Search found 35 matches
- 04 Jan 2011 23:28
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 3952
- Views: 1205769
Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
^ Sounds like masked ASAT testing, if they are aiming to hit targets at 300 Kms...
- 19 Mar 2010 15:21
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments
- Replies: 3235
- Views: 927982
Re: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=12547 Based on this article, Russia's exports are more to China than to us (35% as opposed to 24%). On BR, we have seen a hue and cry about the French, German, US etc supplying to both warring sides (w.r.t TSP). With our huge defence deals with R...
- 23 Feb 2010 03:46
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1016713
Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
Have they completed root cause analysis for the Agni-II failures last year? According to India Today, Feb 22nd Issue, (Quoted from Avinash Chander, Programme Director AGNI), YES. Apparently both failed tests were due to quality issues in production. One was due to 'poor quality wiring' and in other...
- 12 Feb 2010 05:19
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch
- Replies: 3944
- Views: 1353565
Re: China Military Watch
That was with reference to anti-ship ballistic missiles and not cruise missiles. I understand. However, the naval chief suggests the difficulty lies in spotting and identifying targets in High seas as the primary problem (the accuracy/type of missile whether ballistic/cruise is not the doubt). My q...
- 12 Feb 2010 01:11
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch
- Replies: 3944
- Views: 1353565
Re: China Military Watch
Chinese crude shipments are already subject to 2 Indian chokepoints. India needs to build up Fortress Nicobar - It needs at-least 2 squadrons of MKI's with their attendant refuelers. Its needs a major IN base to control everything that moves past those straits. It needs land based BRAHMOS II's with...
- 10 Feb 2010 20:18
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1016713
- 08 Feb 2010 16:41
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Agni 3 tested successfully
- Replies: 129
- Views: 37736
Re: Agni 3 tested successfully
I am not sure how correct it is but I will answer this with a personal incident. In my first year at Aerospace Dep at IITB (about 3 and half years ago) we had one reputed (I am sorry forgot the name) DRDO sceintist (who was presonally involved in our missile program) come and talk to a few students...
- 04 Feb 2010 15:32
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: DEFEXPO 2010
- Replies: 218
- Views: 82019
Re: DEFEXPO 2010
I have an idea for the stall. Considering the volume of DDM we see in the indian press, how about we take up the charge to clean up the articles for them. A committee of Gurus could be formed to look at these and distribute amongst us lesser mortals for the dog work. We do a scan of the articles and...
- 30 Jan 2010 03:41
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA News and Discussion
- Replies: 3861
- Views: 1250697
Re: MRCA News and Discussion
Is it possible that, we can use MRCA contract to get a "political package" with US and Russia along the following lines - 1. India get recognition as Nuclear Weapons State in NPT 2. India signs CTBT once US ratifies it and both Russia and US share simulation of cold nuclear tests. Russia ...
- 24 Jan 2010 22:02
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1016713
Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
Ok... if 1000 KM Brahmos is under development, does it eliminate the need for Nirbhay with the same range (being subsonic)? Someone please explain...brahmos block II -- 300km range brahmos variant with improved seeker characteristics.
brahmos-2 1000km range missile in development.
- 16 Jan 2010 22:00
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1016713
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
I dont understand.. the latest TOI article seems to suggest that captive flight trials haven't even begun, and says the testing has been done only for 45KM range Astra and not the 80 KM one.... http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Astra-tested-but-no-induction-yet-/articleshow/5434798.cms For on...
- 12 Jan 2010 01:47
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1016713
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Captive trials were complete in November 2009, Source Wikipedia and link below:AFAIK, the captive trials haven’t even commenced as yet
http://beta.thehindu.com/sci-tech/techn ... e41575.ece
- 03 Dec 2009 17:08
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Military Flight Safety
- Replies: 3361
- Views: 874791
Re: Military Flight Safety
Shiv, This is becoming a mountain of a mole hill. No one challenges your knowledge or your support to any organization. But a view that is slightly divergent from yours cannot be squashed in the way you do. Its the tone I don't appreciate (the tone which says I have been here longer, its my way or t...
- 01 Dec 2009 15:32
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA News and Discussion
- Replies: 3260
- Views: 880579
Re: MRCA News and Discussion
India is going to take Britain s place in the new century as America s foremost ally. Ha ha ha :rotfl: and you are proud of that? I mean I love the bargains we may get too, but to be an ally is something much more than we asked for or we would even like. Being an ally of US would mean letting go of...
- 01 Nov 2009 23:05
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1016713
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Well this is not DRDO, its IISc which seems to be doing the talking. That could be lent some credibility....
- 30 Oct 2009 00:30
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Naval Discussion
- Replies: 3938
- Views: 1465074
Re: Indian Naval Discussion
Ray - Sto.... indulged in... A fellow Catch 22 fan I see. Reading through all the grim conversation, the name made me smile. :) Extremely OT, but loved the fact that at least one got it.. Grim? Well laughing through it was the only way to stay awake actually :) Ray - I know I am testing your patien...
- 30 Oct 2009 00:07
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Naval Discussion
- Replies: 3938
- Views: 1465074
Re: Indian Naval Discussion
Ray - Stop warning.. start deleting posts...including this one...I spend a few precious hours in a day trying to browse BR forums to keep myself updated and this talk has been the most wasteful read I have ever indulged in...
- 19 Oct 2009 19:26
- Forum: Strategy, Politics & International Relations Forum
- Topic: Deterrence
- Replies: 5130
- Views: 910496
Re: Deterrence
Why assume anything different in an Indo China scenario?even India's response would have been different when it comes to tacking a non nuclear TSP.
- 19 Oct 2009 19:00
- Forum: Strategy, Politics & International Relations Forum
- Topic: Deterrence
- Replies: 5130
- Views: 910496
Re: Deterrence
The pudding we have been eating may be similar to the one we ate between 1947 and 1962. Also for the folks who claim we have been eating the pudding of nuclear deterrence need to be reminded that we didn't have nuclear weapons and capacity to deliver it for much time after 1962. So how can you eat ...
- 19 Oct 2009 18:25
- Forum: Strategy, Politics & International Relations Forum
- Topic: Deterrence
- Replies: 5130
- Views: 910496
Re: Deterrence
Abhiti, Its been a pleasure reading your posts and the counter attacks. However, if you could please clarify something for me? What constitutes the audience for your (satisfactory)deterrence? Any deterrence fails if there is a man/woman who is willing to lose all (a lot or a little then just doesn't...
- 28 Aug 2009 19:24
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist
- Replies: 2362
- Views: 360721
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_first_use 1) Contradiction: Suggests China has NFU policy as of 2008, but then quotes "backpedaled" in 2005. 2) Both India and China follow NFU and TN is essential for (only)second strike capability, doesnt it follow that we can wait (do I dare say comfortab...
- 28 Aug 2009 19:07
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist
- Replies: 2362
- Views: 360721
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist
You're not suggesting that we 'black mail' the world into submitting to our demands? And what are those demands?? No sanctions. No treating of India like some upstart. No ignoring like Obama has been doing. No pressure on 4-letter Treaties. No crowning of PRC as the Asian Emperor. The point is we s...
- 27 Aug 2009 23:35
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist
- Replies: 2362
- Views: 360721
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist
Just wondering why NDTV doesnt believe this is any sort of news? There has not been a single report, denial, confirmation or otherwise. Ofcourse they are running an exclusive on how BJP is infighting and another on a tribute to Michael Jackson, I would call that an NDTV 'Fizzle'. Mr. Som, is Mr. Roy...
- 27 Aug 2009 16:06
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: INS Arihant (ATV) News and Discussion -2
- Replies: 4158
- Views: 1183673
Re: INS Arihant (ATV) News and Discussion -2
If only you saw the quality of engineers....me included.avinash.rd wrote:Philip,
Lakhs and lakhs of engineer pass out every year from Indian engineering colleges. I cant make out what is the problem!!
- 19 Aug 2009 14:40
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA News and Discussion
- Replies: 3260
- Views: 880579
Re: MRCA News and Discussion
Why speculate??????????????Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh its going to be the S.H. Uncle is just to strong politically and will demand payment for the nuke deal via this order. It the IAF decides to go for a single engined fighter then it will be The F-16. Though that might not be so bad if the JSF is thr...
- 13 Aug 2009 18:16
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Naval Discussion
- Replies: 3938
- Views: 1465074
Re: Indian Naval Discussion
The true answer is a fully operational BMD system (accelerate the development and induction of PAD and AAD). I think in the current state of affairs, a BMD with WMD is the true deterrent. Stockpiling nuclear weapons can only achieve MAD policy... which might not be enough...
- 13 Aug 2009 14:09
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA news and discussion
- Replies: 2897
- Views: 1064274
Re: LCA news and discussion
I dont understand how such a prolonged discussion on the primer is contributing to the forum...
- 20 Jul 2009 22:26
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Naval Discussion
- Replies: 361
- Views: 52403
Re: Indian Naval Discussion
The final price does not include the 16 MiG29 K deck-jets that India plans to buy for the carrier
- 14 Jul 2009 14:06
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA News and Discussion
- Replies: 317
- Views: 45762
Re: MRCA News and Discussion
BTW, the rediff article feels that China will attack between 2010 and 12. Great timing for India I would say. I am not sure if that was sarcasm from you, but that will be horrible timing for India. We will still not be up to the sanctioned 39.5 squadrons, no carrier, no credible decapitating second...
- 14 Jul 2009 13:55
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: International Military Discussion
- Replies: 359
- Views: 66379
Re: International Military Discussion
According to a report in the Israeli daily Maariv, Medvedev has announced that if Israel wishes to prevent the sale of S-300 missiles to Iran, it must either buy them itself or work to have another country purchase them How many of these systems do we have? Wiki claims 4. We could go shopping aroun...
- 12 Jul 2009 21:33
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Newbie Corner & Military Miscellaneous
- Replies: 4126
- Views: 850188
Re: Indian Naval Discussion
India's home-built nuke sub The original idea was for the PM to finish his independence day speech and then travel to Vizag to launch the submarine,' a senior official told The Straits Times, using the abbreviation for Vishakhapatnam, a city on India's eastern seaboard. 'But that was not considered...
- 25 Jun 2009 20:32
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA news and discussion
- Replies: 437
- Views: 62056
Re: LCA news and discussion
Have you seen these:shiv wrote:yossarian wrote:Just did some searching and couldn't quite find any videos or snapshots of the LCA in acrobatic displays(apart from the sole inverted flight video)
Thanks.....
- 25 Jun 2009 06:15
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA news and discussion
- Replies: 437
- Views: 62056
Re: LCA news and discussion
Just did some searching and couldn't quite find any videos or snapshots of the LCA in acrobatic displays(apart from the sole inverted flight video) demonstrating agility, while JF17 seems to have attempted and shown off quite a few moves. Wouldn't ADA release such displays (and after 1000+ test flig...
- 20 Jun 2009 02:36
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tracking Errors in Defence reporting
- Replies: 499
- Views: 133267
Re: Tracking Errors in Defence reporting
There have been conflicting reports in the media about the US-Russian Plane. TOI indicates it was a US hired russian plane. CNN-IBN indicates it was a private plane. No one is sure if IAF jets were scrambled. Just wanted know whats the protocol and response time in such scenarios? And what is the cr...
- 09 Jun 2009 04:42
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA news and discussion
- Replies: 437
- Views: 62056
Re: LCA news and discussion
Assuming the LCA is inducted(partially) by 2015, what would it match up against and beat convincingly w.r.t PLAAF and PAF? How long will it be in service and remain competitive against upgrades of match ups in PLAAF and PAF? I am new and I think I am dumb...I anticipate brickbats, so please feel free.