQUE to Hindus and presents a special problem to the Hindus, as most of the babus and non political ruling establishment and some within the ruling establishment too, come from this section of the population. Here we agree. But where you will probably disagree with me is that we have another problem, which is NOT UNIQUE to us Hindus, it is true for all peoples and all cultures. This is the problem that even without the Macaulyte factor, there is a segment of us Hindus who are just pure bad people. I dont mean just bad Hindus, they are bad human beings. They are not Macaulytes, they are quite native, but they are bad people. Just like there are some Americans who are bad people, some Europeans who are bad people, some Africans who are bad people, there are some Hindus who are bad people. These people would not have been a particular problem for us, if we did not also have Macaulytes or if we did not have a slave system imposed on us. Because a normal, healthy, non-slave system will weed out these bad people and at least not reward them and they would be nowhere near any positions of power or influence in our society. But in our slave system, it is these non-Macaulyte bad Hindus(bad people) that have risen to the top, and the BJP is composed of these bad people. So, there is the difference. Both are evil. Congress is derived from the non-Hindu mercenary, Macaulyte mentality, BJP is derived from the bad seed amongst us mentality. Both are corrupt and vicious but both are different. Both are evil and destructive. And yes, in that sense, I dont really care if I get shot by a mercenary macaulyte who is a servant of the West or a native evil person, who is not.
brihaspati wrote:Do you have comparative corruption scales for national/central parties and regional ones?
No statistics, just anecdotal sense. I just believe that in relative terms the "casteist" outfits, just by virtue of their nature of being pure "casteist" are more corrupt, even if they are not more money corrupt. But anectodally, I feel that they are more money corrupt too, maybe not in terms of the quantum of money involved in their scandals, but just in terms of the ubiquity of corruption in their regimes and their total non-pretense of even being honest.
brihaspati wrote:
This is rather difficult to prove about aam aadmi. They simply do not have the resources and means to be corrupt. I am rather curious now about what your actual access to Indian aam amounts to. Can you give me a broad region of India where you are observing or observed generic, aam aadmi level corruption in daily life?
Prove about aam aadmi ?? I can prove it, right here. While you are right, that the average person does not have the means and the resources, but do you think logically that that is a sufficient condition to be always non-corrupt? I think such a person can be corrupt too. Why ? Because corruption is a behavior, not an amount. A person who has access to one rupee, if he is corrupt, will be corrupt with that one rupee, if not, will not be corrupt with a billion rupees. And it is not even about rupees. It is about whether you honestly do your job, you want to move ahead the right way, or you are always on a look out for a "government job". Then if you are a trades person, like a carpenter or an electrician, whether you will do an honest job for your client or do a shoddy job. Then if you are an employer of these tradespeople or any other people, are you always trying to short change them, by not paying them enough, or not paying them at all, making them visit you a hundred times, before you "settle" the payment with them. If you have borrowed money from someone in a private capacity, how promptly do you pay back, or not pay back or "settle" with your creditor. If you go to a bank, even a private bank, are the employees eager to serve you or are just trying to short change you on service. If you want admission in a school, how much will you have to pay, or how may "IOUs" you will have to cash by "tapping your contacts", in terms of "who you know". Do kids attend their classes in college regularly, or never attend and the professors mark the attendance, and if some honest professor tries to get you to attend, then call a strike, gherao the principal and force a humiliation on that honest professor. Am Admi is everywhere in our culture, accepting money, demanding money, extorting money. It is the am admi all the way. Yes, the scale of money he makes is not the billions that the politicians and babus make, but that is simply, because as you said, they dont have access, not because they are not corrupted. When some of these am admis become babus or politicians these same am admis rob in the billions.
You get the idea. If in every sphere to day to day life, ever minute of your existence in India, everyone from top to bottom is trying to steal, is the am admi not corrupt. In terms of what region and how much contact I have with am admi, your question is rather patronizing, insulting and presumptuous. The previous paragraph that I wrote should provide you enough clues about where my "karmaboomie" is in India. The answer is "everywhere", as all things I mentioned in that paragraph happen everywhere in India, from Kashmir to Kanya Kumari and from Kutch to Bengal. Even you will not be able to argue against that. If there is one disagreement I have with you, it is your automatic defense of the "am admi", Hindi movie style. Hindi movies idoloze am admi. In the movies, am admi can do no wrong. I think you are watching too many Hindi movies and you form your impressions from them, rather than direct contact with the am admi and aam life in India. I saw it somewhere in other posts that you dont live in India, and while it is not true that every person that does not live in India is out of touch with am admi in India, to me, you do seem a bit out of touch or at least you are unaffected by the daily trials and tribulations of an average citizen who lives in India and what he has to go through.
brihaspati wrote:
Do you consider current Pakiland and BD the "heartlands"?
If you consider India as at least starting in Afghanistan and consisting of the entire subcontinent, even if you dont consider it extending all the way down to Malaysia and Indonesia, yes, I consider Punjab, Sindh and Bengal to be heartland of India, not necessarily physically (although they are pretty close in terms of physical heartland too), but certainly, they are very much our cultural heartlands or at least were in 1947.
brihaspati wrote:
No. Those who hate us, hate us for our "pagan" culture, because we are kaffirs and heathens according to their measuring stick. Not because we follow a modern form of "democracy". But democracy was not an invention of the west, and ancient Hindus did have well described formulations of democracy. The founder of the Pala dynasty for example, was elected to rule. Earlier many political ethnic groups throughout North India practised this. This was the reason that the early Buddhist Sangha took over this model of electing sangha hierarchy.
The hatred is based on "dark skin" - as Islamics everywhere yearn for the fair skin, and the overwhelming cultural urge to identify with fairer skinned Arab and Persian imagery [many in those regions are dark skinned which would be what it is expected from natural selection], with the same racial thing going on for European Christianity and religion in general.
Yes, they hate us because of our "dark skin" and Hindu culture. But if you read my post carefully, even the portion you quoted right above this answer, you will notice that I did not use the word hate. You are absolutely correct, they HATE us because of our black skin. They hate the Chinese because of their yellow skin too. But they dont ridicule, make fun of, are contemptuous of, are disrespectful of, trivialize or are disdainful towards the Chinese, while they are all of that towards us (note, I did not use the word hate). They are all those things towards the Hindus, not because of the color of our skin, but because of our self-destructive and stupid behavior. The HATE is totally undeserved, all the other things I mentioned above are well deserved.
Let me quote below from my post
"How stupid we looked to the rest of the world. The rest of the world laughed at us, the spectacle we were creating of parading around glorifying the system that enslaved us, they ridiculed us, they made fun of us, they had nothing but contempt for us, they had no respect for us, they never took us seriously despite our nuclear weapons, they treated us with disdain and as second class citizens, not because we were "Kafirs" or "dark people", but because we................."
NOTICE THE ABSENCE OF THE WORD "HATE"
brihaspati wrote:
Reserve this for the elite faction involved in the mercantile mentality. But do not paint all of Hindu aam with the same brush. It is a complex choice for them between physical survival, coercion - subtle or direct by the state, the biz+mafia+politician+admin nexus, and lack of trust in elite harangues out of long historical experience. They make temporary, survival choices, not having the trust or vision as yet. But do not call them corrupt.
There you go again on the elite vs the am admi.
I make no distinction. Most of the elite today is first generation elite and not from the Macaulyte class. This is a fact and can easily be ascertained. We can point to all kinds of flaws in our system, but the one thing we cant accuse our system in the past 60 years is that it did not promote social churning. As a result, most of the elite today is quite nativist "bad humans".
Am admi today votes in a destructive manner, not because he he ignorant. He is quite smart about it, although "short term" smart. He will vote for a castiest party because he wants something for nothing, plain and simple. That is as pure a form of corruption as there is - wanting something for nothing. Am Admi of India too doesnt care about our defense capabilities or territorial integrity of our nation or feels invested in the concept of nationhood or even a community of Hindus. If he did, he would vote in a different manner and put other pressure on the ruling establishment to strengthen our defenses. He comes out on the street at the drop of a hat, for all kinds of trivial and self serving things, but very seldom to cry for maintaining our territorial integrity. That is pure unadulterated corruption. Am Admi is neither ignorant nor uneducated. Every villager and urban slum dweller owns a cell phone and knows how to use it. Every village and slum dweller owns a TV and knows how to use it. Most Indian am admi have at least a two wheeler. They are not stupid. They willingly sell their vote. That is nothing but CORRUPTION.
If we dont correctly diagnose the problem we will never solve it. As difficult as it may be for you to imagine, that the problem is "us", not our elite or our leaders, who are merely a reflection of "us", we will not solve the problem. It is a hard thing to accept that our aam aadmi is corrupt, but it is a fact and if we address this problem, the elite and the corruption within the elite will be automatically taken care of. No society will survive, if its aam aadmi gets corrupted and hides behind "these are my everyday survival choices". What he is choosing is not "survival", but death, when he makes those treacherous choices. He thinks he is very common sense and street smart, but that is the problem with street smart. It is only smart within the confines of that street. Street smart is the one of the most overrated things in the world. In my book street smart is pure Stupid and Dumb.