Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
Jaybhatt
BRFite
Posts: 172
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Jaybhatt »

chetak wrote:
abhijitm wrote:Why AKA is still in the office????
Spotless white mundu
Surely, esteemed colleague, you miss the boat (pun intended).

The principal reason for his continuation in office is because the fellow is the ultimate chaprassi and factotum to Signora Maino, in much the same way as is his nominal boss, the PM, Sardar MMS.

Hallelujah !
arshyam
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4575
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by arshyam »

This is sad, but have to salute the chief for taking a courageous decision. But I wonder why only serving officers have to take the blame always. They have to make do with what's available, and don't have much of a say in getting new equipment.

What about AKA, who has presided over the steady deterioration of the submarine arm over the past 9 years? I mean, 9 years is a lot of time to do something even after dedicated chai-biskoot time - what has he done? The Scorpene hasn't seen the light of the day, and P75I is still caught in red tape. Sure we have the Akula and the Arihant, but those are nuke ships, not the AIP/Diesels that add the numbers.

If the chief, who has been at his post only for a year and a half, feels this responsible, surely AKA can take some responsibility given his long innings at the helm? But of course, horses don't fly, do they?
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Singha »

AK is probably going to be the post election INC candidate for PM if the opportunity comes to pass...

RG will do his usual duck n run act.
srin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2525
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:13

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by srin »

The next thing is to quickly order Type-214 subs (concurrent orders for 6 each from two shipyards) and exercise options for 6 more scorpenes from MDL.

So by 2020, we should have atleast 8 new subs.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20782
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Karan M »

That stuff against Mr Sinha is pure disinfo, same as grandmothers crossing LOC and causing issues.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Singha »

single vendor ? no can do saar...we need (a) a global 10 yr tendering process (b) sort out the fight between MDL who wants it all and pvt shipyards who want in.

nothing short of namo wielding a large stick and a hyman rickover type mahdi-ish deputy in charge of MOD programs can break the gridlock.

we are totally gridlocked on P75...not an inch of movement...not even 'talks' with soryu or U216 makers.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_216_submarine
http://www.thyssenkrupp-marinesystems.c ... s-216.html

as high endurance LR designs only the U216 and Soryu fit our expanding envelope.

if we dont hang our hats on brahmos as a must have, these things could probably carry 25 weapons - mix of klubs, exocets, nirbhays and HWT and spread the fear of the lord all over.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by ramana »

A.K. Anthony has managed to out-Krishna Menon, Krishna Menon*.

* A derivation in Indian context of out-Herod, Herod!!!

Krishna Menon a blustering, bumbling Defence Minster of India

The sad thing is he will go away unsung, unwept and more importanly unhung.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20782
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Karan M »

On the plus side Antony did not give into Khan pressure and allowed IAF to run a free and fair MMRCA process. Also allowed several local programs to come good under his tenure. If only his obsession with his image had not forced him to overdo the ban arms vendors stuff and engage in delayed procurement syndrome.
tsarkar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3263
Joined: 08 May 2006 13:44
Location: mumbai

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by tsarkar »

There are systemic issues as well that need rectification.

While all three armed forces have officer shortages, all shortages are in field postings. Very few, if any, staff posts are vacant in any three services.

Presently it is possible for officers to rise to command positions doing staff roles for majority of career.

Unfortunately lack of field experience comes to the open under tragic circumstances.

Firefighting systems, while deployed automatically are commanded to activate manually. Most ships have the same Freon based system simply because its the most effective system in the world. At times, tough decisions are consciously taken for the greater good for the greater many.
Sanku
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12526
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 15:57
Location: Naaahhhh

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Sanku »

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/brother-of-d ... 758-3.html

Brother of dead INS Sindhuratna Officer refuses government compensation


Very very critical points
LT commander Kapish Singh Muwal's brother gave a very emotional statement by saying that had his brother been alive, he would not have called himself a martyr as he died without fighting because of substandard equipments.

"There was a defect in the submarine, everyone knew that there was some defect with this submarine. These are sub standard submarines which have been used. What's the use of repairing a submarine when it's going to explode again,' asked the dead LT Commander's brother.
"I use to tell my brother that why you want to go on a submarine which has no respect for your life. He used to do it just for the love for the country. We should thank those who work for the nation, not make fun of their lives. It was a bad joke with them. When they knew that the submarine is not in proper condition they should not have sent them. We don't need financial help from the government. We pay you taxes, please use them for the upgradation of equipments. Had my brother been alive he would not have called himself a martyr. He died without fighting because of substandard equipments," he said.
I think some things are very clear

1) There are systematic problems with Sub/Subs(?) -- Kilo class -- most probably due to aging issues
2) Everyone knew about it -- the officers knew, and it was common knowledge enough that their families knew.
3) Navy still used these -- because they had no choice.
4) Def Min knows it, but wants to paper over it, and not do the right thing

It is clear why the Chief resigned, beyond a point he could not take more of the BS that this Govt was pushing down his throat -- without money for upgds, aging ships, hostile threat assessment high, and death of service personnel due to Govts apathy.
kmkraoind
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3908
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 00:24

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by kmkraoind »

Karan M wrote:On the plus side Antony did not give into Khan pressure and allowed IAF to run a free and fair MMRCA process. Also allowed several local programs to come good under his tenure. If only his obsession with his image had not forced him to overdo the ban arms vendors stuff and engage in delayed procurement syndrome.
Probably, strict US laws does not allow direct cash transfer to Ahmad Patel. That is why they choose an Europe vendor and french have no qualms to threw a pie to them. Moreover, if we add malpractices to gain money is corruption, then AK Anthony is no saint. If not why a PSU pays Rs. 28 crores for a mediocre painting. Because SAIL acted on Cong HQ orders who wanted to enrich AK Anthony in one way or other.

Defence minister's wife makes paintings worth Rs 28 crore
negi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13112
Joined: 27 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Ban se dar nahin lagta , chootiyon se lagta hai .

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by negi »

This might sound like a wrong time for this but it is relevant nonetheless i.e. issue of sub standard equipment or using a platform pushing it's safety envelope is not an alien concept for IN in fact when things do not break tey take pride in such things on lines of oh we extracted x hours of more life from the platform as against y hours prescribed by the OEM.

It is a well known fact that when a ship goes for a refit the concerned CO and the crew are always rushed to turn around the ship , basically the CO is on the hook to hand over the ship to next crew and from what I know corners are cut and stuff brushed uder the carpet everytime to meet deadlines , ye sab to har din ka natak hai.

Bean counting culture needs to go all this is same British era log book maintaining exercise which has little method to it.
Nikhil T
BRFite
Posts: 1286
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 06:48
Location: RAW HQ, Lodhi Road

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Nikhil T »

Report: AK Antony torpedoes Naval Chief
In a dramatic chain of events, navy chief Admiral DK Joshi resigned taking “moral responsibility”, hours after a major mishap on kilo-class submarine INS Sindhuratna, 50 nautical miles (80km) off the coast of Mumbai in the wee hours of Wednesday. Joshi’s resignation comes after a series of more than 10 mishaps involving naval warships in the past few months. At least five commanding officers have been stripped of command in the last 18 months.

The navy chief admiral’s resignation came after defence minister AK Antony summoned him at 11am following the INS Sindhuratna mishap. Seven sailors suffered injuries and two naval officers are untraceable. Their chances of survival are slim.

Sources told dna that Antony, who is known for his calm and composed demeanour, was furious over the navy’s dismal safety record. He underlined its inability to maintain its dwindling kilo-class fleet like INS Sindhuratna. Antony pulled up DK Joshi and the vice-chief of staff for their inability to take corrective measures to contain mishaps.

This is the sixth major mishap which has occurred in the past eight months under the Western Naval Command. In August last year, INS Sindhurakshak sank off the Mumbai harbour after an explosion took place on board, killing 18 navy personnel, including three officers. Both Sindhuratna and Sindhurakshak are of Russian vintage and belong to the Sindhughosh (kilo) class.

They are diesel-electric submarines built on contract between the Indian ministry of defence and the highly-controversial Russian arms agency Rosvooruzhenie. Sindhurakshak has a displacement of 3,000 tonnes, maximum diving depth of 300 metres and can notch a maximum speed of 18 knots. It can operate solo for 45 days with a 53-member crew. Sindhuratna was commissioned on December 22, 1988.

According to the navy, Sindhuratna was in the process of being sea-tested after a refit. The submarine was on a routine training exercise when smoke was detected in its third compartment. “It (smoke) could have been caused because of leakages in the battery which resulted in a blast inside the compartment. This led to a fire and smoke spread inside the vessel,” a source said.

“The smoke was brought under control by the crew. In the process, seven crew members inhaled the smoke and fell sick,” said navy spokesperson Rahul Sinha.

“The navy officers from the headquarters of Western Naval Command (HQ WNC) rushed to the spot with a medical team and shifted the seven crew members to Naval Hospital Asvini. They are stable,” Sinha said.

“There were 94 crew members, including commanding submarine of Western Naval Command, Commodore SR Kapur, who was training them. However, two personnel are yet to be traced and efforts are on to locate them,” a navy personal said.

Even as the rescue mission was on in the deep seas, Antony had moved uncharacteristically fast summoning the chief immediately. Sources said after being unable to give a substantive reply to Antony about the repeated mishaps, Joshi told the defence minister that he was ready to take moral responsibility, if the minister felt that way. Antony did not prevent him from taking the drastic step of resigning from his post.

After leaving the defence minister’s room, admiral Joshi went back to his South Block office and drafted his resignation letter before giving it to Antony. The defence minister then consulted PM Manmohan Singh and other key members of the cabinet committee on security before forwarding the resignation letter to president Pranab Mukherjee for the final nod. However, it took the government almost eight hours to announce the navy chief’s resignation.

Navy vice-chief vice-admiral RK Dhowan will officiate as chief of the naval staff till further orders. After admiral DK Joshi’s resignation, the Western Naval Command chief vice-admiral Shekhar Sinha is the senior-most admiral in the navy. But it was difficult for the government to appoint him as the next chief because recently, several incidents happened under his command, including the INS Sindhurakshak mishap.

Antony in December had pulled up the navy after the INS Sindhurakshak tragedy. He told the navy during the combined commanders’ conference in New Delhi “not to fritter away” such expensive national resources.

INS Sindhuratna was being towed back to the docks at the time of going to print. Once at the docks, the compartment in which the two missing officers are believed to be in will be opened, officials said. “All other crew members who were on board are safe. The submarine is also safe and does not have any weapons on board,” a navy officer said.

Since it was still in testing mode, Sindhuratna had not been placed under operations. Naval ships were dispatched by HQ WNC to provide assistance to the submarine. “An inquiry has been ordered to establish the cause of the incident,” said Sinha.

Board of inquiry ordered
The navy has ordered a board of inquiry into the accident that took place on INS Sindhuratna early on Wednesday.

Several theories behind the fire and smoke in the sub are doing the rounds. A naval officer said the battery could have leaked. Another officer said most hydrogen batteries in all Russian kilo-class submarines were upgraded before the INS Sindhurakshak caught fire and sank in Mumbai in August.

He said preliminary reports suggest the smoke in the submarine on Wednesday could be the result of a fire or leakage in one of the hydrogen batteries.

In 2010, INS Sindhuratna had collided with INS Sindhukesari at a Mumbai harbour jetty.
How the f@#$! can the Defence Minister single out the Navy Chief for all the accidents? I can understand if the good Admiral chose to resign himself, but if he was forced to resign - shouldn't the principle of collective responsibility be followed?
Eric Leiderman
BRFite
Posts: 364
Joined: 26 Nov 2010 08:56

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Eric Leiderman »

Taskar ji, I will take the liberty of disagreeing with you on 2 points
quote " Most ships have the same Freon based system simply because its the most effective system in the world."
1) Most modern ships do not use freon as a supressant because it is now illegal to do so. (for new builds)
This has nothing to do with the effectiveness of the system (I will come to that in point 2) but due to it
being super efficient in green house( gas) global warming syndrome.
2) When a fixed fire fighting system like Freon CO2 and High fog are compared side by side the document
data favours the last of the three
Freon and CO2 are harmful to life forms (CO2 because it inihibits breathing)(Freon when heated gives off
phosgene gas which is toxic)
To mitigate the above standard operating procedures are put in place before release of the gas.
a distinctive alarm is sounded to inform personnel to evacuate. A head count is taken to ensure all
personnel are accounted for.
this is time consuming and depending on the location of the fire and size of crew, can take in documented
incidents in excess of 15 minutes to deploy the suppressant.
a u tube link to help u visualise what i am trying to portray


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjdR0QkXvPY

Please bear with this long winded post. I have posted parts of this before , will try to summarise all of it now.

If a fire can be extinguished in under five minutes the loss of life and / or machinery is greatly reduced. Google this fact

This system atomises water so 1) the surface area of the coolant/extinguishing agent is increased to a power (indice) in excess of 4

2) The suppressant/extinguishing agent can be released instantanously , no need for personnel to evacuate.

3) The amount of water used is minimal because it surface area has been increased, reducing water damage.

4) Can be released with running machinery including electrical electronic equipment. does not cause shorts and shock hazards,

5) Can be released automatically or manually

6) Because of the high surface area the water droplets that do come in contact with a heat source instantanously turn to steam which absorbs heat in the form of latent heat, expands 1000 times compared to the volume of water further acting as a smothering agent.

7) Unlike co2 and freon which is a one off use , no fall back, this can be used repeatedly in case of re-ignition.

8) the system can be split up into small zones eg one of the 4 main engines only.
hence you do not drench a whole space like say a sprinkler/drencher system of old.

I have used the system in a real life situation and it works. (hence please excuse the bhasha.)

This system is beingdesigned and manafactured in India (If I am not mistaken by DRDO)
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by ramana »

Karan M wrote:On the plus side Antony did not give into Khan pressure and allowed IAF to run a free and fair MMRCA process. Also allowed several local programs to come good under his tenure. If only his obsession with his image had not forced him to overdo the ban arms vendors stuff and engage in delayed procurement syndrome.

How does that matter, for the MoD wouldnt have bought anything anyway? It kept the reputation clean and the IAF happy to tryout some out of reach toys. It like my taking the kids to FAO Schwartz to try out the latest new toys and later walkout not buying anything.
Does that make me a good parent?

Focussing on his 'obsession' masks the real purpose of his tenure. Its to get money allocated and returned unspent to feed the populist government programs.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by ramana »

DNA report is psy ops to show AKA as an active mantri. If he really was hard taskmaster he need not not have waited 8 hours to forward the resignation to the President.
All along he showed passive oversight of his ministry.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21538
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Philip »

The truth is outing! The brother of the Lt.Cdr. killed in the accident says that his brother said that the sub was not seaworthy,"everybody knew it",he had just been on a 6-day trials run and they had experienced problems during it. Though the faults were well known,it was sent out for another trial despite the concern of the submariners.

The SRatna one must remember was the sub alongside the SRakshak and was also damaged.many experts say that it was the strength of the double-hulled Kilo that saved the sub.Had it been a single-hulled German U-boat,we would've had two subs lost.Now what damage the sub underwent is obviously classified,but considering the long time taken for its refit,it must have been serious enough to warrant such a lengthy "holiday" in the dock.

Now the sub ,25 yrs. old too,was repaired/refitted at MDL/naval dockyard,not sent back to Russia OEM as was done with all previous refits/upgrades.We failed to master the refit of a Kilo ourselves,with a sub which has languished in at Vizag for years.ON TV , a former senior officer says that it took AKA.MOD 6 odd yrs. to OK the Scorpene sub acquisition,plus another 3 yrs. delay in that programme.The IN had 42 ys. of "unblemished record of sub ops ".How can the IN operate 25-30 yr. old subs without experiencing problems that too when they boats are overworked too?

The second issue is the treatment of the navy chief.He from evidence now exploding in the media is that he was shabbily treated by the MOD/AKA when protesting about the lack of critical replacements for ancient weapon systems.There are also other delays in the LR SAMs for DDGs,delays in surface warships delivery,ASW helicopters,etc. In all these issues,there has been a virtual paralysis in the MOD/DM ,and the bias against the Adm.Joshi has been so evident in the indecent haste with which AKA accepted the resignation of the chief.

The resignation of the chief is the most "appalling thing" that has happened says Lt.Gen.Hoon,after Adm.Bhagwat's shunting out.This issue is not going to die a natural death and he has called for a national inquiry.
"The Def. Min and Def.Sec. should resign" It is not just the navy,the IA has had no guns since Bofors,it is time that it goes"

Further accusations are being made about the line of succession,some interests promoted against others.One journo on New X alleges that the SRakshak was an act of SABOTAGE,there is evidence about this and AKA has not given any explanation to the nation thus far.He has also asked who was the def. min who signed on the Westland deal.Further accusations as Ramanna says,that the MOD has been selectively leaking out info detrimental to the services ,obvious which "Saint" is responsible!

"When will we get new eqpt.?", is the clarion call by many experts,former senior officers.

PS:The navy chief ,Adm.Joshi who just retired is alleged to have told AKA "what can I do with 25yr old submarines?" ,when he met him.

(How many of us have cars that old? I've kept one car for 10 yrs. ,great set of wheels,the gas-turbine workhorse which I call the frigate,and am now sadly parting with it because of more frequent maintenance problems.A new diesel-engined frigate has replaced it.)
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by ramana »

Adm Joshi's resignation is a wasted effort as AKA claims Joshi was disturbed!

Joshi insisted on resignation:Anthony
In his first remarks on the sudden exit of Navy Chief Admiral D K Joshi, Defence Minister A K Antony said that he consulted the Prime Minister before accepting the resignation and praised the officer as a “very good Admiral”.

Antony, who met Joshi Wednesday noon for an explanation on the Sindhuratna accident following which the officer turned in his resignation on “moral grounds”, said on Thursday that the officer had requested to be relieved with immediate effect and had recommended that Vice Admiral Robin Dhowan take over interim charge.

“I consulted everybody. I met the Prime Minister also. Ultimately, we took a decision to accept the resignation,” he said, responding to questions on why the resignation of the Navy Chief was immediately accepted by the government. Describing Joshi as a “very good Admiral”, Antony said that the officer was very disturbed about the submarine accident and wanted to take full responsibility for the matter. “Yesterday Admiral Joshi met me personally and he handed over me resignation letter and he requested me to accept the letter with immediate effect,” he said.

The minister also called Joshi a “very fine human being”. “He was very disturbed by the whole development. He is very fine human being and a very good admiral. He was totally upset about the whole development. He requested me that he would like to take the whole responsibility, so he requested me to accept his resignation with immediate effect,” Antony said.

Meanwhile, Admiral Joshi, who came to his office briefly on Thursday in civilian clothes to speak to top officers, has written to his colleagues, saying that he was taking responsibility for the series of mishaps. “I consulted only myself and my wife before taking the decision to resign. After the submarine mishap, I was firm that I should take the responsibility for it,” a message sent by him to senior officers says.

Shows it was Adm Joshi who offered his resignation and not AKA who demanded it as the lifafa journos are saying.

Report also gives lie to how AKA promptly accepted the resignation as is being bandied about.



chackojoseph, when you talk to your sources tell them to read AKA's statement.
And next time don't post such tripe/drivel here.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by ramana »

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120607/nation.htm#10

Bio of Adm. DK Joshi

DK Joshi’s elevation as naval chief
Moments of pride for the Joshi family
Jotirmay Thapliyal/TNS


Vice-Admiral DK Joshi, Naval chief-designate with his wife and daughters; and (below) Joshi as a kid with his parents, Hari Ballabh Joshi and Hansa.



Dehradun, June 6
This Joshi family from Almora, now settled in Dehradun, that too in the close proximity of the Indian Military Academy, keeps little defence lineage. When one of its members joined the Navy's executive branch way back in 1974, little had Hira Ballabh Joshi, a forest officer and father of Admiral-designate Devendra Kumar Joshi, thought that one day his son would be the Admiral of the Indian Navy.

Now leading a retired life in sylvan surroundings of Indira Nagar Colony in Dehradun, HB Joshi, along with his wife Hansa Joshi, today are proud parents. Their elder son and presently Vice Admiral posted at the Western Naval Command, DK Joshi, has been appointed as the next Chief of Naval Staff, succeeding Admiral Nirmal Verma, who retires on August 31. Born on July 4, 1954, and doing his early education from Almora, DK Joshi moved to Hansraj College, Delhi. While studying in Delhi, he applied for the executive branch of the Navy and got selected. Subsequently, he got commissioned in 1974. He moved from one important appointment to another in his 38 years of service.

HB Joshi first got information about his son's appointment from a family friend. He said he was expecting this to happen as his son was heading the key Western Naval Command, a posting generally held by the seniormost officer in the Navy. "It was on expected lines. There certainly were apprehensions when he was earlier elevated as the Vice Admiral as some superseded officers had then gone to court. But after their case was dismissed by court, we were doubly sure of our son's coveted appointment sooner or later," said HB Joshi. He expressed gratitude to the Defence Ministry for upholding the seniority as the basis of selection for the Naval Chief. An octogenarian, HB Joshi asserted that his son's elevation to the top post of the Navy will inspire Uttarakhand youth towards joining defence forces.

Vice Admiral Joshi came to Dehradun almost 18 months ago and spent most of his time at home with his parents. Even in service, despite his tight schedule, the Vice Admiral somehow manages his time to talk to his parents every alternate day. "Whenever in Dehradun, he rests at home and only goes outside to play golf," disclosed HB Joshi, who retired as Chief Conservator of Forests in 1985.

Hansa Joshi, mother of Vice Admiral Joshi, recalled how she was against her son joining defence forces due to the risk factor involved, but later reconciled to her son's wishes, and today, so many years down the line, she lauds her son's decision.

Meanwhile, wishes have started pouring into the Joshi family's residence in Dehradun. Relatives and family friends are either visiting the residence in person or conveying their greetings over the telephone. "We did not even eat food today due to a large number of visitors at our home," said Hansa. Uttarakhand Garhwal MP and Chairman of Parliamentary Committee of Defence Affairs Satpal Maharaj greeted elevation of Vice Admiral DK Joshi as the next Naval Chief. He said Joshi, who hails from Almora district of Uttarakhand, has brought laurels to the state. Uttarakhand Tourism Minister Amrita Rawat, too, has conveyed best wishes to Vice Admiral DK Joshi and his family members.
Has pictures of his family and his parents
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21538
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Philip »

Time Now on the issue:

Participants included Adm.Prakash,V.Adm.Jacob.Maj.Gen.Bakshi,Hardeep Puri,an AVM,etc. and a Congress stooge.Some highlights.

Adm.Prakash on the Scorpene delay."I crore escalation in costs per day by DCN"! (6+3 yr. delay).The MOD enjoyed watching it continue to escalate until Pranabda signed on.He added,that the sub acquisition plan was drawn up aeons ago and followed up with the successive chiefs for the last decade without any effect.

V.Adm.Jacob,former Vice-Chief."I could walk into George Fernandes' office at any time and discuss matters with him.It was approved that we would acquire a sub-rescue vessel during my tenure.I retired in 2001.13 years on,it still hasn't been acquired!"

Maj.Gen.Bakshi."When Gen. VKS stunned the nation with the drastic situ in the army,where it could only fight for 4 days due to lack of ammo,eqpt.etc.,the reaction of the politico-babu nexus was to cut the defence budget by 10,000 crores!" (as Ramana rightly says to fund the freebie populist schemes of the Congress/UPA of which ittle actually reaches the aam aadmi.)

Can our "Saint of Surf",which washes whitest clean ,say anything in his defence? It is so patently obvious that he has been the greatest disaster to the nation's security and defence since the debacle of '62.All that the enemy needs to do to defeat us is to work for a Congress victory so that the "saint" can stay on regardless and decimate India's defence capability beyond repair.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Prem »

Philip wrote:Time Now on the issue:
Maj.Gen.Bakshi."When Gen. VKS stunned the nation with the drastic situ in the army,where it could only fight for 4 days due to lack of ammo,eqpt.etc.,the reaction of the politico-babu nexus was to cut the defence budget by 10,000 crores!" (as Ramana rightly says to fund the freebie populist schemes of the Congress/UPA of which ittle actually reaches the aam aadmi.)
Good thing that so many lives were saved. Army Chief VKS insulted ,now Navy Chief Joshi scarficed and slaughtered. Next time , it will be AF chief. UPA was madated to demoralize armed forces. They succeded 2/3 and still 2 more months to go or Did AF chief acted smart and saved himseff exposing commission and cut in Italian Choper Deal?
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Singha »

EU has enacted a special waiver that allows halon to be used in ship fire fighting systems until 2040. its mentioned in the doc link I posted on page1. there is no binding treaty in naval forces not to use halon or freon.
Eric Leiderman
BRFite
Posts: 364
Joined: 26 Nov 2010 08:56

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Eric Leiderman »

You are right , what I am stating is for new builds, what you are quoting is existing vessels.
The safety oriented commercial companies, did away with freon a long lime back, They are now adding the Hi fog system in addition to a fixed fire fighting CO2 system. I have not seen a commercial vessel (other than eastern block built) after the 80's with freon as a fixed firefighting system for obvious reasons.
Bob V
BRFite
Posts: 389
Joined: 26 Jul 2009 04:29
Location: Out at the sea
Contact:

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Bob V »

Not sure if this report is relevant now that Vice Adm. Sinha is claimed to have resigned.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-new ... 89135.aspx
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21538
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Philip »

Rome days away from bankruptcy.It seems that the "Roman" disease has hit us in India too,as we languish under the bankrupt rule of the Roman empress and her bunch of eunuchs.

V.Adm,Sinha,on whose watch some of the worst accidents have taken place ,according to one report refused to resign/resignation not accepted and his hat has been thrown into the ring as the next chief.Without any disrespect to the good admiral,it would be perfect for the shameful deaf min. and the MOD to have the debris and dirt of the SRakshak and SRatna tragedies swept under the carpet,where the "Saint" retains his halo and the MOD shift the blame for the mess onto the armed forces and their leadership.

V.Adm.Jacob on telly said "yes" when the anchor on channel X alleged that AKA when told of the aging fleet and problems keeping it fighting fit,said,"don's waste govt. resources" or words to that effect!

The Hindu alleges that from reports of senior naval officials,the SRatna had not had her batteries changed due to delays in contracting them from the Indian vendor.That too after her damage sustained earlier when the SRakshak blew up.A battery leak,build up of hydrogen and then an explosion is a probable cause says the paper.

If there is any silver lining in this tragedy,and that too could only be a small sliver,it is that it has exposed the enormous dereliction of duty by the DM,who is now under attack from the entire media,plus the community of retd. senior service officers of all three services across the board.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/b ... 733532.ece

Batteries may have caused blast in INS Sindhuratna
Though the 1988-commissioned INS Sindhuratna had undergone a refit earlier this year, investigators have found that the batteries that powered it underwater had not been replaced because of delay in contracting. Photo: Vivek Bendre
The Hindu Though the 1988-commissioned INS Sindhuratna had undergone a refit earlier this year, investigators have found that the batteries that powered it underwater had not been replaced because of delay in contracting. Photo: Vivek Bendre

Submarine’s ageing power pack was not replaced in refit

Even as the Navy recovered the bodies of Lt. Commander Kapish Muwal and Lt. Commander Manoranjan Kumar, the two officers killed in Wednesday’s explosion on board the submarine INS Sindhuratna, fresh evidence is emerging that ageing equipment might have contributed to the tragedy.

Though the ageing, 1988-commissioned INS Sindhuratna had undergone a refit earlier this year, investigators have found that the batteries that powered it underwater had not been replaced because of delay in contracting, highly placed Navy sources said. Investigators would seek to establish how the flaw escaped attention during earlier harbour trials, the sources said.

Hydrogen leaking from the batteries, as The Hindu reported on Thursday, is thought to have caused the explosion. The two dead officers were trapped in the burning compartment, after it was sealed off to prevent the fire spreading.

Admiral D.K. Joshi, who resigned as Navy Chief hours after the tragedy, made a closed-door speech to 40-odd flag officers who assembled at naval headquarters on Thursday. Admiral Joshi said he felt compelled to resign because, even as he cracked down hard on officers responsible for errors, he had been unable to push the Defence Ministry to take adequate supportive measures.

The Admiral said that he consulted none but his wife before taking the decision.

In a separate statement to the media, Defence Minister AK Antony told journalists he “consulted everybody” before accepting the resignation.

“I met the Prime Minister also. Ultimately, we took a decision to accept the resignation.”

Describing the Navy Chief as a “very good Admiral” and a “fine human being,” the Minister said he was “sad” about the development.

Antony equally responsible for submarine mishap: Uddhav

Government pushed Admiral Joshi to resign: Vishnu Bhagwat

“...The government wants to appoint a pliant chief who has been implicated in some scandal and cannot speak up. They don’t want a straightforward person”

“Admiral D.K. Joshi was one of the best Naval Chiefs the country has had. The government’s decision to accept his resignation will lower the morale of the Navy,” former Navy Chief Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat said in Mumbai on Thursday.

“The government drove him into resigning by attacking him and demanding explanations. Such incidents have been happening for years. The Navy Chief cannot be held responsible. Did the government demand the resignation of the Army Chief for the deaths in Kargil?” he said.

“The government has shown no grace even in the manner of accepting the resignation. They accepted the resignation with immediate effect. They could have said they accept it with utmost regret. They accepted his resignation in five minutes. Is this the way things are done,” he asked.

According to the former Navy Chief the final responsibility for such mishaps lies with the Defence Minister and the Prime Minister. “They should be held responsible in every way.”

The government had no choice but to appoint Admiral Joshi because he had impeccable credentials and an excellent service record, Admiral Bhagwat said. “They could not stop him from becoming Chief. They thought he would fall in line but that did not happen.”

“The bottom line is that the government wants to appoint a pliant chief who has been implicated in some scandal and cannot speak up. They don’t want a straightforward person,” he said.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by ramana »

Philip
Please write a long post examining the Congress and Generalship since Independence.
vic
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2412
Joined: 19 May 2010 10:00

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by vic »

It seems there is some unstated under current to the resignation drama. My feeling is that GoI wanted Joshi to go and was pressurizing him. They found a defective Russian submarine a heaven send opportunity to force him out. I wonder how does the issues relating to uber secret submarine operations (or even problems) hit the main stream media within hours.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Singha »

could be a underground psywar in progress among factions, countries, agents and orgs about who gets the malai for high capital projects like P15B, P75....its always easier to share the spoils if upright people are scapegoated and eased out.
vina
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6046
Joined: 11 May 2005 06:56
Location: Doing Nijikaran, Udharikaran and Baazarikaran to Commies and Assorted Leftists

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by vina »

Phack.. If Al-Hundi is right in it's report (in the days of G Kasturi it always was, but under N. Ram you never know), and if the batteries were not replaced as it should have been when under refit due to "contracting delays" , and if the babugiri / baboon giri and the mantri giri are to blame for new batteries not being in place then it is criminal negligence.

Heads must roll, a couple of Baboons must face criminal suits and Anthony must be crucified and attain sainthood. Two officers have died, 7 crew members injured and the boat and it's crew endangered. This can't be business as usual. I do hope that the family of the crew file RTI and PIL and take the MoD baboons and St Anthony to court if there was babugiri that led to batteries not being replaced on expiry.

This UPA govt needs to go.
negi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13112
Joined: 27 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Ban se dar nahin lagta , chootiyon se lagta hai .

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by negi »

Firstly Halon and Freon are from same family i.e. Bromotrifluoromethane

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromotrifluoromethane

So when one says we have moved from freon to halon they need to be very specific however in this case all this is hair splitting nonsense for all HFC gases work in a similar way they are powerful reducing agents and remove oxygen from the area where they are released .

All IN ships use HFC based systems in critical sections like missile/ammunition stowage sections .

Despite all the talk about substitutes fact is military is allowed to use halons for mission critical purposes because alternatives are not as effective that is why military does not have to adhere to Montreal protocol.
Deans
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2523
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 19:13
Location: Moscow

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Deans »

Singha wrote:Rus has even managed to kill 9 or 11 skeleton crew on a sub under tow for scrapping per the wiki link I posted.

if it werent tragic for the poor 9 sailors it would be simply amazing how this whole affair was handled...and someone was saying we should bring in Rus for safety audit...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-159
There was more to this incident than was reported. (I was based in Moscow then and knew Russian officers).
That sub, on its last voyage had a very large no of senior officers among its 10 crew. The wiki article also lists the ranks of those
officers, though I believe one was an Admiral and that was not reported. Best guess was that it was possibly a fire in the officers
mess of another sub, which led to deaths and was passed off as the sinking of an obsolete sub due to be scrapped anyway. On these matters the Russians are secretive.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32438
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by chetak »

Fire in submarine: seven minutes to evacuate, two minutes to dress

SAMYABRATA RAY GOSWAMI



Mumbai, Feb. 26: Two young officers of the Indian Navy choked to death after they were trapped inside a submarine compartment that was flooded with toxic gases to extinguish a fire on board.

The two officers have been identified as Lieutenant Commander Kapish Muwal and Lieutenant Manoranjan Kumar.

The commanding officer of the submarine is among 29 other sailors and technical staff aboard the INS Sindhuratna, a Russian-built submarine, who are receiving medical aid after inhaling the gases.

The Sindhuratna, a Kilo-class submarine, had embarked on a Task 2 mission under Commodore Commanding Submarines (West) S.K. Kapoor to check whether the recently refitted vessel was fit to be deployed at sea. The Task 1 inspection mission had earlier certified it harbour-worthy.

The submarine belongs to the same class as the INS Sindhurakshak which was destroyed by an ordnance implosion in its missile compartment in August 2013 while being anchored at the Mumbai harbour. As many as 18 sailors had died in that accident.

This morning, around 6, an alarm went off aboard the Sindhuratna when it was about 100 nautical miles from the Mumbai harbour.

“The inspection team was at work at the time and though the alarm signified some problem in the battery pit, some sailors and officers initially did not take it seriously. They thought it was a simulated alarm set off by the inspection team,” said a naval source.

There is a set protocol by which the crew operates in submarines. In case of any exigency in the battery pit, the commanding officer of the submarine issues a series of parallel orders to ensure safety of the crew and the vessel.

In line with protocol after the alarm went off, a crewmember was sent to open the hatch of the battery pit slightly to check if there was a fire.

When he confirmed, the commanding officer ordered immediate isolation of compartment 3 so that fire-extinguishing gas could be sprayed in the compartment.

The hatch between compartment 3 and 2 had already been closed by then to aid isolation of compartment 3.

“The evacuation of crew from compartment 3 to 4 began. Everybody had to grab their IDA suits and move out to the engine room,” said the naval source.

An IDA set is a breathing apparatus consisting of a mask, suit and oxygen cylinder used by submarine crew in emergencies like a gas leak or a fire.

“When the evacuation was ordered, many of the men were sleeping and some officers were hanging around in the galley where the kitchen is located. A bit of a time lost as people did not take things seriously at first, believing them to be part of an inspection drill and not a real emergency,” said the navy source.

By the time crew members started rushing into compartment 4, the gas from the fire-extinguishing sprays which are activated from the main control room had already engulfed compartment 3 and started moving into compartment 4.

“The gases in the submarine fire-extinguishers — a deadly cocktail — are lethal but they do not kill immediately. There is a 7-to-8-minute window after the spraying starts during which one can get into the IDA suit and start breathing oxygen from the cylinder. Since getting into the suit is a two-minute affair for all crewmembers, 7 to 8 minute offer a pretty large window to escape the effects of the gas,” said the naval source.

When it was found that the sprayed gases were spilling into compartment 4, the crew were evacuated into compartment 5 and the hatch between compartment 4 and 5 was closed down.

The entire process usually takes 3-5 minutes. Immediately after compartment 3 was isolated and evacuation over, a headcount began.

“Soon it became clear who the missing personnel were and it was feared that they might have been stuck in the toilet of the sub or late in stepping out of the compartment before the hatch closed,” said the naval source.

By then, the submarine had been raised to the periscope level and then to the surface level. “After a battery accident, a submarine is quickly brought to the surface to recharge it using diesel engines. This happens at periscope level so the exhaust from the diesel can be pumped out. In the case of a fire, the submarine has to be brought to the surface so the snort mast can be raised,” said the navy source.

The snort mast is a pipe through which the toxic gases from fire extinguishers are expelled into the air and fresh air is channelled inside the submarine.

Submarine commander Sandeep Sinha opened compartment 3 after the snort mast had expelled some toxic fumes and went in with some men in search of the two missing officers. Sinha and his men, who breathed in the foul gases, took ill. A doctor on board was also affected by the gases.

“Help was sought to take the sub and its crew ashore but then luck was not on our side,” said the source. With a critical naval exercise on way in the Bay of Bengal, there were hardly any naval ships available. The ones which were deployed on the western shore were far from the Sindhuratna.

A helicopter was rushed from the Mumbai base, which airlifted seven critical crewmembers to the naval hospital, INS Ashwini.

About two hours later, two ships reached the Sindhuratna. The other affected personnel, including Sinha, were evacuated to the shore.

The bodies of the officers were airlifted in the evening to the naval hospital.

The Sindhuratna is expected to reach the Western Command Naval docks by Thursday afternoon.
Ten Kilo-class submarines were procured from the USSR/Russia between 1985 and 2000. The Sindhuratna —fifth in the series — was commissioned in November 1988 in Russia’s Nizhny Novogorod. It went through a short refit at the naval dockyard in Mumbai for six months ending December 2013. The submarine was not armed at the time of the mishap.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32438
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by chetak »

The Indian Navy in a Royal Mess

BY SHAILESH RANADE

Indian Navy Submarine Sindhuratna (S59) was berthed alongside Sindhurakshak (S63) on 14 Aug 2013. It very narrowly missed being put out of commission that fiery night. On 26 Feb 2014, it very narrowly missed its appointment with the Davy Jones Locker. While the sub escaped in one piece, there were a few unfortunate victims. Two Officers are dead, a half a dozen sailors injured and the Navy’s Top Boss has abandoned his South Block Office in Delhi.

In my last post I had mentioned that the Navy (including the Army and Air Force) continue to be run in a whimsical manner by two Bollywood Terms “Chalta Hai” and “Ram Bharose”.

In the last six months, the Navy has not changed at all. The safety stand-down in the immediate aftermath of the S63 incident has not produced the desired results. It was not meant to. For if it had, heads would not be rolling.

The Navy is now in “Mayday” status. A weak and dishonest political leadership begets a frail and spineless military leadership. Cover up is the norm. Statements like – Pass your time buddy, I’m here another 3 months, Let the next bugger sort it out is the new standard operating procedure.

The Chiefs have a direct responsibility for the welfare and safety of the men under them. Pray, why are old systems and platforms still in use. Why is the Air Force still flying the MiG-21? What is the Navy doing with a 50 year old carrier that spends more time in port than at sea? What happened to Gen VK Singh’s letter to the PM about shortages in the Army?

These are serious issues. Why jeopardise the lives of soldiers and colleagues in peace time? The notorious flailing by Gen VP ‘Kargil’ Malik – “we will fight with whatever we have” was actually a one-way ticket for our brave jawans. Who in the Army Headquarters, was taken to task for the shortages. None. But the Brigadiers and Colonels in the field got it in the neck.

The Navy is in a Royal Mess. The other two Services are not far behind. The current culture of this Blue Water Navy is destroying the fleet in Brown Waters without having fired a single shot since 1971.

There is no doubt that the responsibility lies with the Officer Cadre, especially the Flag Rank. While serious issues with the political leadership can be sorted out when the Navy gets its dream four star Admiral one day, the in-house spring cleaning can start right away.

The More Privileged: It is well known that certain prized appointments are the sole preserve of the kith and kin of Senior Officers. ADC’s, Flag Lts and Staff Officers of Admirals move in directly as Commanding Officers without have done sufficient sea time as Lt Cdrs or as Executive Officers. Most of these Officers are in Command for 365 days and are back to serving their bosses only to make way for the next lot of personal staff. Where is the loyalty to the sailor or the ship? In this regard the Navy can learn from the Merchant Navy, where to become a Master; the officer would have done a tour as a Chief Officer. None of the present day three star C-in-C’s have been Executive Officers of ships. Not surprisingly, almost all have poor leadership qualities.

New vs Old: The Navy has the latest ships and also some of the oldest in its inventory. Commonsense demands that the intelligent and more experienced hands run old ships. Instead, what the Navy does is to put those in Command of these ships who are lower in merit and the guy who “dared to request for being wet listed”. Old ships and obsolete engines cannot be run by Officers just seeking to mark time. It requires patience and dedication followed by rewards. None of those who Command these miserable ships get promoted to the next rank.

Lessons Learnt: The Navy almost never seems to learn its lessons. Adm DK Joshi proudly announced at the Sindhurakshak press conference that the Board of Enquiry would be completed and findings disclosed in 4 weeks. Has anyone heard of them? Have the procedures been revised and implemented? Are there any auditors to check? Quite unlikely. Therefore, we get to hear of incidents at regular intervals and the poor tax payers get to foot the expensive bills of the insufficiently trained crews.

Incompetent Dockyards: The technical leadership and the naval dockyards are in strong competition with the DRDO for ineptness and inefficiency. The Sindhuratna had just been refitted and repaired at the Naval Dockyard. Were all systems given the “Green” before she was pushed out to sea for trials? It was most probably a hurried job with a wily Admiral breathing down the submarine Captain’s neck. Despite a massive overtime bill for dockyard employees, almost no refits are completed to the satisfaction of ships’ Captains. The dockyards need a complete overhaul.

Rat Race: Hardly had the CNS resignation news been flashed across the TV screens, the three star stalwarts started promoting themselves. Some used their proximity to defence correspondents with one dumb journalist even stating that a particular C-in-C was not only a very fine officer but also a very intelligent one. The Navy has such officers even at the Sub-Lieutenant level. But the Service, unfortunately, at this moment needs a Leader. The root cause of the “lineage” and “line of succession” as some call it, is the date of promotion and the date of birth that decides the date of retirement. While nothing much can be done about the date of birth, the promotion depends entirely upon a piece of paper called the Annual Confidential Report. So, given the right connections, it is quite possible for a grounded land lubber to move into the flag rank seamlessly. There are many Admirals who have less than 10 years of sea time in a service spanning 40 years. The Navy would do well to split itself into two groups – “Wet” and “Dry”. The Wet Group (at least 20 years at sea) could be expected to occupy all the star billets. The Dry Group (less than 10 years) could hope to go up to Commodore level at best and be responsible all activities in support of the Fleet. Merit should precede seniority at all levels. If this is done, the ubiquitous publication called Navy List will cease to be the most popular book in the Indian Navy.

Admiral DK Joshi should be commended for having called it a day in the middle of his innings. He has set a high standard. It’s a clear hint for the other Senior Officers to follow suit. If one can’t run the Navy, please don’t run it. Admirals must remember – their mistakes and pusillanimity costs lives and ships.

Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way.

Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21538
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Philip »

Tx Chetak for that insightful post.It's exactly what I was told a few months ago by one in the know.The "timepass" attitude of some officers,waiting for their transfer or promotion ,reluctant to take up responsibility and dirty their hands is one aspect.The other is the poor capability of our shipyards in regular maintneenace.We were unable to refit a Kilo class sub years ago,which languished at Vizag,taken apart but unable to be repaired,refitted and put together again.Sending ships and subs out to sea will only result in tragedies like this.Some years ago,a senior oifficer who served mostly in the Eastern Command,told me about the impending crisis regarding maintenance and seaworthiness of its fleet.A few months later exactly as he predicted we had the ignominious sinking of INS Andamans,a Petya class frigate,which was sent out on an exercise in miserable condition,sprang major leaks with large loss of life.The admiral in charge of the eastern command,then V.Adm.Ramdas was made the next navy chief! Is the same thing going to happen this time round with V.Adm.Sinha being chosen despite the tragedies on his watch?

However,the root cause is the continuing use of vintage warships and subs to the detriment of the navy,especially in an era where the IN has expanded its global operations,with the "look east" policy and numerous exercises with international navies (at US behest).These have been a none-too-subtle anti-China grouping and gesture,which has overworked the force.Put these all together and you have a recipe for disaster.The woeful tale of the sub (non) acquisition programme under AKA is too well known to repeat.The absurdity of allowing the Scorpene subs to escalate in price by "one crore a day",as Adm.Prakash has revealed,until Pranabda put an end to the obfuscating,is truly criminal.DCN has been exposed as having given the Pakis huge kickbacks for their Agostas.It would not be out of Q to ask whether the same has happneded here too.WE see a similar pattern emerge with the rafale deal where Reliance (with no history of defence manufacturing) is trying to supplant HAL as local manufacturers for the Rafale's TOT clause!

After the loss of the SRakshak,an immediate urgent replacement and interim buy of new Kilos or lease of existing ones from Russia should've been made.the upgraded versions of the Kilo are still in production for Russia and exports and are being built at a very rapid and cost-effective rate.This way at least the induction of new subs of a familiar type,which would've posed no problem for training would've alleviated the problem.A few years ago,Greece was bankrupt and couldn't pay for her German U-boats;by that time HDW had been cleared of alleged kickbacks too and we could've made an offer for these subs readily available to add to the 4 U-209s in service,which would yet again be a not too difficult induction because of the lineage of the sub derived from the U-209 class.

What urgent action the GOI is now going to do is anyone's guess,esp. as we have Dr."cut your kurta according to your khadi",Singh who has bankrupted India and ravaged the rupee by his snake-oil economics adn scam-promoting regime.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Singha »

er, if what he says is true not even more money and better management process will help because the jernails/karnials in charge have parlayed good connections into positions without the adequate "sea time". how are you going to sort these dozens of senior officers out and who will do it?

angry retd people seem to be piling on to that blog post in support.
tsarkar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3263
Joined: 08 May 2006 13:44
Location: mumbai

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by tsarkar »

^^ Shailesh Ranade has the most accurate reporting of the state of affairs. What is needed is leaders with balls, who can internally set the system right, by giving priority to sea time over staff duties, as well as set priorities right with political leadership like Sam Manekshaw did with Indira Gandhi.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Singha »

sounds like the itvity industry virus to me. apolitical individual contributors and leads given a few bones vs the meat the staff manager clued in well connected durbaris.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Singha »

Image
Brando
BRFite
Posts: 675
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 06:18

Re: Navy Chief Resigns over Sindhuratna fire

Post by Brando »

^^ Might as well be a game of musical chairs.

Who joined a few months before another should not be the sole determining factor in choosing military chiefs. This "order of succession" is absurd and dangerous. Individual competence and experience ought to be the determining factors, not some bureaucratic "first come-first chief" circus.
Post Reply