Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12380
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

The Boeing MQ 25A as an unmanned tanker is powered by a 44 Kn turbofan and has a range of 500 nautical miles with 6.8 tons of transfer fuel.

Kaveri makes an Indian development of unmanned tanker with similar capacity viable.
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4284
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion

Post by Prem Kumar »

What I find baffling is this:

Kaveri did not achieve enough thrust to power Tejas. No shame in that - it was a stretch goal anyway.

But for 2 decades, there has been talk of how a lower thrust Kaveri or its variants or the tech-knowhow gained can be used to power everything from UAVs to Ships (marine Kaveri)

We have not brought out a working product in even one of these spin-offs. That's truly shameful and is an epic fail by GTRE. There seems to be a complete lack of vision in capturing even a slightly lower rung in the value chain
basant
BRFite
Posts: 921
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 20:58

Re: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion

Post by basant »

GTRE did miracles with peanuts thrown at them. If anyone wanted it in production, the services for instace given the strategic importance, they would be have batted for them rather than battering they did sitting on the sidelines. Is that what any other AF did in any country that today has a working engine?

The nicest thing that can be said about IAF leadership is that they like imported toys. Anyone who disagrees can do a web search to find which ex-service chief is on bail for corruption charges. Since 2018!
maitya
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 628
Joined: 02 Feb 2001 12:31

Re: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion

Post by maitya »

Upping the thread with the following nugget:
India’s 5th-gen fighter, the AMCA, looks to move off the drawing board and into the air
...
DRDO officials say: “The F-414 engine generates up to 98 KiloNewtons (KN) thrust, which effectively degrades to 90 KN in Indian climatic conditions. We have calculated that an AMCA, with the configuration the IAF has specified, requires a thrust of 220 KN (in Indian conditions) for super-cruising. That means it requires twin engines, each generating 110 KN thrust.
...
Guess, that should explain the flat-rating requirement for Kaveri, but not for other imported TFs.

Also for those who cry hoarse about 73-75KN (wet) achieved by K9 etc, think again - just how much do you think F404s would be actually achieving in same "indian climatic conditions", while it's shiny brochure 82-83KN thrust claims.
And what about their dry-thrust claims vs actual achieved in sqn services, hain jee ... :P
pravula
BRFite
Posts: 377
Joined: 07 Aug 2009 05:01

Re: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion

Post by pravula »

What are "Indian conditions"? Hot and high? Hot, dry and high?
Post Reply