Nikhil T wrote:Sir by that logic the solution is to have one manufacturer have all the capabilities. Procurement of parts like GE LM 2500+ CODOG engines also happens this way. The engine is imported - GE gets a margin, the shipyard installs it on the Ship - shipyard gets a commission.
Lets separate manufacturing from components. Components like radars and engines always come from OEM and is not relevant for our discussions. What shipyards like DCN/Pipavav/MDL manufacture is hull/superstructure modules + specialized parts like masts and sonar housings.
What Mazgaon Procured Materials (MPM) means is that certain parts - like shock proof rafts on which equipment like engine and DG sets in submarines are mounted to minimize noise and vibration - will be procured from DCN. The reason why this goes against indigenization is that as a shipyard, MDL is supposed to manufacture those or acquire knowhow. When it simply buys structural components and installs and passes it off as indigenous, then it is not being honest to itself or the nation.
Nikhil T wrote:I think the MDL Pipavav deal is great news. Its for the first time that a Govt Shipbuilding yard is collaborating as a JV - this also means shared ownership
Now, as I understand how it will work, Pipavav will manufacture some structural blocks or maybe the entire hull and MDL will put it together and add equipment. The reason its inefficient is that two shipyards will be working on an activity that can effectively be done by one. And both will charge for it.
UK shipyards are building their aircraft carrier in that manner - multiple blocks from multiple shipyards, but it is for employment generation given the high unemployment there. But their Royal Navy suffers, they cant afford ships in sufficient numbers because of the high cost of such programs, hence they're today smaller than the Indian Navy.
Nikhil T wrote:i.e. if the margins between MDL and Pipavav are exorbitant, the JV will lose future orders. We need to create centers of excellence in shipbuilding
No, L1 rule doesnt apply for orders to PSU. An esoteric clause called "Acceptance of Necessity" is used. Nothing stops MDL from charging 30% margin + cost from MoD, and passing 15% margin + cost to Pipavav. Pipavav is happy, because it will never get a frigate/destroyer order under normal circumstances. The policy is skewed that when a PSU builds destroyers, other private players will be denied permission, because government needs to provide revenue to government.
The policy is similar to the government policy that all government employees need to fly Air India for official travel + LTC. This despite the fact that a LCC may charge one third of what AI is charging. The government will deliberately lose money for giving Air India business.
Pipavav has found a good way of milking the mamaries of the welfare state. And MDL can grab even more orders.
NRao wrote:In theory the two companies should be spliting the work, so it should not matter - some basic assumptions apply. The cost to the tax payer should be about the same.
As I said, L1 doesnt apply for PSU. If a PSU is doing the same work as a private firm, then typically the order goes to the PSU even if the private firm is T1 or L1. For the decision maker, its a good cover-your-ass exercise, because he is spending government money on another arm of the government, completely ignoring that the other government arm may be incompetent or inefficient.
Not giving business to a PSU is akin to treason for a government officer.