Hitesh wrote: There are countries that do not have a jury system and yet they do very well in responding to citizens' concern.
1. How countries have population above 20 lakh
2. Of above, how many have judge system and how many have JurySys
3. What is the correlation of corruptionless-ness and presence/absence of Jury?
I have done the above survey, and JurySys and corruptionless-ness have a very good correlation. Even Japan had to accept that and move to JurySys starting Aug this year. This thread is not to discuss the JurySys etc. Some details of JurySys etc are here
http://rahulmehta.com/articles/rn_why.htm . And since you say that JurySys is not needed to reduce corruption, nepotism in courts in India : can you provide me Jury-less laws by which nepotism and corruption in Indian courts can be reduced?
1. No the problem is at the local level where the people don't take the initiative and take matters into their own hands.
2. If you take a look at western countries, you will see that the local government, not the state or national level, are responsible for most of the basic needs, such as water, sewage, garbage collection, electricity (to some extent), and roads.
3. They are able to do those things because they have taxing power at the local level and can spend those local tax revenues to address those concerns. Of course, responsive local courts, media, and enforcement goes hand to hand. Also open and direct participation of the citizens are needed to make this work.
...
1. So pls propose the DRAFTS of the legislations by which you think people will "start taking initiatives". One such way, where people do things themselves, is JurySys which you oppose. Another procedure where people do things themselves is Recall, where in people themselves expel a judge or police chief without calling maai-baap judge or Minister. But again, Recall is a Western (=colonial?) concept and so most likely you oppose (am I right?) So what laws you propose that would enable people to take initiative?
2. In India too, all above except electricity is managed by Municipalities. And in most US states too, electricity is managed by State Govt and not Municipalities.
3. So what laws you propose to promote this - what you call as - "open and direct participation of the citizens "? Three such mechanisms to promote open and direct participation are Jury, recall and referendum which are all Western (=Colonial?) constructs, and since they are Western I am assuming that you oppose them all. So what legislation do YOU propose to increase "open and direct participation of the citizens"?