Second Agni-III test-2
-
- BRFite -Trainee
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 05 Mar 2006 22:22
is it just me ... or are all jingos allowed to get ahead of themselves and salivate on the next versions of A-3.. .... (model again based on Arun Sir's magnificent line drawings)...
and the sickest paint-scheme for A-3++ and A-3SL (planning to send chills down LGM-118 )
cheers
Alok
and the sickest paint-scheme for A-3++ and A-3SL (planning to send chills down LGM-118 )
cheers
Alok
Last edited by chandel_alok on 13 Apr 2007 10:27, edited 1 time in total.
Arun_S, how accurate is the steeply rising curve on your range-vs-payload
in the region of 400-500kg ?
I mean thats serious ICBM territory albeit with only one sdre warhead, not
the big 3MIRV payload that 3-stage ICBMs of a similar size cart around (Topol-M, Minuteman etc).
the 3000km circle most newspapers are printing make no sense coz its
with a obese 1.5T payload and we havent publicly tested MIRV bus yet.
I think friendly journos like VSom should be requested to clarify the vast
amt of confusion in public mind by using materials from your R&D piece.
nothing like boosting the national morale by spreading peace n love to NYC
in the region of 400-500kg ?
I mean thats serious ICBM territory albeit with only one sdre warhead, not
the big 3MIRV payload that 3-stage ICBMs of a similar size cart around (Topol-M, Minuteman etc).
the 3000km circle most newspapers are printing make no sense coz its
with a obese 1.5T payload and we havent publicly tested MIRV bus yet.
I think friendly journos like VSom should be requested to clarify the vast
amt of confusion in public mind by using materials from your R&D piece.
nothing like boosting the national morale by spreading peace n love to NYC
Alok,chandel_alok wrote:is it just me ... or are all jingos allowed to get ahead of themselves and salivate on the next versions of A-3.. .... (model again based on Arun Sir's magnificent line drawings)...
Alok
Do you post at DA ? your work looks pro.. . What's the render time like ?
Please carry on ..
Arun_S, excellent job with the line drawing's and all the other minutiae .. As always..
:Added later: :Images removed:
Alok, Thanks for the Info.
Last edited by Tilak on 13 Apr 2007 09:53, edited 1 time in total.
thammu wrote:Plea for moderation of views!!!
<a href="http://www.indianexpress.com/story/28216.html">Long
range over China</a>
When did CRM jump the boat?? No wonder he sensed his uselessness is Delhi and made a right decision.The writer is a professor at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Alok those are pretty slick renderings you got there. Given your pretty quick turnaround can you illuminate us regarding the software you are using??chandel_alok wrote:is it just me ... or are all jingos allowed to get ahead of themselves and salivate on the next versions of A-3.. .... (model again based on Arun Sir's magnificent line drawings)...
As accurate as Newton's third law of mothion and the value of G (9.81m/sec^2, the Acceleration due to Gravity) Its just the way Physics works, the same way Chinese and French ICBM's work.Singha wrote:Arun_S, how accurate is the steeply rising curve on your range-vs-payload in the region of 400-500kg ?
I mean thats serious ICBM territory albeit with only one sdre warhead, not
the big 3MIRV payload that 3-stage ICBMs of a similar size cart around (Topol-M, Minuteman etc).
The dhimmi Editors dont understand physics even if Vishnu can be made to understand to sufficient level.Singha wrote: The 3000km circle most newspapers are printing make no sense coz its with a obese 1.5T payload and we havent publicly tested MIRV bus yet.
I think friendly journos like VSom should be requested to clarify the vast
amt of confusion in public mind by using materials from your R&D piece.
nothing like boosting the national morale by spreading peace n love to NYC
-
- BRFite -Trainee
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 05 Mar 2006 22:22
Alok: Cool job.chandel_alok wrote:is it just me ... or are all jingos allowed to get ahead of themselves and salivate on the next versions of A-3.. .... (model again based on Arun Sir's magnificent line drawings)...
and the sickest pain-scheme for A-3++ and A-3SL (planning to send chills down LGM-118 )
cheers
Alok
I bought 3 D solid modeling software 5 months ago just for this purpose, but it been waiting installation since then. Result of juggling too many knives.
Yes, I am sure accurate dimensioning does help.
Thanks Dude. Can you help and work with me to make solid models for BR Missile and Space site?
-
- BRFite -Trainee
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 05 Mar 2006 22:22
to say "I'll be honored" would be a a cliche.. but sure!!... plz mail me at *****{ Admin note: I have you email id from your registration. -Arun S}Arun_S wrote: Alok: Cool job.
I bought 3 D solid modeling software 5 months ago just for this purpose, but it been waiting installation since then. Result of juggling too many knives.
Yes, I am sure accurate dimensioning does help.
Thanks Dude. Can you help and work with me to make solid models for BR Missile and Space site?
T Subramanian in the Hindu:
What is he talking about over there? As its Subramanian writing this, the chance of a misquote or some other form of DDMism is pretty much zero. What else does DRDO have hidden under the rug?The series of successes in the last six months, including that of the Prithvi interceptor missile, the launch of Dhanush, the success of another strategic system and now the Agni III "signify that we are maturing in these difficult technologies," said Mr. Natarajan, who was present at the launch site.
I secretly thinking someone will catch that. Sagarika is doing very well thank you.Sparsh wrote:T Subramanian in the Hindu:
What is he talking about over there? As its Subramanian writing this, the chance of a misquote or some other form of DDMism is pretty much zero. What else does DRDO have hidden under the rug?The series of successes in the last six months, including that of the Prithvi interceptor missile, the launch of Dhanush, the success of another strategic system and now the Agni III "signify that we are maturing in these difficult technologies," said Mr. Natarajan, who was present at the launch site.
Arun,
Subramanian further writes:
On a more serious note, I was half expecting Natarajan to be refering to something ATV related when he mentioned the "strategic system". But I will happily take the Sagarika instead.
Subramanian further writes:
Something is black in the lentils onlee.The entire sequence of the Agni III's flight was tracked by radars at the Integrated Test Range at Chandipur-on-sea near Balasore, Orissa; the Outer Wheeler Island, Dhamra on the coast of Orissa; Port Blair and ships stationed at impact points in the Bay of Bengal. "All reported data reception and from this we can conclude that the mission met all its requirements," said DRDO officials.
On a more serious note, I was half expecting Natarajan to be refering to something ATV related when he mentioned the "strategic system". But I will happily take the Sagarika instead.
There already exists a program called "Garika", remember? I think it was speculated on BR that this was a warhead-less cruise mizzile.Singha wrote:but AK Antony in parliament has recently said there is no program called Sagarika!
so pray quite the mindgames here and I am tense enough already. is there a SLBM named Saagarika ?
Last edited by Mihir on 13 Apr 2007 11:22, edited 2 times in total.
Ak Antony will say what needs to be said onleeeee. If he says no sagarika then no sagarika for poor SRDE...Singha wrote:but AK Antony in parliament has recently said there is no program called Sagarika!
so pray quite the mindgames here and I am tense enough already. is there a SLBM named Saagarika ?
No, it did not go under the radar. They were called "nishanth" and "Lakshyas". Darn those little buggers!!! DRDO needs zillions of tests to perfect these complex systems, unlike er, "strategic systems" !!So when was this "system" tested? existance of the program is one and the successful testing of the system is another. Something went under the radar of BR!
On a related topic, what is this "waiting for Surya" at mid-noon by both media and some forumers?
What to do? It is the nature of Yindoo to be deciteful and pussy footing. They just debate, make high sounding temples and build myths. We SRDE onlee like this:Singha wrote:but AK Antony in parliament has recently said there is no program called Sagarika!
so pray quite the mindgames here and I am tense enough already. is there a SLBM named Saagarika ?
http://www.drdo.org/pub/techfocus/aug04/missile13.htm
Never speak Truth, or face Truth face on.
Advertisement Dept onleee: "Satyam Eve Jayate" Please dont take seriously. We only dhotiwalla, not to be trusted.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 6046
- Joined: 11 May 2005 06:56
- Location: Doing Nijikaran, Udharikaran and Baazarikaran to Commies and Assorted Leftists
Let me speculate.. It must be the Submarine Nook "Austin" Power plant that was rumored to be under testing at Kalpakkam.. A shrunk version of that in a cylinder /tube of dimensions similar to that of engine room and machinery spaces of the ATV, must have been run exhaustively in conditions that represent the full operating profile (running low,high power , full power , spool up to max power.. etc.. etc..etc..) and must have passed all tests with flying covers, meaning.. the "kaveri" like bottleneck for the ATV is overcome finally .. and hence you have SDRE line and solid model drawings from some "mijjile" fixated dudes.. Think.. Why would anyone sanction a more "complex" mijjile of the "fat/phat" submarine launched style.. when you already have a long thing starving style dude ? .. Me thinks because the "other strategic" project is going to take to water soon. .. it needs mijjiles.. so presto.. Agni III gives darshan.. That is all..venkat_r wrote:So when was this "system" tested? existance of the program is one and the successful testing of the system is another. Something went under the radar of BR!
A weird article on SLBM,
IS SAGRIKA {SLBM} EVER TESTED
well this report says yes
India appears to be developing a more advanced sea-based nuclear strike capability
in the form of the Sagarika (‘Oceanic’) SLBM, which has sometimes been reported as
being an sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM).19 According to the US Defense Intelligence
Agency, India flight-tested an SLBM for the first time in the spring of 2005.20Some press reports suggest that India may intend to deploy nuclear-armed missiles on
the Advanced Technology Vessel, a much-delayed nuclear-powered submarine project
that began in 1983.21
http://www.sipri.org/contents/expcon/India.pdf
IS SAGRIKA {SLBM} EVER TESTED
well this report says yes
India appears to be developing a more advanced sea-based nuclear strike capability
in the form of the Sagarika (‘Oceanic’) SLBM, which has sometimes been reported as
being an sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM).19 According to the US Defense Intelligence
Agency, India flight-tested an SLBM for the first time in the spring of 2005.20Some press reports suggest that India may intend to deploy nuclear-armed missiles on
the Advanced Technology Vessel, a much-delayed nuclear-powered submarine project
that began in 1983.21
http://www.sipri.org/contents/expcon/India.pdf
Agni III test sends Indonesia jet home: Report
The Garuda Indonesia jet, full of Muslim pilgrims bound for Saudi Arabia, had reached Indian airspace when the nuclear-capable ballistic missile Agni III streaked across the sky on Thursday, forcing the plane to turn around.
Sounds quite strange coincidence indeed , Perhaps the ATC realised that late and when the jet reached the indian airspace , she was kindly told to turn around .krishnan wrote:Agni III test sends Indonesia jet home: Report
The Garuda Indonesia jet, full of Muslim pilgrims bound for Saudi Arabia, had reached Indian airspace when the nuclear-capable ballistic missile Agni III streaked across the sky on Thursday, forcing the plane to turn around.
Seems like the pilots saw the missile , and got scared , so turned around and headed back homeAustin wrote:Sounds quite strange coincidence indeed , Perhaps the ATC realized that late and when the jet reached the indian airspace , she was kindly told to turn around .krishnan wrote:Agni III test sends Indonesia jet home: Report
They complain of no prior information. More form the above article:
Agni III test sends Indonesia jet home: Report
Friday, 13 April , 2007, 11:56
Jakarta: The test fire of Agni III missile by India on Thursday has threatened to erupt into a diplomatic spat after an Indonesian airliner packed with passengers was forced to turn around and head home, a report said on Friday.
The Garuda Indonesia jet, full of Muslim pilgrims bound for Saudi Arabia, had reached Indian airspace when the nuclear-capable ballistic missile Agni III streaked across the sky on Thursday, forcing the plane to turn around.
The Kompas newspaper quoted the Indonesian carrier’s operations director, Ari Sapari as saying that there was no prior information about the test.
Indonesia can lodge a formal protest through its foreign ministry over the incident, Transport Minister Hatta Rajasa reportedly said.
The Boeing 747 jet carrying 400 people aborted its flight after 90 minutes and returned to the Indonesian capital Jakarta, the report said.
"This clearly disrupted our schedule and caused us big losses," Sapari was quoted as saying. The plane resumed its journey four hours later.
The jet's exact location relative to the missile, which trailed orange and yellow smoke as it rocketed skyward, was unspecified in the report.
Arun,
Your work on the missiles is what makes BR *really* special. I've said it before and I will say it again- some of the best open source analysis I've seen. Cheers.
p.s. I think you are right about Agni 3+ test following not that long from now. Given this extremely flexible missile's throw weight, and the needs of deterrence, MIRVing is the natural progression.
Your work on the missiles is what makes BR *really* special. I've said it before and I will say it again- some of the best open source analysis I've seen. Cheers.
p.s. I think you are right about Agni 3+ test following not that long from now. Given this extremely flexible missile's throw weight, and the needs of deterrence, MIRVing is the natural progression.
You simplyhave to hand it to the guys at 'The Register'
India tests intermediate-range missile
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/12 ... _iii_test/
Excerpt: The Indian government claims it has significantly increased its nuclear delivery capability, with a successful test today of the uprated Agni-III ballistic missile.
::
::
Under US pressure, New Delhi actually announced it was cancelling Agni in 1995. At that time India was unwilling to publicly admit that it had aspirations toward nuclear weapons, and the Agni rockets made little sense without atomic warheads.
Time's moved on and subsequent generations of New Delhi politicians were avowedly pro-nuclear. Successful atom-bomb tests were carried out, and the Agni missile programme moved forward.
::
::
However, purely in terms of weapons technology, a nuclear-tipped Agni-III isn't quite top-table stuff. The permanent five all deploy the gold standard of atomic deterrents: triple-stage intercontinental rockets ranging beyond 5,000km, launched from invulnerable nuclear-propelled submarines.
That said, Indians might point out that the UK has no indigenous rocket industry of its own and has to buy its missiles from America. British chauvinists would no doubt counter by pointing out that India hasn't yet built nuclear submarines, arguably an equally complex technology. However, some reports indicate that India might have home-grown nuclear boats at sea as soon as 2010.
::
::
None of that will dampen a certain sense of satisfaction in New Delhi today.
You bet it won't!!!
India tests intermediate-range missile
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/12 ... _iii_test/
Excerpt: The Indian government claims it has significantly increased its nuclear delivery capability, with a successful test today of the uprated Agni-III ballistic missile.
::
::
Under US pressure, New Delhi actually announced it was cancelling Agni in 1995. At that time India was unwilling to publicly admit that it had aspirations toward nuclear weapons, and the Agni rockets made little sense without atomic warheads.
Time's moved on and subsequent generations of New Delhi politicians were avowedly pro-nuclear. Successful atom-bomb tests were carried out, and the Agni missile programme moved forward.
::
::
However, purely in terms of weapons technology, a nuclear-tipped Agni-III isn't quite top-table stuff. The permanent five all deploy the gold standard of atomic deterrents: triple-stage intercontinental rockets ranging beyond 5,000km, launched from invulnerable nuclear-propelled submarines.
That said, Indians might point out that the UK has no indigenous rocket industry of its own and has to buy its missiles from America. British chauvinists would no doubt counter by pointing out that India hasn't yet built nuclear submarines, arguably an equally complex technology. However, some reports indicate that India might have home-grown nuclear boats at sea as soon as 2010.
::
::
None of that will dampen a certain sense of satisfaction in New Delhi today.
You bet it won't!!!
anyone care to guess why the Garika GLCM tube seems to taper down in
diameter from the head to tail in 3 segments ? if the lowest part is a small
booster to clear the tube that drops away, what accounts for the condom shaped nature of the head ? is it to acco a ramjet cap that is blown away after a while....?
btw is it a jet engine or solid fuel ?
theories are welcome...
diameter from the head to tail in 3 segments ? if the lowest part is a small
booster to clear the tube that drops away, what accounts for the condom shaped nature of the head ? is it to acco a ramjet cap that is blown away after a while....?
btw is it a jet engine or solid fuel ?
theories are welcome...
Given the time it took for the plane to return to Jakarta, places the plane somewhere near andaman , could the pilot seen the re-entry?
krishnan wrote:Seems like the pilots saw the missile , and got scared , so turned around and headed back homeAustin wrote: Sounds quite strange coincidence indeed , Perhaps the ATC realized that late and when the jet reached the indian airspace , she was kindly told to turn around .
AI flight from Singapore forced to return back to Singapore
What happened to NOTAM ?
What happened to NOTAM ?
The flight, scheduled to land at 11.05 am, was on its way here when defence officials advised the pilot to take a diversion for safety reasons in view of the Agni test.