Search found 11065 matches

by Suraj
11 Sep 2004 12:21
Forum: Strategic & Security Issues Archive
Topic: Oil & Natural Gas: News & Discussion - VI
Replies: 323
Views: 168087

Railing against the pipeline just because 'it goes through Pakistan' is a counterproductive exercise. There are way too many who are either sufficiently naive or ignorant, or choose to have their heads buried firmly in the sand when any link between Pakistan and terror is revealed. The problem I see...
by Suraj
03 Aug 2004 00:50
Forum: Strategic & Security Issues Archive
Topic: Oil & Natural Gas: News & Discussion - VI
Replies: 323
Views: 168087

More than three decades after they were nationalized, the wheel turns a full circle. Does anyone recall what PSUs were created from the nationalization of Shell, Esso etc by Indira Gandhi ? Burmah Shell = BPCL, Esso = HPCL ? Were there more ?
by Suraj
25 Jun 2004 03:40
Forum: Strategic & Security Issues Archive
Topic: Oil & Natural Gas: News & Discussion - VI
Replies: 323
Views: 168087

Re: Oil & Natural Gas: News & Discussion - VI

RIL Hits Gas Reserves Off Orissa Coast

Reliance Industries — the country’s largest private sector oil and gas company — has struck gas again. This time, it is off the Orissa coast in the Bay of Bengal. The in-place reserves is estimated to be about four to five trillion cubic feet.
by Suraj
26 Apr 2004 20:00
Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
Topic: Indian Health Care Sector
Replies: 1211
Views: 237267

Re: Indian Health Care Industry

India's New Coup In Outsourcing: Inpatient Care Facing Expense, Long Waits At Home, Westerners Fly In; A Hospital Empire Grows By JAY SOLOMON Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL April 26, 2004; Page A1 Wall Street Journal URL MADRAS, India -- Last year, Terry Salo flew 22 hours from his home i...
by Suraj
11 Mar 2004 04:16
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?
Replies: 128
Views: 53634

Re: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?

Originally posted by Sridhar: Regarding AIII - I remember GF's statement (or maybe Atre's) giving a timeframe of end of 2004. Or am I remembering this incorrectly? ToI suggests GF was non-committal on the date. IE seems to confirm the statement. Probably in late summer. Maybe earlier if the NDA com...
by Suraj
11 Mar 2004 03:22
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?
Replies: 128
Views: 53634

Re: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?

The Israelis are not going to like this one bit. Considering the sanguine reaction from New Delhi, I wonder if it was their chankian way of saying "you fired another ? Umm, so what else is new ? Its not us who are p1ssed. Keep your eyes open looking for low flying F-15s with a Star of David on ...
by Suraj
11 Mar 2004 02:39
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?
Replies: 128
Views: 53634

Re: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?

Originally posted by Sridhar: Actually, Suraj, it appears as if Israel is just out of range if you see map you have posted above. Interesting. But Quetta is by no means the westernmost point of Pakistan. That's why I mentioned 'western Baluchistan' - if they fired from close to Zahedan in Iran or G...
by Suraj
11 Mar 2004 02:29
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?
Replies: 128
Views: 53634

Re: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?

Originally posted by Sridhar:
Look at the circle from Quetta, not Karachi.
I was looking at exactly that now: map

Well within range of Israel from western Baluchistan.
by Suraj
11 Mar 2004 01:53
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?
Replies: 128
Views: 53634

Re: Shaheen 2 - proliferation unlimited?

Not of direct relevance to Shaheen 2 but helpful to analyze range claims: great circle mapper

1500 km from Karachi
2000 km from Karachi
by Suraj
09 Mar 2004 23:33
Forum: BR Nostalgia Archive
Topic: Top 100,000 Websites: Bharat Rakshak!!!
Replies: 75
Views: 112653

Re: Top 100,000 Websites: Bharat Rakshak!!!

[quote]Originally posted by narayanan:
[QB]Hmm!!! That's right. When I want REAL QUALITY discussions I go to Sulekha. ;) It would increase the links to various other high ranking news sites, and get traffic from those who want the Indian military news without having to trawl forum threads.
by Suraj
09 Mar 2004 22:02
Forum: BR Nostalgia Archive
Topic: Top 100,000 Websites: Bharat Rakshak!!!
Replies: 75
Views: 112653

Re: Top 100,000 Websites: Bharat Rakshak!!!

One possible suggestion for this website: Some kind of BR news section like Sulekha's newshopper, with Indian military news updated daily along with any links to other sites. The military/strategic news folders could be leveraged for the purpose. Sure, it means greater management overhead, but that ...
by Suraj
23 Feb 2004 23:10
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
Replies: 334
Views: 106691

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Rangudu makes a couple of excellent suggestions. Its not about preventing proliferation; its about retaining monopoly over a potent instrument of deterrence. "Nuclear monopolists" sounds a hell of a lot more practical than "non-proliferation supporters" - the term monopoly has im...
by Suraj
07 Feb 2004 22:44
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107604

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

The most frequently dished out reasons for handling Mush with kid gloves are: a) 'Co-operation' in A'stan b) Apres moi, la deluge. In other words, the feared Islamist takeover that is so scary to US. Now, co-operation in Afghanistan has been sporadic at best, mostly upon significant arm-twisting. I'...
by Suraj
07 Feb 2004 02:19
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107604

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

I still see your argument as a case of drastically exaggerating the potential of punitive action from the Saudis and Chinese if the US had been more strident in their response to Pakistani proliferation. Why would they ? To speak in terms of your description of the mindset of war and peace, the mind...
by Suraj
07 Feb 2004 01:46
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107604

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

Johann, Originally posted by Johann: Pakistan unlike the other three, had the active support of countries like China and Saudi Arabia to withstand American pressure. Without their support its unlikely that Pakistan would have been able to withstand measures such as the end of American military assis...
by Suraj
07 Feb 2004 01:11
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107604

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

I don't have much faith in the "we'll go easy about the nukes if you hand us Osama in fall 2004" argument. That's too simple. Too straightforward. The story doesn't end there. This isn't about just the nukes or about Osama. It doesn't answer the question of *why* the Pakis were allowed to ...
by Suraj
05 Feb 2004 04:04
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Replies: 339
Views: 107604

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004

I fear an effort to tie any attempt by Iraq to get nuke tech with Paki proliferation will not help. You could have a picture of AXK/Mush and Saddam kissing each other in front of a nuke at one of Saddam's palaces and the SD will still tap dance around that. At worst, they'll blame Saddam and provide...
by Suraj
04 Feb 2004 23:53
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94497

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Jumrao: yep, that's the one I mentioned. Any FT subscribers here ?
by Suraj
04 Feb 2004 23:29
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94497

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

Originally posted by kgoan: But folks, please also keep an eye out for anything *new*. i.e. Any *recent* stuff, (meaning anything written in "reputable"** media since the Xerox stuff blew up in Paks face), that mentions BCCI in the current context. kgoan: If the sordid stuff on some of th...
by Suraj
04 Feb 2004 12:40
Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004
Replies: 324
Views: 94497

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 Jan 2004

PAKISTAN'S INVOLVEMENT IN NARCO-TERRORISM (Congressional Record from fas.org) Link with more sublinks about BCCI, drugs and nukes Excerpts (lots more tidbits on the webpage and links): BCCI the largest criminal bank in human history, in 1972, was the center of a global laundry and a conduit for tra...
by Suraj
31 Jan 2002 02:17
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Agni-I/SR: Strategic Implications (Thread 2)
Replies: 241
Views: 82457

Re: Agni-I/SR: Strategic Implications (Thread 2)

I read someplace (FAS ?) that the Prithvi is coated with radar-absorbent material. Is this true ? And if so does it in anyway affect the radar-signature vis-a-vis Agni ?
by Suraj
25 Jan 2002 09:09
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Agni-I/SR: Strategic Implications (Thread 1)
Replies: 227
Views: 82849

Re: Agni-I/SR: Strategic Implications (Thread 1)

An "agni" with a range of 700km ? Maybe they should call it a "chingari"...
by Suraj
25 Jan 2002 09:03
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Agni-I/SR: Strategic Implications (Thread 1)
Replies: 227
Views: 82849

Re: Agni-I/SR: Strategic Implications (Thread 1)

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Vamsee:
Roaring tiger,hidden dragon and shivering rat :D
by Suraj
25 Jan 2002 09:01
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Agni-I/SR: Strategic Implications (Thread 1)
Replies: 227
Views: 82849

Re: Agni-I/SR: Strategic Implications (Thread 1)

How are the Pakis going to fire a missile with all those USN ships in the Arabian Sea ? What if a stray Ghauri hit the Kitty Hawk ?