Deleted.vsudhir wrote:Just guessing. Junior Research Fellow/Senior RFRaviCV wrote: Sorry, I'm not familiar with these aconyms. Could you please expand?
Thanks
Search found 17 matches
- 06 Sep 2007 23:39
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 4 Sept 2007
- Replies: 232
- Views: 107713
- 06 Sep 2007 23:23
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 4 Sept 2007
- Replies: 232
- Views: 107713
- 06 Sep 2007 23:12
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 4 Sept 2007
- Replies: 232
- Views: 107713
RaviCv, In BR there is a tradition that you contribute something before you demand answers. You have got a sum total of 14-15 posts to your credit and are demanding answers. You have already been slapped on your wrists by Arun_S for making pompous ill informed statements. Suggest you drop this ID a...
- 06 Sep 2007 22:53
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 4 Sept 2007
- Replies: 232
- Views: 107713
Could you please exemplify a bit further on the following highlighted statement: Estimates of RgPu vary from 10 tons to 13 tons . Where did this figure come from and on what basis was it arrived at? Next, in what context do you state the doubling time of fuel in the FBR could be 8 to 10 years depen...
- 06 Sep 2007 22:09
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 4 Sept 2007
- Replies: 232
- Views: 107713
]Maybe, I missed it. Do we know or have a fair estimate of India's Pu stock pile? Estimates of RgPu vary from 10 tons to 13 tons. My understanding is that 3-4 tons are required for the intial loading of a FBR. If the FBR uses TH-232 in the blanket, it will produce U-233 which can also be used as a ...
- 06 Sep 2007 02:21
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 4 Sept 2007
- Replies: 232
- Views: 107713
There seems to be some confusion/admiration for the positions of W. Europe and Japan as uncle's poodles on this forum. First thing first. Germany and Japan royally kicked uncle's arse in WW2. America may have defeated the two countries militarily in the war, but did not harm their economic independ...
- 06 Sep 2007 00:14
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 4 Sept 2007
- Replies: 232
- Views: 107713
- 05 Sep 2007 23:41
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 4 Sept 2007
- Replies: 232
- Views: 107713
- 04 Sep 2007 23:45
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 4 Sept 2007
- Replies: 232
- Views: 107713
xPost. Strengthens the case for computer modeling and simulation without the need for explicit testing. Britain in top-secret work on n-warhead British scientists are secretly working on the design of a revamped nuclear warhead at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston in Berkshire, near L...
- 04 Sep 2007 05:31
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 138304
- 04 Sep 2007 04:53
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 138304
I'd love to read your brilliant conclusions. Ramana has pretty succintly stated out the various issues that the Hyde Act encompasses - he's only missed out weapons design! Pray, do share the deliberations of your unbounded wisdom with this forum Just goes to show how shallow your reasonings are sin...
- 04 Sep 2007 01:09
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 138304
Ramana wrote: I had earlier asked the members to chart a course assuming the deal will go through and keeping in mind the Hyde(nn) rocks and Indian autonomy as the foremost goal. To me there is a way its just hidden! Hyde Act reads like Hiranyakashyap's boon from the Devas. The course must deal wit...
- 03 Sep 2007 23:33
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 138304
- 03 Sep 2007 22:55
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 138304
RaviCV, If you want to reply to me please post your ideas not rants. I happen to think, like KS, that India can chart its course. I happen to agree with him that the biggest threat facing India currently is PRC and its adamant attitude towards India.Since Independence, India had to fight with its h...
- 03 Sep 2007 21:08
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 138304
I had earlier asked the members to chart a course assuming the deal will go through and keeping in mind the Hyde(nn) rocks and Indian autonomy as the foremost goal. To me there is a way its just hidden! Hyde Act reads like Hiranyakashyap's boon from the Devas. The course must deal with - test ya no...
- 03 Sep 2007 19:20
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 138304
RaviCV - please explain why you think MMS is a Quisling. The nuclear deal will effect Indian's security for generations to come. The assurances MMS gave in parliament concerning the 123 agreement were orthogonal to the end result and at variance to the truth! In fact, he either tacitly denied or fa...
- 03 Sep 2007 18:06
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 138304