Ukraine said on Sunday it reserved the right to bar Russian warships
There may be a lot of warships marked "Like New! One Owner!" available cheap for the IN too, since they have no base to which they can return.
Now I understand this conflict. Let's see...
The leaders in Province B decides that they have to declare independence from Nation A because they are too Pure to be part of A any more. They see themselves as "Westernized", more Caucasian than even the ppl of the Caucasus. This is pushed by the West, and succeeds. Then Country B (formerly Province B ) starts pogroms against the ppl of "A" ethnicity inside B. The ppl in region C which is on the border of A and B, decide that they want out of "B" and into "A", and so declare independence.
"B" decides on Tactical Brilliance and invades C and commits genocide - over 2000 civilians murdered in 2 days. 30,000 refugees escape to A.
A intervenes, putting paratroopers into B. The military of B now conducts Strategic Redeployment.
US, UK, UN call for Ceasefire. They are supporters of B to try to destabilize A.
******************
Somehow seems familiar, like I've seen this happen in history before. So have any lessons been learned from history? Will A finish the job NOW to save a constant nightmare for the next 1,700,000 years? Or will the UN Ceasefire cause a standoff where there is a war every time a new dictator starts feeling the heat on his musharraf?
Will B become a fine GUBO location for the West to destabilize A?
Will the West train a horde of wackos in B to go terrorize A, but will they then end up flying airliners into buildings in the West? Will the West then go bomb "D" because the POTUS and the Poodle need to show "tough response" and can't admit that their own creations in "B" are the problem?
Stay tuned on Pokrov Rodina Forum (PRF) for the answer, 50 years from now...