If R&AW isn't doing HUMINT these days,it then explains why we are in s*it street when it comes to detecting cross-border terrorism and foreign agents and their operations in India! HUMINT is also vital,as one cannot simply rely upon Tech-int for info.Assymetrical warfare as being practised by AlQ and others,have seen how cell phones and other electronic communications are being intercepted and decoded by the US,etc.Some outfits are reported to have returned to "pigeon post".In any case,worldwide HUMINT is still being seen as the key source of quality info.Remember Aldrich Ames,the Walker brothers,and the most devastating of all,Hansen? Here is some fascinating intel. news.
1.Legendary Communist era spy savior died in Germany
Wolfgang Vogel, a lawyer in Communist East Germany who became a wealthy man in the Cold War by opening cracks in the Berlin Wall to swap captured spies and release political prisoners, died Thursday, August 21, at the age of 82, The International Herald Tribune reports.
His second wife and former assistant, Helga, said he died after a long illness in Schliersee, the lakeside resort in the Bavarian Alps where they went to live after the wall came down in 1989 and Germany reunified a year later.
For three decades preceding reunification, Vogel was an operator who could pull strings in Moscow as effectively as in Washington, useful to each side because he was trusted by the other. He was taken into the confidence of Chancellor Helmut Schmidt of West Germany and into that of Erich Honecker, the Communist leader in East Berlin.
Vogel's first spy-swapping case began in 1959, when he represented an East German woman who said she was the wife of Rudolf Ivanovich Abel, a Soviet spy imprisoned in the United States.
Three years later, negotiations resulted in the exchange of Abel for the captured U.S. U-2 spy plane pilot Francis Gary Powers outside Berlin.
In later years, Vogel often materialized out of the mists at German border crossing points, his wife at the wheel of their gold-colored Mercedes, for spy swaps, releases of political prisoners - 33,755 in all - and family reunifications for 215,019 people, their freedom bought from Communists by the West German government under Vogel's auspices.
The trade brought in $2.4 billion in western currency, needed in East Berlin; Vogel also got annual payments of more than $200,000 from the West Germans.
It was to Vogel that ordinary East German citizens would turn for permission to emigrate, obtainable, he told them, if they had private property to sell to buyers whom he would find, for a fee.
Vogel saw himself as a humanitarian, and his last negotiations were to help thousands of East Germans in West German embassies in Prague and Warsaw make their way to freedom as their regime was collapsing. But all his influence came from his connections with the East German Staatssicherheit, the Stasi security service, and his usefulness came to an end when the agency did.
After reunification, his Stasi links left him open to accusations of extortion, profiteering and tax evasion that culminated in his arrest and later conviction in a state court in Berlin in 1996 on five counts of blackmail. He appealed; Germany's highest court found in his favor in 1998 on two of the cases, and prosecutors agreed to drop the others. But he and his lawyers agreed not to contest a separate conviction for perjury and falsely swearing to an affidavit, and his legal career was over.
When he passed the equivalent of the bar exam in 1949, Vogel was apprenticed to a senior judge and followed him to the East German Justice Ministry in Berlin in 1952. But when the judge fled to West Berlin after the anti-communist uprisings of 1953 and asked Vogel to join him, the Stasi found out and ensnared the young lawyer in its coils.
He went along as a collaborator, but soon his ambitious Stasi controller, Heinz Volpert, saw that this ingratiating young man could serve larger state interests if he was allowed to set up as an independent lawyer who could work in both East and West Berlin. Captain (later Colonel) Volpert closed Vogel's "secret collaborator" file in 1957.
Though Vogel's Stasi connections continued well after 1957, he maintained that he was never a secret informer after that. "My paths were not white and not black; they had to be gray," he said.
2.Legendary Soviet spy died at the age of 101
A Soviet spy code-named "Zephyr" who worked undercover with his wife in Europe and the United States for more than a quarter of a century has died at 101, Russia's foreign intelligence agency (SVR) said, Reuters reported.
The agency issued a glowing tribute to spy Mikhail Mukasei, whose death comes at a time when Russia's tense relations with the West and its conflict with Georgia are prompting many observers to draw parallels with the Cold War.
Mukasei operated with his wife Elizaveta as an undercover team in an unnamed "West European country" from the 1950s until their return to Moscow in 1977, the agency said on its Internet site
www.svr.gov.ru.
"Their active work was as illegal operatives. The geographic operations of the Mukaseis were very extensive: They performed tasks for the motherland on several continents," the SVR tribute said.
Earlier, during the Second World War, under the cover of the Soviet vice-consul in Los Angeles, Mukasei gathered "highly valued" information linked to Japan's wartime threat to the Soviet Union, the SVR said.
3.Revelations of the CIA's secret terror links,carrying out terror strikes supposedly by leftists in Italy.
NATO's Cold War secret armies researched in a new book
At a time when experts are debating whether NATO is suited to deal with the global “war on terror”, new research suggests that the alliance’s own secret history has links to terrorism.
The following report written by Daniele Ganser is based on excerpts from his newly released book, “NATO’s Secret Armies. Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe”, released this week by Frank Cass in London. Report was published today by Macedonia Online website.
The book describes NATO’s clandestine operations during the Cold War. The research was prompted by a story that made world headlines in 1990 but quickly disappeared, ensuring that even today, NATO’s secret armies remain just that - secret.
Until now, a full investigation of NATO’s secret armies had not been carried out - a task that Ganser has taken on single-handedly and quite successfully.
In Italy, on 3 August 1990, then-prime minister Giulio Andreotti confirmed the existence of a secret army code-named “Gladio” - the Latin word for “sword” - within the state. His testimony before the Senate subcommittee investigating terrorism in Italy sent shockwaves through the Italian parliament and the public, as speculation arose that the secret army had possibly manipulated Italian politics through acts of terrorism.
Andreotti revealed that the secret Gladio army had been hidden within the Defense Ministry as a subsection of the military secret service, SISMI. General Vito Miceli, a former director of the Italian military secret service, could hardly believe that Andreotti had lifted the secret, and protested: "I have gone to prison because I did not want to reveal the existence of this super secret organization. And now Andreotti comes along and tells it to parliament!" According to a document compiled by the Italian military secret service in 1959, the secret armies had a two-fold strategic purpose: firstly, to operate as a so-called “stay-behind” group in the case of a Soviet invasion and to carry out a guerrilla war in occupied territories; secondly, to carry out domestic operations in case of “emergency situations”.
The military secret services’ perceptions of what constituted an “emergency” was well defined in Cold War Italy and focused on the increasing strength of the Italian Communist and the Socialist parties, both of which were tasked with weakening NATO “from within”. Felice Casson, an Italian judge who during his investigations into right-wing terrorism had first discovered the secret Gladio army and had forced Andreotti to take a stand, found that the secret army had linked up with right-wing terrorists in order to confront “emergency situations”. The terrorists, supplied by the secret army, carried out bomb attacks in public places, blamed them on the Italian left, and were thereafter protected from prosecution by the military secret service. "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game,” right-wing terrorist Vincezo Vinciguerra explained the so-called “strategy of tension” to Casson.
“The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security. This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the state cannot convict itself or declare itself responsible for what happened."
How strongly NATO and US intelligence backed and supported the use of terror in Italy in order to discredit the political left during the Cold War remains subject of ongoing research. General Gerardo Serravalle, who had commanded the Italian Gladio secret army from 1971 to 1974, confirmed that the secret army “could pass from a defensive, post-invasion logic, to one of attack, of civil war”.
The Italian Senate chose to be more explicit and concluded in its investigation in 2000: "Those massacres, those bombs, those military actions had been organized or promoted or supported by men inside Italian state institutions and, as has been discovered more recently, by men linked to the structures of United States intelligence." Ever since the discovery of the secret NATO armies in 1990, research into stay-behind armies has progressed only very slowly, due to very limited access to primary documents and the refusal of both NATO and the CIA to comment. On 5 November 1990, a NATO spokesman told an inquisitive press: "NATO has never contemplated guerrilla war or clandestine operations”.
The next day, NATO officials admitted that the previous day’s denial had been false, adding that the alliance would not comment on matters of military secrecy. On 7 November, NATO’s highest military official in Europe, Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) US General John Galvin, together with NATO’s highest civilian official, Secretary-General Manfred Wörner, briefed NATO ambassadors behind closed doors. "Since this is a secret organization, I wouldn't expect too many questions to be answered,” reasoned a senior NATO diplomat, who wished to remain unnamed. “If there were any links to terrorist organizations, that sort of information would be buried very deep indeed.” Former CIA director William Colby confirmed in his memoirs that setting up the secret armies in Western Europe had been “a major program” for the CIA. The project started after World War II in total secrecy, and access to information was limited “to the smallest possible coterie of the most reliable people, in Washington, in NATO” and in the countries concerned. Yet when in Italy in 1990 former CIA director Admiral Stansfield Turner was questioned on television on Gladio, he strictly refused to answer any questions on the sensitive issue, and as the interviewer insisted with respect for the terror victims, Stansfield angrily ripped off his microphone and shouted: "I said, no questions about Gladio!", whereafter the interview was over.
If there had been a Soviet invasion, the secret anti-communist soldiers would have operated behind enemy lines, strengthening and setting up local resistance movements in enemy-held territory, evacuating shot down pilots, and sabotaging the supply lines and production centers of occupation forces. Upon discovery of the secret armies, the European Parliament responded with harsh criticism, suspecting it to have been involved in manipulation and terror operations. “This Europe will have no future,” Italian representative Falqui opened the debate, “if it is not founded on truth, on the full transparency of its institutions in regard to the dark plots against democracy that have turned upside down the history, even in recent times, of many European states.” Falqui insisted that “there will be no future, ladies and gentlemen, if we do not remove the idea of having lived in a kind of double state - one open and democratic, the other clandestine and reactionary. That is why we want to know what and how many "Gladio" networks there have been in recent years in the Member States of the European Community." The majority of EU parliamentarians followed Falqui, and in a special resolution on 22 November 1990 made it clear that the EU “protests vigorously at the assumption by certain US military personnel at SHAPE and in NATO of the right to encourage the establishment in Europe of a clandestine intelligence and operation network”, calling for a “a full investigation into the nature, structure, aims, and all other aspects of these clandestine organizations or any splinter groups, their use for illegal interference in the internal political affairs of the countries concerned, and the problem of terrorism in Europe”.
Only the parliaments in Italy, Switzerland, and Belgium had formed a special commission to investigate the national secret army, and after months or even years of research, presented a public report. Building on this data and secondary sources from numerous European countries, “NATO’s Secret Armies” confirms for the first time that the secret networks spread across Western Europe, with great details on networks in Germany, France, Spain, Portugal, Holland, Luxemburg, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Italy, Greece, and Turkey, as well as the strategic planning of Britain and the US. The stay-behind armies were coordinated on an international level by the so-called Allied Clandestine Committee (ACC) and the Clandestine Planning Committee (CPC), linked to NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE). And they used cover names such as “Absalon” in Denmark, “P26” in Switzerland, “ROC” in Norway or “SDRA8” in Belgium. Interestingly, large differences existed from country to country. In some nations the secret armies became a source of terror, while in others they remained a prudent precaution.
In Turkey, the “Counter-Guerrilla” was involved in domestic terror and torture operations against the Kurds, while in Greece, the “LOK” took part in the 1967 military coup d’état to prevent a Socialist government. In Spain, the secret army was used to prop up the fascist dictatorship of Franco, and in Germany, right-wing terrorists used the explosives of the secret army in the 1980 terror attack in Munich. In other countries, including Denmark, Norway, and Luxemburg, the secret soldiers prepared for the eventual occupation of their home country and never engaged in domestic terror or manipulation. In the context of the ongoing so-called war on terror, the Gladio data promotes the sobering insight that governments in the West have sacrificed the life of innocent citizens and covered up acts of terrorism in order to manipulate the population.
Allegations that NATO, the Pentagon, MI6, the CIA, and European intelligence services were linked to terror, coups d’état, and torture in Europe are obviously of an extremely sensitive nature, and future research is needed in the field. In the absence of an official investigation by NATO or the EU, ongoing international research into terrorism is about to tackle this difficult task, the first step of which I hope to have promisingly taken with “NATO’s Secret Armies”.
Dr Daniele Ganser is a Senior Researcher at the Center for Security Studies at the ETH in Zurich. For more information on the topic, compare the research of the Center of Security Studies (CSS) at ETH Zurich.
4.Georgian spy to be sentenced to 20 years in Russian prison
A Russian army officer accused of spying for Georgia has been arrested in the Stavropol region. The news comes one a week after Russian intelligence announced it had uncovered a Georgian spy network that was allegedly planning terrorist attacks in Russia.
Army officer Mikhail Khachidze, an ethnic Georgian, is being investigated for state treason, Russian news agencies reported, citing a statement from the Federal Security Service (FSB). Details regarding his apprehension were not disclosed.
According to the FSB, Khachidze began working for Georgian intelligence on Georgian territory in 2007. Then, while stationed in a Russian Army unit in the North Caucasus region Khachidze allegedly "gathered secret information about Russian armed forces, the military capabilities of Russian units, and his fellow servicemen."
He is being charged under Article 275 of the Criminal Code (state treason), which is punishable by between 12 and 20 years in prison.
The announcement came just days after FSB Chief Alexander Bortnikov said that Georgian intelligence were planning a series of terrorist attacks in the North Caucasus region - a volatile area of Russian provinces separated from Georgia in the south by the Caucasus Mountains.
Earlier, the FSB had apprehended nine Georgian members of an alleged terror cell that included a member of Georgian intelligence identified as ‘Kherkeladze.' Bortnikov informed Russian officials that Kherkeladze was working on Russian territory and directing a group of other agents. In footage broadcast on Russian television, Kherkeladze is shown confessing that he occupied a high-placed position in Georgia's military intelligence unit. It is alleged he entered Russia on a Russian passport earlier this year with orders to gather intelligence on Russia's military forces, as well as South Ossetia's President Eduard Kokoity. Another suspect, Alexander Khachirov, was shown on state television confessing to planning to blow up a mine on Russian territory in June.
The nine intelligence agents were most likely detained at different times over the summer, while the announcement was made in wake of Georgia's attack on South Ossetia's Tskhinvali and Russia's punitive counter-offensive, which ended last week.
Georgian authorities are denying the espionage and terrorism allegations. Georgian Interior Ministry Chief Shota Utiashvili was reported as saying the accusations are meant to justify the presence of Russian forces on Georgian soil.
Excerpts from
http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?article=1628
So now we have to figure out how to make their nuts be on the line all the time. 
)
