10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
ricky_v
BRFite
Posts: 1145
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by ricky_v »

mods, apologies for ot, if too deviating, request to move to appropriate thread
Haresh wrote: 13 Jan 2024 02:55
The relationship with the old apartheid SA and Israel was strictly transactional, nothing more. The Iranians under the Shah and the sowdis/gulf nations also traded with them. If my memory is correct I remember reading many years that some Vijayanta tanks were exported whole to SA as scrap.
the only thing that matters in this affair is what the south africans (majority / system), or the ones who are in power at least, think about any perceived wrongs perpetuated against them; listing the below from wiki, the sources are a matter of public record, needless to say, this is not the first rodeo between the 2 nations
In 1994, South Africa held its first democratic elections, and Nelson Mandela was elevated to the presidency. In a speech in August 1993, Mandela had said that his party, the ANC, had been "extremely unhappy" with the apartheid-era Israel–South Africa connection, but was willing to move past it, including in seeking a resolution to the longstanding Israeli–Palestinian conflict:

"As a movement, we recognize the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism just as we recognize the legitimacy of Zionism as a Jewish nationalism... We insist on the right of the state of Israel to exist within secure borders, but with equal vigor, support the Palestinian right to national self-determination."[134]


He (Mandela) finally visited Israel in October 1999, during a tour of the Levant. He reiterated his unwavering opposition to Israeli control of Gaza, the West Bank, Golan Heights, and Southern Lebanon,[139] but also said:

"To the many people who have questioned why I came, I say: Israel worked very closely with the apartheid regime. I say: I've made peace with many men who slaughtered our people like animals. Israel cooperated with the apartheid regime, but it did not participate in any atrocities."[140]
[in 2004] This followed a particularly tense phase in relations: earlier that year, the South African government had criticised Israel's construction of the Israeli West Bank barrier,[141] and an official delegation led by Deputy Foreign Minister Aziz Pahad had made representations in support of the Palestinian case at the International Court of Justice.[143]
In 2008 a delegation of African National Congress (ANC) veterans visited Israel and the Occupied Territories, and said that in some respects it was worse than apartheid.[156][157] In May 2018, in the aftermath of the Gaza border protests, the ANC issued a statement comparing the actions of Palestinians to "our struggle against the apartheid regime". It also accused the Israeli military of "the same cruelty" as Hitler, and stated that "all South Africans must rise up and treat Israel like the pariah that it is".[158] Around the same time, the South African government withdrew indefinitely its Ambassador to Israel, Sisa Ngombane, to protest "the indiscriminate and grave manner of the latest Israeli attack".[159]
Following the 2010 Gaza flotilla raid, South Africa recalled its ambassador from Israel,[161] and summoned the Israeli ambassador for a reprimand.[162] In 2013, Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, the South African Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, said that South Africa had not been sending its ministers to Israel, having decided "to slow down and curtail senior leadership contact with that regime until things begin to look better".[162] Later that year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cancelled his planned trip to South Africa for Mandela's funeral.[163]

In April 2015, Israel denied South African Higher Education Minister Blade Nzimande and his aides permission to visit the Palestinian government in Ramallah, provoking an angry response from Nzimande.[164] And, later that year, the governing ANC in South Africa angered Israel by hosting a delegation from militant Palestinian nationalist group Hamas, which met with South African President Jacob Zuma – though in his capacity as ANC party leader – and signed a memorandum of understanding with the ANC about ending Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories.[165] In response, the Israeli foreign ministry summoned South Africa's deputy ambassador for a reprimand.[166]
An additional contributor to tensions between Israel and South Africa over the past two decades has been high-level political support in South Africa for the pro-Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign. As early as June 2006,[167] the Congress of South African Trade Unions – then the largest union federation in South Africa, and a close partner of the ruling ANC – declared its support for boycotts of Israel, calling the latter an apartheid state.[168]

In September 2011, due to lobbying by Zackie Achmat and his pro-Palestinian Open Shuhuda Street organisation, South African Trade and Industry Minister, Rob Davies, "agreed in principle" that imports manufactured in occupied Palestinian territories should not be labelled as products of Israel, in order to facilitate voluntary boycotts of Israeli goods under BDS.[169] At its 2012 elective conference, the ANC formally resolved to support the BDS campaign.[170] Particularly sensitive has been the academic boycott of Israel by some South African universities.
Following an apparent détente in 2017,[171][172][173] on 14 May 2018, South Africa withdrew its ambassador indefinitely following the 2018 Gaza border protests. In a statement, its Department of International Relations and Cooperation reiterated South Africa's "view that the Israeli Defence Force must withdraw from the Gaza Strip and bring to an end the violent and destructive incursions into Palestinian territories."[174]

In a less restrained statement the following day, the ANC called "on all South Africans to demonstrate to the world that we regard the Israeli government and its armed forces as an outcast and blight on humanity."[175] The ambassador returned to Tel Aviv in September of that year,[176] but, in April 2019, the South African foreign minister, Lindiwe Sisulu, announced that the ambassador would not be replaced when his term ended, and the Tel Aviv embassy would be downgraded to a liaison office.[177][178] This downgrade had earlier been endorsed as the official policy of the ANC by delegates to its December 2017 elective conference.[179][180]
The South African Department of International Relations summarises the prevailing situation as follows:

"There is currently limited political and diplomatic interaction between South Africa and Israel, mainly due to Israel’s antagonistic attitude towards the MEPP [Middle East peace process] and disregard for International Law regarding the rights of the Palestinians and their territories. South Africa’s baseline is that Israel must return to negotiations and create favorable conditions for peaceful negotiations."[18]
Cyrano
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5491
Joined: 28 Mar 2020 01:07

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Cyrano »

South Africa seems to draw needless parallels and getting into perceived/manufactured outrage.
drnayar
BRFite
Posts: 971
Joined: 29 Jan 2023 18:38

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by drnayar »

Cyrano wrote: 13 Jan 2024 11:30 South Africa seems to draw needless parallels and getting into perceived/manufactured outrage.
Just an African country getting involved in the middle east where they have no direct involvement..it tells you something else.. the main issue is the internal economic and social situation in SA that is steadily going from bad to worse. The "Israel issue" is a convenient distraction for the poor South African s.
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

Agreed. There's only so often they can go onstage and shout old songs like "Kill the Boer"

So they have to come up with new distractions and vote-bank pandering too.

Meanwhile, US seems to be more involved in Gaza operations than they'll admit

Tanaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4555
Joined: 21 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Tanaji »

Many thanks ricky_v for the explanation, learnt something new!

Meanwhile in Londonistan , Palestinian demonstrations yesterday outright called for elimination of Zionism cult. Predictably no clamp down by the policr.
ricky_v
BRFite
Posts: 1145
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by ricky_v »

all good, Tanaji ji; now the assertion that the policy is new and only initiated to obfuscate poor internal performance is patently untrue as looking at public records, the anc has been seething about the israel - apartheid relation ever since coming to power in 1994 and was even covered by mandela, their tallest leader

as for conflating issue to tilt at windmills, the fight against apartheid is sa's foundation myth, it will always find these institutions and wage war against them, similar to how revolt against tyranny and insurrection is the foundation myth of the us (ironic and doubly so as we are discussing in this month) and thus they are always at the forefront for arab springs and colour revolutions, it is their way of deeply inculcating the members in america's foundation myth
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by ramana »

ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by ramana »

Ricky Thanks for that essay.
Haresh
BRFite
Posts: 1531
Joined: 30 Jun 2009 17:27

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Haresh »

How long before they turn their attention on the Indian community?
My view is that it is already happening.

"London pro-Hamas rally proves that the absurd is now acceptable - opinion"

https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-7 ... v2-vQp0ogv
ricky_v
BRFite
Posts: 1145
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by ricky_v »

all good ramana sir,

some graphics mapped in the conflict

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/2 ... iddle-east

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

Israel now under the gun from ICJ, courtesy of South Africa




But why has South Africa, of all countries, made this issue their holy crusade?
Jay
BRFite
Posts: 699
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 18:24
Location: Gods Country
Contact:

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Jay »

sanman wrote: 27 Jan 2024 00:23
But why has South Africa, of all countries, made this issue their holy crusade?
Because Israel was one of the very prominent supporters of the apartheid regime in south africa. Combining this historical fact with the most recent support of arab regimes to the south african finances explains this crusade.
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

Jay wrote: 27 Jan 2024 00:30 Because Israel was one of the very prominent supporters of the apartheid regime in south africa. Combining this historical fact with the most recent support of arab regimes to the south african finances explains this crusade.
I'm aware of Israel's collaboration with apartheid South Africa on military and nuclear development, including hydrogen bomb.
But arguably, the United States was the biggest collaborator with South Africa's apartheid regime.
I think your point about Arab financial support to South Africa is more relevant.

@3:52 Khalistani Jagmeet Singh is chiming in with support for ICJ ruling



Image
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

NeoCons Screaming for War On Iran, After US Troops Killed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNiuSqMvmTw
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32447
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by chetak »

Image
Cyrano
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5491
Joined: 28 Mar 2020 01:07

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Cyrano »

I wont read too much into the ICJ judgement.

They havent said a genocide has happened or is happening.
They havent said Israel must stop all operations in Gaza
They have said Israel must stop your officials from making genocide like statements
They have said Israel must ensure civilians are not harmed
They have said Israel must not prevent humanitarian aid from reaching civilians
and
They have said Hamas must immediately and unconditionally release all hostages.

At best it looks like a gentle rap on knuckles and a thinly disguised pat on the back of Israel saying keep it out of media and hope you get it done quickly.

All the rest is taquiyya.

BTW, how can the west afford any strong condemnation or judgement against Israel and set a precedent ? They have a lot more wars to wage in the future dont they ?!
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

Commentary and Analysis from Col. Douglas MacGregor

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9l7-JyXPp4

Bard summary:
In the video, Colonel Douglas McGregor discusses the recent attack on a US military base in Jordan and the possibility of the United States going to war with Iran.

Colonel McGregor believes that the United States does not have a clear strategy or policy in the Middle East, and that they are essentially pawns of Israeli national policy. He is critical of the US support for Israel, and believes that it is leading to more instability in the region.

He also warns of the dangers of a wider war with Iran, which could draw in other countries such as Russia and China. He believes that the US military is not prepared for such a war, and that it would be a disaster.

Colonel McGregor believes that the American people are not being told the truth about what is happening in the Middle East, and that they need to be more engaged in their government. He encourages people to join his organization, Our Country Our Choice, which he believes can become a third party in American politics.

I hope this summary is helpful!
Sachin
Webmaster BR
Posts: 8989
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Undisclosed

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Sachin »

Meanwhile.. 10,000 Indian construction workers to reach Israel soon in batches starting next week. It would be a good idea to check the demography of the workers. From which part of India, their religion etc.
Cyrano
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5491
Joined: 28 Mar 2020 01:07

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Cyrano »

Many commentators like Col MacGregor, Scott Ritter et al have repeatedly made comments that the Oct 7 attack by Hamas was either justified or that Israel has cooked up evidence, they routinely take Hamas numbers at face value and make a show of defending civilians.

The same guys who criticized AFU for using civilians as human shields don't use the same principle when it comes to Hamas.

Hard to say what's motivating them beyond being anti-establishment all the time.
ricky_v
BRFite
Posts: 1145
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by ricky_v »

interesting collection of viewpoints from organisations who have expertise in these matters

https://jamestown.org/program/israel-ha ... ecosystem/

Israel–Hamas War’s Impact on Afghan and Pakistani Jihadist Ecosystem
Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) issued an immediate response to Hamas’ attack, and tried to frame the event to promote al-Qaeda’s agenda of global jihad.

The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) also voiced its support for Hamas on October 7, identifying with the group’s struggle against a stronger power while also highlighting the localized nature of its own fight with Pakistan.
The Afghan Taliban gave a somewhat delayed statement, and surprisingly appealed to the International Court of Justice to intervene, reflecting its increasingly internationalized outlook.
Islamic State in Khorasan province (ISKP) waited until the end of November to put out a statement regarding the attack, but used the opportunity to denounce the Afghan Taliban,
Hamas, and Muslim countries in general for failing to unite under a caliphate before confronting Israel.
The most detailed response came from AQIS, including a press release, detailed statements by three key leaders, and a special issue of its Urdu-language flagship magazine Nawai Ghazwat Hind (NGH).

In contrast, ISKP remained silent on the attack until late in the year, only publishing a statement on November 27. The Afghan Taliban, amid their transition from an insurgency to a state actor, issued only brief, formal statements. Given their efforts toward statehood, this minimalistic approach is noteworthy.

The TTP, similar to AQIS, extensively covered the conflict with three statements, a podcast, and special issues of their Urdu- and Pashto-language magazines. Despite utilizing the opportunity to advance a local agenda, the TTP, like the Afghan Taliban, maintained a relatively cautious response. In particular, the TTP attempted to convey that, unlike in the past, it should not be considered a threat to the international community, with its only target being Pakistan itself.

A comprehensive analysis reveals the responses of these four groups to the Israel–Hamas War provides a deeper understanding of the intricate global dynamics that are shaping the jihadist landscape in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Similar to AQIS, the TTP voiced its support for Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel the day of the attack, portraying it as a significant triumph (X/@SamriBackup, October 7, 2023). The message was aimed primarily at rallying support for the TTP’s conflict against Pakistan’s security forces, drawing inspiration from the Hamas attack. It underscored the notion that steadfastness in armed struggle can overcome any enemy, irrespective of each side’s military strength.

Amid escalating Israeli airstrikes on Gaza, the TTP issued multiple statements condemning Israel’s actions. On October 18, for example, TTP spokesman Mohammad Khorasani censured the international community, especially the United States, for failing to stop Israel, accusing them of complicity in the bloodshed (X/@IhsanTipu, October 18, 2023). Khorasani urged Muslim leaders, organizations, and individuals to intensify efforts to prevent Israeli operations in Gaza.

A special October 22 episode of the TTP’s Umar Media-connected Pasoon podcast featured leadership council member and influential ideologue Qari Muhammad Shoaib Bajauri discussing the conflict (X/@abdsayedd, October 22, 2023). Bajauri claimed that Muslim rulers were US puppets, and therefore are afraid of American retribution. He likewise argued that Israel was fully dependent on US support. The TTP also extensively covered the conflict in the November issue of its Urdu- and Pashto-language magazines, lauding the attack as a major victory for Hamas (X/@abdsayedd, November 2, 2023; X/@khorasandiary, November 16, 2023). The publications held the United States responsible for civilian casualties in Israel’s attacks. In the same vein, the magazines inspired supporters to oppose the Pakistani army, which was branded a US puppet, partially for its role in the post-9/11 US-led Global War on Terror. An article in the Pashto magazine further underscored the importance of participating in the ongoing war in Gaza for militants from Pakistan and Afghanistan.
A notable aspect of the statement from Haqqani—who also serves as the chief justice in the Taliban government—was his appeal to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to take action against Israel, branding its actions in Gaza as war crimes. In this sense, Haqqani’s statement was a rare expression of the Taliban’s acceptance of the international system. Mujahid, for his part, criticized the international community and human rights organizations for their perceived inaction in response to Israel’s attacks, categorizing the Israeli operations in Gaza as a “war crime” and a “grave violation of human rights.”

A key element of Mujahid’s statement was levelling his own critique of the international community’s criticism of the Taliban’s government. Using Israel’s actions in Gaza as a counterpoint, he questioned the validity of complaints against Afghanistan’s handling of women’s rights and other human rights issues. Mujahid opined,

Why [do] those countries and organizations [which choose to exploit] human rights violations, especially those concerning women and children, in sovereign states to justify interference, remain silent on human rights violations and oppression against women and children in Gaza, instead [choosing to support] the occupiers?
The central op-ed within the magazine offered a comprehensive religious analysis of statements made by the Afghan Taliban’s Haqqani and Mujahid. The purpose was to substantiate ISKP claims about the Taliban’s ties to the United States and portray the Taliban as an apostate group. ISKP specifically emphasized Haqqani’s appeal to the ICJ as a decisive factor that undermines the religious legitimacy of the Taliban.

ISKP also criticized Hamas and nearby Muslim countries, including Iran and Qatar, who are perceived as supporters of Hamas. ISKP’s position is that the sole solution to the liberation of Muslim regions, including the Levant, is the dismantlement of the current state systems and the establishment of a caliphate. ISKP’s underlying message is that the existing government of Muslim countries should be overthrown first, before confronting Israel directly.

ISKP urged Muslims to cease their support for Hamas and asserted that it is not an Islamic organization but a nationalist party motivated by national interests rather than properly religious objectives. Furthermore, the group criticized Hamas by arguing that if it were genuinely Islamic, it would have implemented strict sharia law in the areas under its control and would not have fought with Islamic State (IS) in the border areas between Gaza and Egypt.
so in the end, are these the 4 flagbearers of IT in middle east currently, aqis, offshoot of the aq, ttp, the taliban and the iskp (the isis version in "south" asia)?
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19236
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by NRao »

Perplexed. Israeli-Gazan, IMHO, should be up there.

Hamas demanding to change entry protocol to Temple Mount for Jews, says political source

Not that it matters, however, if these demands are supported by the US and others, then we can expect them to be implemented in Bharat.

"Expect" is the operative word.

I have on X campaigned for the opposite: Every Mosque that was built on a place of worship of another faith is fair game to be destroyed.

This demand by Hamas is unacceptable. For the simple reason, if accepted by Israel, it could be applied elsewhere.

(Would like to clarify "Not that it matters": If anyone wants to butt heads with Modi, please be our guest.)
Deans
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2523
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 19:13
Location: Moscow

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Deans »

https://rpdeans.blogspot.com/2024/02/ga ... d-war.html

Part 3 of my blog on the Gaza war. No politics, only military stuff.
Last edited by Deans on 08 Feb 2024 21:26, edited 1 time in total.
IndraD
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9335
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 15:38
Location: भारत का निश्चेत गगन

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by IndraD »

Cyrano wrote: 01 Feb 2024 15:19 Many commentators like Col MacGregor, Scott Ritter et al have repeatedly made comments that the Oct 7 attack by Hamas was either justified or that Israel has cooked up evidence, they routinely take Hamas numbers at face value and make a show of defending civilians.

The same guys who criticized AFU for using civilians as human shields don't use the same principle when it comes to Hamas.

Hard to say what's motivating them beyond being anti-establishment all the time.
exactly my thoughts, likely they get money from Ru-iran. Also a reminder in war first casualty is the truth and our sentiments get expolited by scum like them.
Deans
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2523
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 19:13
Location: Moscow

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Deans »

IndraD wrote: 08 Feb 2024 19:35
Cyrano wrote: 01 Feb 2024 15:19 Many commentators like Col MacGregor, Scott Ritter et al have repeatedly made comments that the Oct 7 attack by Hamas was either justified or that Israel has cooked up evidence, they routinely take Hamas numbers at face value and make a show of defending civilians.

The same guys who criticized AFU for using civilians as human shields don't use the same principle when it comes to Hamas.

Hard to say what's motivating them beyond being anti-establishment all the time.
exactly my thoughts, likely they get money from Ru-iran. Also a reminder in war first casualty is the truth and our sentiments get expolited by scum like them.
I think Scott Ritter is sound in some areas, like Intel or understanding of tactics - on both he has good credentials. The problem is when he stretches the facts, or makes (in my opinion) implausible conclusions, based on those facts. He has been predicting a Hamas victory around now and the collapse of Ukraine a year ago. McGregor is closer to the pro Trump elements among US politicians.
IndraD
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9335
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 15:38
Location: भारत का निश्चेत गगन

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by IndraD »

Deans wrote: 08 Feb 2024 11:29 https://rpdeans.blogspot.com/2024/02/ga ... d-war.html

Part 3 of my blog on the Gaza war. No politics, only military stuff.
full of hard numbers & facts! So US Israel do have some ace up sleeves to 'defeat' Iran
Alternatively ideology like Hamas can never be defeated!
Their funding come from Qatar Iran so far no sign US is tough on Qatar.
Netanyahu seems quite confident he will win.
tandav
BRFite
Posts: 723
Joined: 26 Aug 2016 08:24

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by tandav »

https://www.eurasiantimes.com/houthis-m ... eaper/amp/

3 MQ9 reapers each $32000000 shot down since Nov 2023 by the Houthis by apparently by sub $10000 munitions off Yemen. British Tanker also sunk

The attrition of expensive NATO assets by non peer ragtag militias makes one doubt the ability to face near peer adversaries like China and Russia
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

Houthis Threaten to Use "Submarine Weapons" to Target Ships | Red Sea Crisis

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mOropNBlW0
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

AlJazeera asks: Is Israel replacing Palestinian workers with Indians?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zd-VPh7voF4

Indian Lefty reporter, of course
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

US Air Force serviceman sets himself on fire outside Israeli embassy in Washington DC, to protest "genocide against Palestinians". He's taken to hospital with life-threatening injuries, and later dies. Very tragic.

sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

Houthis now attacking undersea internet cables

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hF_QUZJt28
chanakyaa
BRFite
Posts: 1724
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 00:09
Location: Hiding in Karakoram

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by chanakyaa »

Yeah, this story is making rounds...
Houthis hit submarine communications cables
According to the reports, these are cables from the companies AAE-1, Seacom, EIG and TGN. This is causing serious disruption of Internet communications between Europe and Asia, with the main damage being felt in the Gulf countries and India.
...
IndraD
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9335
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 15:38
Location: भारत का निश्चेत गगन

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by IndraD »

3 Red Sea data cables cut as Houthis launch more attacks in the vital waterway

https://apnews.com/article/red-sea-unde ... bbf0b0860a

Iran is bleeding Nato in Red Sea , US is trying to look the other way and not attack Iran before election at least (probably not after either) for Several reasons....
bomming random targets in bhooka nanga yemen, lebanon etc won't yield any result
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

US sending its soldiers into Gaza warzone to build pier to supply aid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndxUpile5ZQ

I think US political leaders have now turned their constitution into a joke.
We can see US commanding officer taking pains to emphasize that "no US troops will be on the ground" (as if that will somehow make these troops invulnerable to attack)
The reason he's doing this is because US president is failing to inform Congress of deployment of US forces to warzone, as is required under Article 1 of US constitution.
The more America has embraced foreign entanglements, the more they turn their back on their constitution.
Lisa
BRFite
Posts: 1737
Joined: 04 May 2008 11:25

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Lisa »

^ To the best of my knowledge there is no such provision under Article 1 of US constitution. I think furthermore that this individual is misunderstanding the War Powers Resolution and it scope/intent.
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

Lisa wrote: 13 Mar 2024 23:02 ^ To the best of my knowledge there is no such provision under Article 1 of US constitution. I think furthermore that this individual is misunderstanding the War Powers Resolution and it scope/intent.
Article 1 defines the separation of powers, and vests the US Congress exclusively with the power to declare war.

US administrations have been increasingly trying to skirt around that requirement -- because warmongers need their freedom of action.
That's why that military officer was trying to take pains to proclaim that "no US boots would be on the ground" over there.

The founders who wrote America's constitution sought to put in safeguards to prevent their own govt from becoming like the imperial power they'd just overthrown.
However, we can see that over time, various crooked politicians have eroded those safeguards.

Power corrupts - and imperial power corrupts absolutely.
Lisa
BRFite
Posts: 1737
Joined: 04 May 2008 11:25

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by Lisa »

Exactly! There has been NO declaration of war, therefore not applicable.

The safeguards you refer to did not exist until 1973, way after the founders were dead. US involvement in Vietnam caused that event i.e. the US had never actually declared war on Vietnam and thus this need to inform Congress was negated.
AkshaySG
BRFite
Posts: 419
Joined: 30 Jul 2020 08:51

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by AkshaySG »

Frankly at this point meddling in foreign conflicts and lands is more "American" than anything in the Constitution

It is country and empire built on foreign expertise and wealth sometimes via immigration and sometimes via wars.

Besides any "superpower" whether rising or fading history has never been able to stay out of such conflicts because they fear that it they don't everyone will understand that the world doesn't revolve around them.

For the Israel/Gaza conflict the current government is in a right predicament, If this was 20-30 years ago the President could be completely pro Israel and suffer no consequences however demographics and dynamics have changed.

Young people are overwhelmingly pro Gaza and there are a lot of Arab/Asian migrants and second-third Gen kids leading this charge and with the razor thin margins of US elections them abstaining is a very real threat.

I think that's something Israel is also recognizing and is trying to get ahead of, It's more trusted and guaranteed ally may not be completely one sided any longer and Israel will have its hands tied much more.
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

Oh wow. Major plans are afoot to get rid of the Palestinian problem. Biden has already paved the way for it. Soon the baton will be handed to Kushner to complete the final stretch. I think Iran's going to come squarely in their way. Maybe Americans will finally manage to reunite all Sunnis and Shias in hatred against them.

https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/2024-03 ... bb4ed30000
Jared Kushner Calls Gaza Seaside Property 'Very Valuable,' Suggests Israel 'Move the People Out Then Clean It Up'

In an interview with Harvard University, Trump's top White House adviser described a potential Palestinian state as 'a super bad idea,' and suggested Israel 'bulldoze something in the Negev' to house displaced Palestinians so it can reconstruct Gaza and 'finish the job'


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... rael-negev
Jared Kushner Says Gaza’s ‘Waterfront Property Could Be Very Valuable’

Jared Kushner has praised the “very valuable” potential of Gaza’s “waterfront property” and suggested Israel should remove civilians while it “cleans up” the strip.

The former property dealer, married to Donald Trump’s daughter Ivanka, made the comments in an interview at Harvard University on 15 February. The interview was posted on the YouTube channel of the Middle East Initiative, a program of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, earlier this month.

Kushner was a senior foreign policy adviser under Trump’s presidency and was tasked with preparing a peace plan for the Middle East. Critics of the plan, which involved Israel striking normalisation deals with Gulf states, said it bypassed questions about the future for Palestinians.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/202 ... ot-vpx.cnn
Jared Kushner Suggests Israel Should Move Palestinians out Of Gaza and 'Clean It Up'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7EYoVGk6mo
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

This was no ISIS attack. Westerners are quickly scrambling to pin blame on ISIS. Methinks they doth protest too much.

Assorted "experts" are claiming this attack was because Russia has been cooperating with Taliban against ISIS-K. But even the US has been cooperating with Taliban against ISIS-K, since ISIS-K are basically the reconstituted elements of the now defunct AlQaeda terror group, and were responsible for the bombing that killed 13 US marines at Kabul airport.
So I don't think that ISIS offshoot is responsible for this attack, which has been organized at the behest of others. Victoria Nuland did say Russia was in for a "surprise" when she left.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEtJV54rSx4

Only the NeoCons are motivated enough and reckless enough to do something like this. As the Romans said, "Cui bono?" - "Who profits?"

My suspicion is that this attack is a follow-up to that attack in Iran a couple of months back:

https://apnews.com/article/kerman-us-wa ... 4868c8399c

Then too, the blame was quickly laid at the feet of ISIS.

But we saw Iran quickly retaliate against Pakistan soon after. Because Iran knew where the attack really came from: the same Pak that Nuland had been visiting.

Now with this attack on Moscow, we again see the same ISIS bogeyman being raised.

I think that Israel (along with its NeoCon supporters) feel that Hamas did not pull off Oct 7 alone, and had Iranian sponsorship/help.
I also think that Israel (along with its NeoCon supporters) feel that Iran could not have dared to participate in such a bold gambit without Russian approval.

Therefore bombing attack in Iran was the first retaliation for Oct 7.
And now this attack on Moscow is the second retaliation. The dropping of the other shoe.
That's why young concert-goers were particularly targeted in this attack.
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2384
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: 10/7 vs 9/11 (Israel-Gaza) Strategic Fallout & Implications

Post by sanman »

Douglas MacGregor: Israeli escalation is a sign of desperation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbQHSAkopyU
Post Reply