Search found 1148 matches

by Rye
25 Feb 2004 20:21
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
Replies: 334
Views: 107082

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Originally posted by sunil s: Nobody listens to them and with good reason - these guys are completely irrelevant. I could be wrong, but they seem to have a huge grip on the Indian DIE and DDM. Thankfully, the english mediain total in India caters to a small part of the population, so in that sense ...
by Rye
25 Feb 2004 18:01
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
Replies: 334
Views: 107082

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Gaddafi's son wants to play pro soccer in Europe (and daddy got him his own pro soccer team), but has been hounded predictably by the EU countries, who have been claiming that he has been failing drug tests. But Gaddafi has been doing his penance as far back as 1998, when he paid 1 million $$ to Abu...
by Rye
25 Feb 2004 08:02
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
Replies: 334
Views: 107082

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Maybe this is common knowledge, but after noting the careful manner in which china is being kept out of the picture by the Selective Proliferation crowd like Milhollin et. al, it is essentially to protect the NPT from crumbling apart. If one of the NW states is openly accused of proliferation, then ...
by Rye
24 Feb 2004 23:03
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
Replies: 334
Views: 107082

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Now Hindustan Times has a link to the MIIS website in its main page. I am amazed at how deep MIIS's claws have reached into the world of the Indian moron DDM.
by Rye
24 Feb 2004 01:51
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
Replies: 334
Views: 107082

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Hi, I was reading cohenist ideas from the following, specifically the army being a very professional army...but if I am reading this the wrong way, it won't be the first time. Despite its roguish agenda, the Pakistan army is a very professional army. It would have established a foolproof storage sys...
by Rye
24 Feb 2004 00:54
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
Replies: 334
Views: 107082

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=41677&h eadline=Pakistani~nukes~may~end~up~in~jihadi~hands A "senior fellow from ORF in New Delhi" who refuses to divulge his name. Seems to have been trained by the cohenistas. Ever since Pakistan’s tit-for-tat nuclear explosions...
by Rye
19 Feb 2004 22:19
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Indian NCA formalized
Replies: 82
Views: 37311

Re: Indian NCA formalized

Originally posted by ramana: Something is not right here cant put my finger on it. This guy has been offered a grant by a non prolif academy and I am guessing that looking at India's nuke program was his first assignment/project suggested by his mentor. What I am wondering is "how did this non...
by Rye
16 Feb 2004 05:10
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004
Replies: 333
Views: 99450

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004

Originally posted by Calvin: This is probably a disguised pointer at China to come clean on NK and Pakistan. He then goes on to note a possible carrot for India. Firstly, there is no carrot on this planet that will make China come clean on its proliferation activities, which is part of a carfully p...
by Rye
16 Feb 2004 05:07
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004
Replies: 333
Views: 99450

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004

Oooh, china has decided to proliferate nukes via NK rather than pakisan. How interesting!
by Rye
15 Feb 2004 21:48
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004
Replies: 333
Views: 99450

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004

Originally posted by Niranjan Rao: Someone needs to also tell him that India has exploded a nuke and is a declared nuclear state - thus it cannot sign under the non-nuclear category. (The logic follows that if they expect India to roll back, then so can the rest of the declared states. And, that ac...
by Rye
12 Feb 2004 21:31
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004
Replies: 333
Views: 99450

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004

Originally posted by John Doe.: India should sign NPT as a NWS as long as TSP signs it as a non NWS. Only under those circumstances, should we be willing to sign it. No, Pakistan should not even be mentioned in the same paragraph on any talks with respect to India and NPT. India will not sign the N...
by Rye
12 Feb 2004 20:18
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004
Replies: 333
Views: 99450

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 11 Feb 2004

Originally posted by ramana: That Oakley quote & the US laison committee putting authorizing codes onover 40 weapons is diturbing noting that the TSP's stated target is India. If they are worried about loose nukes falling into extremist hands xhouldnt they corral them or better yet take them ou...
by Rye
12 Feb 2004 01:17
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 07 Feb 2004
Replies: 354
Views: 106522

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 07 Feb 2004

Originally posted by Vikram:
So he called Mushy by his full name - first, middle and last ? Some stern line indeed !
Stop, Stop, Al Qualin Bin Powell, don't be so harsh on the savior of the muslim world and best friend of all the foes of terrorism.
by Rye
07 Feb 2004 22:07
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

"Look, it seems Machiavellian, but it is Machiavelli with a purpose,'' said George Perkovich, a Pakistan expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "It's worth it if you are secretly getting enough cooperation from the Pakistanis to map the entire enterprise and roll it up. ...
by Rye
07 Feb 2004 06:28
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

One of many whoppers from Mushy: And if we look, all the atomic powers of the world in the beginning have been made with the help of the underworld. We have made it with the help of underworld, so has India. No one can pinpoint Pakistan. Underworld is there, which is there also in European countries...
by Rye
06 Feb 2004 23:21
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

http://in.rediff.com/news/2004/feb/06khan.htm

(self edited: this item has some quotes from David Albright, not madeleine. Thanks, sridhar. Must be my mid-afternoon blindness)

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/FB07Df05.html

Asia times article on India's response
by Rye
06 Feb 2004 10:10
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

Originally posted by Nandu:
Rye, I never claimed that Paki nukes are safe or are under US control. Good night.
Well, I am glad Krepon has calmed your fears of an impeding holocaust then. sweet dreams.
by Rye
06 Feb 2004 09:42
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

Originally posted by Nandu: Rye, I do not subscribe to nook nood theory. I interpret what Krepon said as "no more nuclear blackmailing in the name of Kashmir". I can live with that. Uh huh. Glad to know that the non prolif mullahs have calmed all your fears. I mean, where would we be with...
by Rye
06 Feb 2004 09:37
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

If we go back to Teresita Schaffer's report and all the talk about US efforts to westernize the pakistani army. I wager a Saudi Arabia like situation will happen in pakistan, with the army in place of the Saudi elite, and the mullahs herding the jihadis. Tons of dole will be passed from US coffers t...
by Rye
06 Feb 2004 09:07
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

Originally posted by Nandu: Pakistan should negotiate nuclear CBMs with India rather than hold the issue hostage to Kashmir. let us see now. The pakis are buck nekkid, and this non prolif mullah wants CBMs with India. If pakis do not have nukes, and nukes are controlled by the US, why have CBMs wit...
by Rye
06 Feb 2004 07:41
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

Originally posted by Rangudu:
In other words, I lost my undie, so please you also lose yours
I wager the non-prolif crowd, of which Krepon is a cheer leader, will push for this too. No quicker way to destroy a lot of goodwill from the Indian side.
by Rye
06 Feb 2004 05:09
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

Originally posted by James Bund: But I don't see any reason for moral outrage. The US will control Pakistani nukes, not as a favour to India; but in its own self-interest. I do not see such actions a "favor to India" or a positive thing from India's POV. However, I strongly support the US...
by Rye
06 Feb 2004 02:40
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

Originally posted by Gerard: Strobe Talbott says: So we thought there could be a benign version too. India signs the CTBT and agrees to export controls; and then Pakistan follows. Talbott must think that the brown rice-eating yindoos are a bunch of dimwits to swallow such "logic", and cal...
by Rye
05 Feb 2004 23:28
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

Originally posted by nachiketa: I get a vague feeling that somehow Xerox Khan will also be used to take care of the "No WMDs in EyeRak" situation too.. The pakis are not suicidal, and besides, them admitting an iraq connection would still raise the question "why was iraq attacked ins...
by Rye
05 Feb 2004 02:22
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107937

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

various other BCCI links I found on the web. Some of them sound very leftwing-ish (hack canada, for eg.), so not sure how credible they are. But these links seemed to have other references I have not gone through. Heck, all of these references are left-wingish so, caveat emptor. http://www.the-catbi...
by Rye
05 Feb 2004 01:10
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by narayanan: How come this has not been seen anywhere else? Sounds like it should be in the Washington Boast, hey? As I suspected, the "free press" in the land of the free and the home of the brave probably have been requested by the SD to keep this one out of the news....
by Rye
03 Feb 2004 10:46
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by parsuram: One possibility I would suggest, though risky and dangerous, would be to press the US at this time to take Indian PKF contengent(s) in Afghanistan. It should be attractive to the US as a breather for its forces, and pakis wailing against it at this time should not be ...
by Rye
03 Feb 2004 10:41
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_557968,00050001.htm Pakistan to prosecute AXK. I believe that this is the "Charge of the light brigade" excuse Humphrey outlines to Jim Hacker in "A question of loyalty" (Yes, Minister). excuse: This was the work of a misguided individual, ...
by Rye
03 Feb 2004 07:08
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by parsuram: The PRC, imo, is a prime candidate in causing these developments. They have the necessary clout in all three countries. This bomblets proliferation was their strategic baby all along, with pakis as side kick Pancho Vila. PRC's scheme was simple yet completely deniable...
by Rye
03 Feb 2004 02:08
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Cannot find the document written by Mohan Malik and Justin Bernier. Bunch of references to articles by Mohan Malik on this issue, though.
by Rye
02 Feb 2004 22:22
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by L Dev: If the straws in the wind about building up MI as a counterweight to the ISI are anything to go by, then the AQK castration is also an attack on the ISI since they were his primary patrons. The fine line that Mushy has been walking is the jihadi vs. fake-jihadi (a.k.a. m...
by Rye
02 Feb 2004 21:38
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by L Dev: If they can get OBL on their own, I would reckon Mushraff can say goodbye to PAEC. But they won't be getting OBL without the help of the ISI. OBL will move around easily right under the nose of the US, which is why this is a pressure tactic to get Musharraf to cooperate,...
by Rye
02 Feb 2004 21:30
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by Sai Krshna: The worst thing for america now should it happen that libya or nk or iran explode a n-test.. and going by the chain of events, they can say, "mr khan gave it to us", so we used it. Iran certainly has people smarter than that at the helm. It think there is ...
by Rye
02 Feb 2004 21:18
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by L Dev: The big question now is how will PAEC be controlled? After all, there could be copies of Xerox floating around in PAEC ready to xerox his feats. Pakistan does not really care about PAEC being controlled, as long as PAEC is left alone, and there will be 400% cooperation o...
by Rye
02 Feb 2004 20:55
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by narayanan: So the Big Squeeze is on - DIRECTLY on mush. Right on! And add to this Uneven's statement that Mushy is not all that important, i.e., replacable. Mushy goes out on a date with 72 beautiful women, and his replacement will be touted as the saviour of pakistan. The last...
by Rye
02 Feb 2004 03:37
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by Calvin: The Pakistanis probably tested a Pu weapon from China, and with the criticality of Khushab, they may actually have had a Pu-based program. Hence the need to protect PAEC. So are the powers that be so daft that they will allow pakistanis to develop a Pu-based program, an...
by Rye
02 Feb 2004 03:03
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

So the nook nudity of pak has nothing to do with third parties like Unkil securing the nukes, but that the emperor had no clothes from the very beginning. Which brings up the question of why the GOTUS/SD keeps proclaiming that Pakistan's nuclear weapons program is more advanced than the Indian progr...
by Rye
01 Feb 2004 23:10
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by L Dev: I have one question which puzzles me in all of this and it is," Why now"? Why is all of this "outing" happening now? Why are Khan's activities being publicized now? Why all the synchronized news reports now? Actually, this is not just synchronized rep...
by Rye
01 Feb 2004 22:30
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94863

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

I believe Rajesh is right. The video tape is AXK's insurance policy. Already he is "missing", and he managed to get this tape out of the country before he went missing. I wager that he prepared the tape a while back, and made sure that the paki army's dirty secrets won't die with him. More...