Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
Atmavik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2000
Joined: 24 Aug 2016 04:43

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Atmavik »

drnayar wrote: 18 Feb 2024 00:23 Pakistan AF did not "build" anything they bought off the shelf from Sweden and China ..and the Chinese stuff was just junk. guys chill. The Indian AWACS / AEW&C would be a much more capable and cutting-edge platform
The top brass dropped the ball. their role is to plan and acquire platforms to maintain the edge. we are repeating the same mistake with ATAGS now.
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4248
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Prem Kumar »

The latest AoN is a breath of fresh air. Total 30 aircraft approved, out of which 15 are MRMR, 3 COMINT/SIGINT, 6 Netra 1a, 6 refuellers

All 30 are force multipliers!

But

1) AoNs have to translate to orders. ATAGS AoN was issued in Jan 2023. The order is still to materialize, following which deliveries will start after its own lead time

2) Even 6 more Netras are an insufficient for a 2 front war. They will barely give us parity vis-a-vis Pakistan, while we should have had overmatch against that beggar nation and should be threatening China on the sheer # of birds we can put up against her in a sector

3) Repeated IAF Chiefs indeed dropped the ball. Even more egregious, considering how much actual war experience with AEWs they actually got during 2019 Balakot. Just like the IA, they don't even learn from their own experience. Their MRFA tunnel-vision has clouded their thinking
Cain Marko
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5353
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Cain Marko »

My guess is that they preferred s400 + rafale combo over force multipliers. But they could have easily ordered additional 3 Netra systems IMHO.
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4248
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Prem Kumar »

Given that they are scrambling now, it means that their thinking was wrong. Its hard to understand how an S-400 + Rafale combo will give you full air picture, guide fighters etc. Plus we dont have enough of either to assume we have achieved area denial versus even Pakistan

Its unfathomable how often the armchair pundits are proven right, while our super-duper fighter jockeys and West Point thinkers cannot get the basics right!
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5306
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by srai »

“No Plan B” was how it was stated as an ultimatum on obtaining the MMRCA … even when it was obviously unaffordable
Cain Marko
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5353
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Cain Marko »

Prem Kumar wrote: 20 Feb 2024 14:59 Given that they are scrambling now, it means that their thinking was wrong. Its hard to understand how an S-400 + Rafale combo will give you full air picture, guide fighters etc. Plus we dont have enough of either to assume we have achieved area denial versus even Pakistan

Its unfathomable how often the armchair pundits are proven right, while our super-duper fighter jockeys and West Point thinkers cannot get the basics right!
Yeah. And it's not just the authorize brass either. IMHO the Navy strung along the nlca (and scored massive brownie points in the name of being indigenius) knowing fully well that they'd drop the ball in short order. Very cleverly put the blame squarely on the "inadequacy" of the platform.
The less said about army procurement, the better :cry:
Post Reply