Search found 552 matches
- 01 May 2012 19:18
- Forum: Military Issues Archive
- Topic: Agni-V ICBM: New capabilities, technologies, strategies
- Replies: 605
- Views: 119499
- 11 Apr 2012 20:23
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1030344
- 29 Mar 2012 09:51
- Forum: Military Expositions Archive
- Topic: DEFEXPO-2012: March 29 to April 1, 2012 - Photos & News
- Replies: 143
- Views: 45245
Re: DEFEXPO-2012: March 29 to April 1, 2012 - Photos & News
Want to visit on 31 st March! Can ticket be booked online?
- 11 Feb 2012 09:38
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1030344
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Three T-50 prototypes have performed 120 flights Three T-50 (PAK FA) prototypes have performed more than 120 flights. The fourth prototype will join the flight testing in 2012. "We will start the deliveries of pilot batch in 2013." - Pogosyan noted. The fourth one - Т-50-4, should have jo...
- 01 Feb 2012 20:01
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1030344
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
News say that
is it a reporting error...or they are ready to pull the plug.By the time the T-50 fighter enters service with the Russian Air Force in 2014, its missile systems will be fully operational, Obnosov said.
- 31 Jan 2012 18:13
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: International Aerospace Discussion
- Replies: 4918
- Views: 1174459
- 31 Jan 2012 18:08
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: India selects Typhoon & Rafale for MMRCA shortlist - Part 3
- Replies: 716
- Views: 93612
Re: India selects Typhoon & Rafale for MMRCA shortlist - Par
From what I understand, Mig 35 is modified version of Mig 29. So, chances for further growth were limited like that of F-16. Also, the jet is yet to book order and hit production lines..!
By the way rafale is a good choice...!
By the way rafale is a good choice...!
- 29 Jan 2012 21:06
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: AMCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3310
- Views: 890428
Re: AMCA News and Discussions
Wiki says "The final design is expected to be shown to the air force by 2012, after which full scale development on the aircraft may start."
From my understanding, Final Design means staff requirements being charted out and a conceptual design of would be fighter to be framed. am I right?
From my understanding, Final Design means staff requirements being charted out and a conceptual design of would be fighter to be framed. am I right?
- 29 Jan 2012 09:47
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: AMCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3310
- Views: 890428
Re: AMCA News and Discussions
wasn't there talk of artificial intelligence in AMCA?kuldipchager wrote:What this have to do with our amca.
- 23 Jan 2012 20:52
- Forum: Military Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Naval Discussion
- Replies: 5409
- Views: 707138
- 22 Jan 2012 22:22
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1030344
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
An article about NPO Saturn's R&D during . Somebody translate it..!
- 21 Jan 2012 09:37
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1030344
- 29 Jul 2011 21:16
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: India selects Typhoon & Rafale for MMRCA shortlist - Part 2
- Replies: 3977
- Views: 863172
Re: Graj-online.pl Filmy-online.com.pl Pozycjonowaniee.pl Na
^^ यह क्या था?
- 13 Mar 2011 22:52
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 889647
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
An OT.
But, I am fed up with all the giggling of negotiations...! Waiting for the knock out punches...!
But, I am fed up with all the giggling of negotiations...! Waiting for the knock out punches...!
- 27 Feb 2011 07:59
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 889647
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
Haven't we grown two weeks old since IAF Chief announced about the start o contract negotiations..? Any concrete news on that....
- 26 Feb 2011 16:29
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 889647
- 25 Feb 2011 19:45
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 889647
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
Hamari Hindi me ek Kahawat hai....MUNGERI LAL KE HASIN SAPNE...!karan_mc wrote:So Sea Gripen will be reality only and only if Gripen Ng is selected by IAF and Navy also goes for the same platform ,
- 19 Feb 2011 21:51
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 889647
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
assuming F16 has no chance of being selected for its operational history with PAF. I hope there is no point in Buying Grippen as a single engine fighter. IAF should support LCA. Perhaps I should be sorry to say like this but, Supporting or buying anything foreign over Indigenous ones, IAF would just...
- 16 Feb 2011 14:45
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 889647
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
I don't think any of the double engine can as of now affect AMCA in negative way. It is pretty much on the drawing board..I hope that technologies from these aircrafts will be a feeder for AMCA...!abhik wrote:How much choosing a double engined might hurt the AMCA also has to be considered.
- 13 Feb 2011 10:27
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 889647
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
I think, The deal should be divided between two vendors. That should increase the rate induction and we also may get alternate technologies.
- 13 Feb 2011 10:27
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 889647
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
Self Deleted.
- 11 Feb 2011 18:11
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: AMCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3310
- Views: 890428
Re: AMCA News and Discussions
If that is the model....with a flat nozzle..it would just be सोने पे सुहागा!
- 11 Feb 2011 13:21
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
- Replies: 6593
- Views: 1255434
Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
5)During China's internal military excreise, J-10 (short distnace coupling canards) have always beaten the crap out of convetional layout Su-27/30s, for instance: 1 J-10 vs 4 Su-27s, 4:0 http://mil.jschina.com.cn/2009/1105/1664.htm 2 J-10s vs 4 Su-27s, again, 4:0 http://dh.jgjy.gov.cn/shownews.asp?...
- 10 Feb 2011 20:53
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: AMCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3310
- Views: 890428
Re: Re AMCA News and Discussions
From above link::
Subramanyam says, the MCA "does not clash" with the FGFA. He says the MCA will be comparable to the Lockheed Martin F-35, and the FGFA comparable to the F-22 Raptor.
- 10 Feb 2011 20:44
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
- Replies: 6593
- Views: 1255434
Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
How could J-20 copied from MiG-1.44, their short-distanced coupling canard, their crap straight intakes or their votaka-reinfored "plasma stealth" :rotfl: We all know MiG-1.44 is even less advanced then J-9VI-2 this really is a wow...! I don't blame you...as some says...If you are aiming ...
- 10 Feb 2011 19:09
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: The Trash Thread in the Trash Can (Use 4545 to Merge Posts)
- Replies: 1207
- Views: 224338
Re: AMCA News and Discussions
Well, My friend this is the issue of perception not the arrogance.wen wrote:Still wonder why few takes AMCA or the Japanese stealth proposal seriously?
- 10 Feb 2011 18:58
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
- Replies: 3205
- Views: 889647
Re: MRCA Discussion - October 2, 2010
SriSri wrote:I'm just jealous no one offered me a flight.. :-(
- 10 Feb 2011 18:55
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: The Trash Thread in the Trash Can (Use 4545 to Merge Posts)
- Replies: 1207
- Views: 224338
Re: AMCA News and Discussions
Wen, What make to think like that...? My eyes don't see any connection between design features...?
- 10 Feb 2011 13:55
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: AMCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3310
- Views: 890428
Re: AMCA News and Discussions
Image is not visible...!Gagan wrote:Again very crude diagrams based on the air intakes and weapons bay above.
- 09 Feb 2011 21:09
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1011814
Re: LCA News and Discussions
I think Mk 2 is in development mode....so HAL/IAF should go with more and more Mk1....After that all being upgraded to Mk2.Gagan wrote:OK so I ask this question once again to the jirga.
Do you want more MK-1s or should HAL go in for rapid induction of MK-2?
- 09 Feb 2011 19:55
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: AMCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3310
- Views: 890428
Re: AMCA News and Discussions
Gagan wrote:AMCA
Only one undercarriage...?
- 09 Feb 2011 19:41
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: AMCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3310
- Views: 890428
Re: AMCA News and Discussions
Changes in the vertical stabilizer is quite visible.vic wrote: Can the gurus tell us, what is the change from Def Expo 2009 model? To my layman eyes, it looks the same!
- 08 Feb 2011 18:13
- Forum: Military Expositions Archive
- Topic: AeroIndia 2011
- Replies: 940
- Views: 303174
Re: AeroIndia 2011
Hello Guyz,
I am unable to stream videos online as of now....can it be arranged in shared format..i mean via youtube or something like that.
I am unable to stream videos online as of now....can it be arranged in shared format..i mean via youtube or something like that.
- 08 Feb 2011 18:10
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCH and other Helicopters Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3908
- Views: 1144528
Re: LCH and other Helicopters Discussion Thread
Any design changes for second prototype of LCH...
- 07 Feb 2011 20:56
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1011814
- 05 Feb 2011 23:03
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1030344
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Austin wrote:Ok FGFA/PAK-FA fans some update on the bird from Air International by Piotr Butowski
Russian Supercruiser
Piotr Butowski
It says that Sukhoi Design team insists that no rear looking radar is planned for PAK-FA.
- 05 Feb 2011 21:42
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1030344
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
It seems to be longer and having larger diameter....atleast to my eyes..!Gaur wrote:^^
Why do you think so? Because one seems larger than other? If so, then that is merely an optical illusion because of the strange angle. Or did you notice any other difference?
- 05 Feb 2011 19:58
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1030344
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Two different Engine...?Vishal Jolapara wrote:http://www.airliners.net/photo/1860366/L/
- 04 Feb 2011 21:26
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Naval Discussion
- Replies: 3950
- Views: 1299333
- 04 Feb 2011 21:17
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Pakistan arms sales, ops, doctrine, etc
- Replies: 3959
- Views: 1280533